Flashlights

"Health data is gold. They can slice and dice it. They can sell the products of their slicing and dicing. They can use it to create treatment protocols to control the doctors." —Twila Brase Twila Brase is a registered nurse (RN Registered nurse and PHN Public Health nurse) who co-founded and serves as president of the Citizens' Council for Health Freedom (CCHF). In 2018, Brase published the book Big Brother in the Exam Room: The Dangerous Truth about Electronic Health Records. That is also the topic of our discussion. "Once the government has grabbed all the data, then they have the ability to control the doctors, control the hospitals and profile the patients." Government certified electronic health record systems are not simply record bookkeeping systems. The term is deeply misleading because they are way more than that. In Twila Brase's book "Big Brother in the Exam Room," she quotes Scott Silverstein, a physician who is an authority in health IT. He called EHR systems "medical meta devices." In 2018 already he said that these systems are not anything resembling electronic filing cabinets, but that they are way, way more. He called them "enterprise-wide command and control systems through which all medical transactions have to pass. Controlling clinicians and clinical resources. They are beyond just a medical device. They are really command and control systems." Brase said: "Being certified for the government means that the electronic health record has to do what the government says it has to do." Many doctors in the United States already had some version of private electronic records before the introduction of Government certified ones. And they worked quite well since such private patient record databases were designed for doctors' practical needs only and were based on doctors' requirements. They had nothing to do with government's goals and desires. But this changed completely with the introduction of government certified EHRs under Obama in [check]. Twila Base told me: "Once the government has grabbed all the data, then they have the ability to control the doctors, control the hospitals, profile the patients. One of the things we say in our organization is 'he who holds the data makes the rules.'" True. And controlling doctors and nurses is a surefire way to turn them into killers, making them into the state's instrument of eliminating part of its population. Also, governments love getting their hands on as much data as they can since their appetite to make rules and lord over their citizens is very hard to restrain and since their voracious appetite increases in proportion to the growing amount of data available through new technologies. If massive amounts of data can be used as an easy gateway to control and command citizens, then those in power will almost by default be driven to get access to as much data as they possibly can. The amount of medical data available to governments is growing exponentially: one example are the data from so-called ambient listening devices that by now have been installed in many doctors' offices. This means that an AI app is recording and transcribing everything that is being said in the exam room - whether the doctor or nurse is present or not. All this data is stored with the patient's records and can be accessed by a vast number of people, including about 1.5 million of third parties, called "business associates of covered entities." HIPAA, Brase explains, is not there to protect your privacy but to share data with about 700,000 "covered entities" and their business associates. CHAPTERS 00:06 Electronic Health Records: More Than Digital Paper Charts 01:38 How EHRs Changed the Doctor–Patient Encounter 05:49 Copy-and-Paste Records and the Problem of "Within Normal Limits" 08:45 EHRs as Command-and-Control Systems 12:11 Government-Certified Records and the 2009 Federal Mandate 16:08 Who Designed Government Electronic Health Record Systems? 17:30 Billing, Surveillance, and the Business of Health Data 22:14 HIPAA: Privacy Protection or Data-Sharing Framework? 24:18 Who Can Access Your Medical Data? 27:45 Why Signing a HIPAA Form Does Not Prevent Data Sharing 29:47 The Real Meaning of HIPAA and "Administrative Simplification" 31:19 Clearinghouses, Business Associates, and the Health-Data Economy 36:56 AI, Ambient Listening, and the New Medical Surveillance System 43:36 Clinical Decision Support and the End of Physician Autonomy 44:56 Evidence-Based Medicine, Protocols, and Algorithmic Care 48:47 The Deskilling and "Unskilling" of Doctors 53:28 Medical Ethics, AI Control, and a Patient-Centered Alternative 54:13 The 3C Solution: Cash, Catastrophic Coverage, and Charity

"It's amazing to see how the trajectory of the care being provided to the patient changes once they know that you have a professional advocacy service on board. They start changing everything." https://flashlightsproductions.substack.com/p/never-enter-a-hospital-without-an?utm_source=youtube This is my second interview with Kimberly Overton. In our first interview, Overton talked about the horrifying events she witnessed as a critical care nurse during Covid in a hospital in Hendersonville, Tennessee. All except two of the hundreds of Covid patients she witnessed being put on ventilators died. Nonetheless, the treatment protocols remained unchanged. To this day, ventilators and Remdesivir are protected as medical countermeasures under the PREP Act that was declared for Covid-19 (and ends only in December 2029). Overton quit her job in protest against the hospital killings and founded the organization "The Nurse Freedom Network" in the summer of 2021. Later, in 2022, she founded Remnant Healthcare, a private membership association that provides nursing and also patient advocacy services. According to its website, its mission is to "provide compassionate, patient-centered healthcare services using holistic modalities and a root cause approach." Patient advocacy services is what we are talking about in our second interview: What are they? Why are they needed? And why is it that everyone should have an advocacy plan in place well before setting foot into a hospital? CHAPTERS 02:54 Hospital Consent Forms and Signing Away Rights 05:39 How Patients Lose Control of Their Own Treatment 10:52 The Shift Toward Profit-Driven Healthcare 13:13 The Rise of Electronic Health Records 14:00 The Forgotten Patient Bill of Rights 15:00 The Insurance Lie Nurses Were Told to Tell 16:52 The Right to Refuse Treatment 18:08 Doctor Google and Patient Gaslighting 21:14 Informed Consent and the COVID Vaccine Rollout 23:24 Polypharmacy and Alarm Fatigue 25:56 Refusing Daily Blood Draws 28:57 Defining Patient Advocates and Advocacy Plans 31:42 How Remote and In-Person Advocacy Works 33:00 Adding an Advocate to Your HIPAA Form 34:01 Why Hospitals Change Behavior With an Advocate Present 36:21 Directed Blood Donation and Post-COVID Pushback 40:24 Concrete Examples of Advocacy Changing Outcomes 42:12 Building Ongoing Relationships With Hospitals 44:14 Advocates as Allies to Nurses and Doctors 46:27 Planning an Advocacy Strategy in Advance 46:56 Membership Costs and Planning Session Details 52:17 Preparing for Planned Hospital Visits 54:06 Listening in on Appointments as an Advocate 56:19 What Makes a Good Advocate 57:40 Bringing a Holistic Perspective Into Hospital Care 59:41 The PREP Act and Loss of Patient Recourse 1:03:47 Remdesivir's Continued Protection Under the PREP Act 1:04:03 Finding and Vetting Advocacy Services 1:06:53 Pricing, Value, and Avoiding Price Gouging RESOURCES: The Nurses Report on America Out Loud: The Miracle of Drew Brophy Nurse Freedom Network Remnant Healthcare Kimberly Overton's X account Kimberly Overton's Substack account

"In a disturbing campaign for control typically characteristic of totalitarian societies, the government co-opted the voices we trusted into a vast covert government operation." Jim & Maggie Thorp https://flashlightsproductions.substack.com/p/goebbels-would-have-approved-how?utm_source=youtube In the second part of my interview with Dr. James Thorp we talk about many things, among them the deep corruption of medical journals, ongoing fertility concerns and how Thorp got fired from SSM Health.  But in the post below I want to highlight what I consider the most important piece we discussed during the interview - and that is the federal government's Propaganda Blitzkrieg to get Americans injected with the toxic mRNA shots. CHAPTERS 00:05 Medical Journal Corruption Exposed by Former Editors 03:11 Billion-Dollar Payments to Journal Reviewers 03:43 Fraudulent Data Behind the Hydroxychloroquine Study 05:19 ACOG's Revenue Chart: Following the Money 07:44 Program Services and the 2018 Revenue Spike 11:06 Marketing Vaccines Through OB-GYNs and Mothers 13:34 HHS Funding and the Move to Washington, DC 16:02 The $67 Million Grant and Massachusetts Payoffs 18:59 Trillions in Pandemic Spending and Institutional Capture 20:31 Origins of the Trusted Messenger Strategy 21:48 Hospitals Paid to Push the Vaccine 26:03 How Many OB-GYNs Knew They Were Being Used 27:33 Trust Through Coercion 28:50 Did Doctors Believe the Narrative 29:41 ACOG's Conversation Guide for Patients 32:50 A Radioactive Topic Among Colleagues 34:02 Introducing Mark Weber and His Article 35:11 Inside the HHS Propaganda Campaign Paper 37:49 Projection and the Politics of Public Health 39:36 The Nine Learnings of Systems Change 42:38 Mark Weber's Career and Education 44:32 Bragging About Vaccination Numbers and ROI 45:32 The April 2021 Inflection Point and Faiths for Vaccines 48:25 A Goebbels Comparison 51:28 The Septem Group and the Revolving Door 53:25 The Firing Begins 58:03 The Termination Call 1:00:41 A System Wide Email Within Minutes 1:03:21 The Non Disparagement Clause 1:04:49 A Terrific Investment 1:06:07 Fertility and Long Term Safety Concerns 1:09:24 Why No Spike Protein Home Test Exists 1:09:41 Five Years Later: Has Anything Changed 1:12:30 Placebo Speculation and DARPA 1:14:28 The Purpose Behind Targeting the Vulnerable 1:15:29 A Spiritual Battle 1:20:31 Celia Farber and the Book's Legacy

"You have to convince your community how great these things [data centers] are. You can't fight it. You have to go with it." —Donald Trump https://flashlightsproductions.substack.com/p/theyre-telling-us-that-we-need-to?utm_source=youtube This is the second part of my interview with Lori Merriman who is leading the opposition against building a hyperscale data center in a small town in Missouri, half an hour to the south of St. Louis. CHAPTERS 03:42 Bob Clark's Closed-Door Visit to Festus City Hall 08:31 Confronting Bob Clark Outside City Hall 16:38 Five Attorneys Against One 18:50 FOIA Comments: "Dumb Hicks" and "Keep the Flock Herded" 23:17 The $40,000 PAC and Labor Union Backing 26:00 Temporary Jobs, AI, and Housing for Outside Laborers 28:03 Recall Lawsuit: Judge Recusal and Delays 30:14 The Third Lawsuit: City vs. County Clerk 32:38 Corruption Concerns in Jefferson County 34:00 From City Hall to the Governor to Trump 35:15 Trump's "Ratepayer Protection" Clip and Reaction 36:21 National Security, Domestic Terrorism, and Data Center Opponents 38:31 Chinese Components and National Security Contradictions 39:52 Surveillance Creep: Cars, Thermostats, and Kill Switches 41:00 Living With the Domestic Terrorist Label 42:49 Other Missouri Data Centers and Abandoned Projects 46:05 What Are These Data Centers Really For? 47:46 Biometric Data, Stablecoins and Programmable Currency 49:55 Advice for Other Towns: Organize, Form an LLC, Show Up 54:00 Fundraising Struggles and the Wake Up Jeffco GoFundMe 58:16 Finding a Lawyer: 80 Hours of Cold Calls RESOURCES 'You can't fight it,' Trump tells Americans about data centers moving into their communities https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=B7kmEbWsDnE

"I believe it's the most consequential board, certainly in terms of power and in terms of prestige. There's never been anything close." —President Donald Trump, February 2026 https://flashlightsproductions.substack.com/p/trumps-board-of-peace-as-his-personal This is the third part of my interview with Patrick Wood about his newest book "The New Economics of Technocracy - You Will Own Nothing." In the first part we talked about the Genius Act, stablecoins, tokenization and the privatization of money. In the second part, we talked about Islamic finance and the Gulf Money Pipeline. And in this third and last part, we talk about the Board of Peace. According to Patrick Wood, the Board of Peace isn't about peace and it isn't about Gaza: "The Board of Peace is not a peace organization. It is the first fully operational prototype of technocratic governance — a privately controlled international body chaired for life by one man, administering 2.3 million people who have no seat, no vote, and no veto." Wood sees Gaza as a test case for something much larger: "This is not a reconstruction plan. This is a blueprint."   CHAPTERS 00:47 Trump's Purpose at the World Economic Forum 01:50 What Is the Board of Peace 03:56 The January 16 Executive Order 06:10 Explaining the International Organizations Immunities Act 12:31 Remarks at the Inaugural Board Meeting 17:49 Kushner's Plans for Smart Cities, Surveillance, and Finance 22:21 Article 3.2: The Chairman's Authority 23:25 Article 3.3: Succession and Chairman for Life 29:32 The Security Layer and CENTCOM 34:30 Naming the Executive Board Members 37:23 Limited Powers of the Executive Board 39:57 The $10 Billion Pledge and Congressional Authority 41:44 Rubio's $2 Billion State Department Donation 44:40 Trump's Post-Presidency Power Base 47:38 The Billion-Dollar Membership Fee 50:27 Where the Money Actually Comes From 51:24 Constitutional Standing of the Board 53:15 Prospects for Congressional Oversight 55:19 Defining the True Purpose: A Technocratic Blueprint 1:05:29 Countries That Rejected the Invitation 1:07:11 A Direct Challenge to the United Nations 1:16:39 The Gaza Executive Board as a Third Tier 1:20:00 Overlapping Membership Across Boards   RESOURCES Patrick Wood: The New Economics of Technocracy - You Will Own Nothing Patrick Wood: The Final Betrayal: How Technocracy Destroyed America Patrick Wood's Technocracy News

"The patient was not speaking to her doctor. The patient was speaking to Anthony Fauci and the government… It was a horrible betrayal. It was an awful betrayal." James Thorp "There is strong evidence that the rollout of the vaccines for pregnant women was pre-planned, like the pandemic." This is the first part of a three-part interview with Dr. James Thorp about his and co-author's Celia Farber's book "Sacrifice: How the Deadliest Vaccine in History Targeted the Most Vulnerable." Dr. Thorp specializes in maternal and fetal medicine and treats women with high risk pregnancies. He has forty-seven years of clinical experience. In the first part of our interview he discusses how the federal government weaponized the three big OBGYN professional organizations (ACOG, ABOG and SMFM) as transmission belts for government orders to compel America's tens of thousands of obstetricians and gynecologists to push the toxic mRNA Covid shots on pregnant women. ACOG, ABOG and SMFM, Dr. Thorp told me, "are supposed to be a non-governmental organizations... The government weaponized these independent organizations and used them to do their dirty work." ABOG, ACOG and SMFM Became the Willing Executioners of Government Commands That Were Harmful or Deadly for the Unborn How were these three large and powerful professional organizations weaponized? With a flood of money, billions of federal dollars. From not recommending the shots to pregnant women at the end of 2020, all three medical OBGYN organizations quickly pivoted to strongly recommending them in July of 2021 and shortly after, in the fall of 2021, threatening OBGYN doctors with the loss of their medical certifications if they refused to go along. Thorp said: "It was around December of 2020. The American Board of Obstetrics and Gynecology, the American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists and the Society for Maternal and Fetal Medicine, they all said we're never gonna push the vaccine in pregnancy. "We're not gonna do that… "Now those same three societies did a complete 180. They decided to push it, push the vaccine in pregnant women. "But look what happened in April of 2021. They received $13 billion from HHS through the project called CCC, the COVID-19 Community Corps. Around the same time, in the spring of 2021, major medical journals also began promoting the vaccine in pregnant women - despite the fact that there were no safety data and despite the fact that over 80% of Pfizer's pregnant clinical trial participants whose pregnancy was followed lost their unborn children. The American Board of Obstetricians and Gynecologists Has Enormous Leverage Over America's and Canada's OBGYN Doctors ABOG, which is a non-profit organization, does not issue OBGYN licenses. Issuing medical licenses is the job of state medical boards. ABOG does something else: It certifies OB-GYN physicians in the US and Canada. Such board certification is voluntary and, at least in theory, a doctor doesn't strictly need it in order to practice. However, the reality is different: Hospital credentialing committees often require certification (or "board eligible" status) to grant admitting/surgical privileges. Malpractice insurers may decline or complicate coverage for uncertified specialists. Health insurance networks frequently require certification for in-network reimbursement. Employers, especially hospital systems and large practices, typically mandate it as a condition of employment. In other words, without ABOG certifications, OBGYN doctors are severely limited in the way they can practice their professions. Therefore, ABOG has huge leverage over all OBGYN doctors in the United States and Canada. The Federation of State Medical Boards Threatens Doctors with Loss of License; ABOG Threatens Doctors with Loss of Certification In September of 2021, ABOG sent an email to its 62,000 members threatening them with the loss of their certifications if they spread "misinformation" - without ever qualifying what such misinformation actually constitutes. Here is the first sentence of the email where ABOG declares that it "fully supports" a statement published by the FSMB, the Federation of State Medical Boards. These medical boards, as explained further up, license doctors and therefore have even greater leverage over doctors than ABOG: "The American Board of Obstetrics and Gynecology (ABOG) fully supports the statement published by the Federation of State Medical Boards (FSMB) that asserts that providing misinformation about the COVID-19 vaccine contradicts physicians' ethical and professional responsibilities, and therefore may subject a physician to disciplinary actions, including suspension or revocation of their medical license." Here is the the FSMB's statement that ABOG is referring to in its fall 2021 email: "Physicians who generate and spread COVID-19 vaccine misinformation or disinformation are risking disciplinary action by state medical boards, including the suspension or revocation of their medical license." Dr. Thorp told me the following about ABOG's infamous email: "There's a threatening email. And, by the way, the American Board of Obstetrics and Gynecology deleted this email. "They deleted it because when you read the language, it was literally like Adolf Hitler or you know, Mao Tse-tung: 'You will do this. You will not spread disinformation.' "This email was sent to sixty-two thousand OBGYN doctors in Canada, the United States of America, and some countries in South America. 62,000 OBGYN doctors. "Dr. George Wendel was the executive director of the American Board of Obstetrics and Gynecology, at that time. "And by the way, I've been highly regarded by all of those organizations. I was an examiner for the American Board of Obstetrics and Gynecology at around the turn of the century. So these were my colleagues. I was a senior examiner. "I was given awards by the American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists. The Society of Maternal Field Medicine, I was given many research awards. I was on their board of directors for a three-year term at the turn of the century. Doctors' Response to ABOG's Email: Deadly Silence, Betrayal of Pregnant Women and Their Unborn Babies I asked Thorp how doctors' reacted to ABOG's outrageous email which tried to force doctors to break their Hippocratic oath and betray their patients. The reaction was "dead silence" he said: "Dead silence. They saluted. They bowed. They wanted to continue collecting their paychecks and be good servants… "We talked about it [the email] and a lot of people were really upset, but nobody would raise their hand. "You gotta remember when you get a letter from the American Board of Obstetrics and Gynecology, you do what you're told to do and you don't step out of line. And they didn't. Now, there's a few other obstetricians around the country that agreed with me, but they've told me that I'm the only maternal fetal medicine physician in the country who spoke out. Instead of advocating on behalf of their pregnant as well as not pregnant or not yet pregnant patients and warning them against taking the shots, most OBGYN doctors, according to Dr. Thorp, abused the trust of their patients and convinced huge numbers of pregnant women to take the shots - and take them at any time during their pregnancy, including during the most vulnerable first trimester. Thorp told me during the interview: "My definition of totalitarian state is when most of the citizens of a state know it's a lie, but they remain silent. And that's exactly where the United States of America is right now. You know, they're still pushing the COVID nineteen vaccine." Dr. Thorp Responded to ABOG's Email. He never received a Reply. In January of 2022, Thorp sent a long response to ABOG's email in which he cites over one thousand studies documenting harms of the shots and challenges ABOG to a public debate: "I invited the board to have me come down and present the data. I challenged everybody on the board of directors of ABOG to debate me". In his book 'Sacrifice," he writes: My online ninety-eight-page letter included 1,019 peer-reviewed medical journal publications—in just twelve months—that documented injuries and deaths after the rollout of the COVID-19 vaccines. Let that sink in: 1,019 peer-reviewed medical journal articles in just twelve months after rollout of this lethal, injurious shot. And here is the beginning of his reply to ABOG's threatening email: "Couched in bullying language, ABOG's Statement Regarding Dissemination of COVID-19 Misinformation begs critically important questions for both constituents and patients alike. "These questions are intrinsic to a physician's ability to treat patients free from conflict of interest over fear of reprisal from ABOG (or others). Even more important, these questions concern matters essential to safeguarding and protecting maternal and fetal health and well-being, and are essential to upholding the physician's oath to do no harm. "First, what constitutes that which ABOG deems "misinformation about the COVID-19 vaccine"? Second, by whom and how is such "misinformation about the COVID-19 vaccine" determined? "ABOG's Statement Regarding Dissemination of COVID-19 Misinformation fails to provide answers to these questions and also fails to acknowledge the growing body of scientific, peer-reviewed evidence that the experimental mRNA and DNA gene therapy injections are a failed strategy that have killed, injured, and endangered many. "ABOG's widely circulated Statement Regarding Dissemination of COVID-19 Misinformation has placed patients' health in jeopardy while leaving constituents holding the proverbial bag as their medical license and livelihood hang in the balance. "Patient safety is sacrificed as constituents toe the line—forced to choose between pushing experimental gene therapies shown to be dangerous to both mom and fetus or lose their livelihoods. "ABOG's Statement Regarding Dissemination of COVID-19 Misinformation turns a blind eye to this ever-growing evidence and dodges these thorny issues by pointing to published statements made by the Federation of State Medical Boards (FSMB) and the American Board of Medical Specialties (ABMS). However, upon further examination, neither the FSMB nor the ABMS provides adequate answers. "If anything, the express collaboration of ABOG with the FSMB and ABMS, together with the language of the FSMB's and ABMS's individual statements, raises red flags about potential collusion, bias, and conflicts of interest within the various medical stakeholders, Big Tech, and the media." He says that he never received a reply from ABOG to his letter. In fact, ABOG left him alone. It did not revoke Thorp's certification as threatened in the email. Nor did the state medical board revoke his license. The Consequences of the Shots Were Catastrophic Dr. Thorp told me: "What I saw during 2020 was really nothing in terms of major obstetrical disasters. The disasters began early in 2021, coincident with the vaccine rollout. "I saw severe menstrual abnormalities, very increased risk of miscarriage, very bloody miscarriages. We define a miscarriage as a pregnancy loss up until less than 20 weeks. At 20 weeks it becomes a fetal death. That's how we define it in the United States of America. Other countries can define it a little bit differently, but the vast majority of miscarriages will occur before twelve weeks. "So a late miscarriage then would be between twelve weeks and twenty weeks. Those are very rare, but I saw many of them. "I saw significant increase in malformations of every organ system. "I saw a devastating increase in what we call cervical insufficiency, where the cervix opens without symptoms, membranes rupture, the pregnancy is lost. That can occur at 17, 18, 19, 20 weeks, or 24 weeks, 26 weeks, 30 weeks. Substantial increase. "I saw a substantial increase in severe growth disturbances, fetal death, fetal malformations, fetal cardiac arrhythmias, blood clots in the fetus, fetal cardiac arrest. "I saw an increase in babies that were delivered prematurely, premature rupture of membranes, very heavy bleeding episodes, blood clots in the mother. "Neurologic disease in the mother, new onset seizure, and then in delivery a substantial increase in hemorrhage. "The babies had an increased risk of dying after birth and a substantial increase in the babies going to the neonatal intensive care unit. "So it was it was horrible. And it was a very difficult experience because I of course had been following the data from other practitioners, from nurses around the country who were seeing the same thing." CHAPTERS 00:45 Reading From "Sacrifice" — Targeting Pregnant Women 02:28 Thorp's Practice at SSM Health, St. Louis 03:58 Obstetric Disasters Begin After Vaccine Rollout 09:16 Placenta Imaging Evidence 11:12 Explaining Placental Infarcts 12:35 Pfizer's Vaccine Rollout Timeline and Manufacturing Switch 17:58 Uncovering the Money Trail 18:09 Leaked Pfizer Post-Market Data 20:34 Miscarriage and Neonatal Death Rates 22:01 The Threatening Email to 62,000 OBGYNs 23:02 Thorp's Letter Challenging the Board 27:44 VAERS Data and Underreporting 31:14 Redacted FOIA Documents 34:06 Fetal Malformation Data Comparison 38:47 Colleagues' Silence 41:24 Threat From the Federation of State Medical Boards 43:23 Current Vaccine Uptake in Pregnant Women 47:23 Analyzing CDC Wonder Fetal Death Data 50:42 Questioning Official Data and Death Certificate Fraud RESOURCES James Thorp and Celia Farber: Sacrifice: How the Deadliest Vaccine in History Targeted the Most Vulnerable Dr. James Thorp's Letter to the American Board of Obstetrics and Gynecology on the Risks of the Covid-19 Vaccine in Pregnancy Thorp's X account: https://x.com/jathorpmfm

"When I started this, I thought I was just fighting a data center, and the amount of corruption that has been uncovered is mind blowing." —Lori Merriman https://flashlightsproductions.substack.com/p/inside-the-fierce-battle-over-a-6?utm_source=youtube "I thought we were in the United States and I thought that they worked for the people." Festus is a small town thirty-five miles south to St. Louis, Missouri. About a year ago and unbeknownst to Festus' 14,000 residents, the town's city council started secretly meeting with real estate developer CRG to discuss building a massive 360-acre hyperscale data center in a wooded area in Festus. The North American real estate firm CRG is the real estate development arm of the construction company Clayco. Bob Clark is Clayco's founder. Lori Merriman, who lives in Festus, became a leading force in the town's fight against the data center. She told me that it took three to four months before citizens in Festus got wind of what was happening behind the scenes. Once they did, they turned up in force to the next council meeting where the mayor and councilmen told them not to worry and that the whole scenario with the data center was completely hypothetical. Just two days later, the city council voted unanimously to approve the rezoning of a large woodland area to allow for the construction of a hyperscale data center called "Festus Campus." The fight was on. Battles have been waging since November 2025 and they will continue for an unforeseeable time. CHAPTERS 0:00 Introduction to Festus and the Data Center Threat 0:18 Data Center Crash Course: US Statistics and Global Rankings 9:11 Missouri's Data Center Boom and Major Operators 13:37 Life in Festus Before the Data Center Craze 14:54 November 2025: The Meeting Where It All Began 21:46 City Council Composition and the Vacant Seat 22:19 Secret Meetings to Dodge Sunshine Law Quorums 25:10 The 6-2 Vote to Approve the Contract 27:16 Local Newspapers and Buried Public Notices 31:26 FOIA Documents Reveal "Dumb Hicks" Insults 33:07 Public Backlash Against the Mayor's Conduct 35:47 Governor Kehoe's Offer to "Nudge" Council Members 38:03 Political Fallout and Ties to State Politics 39:21 Union Members Bussed in to Support the Project 40:37 The Search for an Attorney 41:28 Stephen Jeffery and Wake Up Jeffco LLC 42:34 Why Everyone Was Afraid to Form the LLC 45:02 Fast-Tracked Approval of Data Center in the School Gymnasium 45:37 April 2026: Incumbents Voted Out 47:00 Discovery Battles and Delay Tactics 49:33 Fundraising Totals and Ongoing Legal Costs 50:16 Untangling the Three Lawsuits 54:41 Organizing the Recall Signature Campaign 55:12 National Media Attention and Uncertain Future 55:37 Bob Clark, Clayco, and the Closed-Door Meeting 1:00:00 The Recall Rejected: Reasons Deemed "Not Sufficient" 1:01:11 Suing the County Clerk Over Election Certification 1:03:53 More Delays, More Legal Costs for Citizens 1:16:49 The Recall Signature Requirements Explained   RESOURCES Data Center Watch Missouri town fires half its city council over data center deal Digitalisation World, Shift in US hyperscale data centres towards central regions GoFundMe Campaign for WakeUpJeffco: Protect Our Community

"We the people have been completely taken out. Did you vote for Pax Silica? I don't remember voting for Pax Silica. This wasn't on my list." Pax Silica - Silicon Peace: America's Claim to Global AI Hegemony Ever heard about Pax Silica? Probably not. But it's up there together with Pax Romana and Pax Britannica. At least that's the claim and the intent of those who launched the Pax Silica initiative in December of 2025. Eras are usually declared after the fact. The Pax Romana was declared more than a thousand years after it happened. Not so Pax Silica: it's an announcement of an era that is in the process of being created right now - or at least that's the hope of Pax Silica's architects. Eras used to be named after geographic locations. Not Pax Silica. It's named for the material that functions as a semiconductor and that enables AI control systems. Humans as Nodes Inside an AI Based "Security Economy" In our interview, Courtenay Turner argues that this Silicon Peace era is creating global control systems that turn human beings into data "nodes" within a programmable "security economy." The traditional concept of autonomous citizens with individual rights is disappearing; humans will have no meaningful say in the AI governed world of Pax Silica. "People are not part of this equation because people have become nodes. We're just nodes for that infrastructure." Turner is the host of The Courtenay Turner Podcast. She and Patrick Wood co-authored the recently released The Final Betrayal: How Technocracy Destroyed America, a book about the rise of technocratic control systems. You can find her substack here. CHAPTERS 00:05 Introduction to Pax Silica and the Power Structure 14:00 What Is Pax Silica and Why Was It Launched 21:18 Wearables, Biometric Data, and the Selling of Personal Data 24:03 Catherine Austin Fitts' Two-Lock vs. Three-Lock Transaction System 29:03 Why Data Centers Are the System's Linchpin 34:30 The Push for a Global AGI Constitution 39:30 Data Centers as National Security Infrastructure and Protest Risk 42:32 The "Anti-Tech Extremist" Designation and Environmental Concerns 47:30 Reading the Official Pax Silica Declaration on State.gov 49:58 Comparing Pax Silica to Trump's Three-Pillar AI Stack 55:22 Profile of Jacob Helberg and His Career Path 1:02:28 Humans as Nodes: Sovereign Property vs. Private Property 1:15:18 The Declaration's Vision for Economic Partnership 1:28:03 Trusted Information Networks and the Meaning of "Trust" 1:29:26 Building a New "Economic Security Order" RESOURCES The Courtenay Turner Podcast Patrick Wood and Courtenay Turner: The Final Betrayal: How Technocracy Destroyed America Courtenay's Substack Pax Silica - United States Department of State Jacob Helberg | LinkedIn

Both Haviland and Pathologist Ryan Cole Talked to Bhattacharya About the White Fibrous Clots Tom Haviland: "I've called Jay at his own home and I've got Jay's home phone number. They know about the clots." Cornelia: "So when you called Bhattacharya, did you actually talk to him?" Tom: "Yeah, it was a Saturday night, so I didn't want to keep Jay too long. It was back in August of last year. And I just wanted to let him know… In fact, it was shortly after I returned from the 2025 Tennessee Funeral Directors Association convention. Remember, I captured on video footage the eighteen of twenty-eight embalmers in that room raising their hands saying they were seeing the clots. "I said, Jay, I just want to make sure you're aware that that that's what happened. You know, I got invited to speak to this convention because these embalmers and funeral directors are very concerned about this issue that they're still seeing. And I just want to make sure you're aware of it." "He says, I'm aware of it. And he also mentioned that he had talked to Dr. Ryan Cole, the pathologist. And Ryan of course had received very early on some of these sample cloths from Richard Hirschman. And Ryan had examined them and determined that they were amyloid or amyloid like at that time. "So that was the extent of the conversation."   Haviland Sent the Results of His Annual Embalmer Surveys to Federal Health Agencies Every Year Since 2022, Tom Haviland has been doing yearly surveys asking embalmers if they are see white fibrous clots in the bodies they embalm and, if so, in which percentage of bodies they find them. He has sent the results of his yearly surveys to the federal health agencies every single year. The CDC, FDA and NIH know exactly what is going on with these white clots. Nonetheless, to the best of my knowledge there hasn't been a single grant given by the NIH under Bhattacharya's leadership to research the white clots, what causes their formation, what they consist of, and what can be done to help people get rid of them. The 2026 budget of the NIH is gargantuan: almost $50 billion (to be precise: $47.22 billion). No grant money nor even a proper acknowledgment of the new phenomenon of these fibrous clots. When it comes to the mRNA Covid shots that have caused and continue to cause such immense harm among Americans and the world's population in general, you only get lies, denials or simply silence. This is typical human behavior of people who have blood on their hands but were able to stay in power after committing mass atrocities and crimes against humanity on an unprecedented scale - across the entire world population, billions of people. Why Haven't RFK Junior and Bhattacharya Resigned? However, it's haunting that those who had shown great courage, common sense, integrity and persistence during the terrible years of the pseudo pandemic, people like RFK Junior and Jay Bhattacharya, fell mostly silent once they joined the ranks of those with blood on their hands. They didn't resign in protest once they realized they were simply puppets in a power game of hardened people that fear truth, justice and accountability and will do whatever it takes to avoid what in German is called Wiedergutmachung" - which literally means "making good again" (as far as that is even possible). Do RFK and Bhattacharya not realize that they are risking to become complicit with the criminals by not distancing themselves from them to a far greater degree than they have done? Germans know all about Wiedergutmachung of course. And for good reason. But when American leaders commit crimes against humanity, a very different yardstick is used to measure the crimes they committed against American citizens. And no wonder: those "leaders", the perpetrators, remained in power. They survived the carnage that they visited upon their own people. They still hold the strings of immense power. How do they live with the mass crimes they committed and the mass deaths and disease they caused? Those Responsible for the Carnage Silence Those Who Speak Up About It - to This Day in order to survive with their power and wealth intact, the perpetrators must silence those who speak out for as long as they possibly can and ideally forever. During our interview, Haviland gave me a few recent examples of silencing: one embalmer, Dana Goodell, and a vascular surgeon. First Goodell's story: "Mr. Danny Goodell from the Iowa Funeral Directors Association, he went on a show with me with Maria Zeee. He agreed to do the interview with me and he talked about seeing the white fibers clots in his corpses for the last five years. "And Dana's been in embalming, by the way, for 37 years. So he's well respected. Like I said, he he actually travels around like Wallace Hooker does and gives tips of the trade to other embalmers at conventions and things. "But what was interesting is a week after we went on Maria Zeee's show, I got a call from Dana. And Dana said, 'Tom, I don't think I can go on any more shows with you.' "I said, 'Why not, Dana?' He said, 'Well, I'm getting some flack.' "I said, 'Well, who are you getting flack from?' He says, 'I'm getting flack from my Iowa Funeral Directors Association. In fact, I'm getting ready to go on a Zoom call tomorrow where I'm going to get reprimanded for going on that show with you on Maria Zeee last week.' "And I said, 'Dana, you did nothing wrong. All you did was go on her show and tell the truth about what you were seeing in your own embalming room.' And here the story of the vascular surgeon who in 2025 told Tom that he's pulling white fibrous clots out of patients' vascular systems every week: "I communicated with an endovascular specialist and cardiologist from Jacksonville, Florida, who's been removing these same white fibers class from living people for the last five years in his cat lab. But then he cut off communications with me about a month after we first made contact, saying, 'Tom, I've been instructed to terminate communications immediately.' No doubt, this highly specialized surgeon would have been fired from his job had he refused to terminate communications with Tom. Ruining a man's life, or for that matter a million men's lives, is just par for the course for our killer class. Preprints.org Declines Publication of Haviland's Paper Tom Haviland decided to write up a scientific paper, together with Dr. Daniel Santiago and Laura Kasner from the Clotastrophe substack, about the four embalmer surveys he conducted from 2022 to 2025. The idea here was to get the attention of scientists once a phenomenon like the white fibrous clots appears in a respected scientific journal. When I interviewed him, more than 48 hours had passed already since he had submitted his paper to the Preprints.org platform as a first step to getting picked up by a scientific journal. Preprint.org describes itself in the following way: "Preprints.org is a multidisciplinary platform providing preprint service that is dedicated to making early versions of research outputs permanently available and citable. "We post original research articles and comprehensive reviews, and papers can be updated by authors as long as the updated content has not been published online. "Content on Preprints.org is not peer-reviewed and can receive feedback from readers." So far, so good. They accept papers across all sorts of research topics without requiring peer review. Excellent idea to share one's research and get feedback on it without going through the lengthy and rather corrupt process of peer review. Usually it takes between 24 to 48 hours to get uploaded to Preprints.org once a paper has been submitted. Not so in Tom's case. Forty-eight hours passed - and no response. Another day passed and then he received the message that his paper about the fibrous clots had been declined. No reason given. According to Preprints.org, White Fibrous Clots Are of No Significance Haviland then emailed Joan Guo, the editor, for an explanation why his paper had been declined. He got a remarkable response in which Guo told him that papers are selected for publication according to two criteria: novelty and general significance. Which means that Guo does NOT consider the white fibrous clots a new phenomenon and, furthermore, a phenomenon that is significant. It's unlikely that this is in fact her opinion. It's much more likely that she caved to the spoken or unspoken demands of the perpetrator class and did what she felt she needed to do to keep Preprints.org in good standing and ensure its survival. Tom's comment was that this is a slap in the face of all those who died of the clots and the unknown, and likely huge number of people, in whose bodies they are presently forming. The perpetrator class is as powerful and dangerous now, and likely even more so, than it was during the so-called Pandemic. The Journal That Dared to Publish Haviland's Paper But the arm of the perpetrator class is only so long, it doesn't reach everywhere. There is a journal that dared to pick up Haviland's paper detailing the insights gained from his four embalmer surveys. This magazine is called "The International Journal of Innovative Research in Medical Science", abbreviated IJIRMS. The journal was founded in 2016 and is an open-access, peer-reviewed medical journal that publishes original research across all areas of medical and clinical science. You probably won't be surprised to hear that it's not based in the United States: it's based in India. It's the same journal that also just published a paper by Greg Harrison and his research team about insights into the character of the white clots via Raman spectroscopy: Raman spectroscopic Characterization of Anomalous Intravascular Fibrous Casts: Evidence for Stage-Dependent β-sheet Enriched Protein Maturation. This is how the Journal describes its mission: "The International Journal of Innovative Research in Medical Science aims to advance the field of medical science by publishing and disseminating high-quality, peer-reviewed research articles and advancements in the field. "The journal seeks to foster knowledge exchange and collaboration among researchers, healthcare professionals, and other stakeholders." Haviland's Scientific Paper: "Self-Reported Observations of Unusual White Fibrous Structures in Embalmed Corpses: Multi-Year Survey Results from Embalmers in Five Countries, 2022– 2025" Haviland's and his co-authors' paper was published on July 1, 2026. The paper provides a succinct summary of the findings of Haviland's four annual surveys conducted between 2022 and 2025. In total, he received 808 responses, mostly from American embalmers but also some responses from embalmers in the UK, Canada, Australia and New Zealand. The number of embalmers reporting observation of these white fibrous structures ranged from 66% to 83%. CHAPTERS 00:05 Introduction to White Fibrous Clot Surveys 04:10 Tennessee Convention Attendance and Survey Numbers 07:27 Embalmer Reactions and Leadership Hesitancy 11:51 Survey Results and Presentation to Mortuary Students 18:39 Declining Response Rates and Public Disillusionment 19:51 Contacting NIH, FDA, and RFK Jr.'s Team 21:53 Calls for Federal Investigation and Moratorium 23:16 Writing the Scientific Paper with Co-Authors 24:07 Submitting the Paper to Preprints.org 27:12 Survey Methods and Anonymity 33:41 Photographic Evidence from Richard Hirschman 34:57 Ruling Out Formaldehyde as the Cause 39:07 Early Reports from O'Looney and Ohio Embalmers 40:27 Woody Wilson's Confirmation and Retreat 42:31 Four-Year Survey Trend Analysis 45:22 Retaliation Against Embalmers Speaking Out 46:06 Ongoing Spike Protein Production Theories 53:35 Recall Bias and Data Limitations 58:30 Alternative Explanations Considered and Dismissed 1:03:52 Conclusions and Cautious Scientific Language 1:05:34 Preprint Upload Delays and Next Steps 1:07:28 Senator Ron Johnson's Congressional Hearings 1:09:09 Proposed Panel for a Future Hearing 1:10:32 Independent Medical Alliance as Backup Publisher RESOURCES Self-Reported Observations of Unusual White Fibrous Structures in Embalmed Corpses: Multi-Year Survey Results from Embalmers in Five Countries, 2022–2025, International Journal of Innovative Research in Medical Science; Authors: Daniel Santiago, Laura Kasner, Thomas Haviland Raman spectroscopic Characterization of Anomalous Intravascular Fibrous Casts: Evidence for Stage-Dependent β-sheet Enriched Protein Maturation, International Journal of Innovative Research in Medical Science; Authors: Daniel Santiago, Greg Harrison, Miklos Veres, Mark File and Dennis Planner Laura Kasner's Substack: Clotastrophe Preprints.org

White Clots Removed from Bodies Still Trigger Protein Misfolding Three Months Later  https://flashlightsproductions.substack.com/p/the-body-cannot-dissolve-them-scientists?utm_source=youtube "This is truly groundbreaking" —Greg Harrison "We had to find a lab, we had to fund it ourselves. It's all out of our own pocket… "We have forensic grade proof that the material is amyloid like… The proteins have not merely lost their native fold, they have adopted a new thermodynamically stable architecture. "Data is data and facts are facts. And these are facts. So all we can do is present the facts… "We challenge people. If you disagree with it, you go and rerun the work, you go and get the Raman analysis and prove us wrong." Greg Harrison is an organic chemist based in Sydney, Australia. For the past two years, he has been working with a small international team of scientists analyzing unusual white, rubbery, fibrous clots found inside the blood vessels of deceased people — and also in living people. These white clots began appearing in corpses in late spring 2021, shortly after the mRNA vaccine rollout began, and they are still being found today. Embalmers were the first to notice them; vascular surgeons have since found them in living patients as well. Greg's team now believes these white clots are amyloid or amyloid-like which means that they consist of misfolded proteins that have locked into a rigid, crystalline structure. Amyloidosis is a group of diseases that are caused by misfolded proteins building up in organs, including the brain. Alzheimer's is one of them, Lewy body diseases another. Greg told me that there are 36 known different types of amyloidosis in total and that the white clots are a completely new type of amyloidosis: a blood-borne systemic amyloidosis, never seen before. Traditional amyloidosis develops slowly over decades. But this white clot amyloidosis develops much faster, namely within months. These white structures were seen by embalmers in corpses for the first time in spring of 2021, just months after the mRNA Covid mass injection campaign had begun. CHAPTERS 00:05 Opening And Recap Of The White Clot Mystery 00:49 Greg Harrison's Claim: White Clots Are Amyloid‑Like 03:04 What Is Amyloidosis? From Rare Brain Disease To Blood‑Borne Systemic Form 05:50 Known Amyloid Diseases And Why Misfolding Matters 06:17 Early Analytical Work: Phosphorylation, Sulfation And Misfolded Fibrinogen 10:30 Thioflavin T Fluorescence And Elemental Signals In Embalmer Clots 14:51 Kevin McCairn's Findings: Misfolded Amyloidogenic Fibrin And Systemic Risks 19:05 Infective Peptide Concept: White Clots Seeding Misfolding In Fresh Plasma 20:19 Microscopy Of "Calamari" Clots And RT‑QuIC Seeding Experiments 25:18 Amyloid‑Prion‑Like Behavior And Caution About True Prion Claims 27:00 Why Raman Spectroscopy Is Definitive For Detecting Amyloid Structure 28:37 Raman Fingerprints Of Clot Samples Showing Progression Toward Beta Sheets 31:18 Reference Spectra: Healthy Plasma, Fibrinogen And Spike‑Protein Bands 34:16 European Raman Lab Work And Peer‑Reviewed Paper Preparation 35:09 "Amyloidogenic Scaffolds": Converging Raman And ThT Evidence 37:30 Novel Intravascular Scaffolds And Why They Differ From Standard Clots 38:34 Structural Reorganization: From Flexible Proteins To Rigid Crystalline Lattice 41:02 Lab Conclusion: Self‑Assembling Amyloid Scaffold, Not Reversible Clotting 42:36 Data, University Backing, And Anticipated Pushback From Institutions 43:45 Explaining Aromatic Packing And Why These Scaffolds Resist Breakdown 44:39 Possible Dissolution: Stem‑Cell Approaches And Other Anti‑Amyloid Strategies 46:09 Microclots, Strokes And Links To Long COVID And Fibrin(oid) Deposits 47:22 Microclots In Vaccinated And Unvaccinated: Role Of Open Spike Conformation 49:34 Speed Of Clot Emergence After mRNA Rollout And Survey Data 50:06 Apheresis In Japan: Blood‑Filtering To Remove Amyloid Microclots 51:08 Follow‑Up Outcomes: Patients Remaining Clot‑Free For 6–8 Months 51:29 Self‑Amplifying RNA, Broader mRNA Platform Concerns And Phosphorylation 54:02 Lack Of Interest From Australian Public Health And Self‑Funded Research 55:28 Future Tests: Focused Raman On Spike Region And Phosphorus NMR RESOURCES Raman spectroscopic Characterization of Anomalous Intravascular Fibrous Casts: Evidence for Stage-Dependent β-sheet Enriched Protein Maturation, International Journal of Innovative Research in Medical Science; Authors: Daniel Santiago, Greg Harrison, Miklos Veres, Mark File and Dennis Planner: https://ijirms.in/index.php/ijirms/article/view/2202 Australian Amyloidosis Network: https://aan.org.au/patients-and-carers/what-is-amyloidosis/ Douglas B. Kell and Etheresia Pretorius: Proteomic Evidence for Amyloidogenic Cross-Seeding in Fibrinaloid Microclots https://www.mdpi.com/1422-0067/25/19/10809

"Maybe the elites of the world have a lot more in common than we think. And the people of the world have a poor cast of everything in the end — where they didn't see it coming." Patrick Wood This is the second part of a three part interview with technocracy expert and researcher Patrick Wood about his latest, just released book "The New Economics of Technocracy - You Will Own Nothing." In the first part we discussed the Genius Act, stablecoins (in particular the Trump family's USD1 stablecoin) as well as the move from a debt based system to an asset based system. And this is where the second part picks up: asset based systems are financial systems compatible with principles of Islam. Transnational Elites United Against "Their Peoples" Transnational elites of unfathomable wealth and power, like Muslim Gulf monarchs and Atheist/Agnostic/Religious tech billionaires, are working together across ideological and religious lines to push digital financial systems that function as behavioral control systems for "their peoples." The Unbanked and Islamic Finance Hundreds of millions of Muslims in countries like Pakistan, Egypt, and Afghanistan have never had bank accounts — not because they are poor, but because traditional Western banking lives of interest, which the Koran strictly forbids. This prohibition is called riba. Instead, Islamic finance uses three asset-based tools. Murabaha: cost-plus financing, where a financier buys an asset and resells it at an agreed markup over a period of time Ijara: similar to leasing, where income comes from a real asset rather than interest Sukuk: Ownership shares in a real asset, not debt). The global Sukuk market surpassed $1 trillion in 2024. There is also an extensive "Green Sukuk" market similar to Western ESG financial markets and investment products. The New Digital Financial System Fits Islam The Western debt-based financial system spent a century trying to bring Muslim populations into its fold, but it failed because its core mechanism - making money from money via interest - violated Islamic law. But the new asset-based, tokenized financial system is structurally different: it deals in real assets, just as Islamic finance does. This makes it compatible with Islamic principles. In his new book, Wood writes: "The Western debt-based financial system spent a century trying to integrate the Islamic world and failed—precisely because its core mechanism violated Islamic law. The asset-based Technocratic system succeeds where the debt-based system could not, because its core mechanism is structurally compatible with Sharia. "And the Gulf monarchies—which command over half of global Islamic finance assets and manage sovereign wealth funds totaling trillions of dollars—are not being dragged into this system reluctantly. They are funding its construction, hosting its infrastructure, positioning their sovereign wealth at its center, and deploying their political influence to clear the regulatory path. "The $2 billion in USD1 that MGX deployed for the Binance investment was not merely a financial transaction. It was a proof of concept: Gulf sovereign wealth, denominated in a Sharia-compatible digital token, deployed at sovereign scale through a platform owned by a sitting American president and a Gulf intelligence chief. The bridge is built. The traffic is flowing. And the toll is collected by the architects." "Smart" Contracts Function as Gatekeepers or Uber-Locks The layers of control that can easily be built into such AI controlled financial asset systems are limitless. It's the kind of control over transactions that neither Western finance nor Islam finance every had before in history because it was technically impossible. Smart contracts on the blockchain can be programmed to enforce compliance with any kind and number of government-mandated behaviors our overlords fancy. Tailormade for you and me. Once we enter this digital financial system that will be linked to their biometric identity, we'll be trapped. Our digital identity will be tied to our health records, a myriad of social compliance scores, and behaviorally dependent government benefits. Wood calls such a financial control system "financial enclosure." "This is not financial inclusion — it is financial enclosure, the absorption of a population that existed outside the system into a system that once entered cannot be exited." The Gulf Money Pipeline Feeding the Construction of Hyperscale Data Centers in American and the UAE What is needed to built such control system is massive amounts of computing power. And that's why large numbers of hyperscale data centers are currently planned or built in the United States. But not only there: In May 2025, President Trump toured the Gulf with the world's top tech executives including Sam Altman, Elon Musk, and Jensen Huang. He picked up something like $2 trillion in investment commitments and almost all this money is slated to be spent on AI infrastructure and data centers. Many of them in the United States but some of them in the UAE. Since then, the United Arab Emirates started building the largest hyperscale AI data center "campus" outside the United States. CHAPTERS 01:18 The Unbanked Muslim World: Why 1.8 Billion People Avoid Conventional Banking 02:42 The $6 Trillion Islamic Finance Industry and the Banking Cartel's Problem 05:41 Sharia-Compliant Finance Meets Asset Tokenization: A Structural Alignment 07:49 The Trump Family stablecoin, USD One, and the $2 Billion UAE Investment 08:02 World Liberty Financial: How Gulf Sovereign Wealth Became a Partner 12:23 Financial Inclusion or Financial Enclosure? The Pakistani Farmer Example 16:01 Pakistan Adopts USD One: The First Islamic Country on the International Stage 17:39 Stablecoins as Global Payment Architecture 18:15 The Three Islamic Financial Instruments: Murabaha, Ijara, and Sukuk 26:20 Islamic Finance as a Tool of Evangelism 28:12 Green Sukuk: Where Sharia Law Meets ESG and UN Sustainability Mandates 30:33 Western Banks and Sharia Scholars: JP Morgan's Unusual Arrangement 32:11 The Irony of Green Sukuk in Fossil Fuel Nations 33:56 The Arab World's Return to Its Trading Roots and the IMEC Corridor 36:17 Jihad Through Wealth: Islamic Finance vs. Tech Billionaire Ideology 37:10 The Dark Enlightenment and the Tech Bros' Own Financial Jihad 41:03 Elite Hypocrisy East and West: Control Through Smart Contracts 45:36 Smart Contracts as the New Sharia: Electronic Behavioral Control 46:53 The Gulf Money Pipeline: Trump's $2 Trillion Gulf Tour, May 2025 49:38 The AI Diffusion Rule, the Pax Silica Declaration, and Full-Stack Tech Transfers 52:50 Stargate UAE: The Largest AI Data Center Cluster Outside the United States 54:25 Can Data Centers Be Defended? Military Protection and Public Backlash 55:44 America's 5,000 Data Centers vs. China's 375 56:55 The Abraham Accords: Trade Over Politics as a Peace Strategy 1:00:20 Old Trade vs. New Trade: The Three-Lock Control System 1:03:15 Sheikh Tahnoun's Web of AI, Crypto, and Sovereign Power 1:06:32 The UAE at the Center of the IMEC Corridor and Oil Tokenization 1:08:07 The Strait of Hormuz: Why Iran's Response Threatened the Entire Corridor 1:11:29 The UAE Withdraws from OPEC: What Is Tahnoun's Strategy? RESOURCES Patrick Wood: The New Economics of Technocracy - You Will Own Nothing Patrick Wood: The Final Betrayal: How Technocracy Destroyed America Patrick Wood's Technocracy News

"I swear I have never seen so many fetal demise in the last few years than I saw in all of my 20 years combined. The number of fetal demise is through the roof. How can the CDC say that there's no link? I'm sorry, I don't buy it at all." The Censorship-Industrial Complex Silenced Hirschman From the Beginning - And Hasn't Stopped to This Day It's about five years ago, in the spring of 2021, that embalmer Richard Hirschman from Alabama first noticed white rubbery structures in the veins and also the arteries of bodies he embalmed. He was astonished since never in his long embalming career had he ever seen anything like it. But when over many months he kept finding more and more of these 'white clots', he started posting pictures of them on social media, in particular Twitter, now X. His first public interview aired in early 2022. Very soon soon after, on January 28, 2022, "factchecker" PolitiFact published an article proclaiming the finding of such clots "mostly false." Did anyone from PolitiFact speak to Hirschman? Of course not. Did anyone ask him for pictures? Did anyone ask him if they could watch him embalm someone? No and no. PolitiFact employees sent him some emails but never even bothered to call him. Hirschman said: "PolitiFact did a hit piece on me back then and they didn't speak to me directly, just a couple of email messages. They didn't waste any time writing this hit piece, basically saying that my story is mostly false." Hirschman Is Brutally Censored on X To this day, the rubbery white clots remain one of the most forbidden and, by the way, also the most brutally censored topics on platforms like X and YouTube. Hischman's X account has many followers, more than 78K - but he can't reach them. He stopped posting altogether for a long while because he got so discouraged about X censoring his posts - especially those showing the white clots. But, luckily, he started posting again recently. And this is how it happened: "I dropped off and I stayed off of social media for a long, long time. And I ended up having a conversation with a doctor and he thought that the clots had gone away because I wasn't posting anything. And I had to tell him: 'No, that's not the case. I'm just censored so bad. What's the point?' "And he said to me: 'You really need to continue to do this because it's a documentation of what's still happening. And if you don't post anything, how is anybody to know? So I really contemplated that and I made a post. And I hadn't made a post in quite a long time. And that post actually got some traction and it wasn't censored right away. "And part of me feels like because I had been off of it for so long, I somehow dropped off of their watch list. But I'm back on it. It's the pictures, a lot of times they censor the pictures. They didn't censor the pictures for I think the first twenty-four plus hours, maybe thirty-six hours. "If I post a picture now, usually it's pretty much boom, it's just automatic." Instead of being discouraged by the censorship, Hirschman decided to look at it in a different way. His inspiration is Sophie Scholl who was, together with her older brother Hans, guillotined by the Nazis for depositing anti-Nazi leaflets at the University of Munich. Sophie was 21 years old when she was executed. Hirschman told me: "She said something like "I'm gonna stand for truth even if I have to stand alone.'" Thank you, Sophie! And be on the lookout for new posts from Richard Hirschman: https://x.com/r_hirschman, @r_hirschman. Five Years Later Hirschman Still Finds White Clots in About 40% of Bodies It was almost exactly five years ago that embalmer Richard Hirschman pulled out the first white fibrous structures out of bodies he was embalming. He had never seen anything like it before. Despite the fact that only a small percentage of Americans still take the deadly mRNA covid jabs, the number of bodies that contain these white clots has not at all or barely gone down according to Hirschman. He told me: "My simple brain says if spike protein induces clotting issues, why are we injecting RNA that makes the body create spike protein that causes clotting issues?" And apparently, the RNA continues to produce the spike protein in sufficient numbers to produce almost the same number of white clots in the bodies of people five years on. Nobody knows when, if ever, the RNA will stop producing the toxic spike protein which is the MOST toxic part of the sars-cov-2 virus. Never before in the history of vaccine design was the most toxic part of the virus chosen to create a "vaccine." And "chosen" by every single one of the pharmaceutical companies that lined up to develop a "vaccine" against Covid-19. Talk about crimes against humanity. The FDA Investigated Hirschman Without His Knowledge in Early 2022 Hirschman told me something fascinating during the interview: Soon after the hit piece in PolitiFact appeared about him, someone from the FDA contacted one of his former instructors at the mortuary college where Hirschman had gone to school: "My instructor informed me that shortly after I came out, which was in January of 2022, so it would have been probably, you know, February or March, he was contacted by the FDA concerning me." His instructor didn't remember the exact date but, Hirschman told me, "he said it was not long after I became publicly known speaking out [that] they had gotten a phone call from the FDA asking questions about me." What was it that the FDA wanted to know about Hirschman? They wanted to know if he was legit. They wanted to find out if he really was a licensed embalmer and funeral director. In other words, the very latest the FDA knew about the scary rubbery structures found in the blood of dead people was by early 2022 - and probably even earlier. Only Silence from the Government In the years since then, there has been nothing but silence from the federal health agencies, during the years of the Biden administration and also during the time of the Trump administration. There has been only silence from people like RFK and Jay Bhattacharya - people, on whom Americans had placed great hopes. By the way, RFK personally contacted Hirschman in 2022. RFK wanted to know from him about the white clots: "I spoke with RFK, I would say probably late spring, early summer of 2022, before he ran for president, long before he became a member of the government right now. He knows all about this stuff." Hirschman's Recent Encounter With Someone from the CDC Earlier this year, Hirschman had a chance encounter with someone from the CDC. When the individual from the CDC recognized Hirschman, he was eager to talk to him. In the end, Hirschman tells me, "I had about an hour and a half meeting face to face with [the person] from the CDC on this. They know. They know about this issue." Well, obviously they know. And they're sitting on this explosive knowledge and they're not doing a thing. This is what Hirschman told me about the conversation: "I was told there are people in the government that are trying to stop this, but there's so much corruption and there's so many things that are going on up there… they stonewall and they make things very, very difficult. He said they knew there were issues long ago, but the previous administration was very, very hard, making it very difficult for anything to happen." Yes, we know that. But what about the current administration that baited Americans with MAHA and the prospect of transparency? In my own opinion, this person from the CDC should resign from the CDC and go public about what is happening in the CDC during the Trump administration. It's clear to most people by now, after all, that Trump himself and his highest officials have as little interest in acknowledging and investigating the white clots as the Biden administration had. The CDC still recommends Covid-19 shots to the population and in particular for people whom they consider at particular risk for Covid - like pregnant women (!!). NIH Sits on 40 Billion Dollars - But Can't Fund a Single Study to Investigate the White Clots The NIH hasn't given out any grant money to study the clots, and to find out how to treat people who have them. With its gigantic budget of around $40 billion, Jay Bhattacharya did not allocate any money, as far as I am aware, to the study of the white rubbery structures. Why hasn't Bhattacharya resigned a long time ago? What is he still doing there? Bodies of Three Babies in the Cooler At the Same Time - Hirschman Never Saw Anything Like It Before It used to be extraordinary, Hirschman said, to see a baby's body in the cooler room. Now it's the "new normal." "I remember years ago, somewhere around 2008 or 2009, I worked at a company where we did maybe 900 to a 1,000 bodies a year. During my few years there, I probably couldn't count on one hand the number of babies that I would see." No longer. The situation today is very different: "There is a funeral home that I do work for. I have seen three babies in the cooler at one time. And I'm not saying that I see it every single day, but I am no longer surprised when I see another baby. So what used to be exceptionally rare, extraordinarily rare, is now a pretty common occurrence." A Handful of Intrepid Scientists Are Independently Studying the White Clots Richard Hirschman not only alerts the world to the existence of the white fibrous clots but he also assists the handful of courageous and independent scientists who took it upon themselves to find out what these clots consist of, how they formed and what can be done to heal people. The names of these scientists are, for the most part, unknown. For good reason: these mainly young scientists would risk being thrown out of university if it became known that they are privately researching the white clots. We do know, however, that this small international team is led by the Australian chemist Greg Harrison. And the British neuroscientist Dr. Kevin McCairn who currently works at Korea's Brain Research Institute has helped the team by using advanced laboratory methods to analyze the white clots. The samples that the team and Kevin McCairn used in their scientific analyses were provided by Hirschman. What the Clots Are For more than a year now we know a lot about what these clots are and how they formed: The analysis of Harrison's team, using thioflavin T staining, Raman spectroscopy, and scanning electron microscopy, showed that the white clots are amyloid, which means they're misfolded proteins. The clots are composed primarily of misfolded fibrinogen, with a highly abnormal ratio of roughly 1 part alpha chain, 9 parts beta chain and 4 parts gamma chain. Normal fibrinogen clotting produces a balanced 1:1:1 ratio across the three chains. This completely out of whack composition of fibrinogen causes the protein strands to tangle into rigid, tough, insoluble structures that the body cannot break down. CHAPTERS 00:08 A Five-Year Retrospective: White Clots Still Unacknowledged 02:51 FDA Contacts Hirschman's Instructor; PolitiFact Hit Piece 11:00 What Has Changed Since the Last Interview? 12:17 White Clots Still Appearing: Frequency & Spreadsheet Data 22:10 Ethics of Speaking Out: Hirschman Defends Going Public 31:08 Clots Found in Arteries — an Unusual Finding 33:23 Spike Protein, Traditional Clots & mRNA Concern 40:40 The Establishment Knew Early: Papers from 2021 41:49 RFK Jr. & a Secret CDC Meeting in 2026 43:32 Scientific Analysis: Amyloid, Fibrinogen & Misfolded Proteins 50:00 How Misfolded Proteins Self-Assemble into Clots 52:07 Micro Clots: Coffee Grounds in the Blood 55:50 Ante Mortem vs. Post Mortem: Are Clots Forming in the Living? 1:00:53 Treatment Hope: Double Plasmapheresis in Japan 1:04:12 Long-Term Questions About Detox & Healing 1:06:49 CDC Insider Confirms Awareness; Vaccine Uptake Declining 1:09:36 Why Government Agencies Aren't Acting 1:10:00 CDC Still Recommends COVID Shots for Pregnant Women 1:12:10 Fetal Demises: A Dramatic and Ongoing Increase 1:15:57 White Clots in Babies? 1:18:48 American Children's Health & RFK Jr.'s Warning 1:19:22 Inviting Doctors to Witness Embalmings 1:22:00 Spike Protein Fingerprint & Next Steps in Research 1:23:08 Embalmer Surveys: Tom Haviland & Declining Participation 1:25:51 Colleagues Quietly Aware: Messages from Fellow Embalmers 1:27:43 Why Survey Responses Are Dropping — COVID Fatigue & Censorship   RESOURCES Hirschman's X account: https://x.com/r_hirschman Thomas Haviland, Laura Kasner, Daniel Santiago: Self-Reported Observations of Unusual White Fibrous Structures in Embalmed Corpses: Multi-Year Survey Results from Embalmers in Five Countries, 2022–2025 Laura Kasner's Substack Clotastrophe PolitiFact's January 2022 Article about Embalmers Seeing White Clots: https://www.politifact.com/factchecks/2022/feb/09/newswars/no-clear-evidence-covid-19-vaccines-are-responsibl/  

"None of what Hilary Marston is doing is about practice of medicine. It's all about the globalist objectives, subverting public health for purposes of extracting wealth & controlling the population." https://flashlightsproductions.substack.com/p/from-preparedness-to-deadly-response?utm_source=youtube This is the second part of my VRBPAC Series with Sasha Latypova. We dissect the 400 page long transcript of the pivotal VRBPAC meeting on October 22, 2020. Its purpose was to prepare VRBPAC members and also the public for the coming Emergency Use Authorization of the Covid-19 mRNA shots. The VRBPAC is the FDA's external expert advisory committee that reviews data on vaccines and makes non‑binding recommendations to the agency on their safety, effectiveness, and appropriate use. To watch or listen to the first part, go here: https://flashlightsproductions.substack.com/p/the-fda-meeting-that-paved-the-way The meeting on October 22, 2020 is highly incriminatory. If any of these high FDA, CDC, NIH, NIAID and BARDA officials who gave presentations that day are ever being held accountable, there is a wealth of incriminating data in their many presentations. Ten health agency employees gave slide show presentations during the meeting. Many of them were long and dense. Since it was a public meeting, all the meeting material is public as well. You can access everything here: https://www.fda.gov/advisory-committees/advisory-committee-calendar/vaccines-and-related-biological-products-advisory-committee-october-22-2020-meeting-announcement#event-materials High FDA, CDC, NIH, NIAID, BARDA Officials Must Be Held Accountable for Covid Crimes The Covid clinical trials were as fake and barbaric as everything else that had to do with the so-called Pandemic. Those in high positions inside federal health agencies who lied to the public about the safety of the trials should be prosecuted for their lies that had deadly consequences. The Covid Clinical Trials Were a Charade to Mislead the Public: The Pre-Manufacturing of 30 Million Doses Proves It Approximately 30 million doses were manufactured starting July 2020 — before Phase 3 enrollment concluded and months before any data was reviewed. Which means that there was no safety evidence for the shots. Sasha Latypova said during the interview: "The first batches that were released onto the public in December were manufactured starting in July of 2020 - so before the phase three trials even enrolled. "When enrollment in phase three trials was completed in September, they had pre-manufactured about 30 million doses already. It was already sitting in the warehouse. By the time even the first set of data was reviewed by FDA on December 10th. All those vials were sitting already ready to go. "None of those 30 doses were dependent on any data, not animal, not human, no data of any kind. They were just pre-manufactured and then shipped disregarding anything. "And that is a major crime according to the current Food and Drugs and Cosmetics Act and the Public Health Services Act that governs biologics and biologic drugs. "But you see when the government declares an emergency, this major crime becomes an accomplishment, an achievement, something for which we get awards from President Trump and Biden and everyone. "This is how this crime cartel operates. They make totally illegal stuff legal when they say so. And then they profit massively of total knowledge, coordination, pre-planning, funding their own activities, putting all their secret Politburo members on this Data and Safety Monitoring Board and monitoring everything themselves." Hillary Marston, Fauci's Mentee You probably never heard about Dr. Hilary Marston but you should know who she is. In a just world, she would be prosecuted for participation in Covid crimes. Hilary Marston was one of the mentees of Anthony Fauci. Her career got a big boost shortly after her presentation at the October 2020 VRBPAC meeting: in January of 2021 she official switched over into an intelligence role as the Director of Medical and Biodefense Preparedness at the National Security Council. On top of that, she was also appointed, a few months later, as Senior Policy Advisor for Global Covid Response at the White House. This almost certainly happened with the full support and likely the initiative of Anthony Fauci himself. With his mentee Marston firmly embedded on the intelligence side, he now had a reliable executioner in the White House and the National Security Council. CHAPTERS 05:00 Hilary Marston's Presentation: Claims of Safety Without Showing Data 14:25 Marion Gruber's Role, EUA Framing, and Career at FDA 25:11 Transition to Hilary Marston and Her Career Overview 30:32 From NIAID to National Security Council: Marston's Biodefense Role 33:09 Matthew Hepburn, DARPA, and the 60‑Day Vaccine Concept 34:34 NSC, Pandemic Policy, and Who Actually Drove COVID Decisions 36:20 Canal Row Advisors: Monetizing FDA and Regulatory Connections 41:44 Start of Marston's VRBPAC Talk: "Role of NIH in COVID‑19 Vaccines" 41:44 Part 1 – From Pandemic Preparedness to Response 50:25 65‑Day Path to Phase 1 and Rapid mRNA Manufacturing 52:31 Phase 1 Launch, Early Trials, and "Quite Safe, Well Tolerated" Claims 55:11 Part 2 – Evaluating Safety and Efficacy via Harmonized Trials 56:21 "Harmonization" of Clinical Trials and Centralized Control 1:02:12 Clinical Trial Networks, HIV Platforms, and DoD Involvement 1:06:02 NIH‑Controlled Labs, Assays, and Case Definitions 1:09:17 Distinguishing Infection vs Vaccination and Controlling Endpoints 1:10:46 DSMB Structure and NIH's "Independent" Safety Oversight 1:12:59 CoVPN Architecture: NIH, BARDA, DoD, and Pharma Sponsors 1:19:24 NIH at Every Level of Trial Governance and the Pfizer Footnote 1:26:04 Trial Design: Sample Sizes, Endpoints, and Efficacy Metrics 1:29:20 Relative vs Absolute Efficacy and Interpreting the 95 Percent Figure RESOURCES VRBPAC-10.22.20-Meeting-Draft-Agenda.pdf How the FDA Lied to the American People About Covid-19 'Clinical Trials' 2020.08.25-sadove-fda-cdc-regulatory-updates-use-of-mcms-table-p.-18.pdf Marion F. Gruber, Ph.D., MS | LinkedIn About IAVI - IAVI Hilary Marston | LinkedIn Hilary Marston, MD, MPH | Principal, Drug and Biological Therapies Our Services - Canal Row VRBPAC-10.22.20-Meeting-Presentation-COVID19-Vaccine-Development-NIH-Role.pdf Matthew Hepburn | LinkedIn

"Vaccine equity score, age, how many people are five plus… population with one plus dose, population with booster doses... They're down to the last number, yeah, to the zip code — everything." https://flashlightsproductions.substack.com/p/zip-code-by-zip-code-government-tracking This is the second part of my interview with Julie Threet where she discusses the FOIA'd materials from former HHS Secretary Xavier Becerra's secret visit to Butte County in March of 2022 where he went hunting for uninjected kids - and in particular minority kids: Hispanics, Native Americans and Hmong Chinese. The interview picks up right where we ended the first part: Julie starts reading from the meeting moderators' talking points. Then we go over the notes that one of the health officials present took during the secret meeting and we end with Butte County's request for funding that was submitted promptly in the days after the meeting. Parents were not present at the meeting, only carefully vetted pediatricians and of course Butte County's top public health officials attended. Press was not allowed. Go to my substack to see a bunch of screenshots from the FOIA'd materials because it's important to see these incriminating documents with your own eyes and read through them: https://flashlightsproductions.substack.com/p/zip-code-by-zip-code-government-tracking They reveal in all desired clarity the insidious strategy and tactics of getting the injections into the arms of kids - and again, with particular emphasis on the arms of minority kids which had particularly low injection rates. 01:05 Approaching Vaccine-Hesitant Parents 01:57 Zip Code Vaccination Data and the VEM Score 03:58 Hesitancy Scores Across Chico and Butte County 07:16 Butte County vs. California Statewide Vaccination Rates by Age Group 09:40 Notes from the Roundtable: Secretary Becerra's Opening Remarks 11:57 Misinformation, Changing Guidance, and the Eroding Doctor-Parent Relationship 15:03 Hispanic and Immigrant Families: Trusted Voices and Church Outreach 17:06 Mistrust, Messaging Strategy, and "Taking Chico" 19:55 Nurse Injuries and Vaccine Resistance 20:48 Logistical Challenges: Single-Dose Vials, Cold Storage, and Running Out of Money 22:27 Schools, Politics, and Civic Leaders in Vaccine Outreach 23:22 Butte County's $225,000 HHS Funding Request 27:30 Vaccination Rates by Quartile and the Zip Code Targeting Strategy 28:43 Weaponizing Pediatric Trust: Targeting Ages Five to Eleven 30:48 Vaccine Outreach at the County Fair, Costco, and Sierra Nevada Brewery 32:40 White House Convening on Equity: Becerra's Speech One Month Later 33:51 Secretary Becerra's Remarks: Going to the People and Minority Vaccination Gaps 35:47 VAERS Reports, Racial Data, and the Becerra Clip as a Political Tool 38:00 Closing: FOIA Documents, AI Surveillance Concerns

"We knew we had to do a couple of things. First, we had to change the paradigm where people had to come to us… We decided we have to come to you." —HHS Secretary Becerra, April 2022 "I want my grandchildren to know I fought. I fought. I didn't stop fighting. I will pick this thing apart until somebody's behind bars… And we need to make sure this man [Xavier Becerra] doesn't become our governor." —Julie Threet https://flashlightsproductions.substack.com/p/when-hhs-secretary-xavier-becerra Becerra's Stealth Visit to Butte County, CA, in March 2022 In this first part of our second interview, Julie Threet walked me through a chain of FOIA'd emails between a high HHS official, Bonnie Preston, and public health officials in Butte County. Seemingly out of the blue, on March 7, 2022, Preston, who then was HHS Director of US Region 9, contacted Butte County's former public health director Dr. Bernstein to discuss how to increase the Covid mRNA shot injection rate for children. Exactly one week later, Becerra paid a stealth visit to the county and met with a handful of carefully selected pediatricians and parents. Almost nobody knew about this secret meeting until it was over and Becerra had left. Why Butte County? Because at that time it had California's lowest Covid-19 mRNA injection rate for children between age 5 and 11: 16%. Julie said: "They wanted to keep it [the meeting] under wraps, they wanted to have a private conversation. They clearly excluded even our state elected officials. They didn't want them there, they wanted it to be a closed press and I was outraged… I wasn't getting any information out of them during the public session. So finally, I think it was 2023, I did a FOIA request to get all this information out of the county. "So I submitted a public records request and I got a data dump consisting of a ton of emails, PowerPoint presentation, PDF files and Word documents about exactly what happened in this meeting. And so it's a lot of information which I finally put together in a kind of story form so we can follow along and see what really happened in that private meeting. Why was he here? And we answered that question." Becerra, as the FOIA'd documents show, came to Butte County determined to figure out how to get more kids in Butte County as well as neighbouring counties injected with the mRNA Covid-19 shots. Why were pediatricians invited to the meeting? Becerra wanted to hear from them why so few parents brought their 5 to 11 year olds to Butte County's mass vaccination clinics and why pediatricians didn't inject the kids themselves right in their practices. HHS Used the "Minority Health Social Vulnerability Index" to Target Regions With Low Injection Rates Exactly one month after Becerra visited Butte County, he explained how HHS officials targeted specific regions during the Pandemic. Becerra made those revealing comments during what was called the "White House Convening on Equity" event on April 14, 2022: "We established a Minority Health Social Vulnerability Index. A vulnerability index which helps us collect data, good quality data with a better collection methodology so we could actually figure out where we needed to go rather than wait for you to come to us." 1 That's how HHS officials discovered that little Butte County, rural and conservative leaning, had California's lowest injection rate for children . What they also discovered was that among the overall low injection rate of kids in Butte County and surrounding counties, Hispanic and Native American kids had even lower injection rates than white kids. That's why HHS officials zeroed in on minority kids and invited mainly those pediatricians to the meeting who practiced in areas with high percentages of minority kids. They were singled out among the singled out ones under the disguise of "Health Equity." The whole story of the meeting and its sinister consequences unfolds in all its banal evil in the email chain below. There were many additional documents in the FOIA dump that Julie received and in the second part of the interview we'll go over some of those. CHAPTERS 02:08 Secret Visit Of HHS Secretary Becerra To Chico 06:08 Filing The FOIA Request About Becerra's Butte County Meeting 17:34 Butte County Flagged For Lowest Pediatric Covid Vaccination Rates 23:45 Targeting Children Through Schools And Pediatric Provider Enrollment Barriers 31:55 Public Health Language About "Targeting This Population" 33:20 Shifting Focus From Chico To Oroville As An "Equity Focused" Rural Target Area 35:41 Equity Framing, NAACP, Hmong Community, And Selecting Specific Parent Groups 39:13 Strategy Pivot: Secret Pediatric Roundtable In Chico And Excluding Broader Public 49:00 Scramble To Recruit Select Pediatricians And List Of Participating Clinics 52:09 Focus On Native American And Underserved Clinics As Key Vaccination Channels 1:00:04 Notifying California Health Chief Mark Ghaly And Framing Shots As "Vital Resource" 1:08:02 Last-Minute Sunday Email To Assemblyman Gallagher Offering Only A Readout 1:11:51 Post-Event Thank-You Email: Accepting Becerra's "Challenge" And Next-Step Plan 1:13:51 FEMA-Funded Follow-Up: Office Of Health Equity, Commander Matthew Johns

"We have this old order, that's the old system that came into existence after the Second World War. And now we will crash it so that we can install the new system in the end." Jacob Nordangård https://flashlightsproductions.substack.com/p/catalysts-of-change-ai-crises-women This is the second part of my interview with Jacob Nordangård about the just released English edition of his book "The Digital World Brain." CHAPTERS 00:05 Fear and Crisis as Tools for Global Transformation 01:38 Politicians Are Obsolete: The AI God and the New System 03:15 The Elite Hierarchy and the Pact With the Devil 04:19 Controlling Youth and Speaking for Unborn Generations 05:56 Manufacturing Emergencies: Their Bread and Butter 08:14 The Global Emergency Platform and Automated Crisis Response 12:17 Unleashing Simultaneous Crises to Force Reform 13:01 Trump: Crashing the Old World Order 14:24 The Great Transition Initiative and the General Emergency 15:54 Transhumanism, the World Future Society, and Perfecting Humans 17:11 The Millennium Project: Rewriting Human Rights for Cyborgs and AI 18:59 Women as Pawns: The Fifth Commitment in Our Common Agenda 20:42 Female Psychopathy and the Anti-Human Agenda 26:53 Sweden's Feminist Foreign Policy and Its NATO Contradiction 31:11 WEF Young Global Leaders: The Feminization of Power 33:54 Peter Thiel and the Antichrist Lectures in Rome 35:25 Who Is the Antichrist? Thiel's War on AI Regulation 37:10 Deception, False Gods, and the Digital Control System 38:52 Thiel Inside the Machine: Bilderberg, Rockefeller, Kissinger 40:55 The American Friends of Bilderberg and the Superclass 42:43 Thiel's Self-Contradiction: Naming the Beast He Builds 44:36 Factions and Rifts: Stable Coins vs. Sustainability 45:56 Trump, Energy Deregulation, and the Data Center Buildout 48:18 What Can People Do? Awareness, Non-Compliance, Resistance 53:23 Use Cash, Refuse the Real ID, Don't Comply 54:01 Havel's Power of the Powerless: Living Without Lies 55:28 Never Forget: The Elites Are Just Morons RESOURCES To buy Nordangård's book: https://pharosmedia.se/shop#!/english His Substack: The Pharos Chronicles Our Common Agenda Pact for the Future

"They don't need a man like Epstein anymore because they will have a digital world brain that will know everything about everyone." Jacob Nordangård https://flashlightsproductions.substack.com/p/what-the-transnational-elite-is-doing?utm_source=youtube This is the first part of my interview with Jacob Nordangård about the just released English edition of his book "The Digital World Brain." Nordangård presents a plethora of evidence that the transnational elite is building a global AI-driven governance system via their proxies United Nations, the World Economic Forum, UN member states and and a myriad of other entities. The digital world brain runs on data. The more information it has, the better it can control people. Look at, for example, the Trump administration's Stargate project: its purpose is to build the infrastructure for an enormous digital control system that will eventually contain and run on massive amounts of data. And that's why thousands of new data centers are built in America right now. CHAPTERS 0:03:07 Andre Hoffmann and the Transnational Elite 0:07:11 Elites' View of Humanity: "Bad Case of Homo Sapiens" 0:09:09 What Is the Digital World Brain? Data, AI, Control 0:14:07 Trump, Operation Warp Speed, and System Reset 0:15:34 Putin, Xi, BRICS, and the Pact for the Future 0:18:55 UN, Global Conflicts, and a Shared Control Agenda 0:25:24 The 12 Commitments of "Our Common Agenda" 0:28:11 UN–WEF Partnership, Epstein, and Rockefeller Links 0:35:19 "Our Common Agenda" Website and Guterres' "Vision" 0:39:53 Pandemic as Trigger to Upgrade Global Governance 0:49:03 "Leave No One Behind" and "Protect Our Planet" 0:52:56 "Build Trust," Infodemics, and Censoring Dissent 0:58:04 "We Own the Science": UN Partners with Google 1:01:02 Global Digital Compact and Total Digitization 1:06:26 Every Action Counts: Social Credit and Behavior Control 1:07:06 Nudging, Sludging, and Phasing Out Cash 1:12:29 CBDCs, Stablecoins, and Programmable Money 1:17:06 Net Zero Finance and Capital Flow Enforcement 1:20:26 From Nation-States to Regions and a Borderless Elite RESOURCES Here you can get Nordangård's book: https://pharosmedia.se/shop#!/english

"Before I clicked send, I looked up & said: "Lord, what are they going to do to me when I send them this email?" And I felt the Lord speak into my spirit: "What am I going to do to you if you don't?" *** When Covid hit, Ronald F. Owens Jr. worked for California's Department of Public Health (CDPH) as a so-called Information Officer 2. His job was to handle media requests related to programs like the Center for Environmental Health, the Center for Family Health and Health Equity. He resigned from CDPH at the end of 2023. In 2024, he published the book "Muzzled Truth: How The California Department of Public Health Rejected COVID-19 Treatment and Vaccine Health Risks Warnings." Owens Recommends the Use of Ivermectin to His Bosses at CDPH In October 2021, Owens received an internal CDPH email asking him to review a draft website created to warn Californians about the "misuse" of ivermectin in treating COVID-19. Rather than rubber-stamping the draft, Owens spent five days researching the topic, consulting knowledgeable friends and drawing on testimony by Dr. Pierre Kory, who successfully treated over 8,000 COVID patients with ivermectin. Owens then sent his carefully crafted email to senior leadership at California's Department of Public Health, arguing that properly dosed ivermectin should be regarded and endorsed as a viable treatment option for Californians. His bosses at CDPH were displeased - that was not at all the kind of answer they had expected. Owens was told that his opinion was not relevant since he wasn't a physician. In addition, he was told that it's the FDA that makes treatment decisions, not CDPH. And lastly he was told that he should never again include senior leadership in such emails. You wonder why they asked him to comment on the website draft in the first place. Apparently, all they wanted from him was to go along and applaud the website draft about the "misuse" of Ivermectin. That clearly was what those further up expected from employees at California's Department of Public Health. If California's Department of Health Had Endorsed Ivermectin as Treatment Option… Imagine for a moment what the effect had been if CDPH had endorsed the use of ivermectin to treat Covid-19. Given California's 40 million residents and CDPH's outsized influence among America's state health departments, a single honest press release about ivermectin would have sent shockwaves across the entire country and could have saved countless lives. Would CDPH have been within its rights to endorse ivermectin despite the fact that the CDC didn't? Yes. Just look at how CDPH defied the new Covid-19 recommendations issued by the FDA and CDC last year and how it continued to recommend regular Covid booster shots for everyone above the age of 6 months. Unfortunately, on March 16, District Court Judge Brian Murphy of Massachusetts issued a preliminary injunction that rolled back all of RFK Jr.'s vaccine policy changes - including the changed Covid-19 injection recommendations. Owens Alerts the CDPH about the Death Toll of the Covid Shots In April 2022, Owens came across a quote from then HHS Secretary Xavier Becerra at a White House "Convening on Equity," in which Becerra appeared to say that COVID-19 shots were "killing people of color… at about two times the rate of white Americans." Owens also reviewed VAERS data showing 26,976 deaths across the U.S. attributed to COVID-19 vaccines at that time. On April 18, 2022, he sent another email to his bosses at California's Department of Public Health alerting them to the horrific death toll of the Covid-19 shots as well as the many serious injuries like strokes, seizures, and heart attacks. Again, management dismissed his concerns. When Owens persisted with his warnings, they issued him a formal counseling memorandum warning him to stop. CDPH Orders Owens to End his Thoughtcrimes The counseling memorandum Owens received was rather Orwellian in nature. He was ordered to correct his wrongthink without delay: "This memo is further intended to direct you in immediately correcting this concern." "This concern" was Owen's concern about the almost 30,000 deaths as well as the huge number of serious injuries doctors and nurses had recorded in VAERS as caused by the Covid shots. By then he knew for sure that he was going to face disciplinary measures. Sooner or later his superiors would dock his pay. He also knew that CDPH would never take his warnings and recommendations seriously. That is why he decided to retire at the end of 2023, years earlier than he would have otherwise. Alerting All 58 California's Boards of Supervisors of Covid Shot Deaths and Injuries After retirement, Owens decided he needed to notify all of California's 58 county governments of the many deaths and injuries the Covid-19 shots caused in California. Why? The plan is to deny county supervisors plausible deniability regarding the immense harms the injections cause. Without plausible deniability, Californian supervisors can be held legally responsible at some point for not having done anything to stop the shots. He told me: "The California Department of Public Health has a partnership with the counties and I'm performing my public information officer role by informing the counties about the danger of the COVID-19 vaccine. When I finish what I'm doing, every county, all 58 counties will have three written notifications: one from July 2024, and one from December 2024. At the time that I appear [before a Board of Supervisors], I follow up by sending them a third email… So each county will have three written notifications and one in-person appearance per county. I'm providing documentation for somebody in the future to hold these public officials accountable legally." When I interviewed him, he had already spoken in front of 51 Boards of Supervisors and was getting ready for a long trip on his motorbike to speak in front of the 52nd one. CHAPTERS 0:00:05 Ronald's CDPH Role and Book 0:05:39 CDPH Growth and Clout 0:13:10 Budget, Scale, and Reach 0:15:01 Website Image and DEI 0:19:15 Measles vs Vaccine Deaths 0:22:39 State vs Federal Power 0:37:02 The Ivermectin Email 0:51:39 Inside CDPH During COVID 1:06:20 Ronald's Vaccine Warning Email 1:17:51 Becerra's "Equity" Remarks 1:25:20 Hospital Protocols and Harm 1:36:20 County Board "Odyssey" 1:53:25 Retirement and Ongoing Mission RESOURCES Muzzledtruth.com Ronald Owens Featured on Sharyl Attkisson's Full Measure Motorcyclist Warns CA County Sups About COVID-19 Vaccine Risks Fresno County Board of Supervisors Informed on 8/19/25 About COVID-19 Shot Injuries & Deaths 'Why Are We Not Stopping the Shots,' Sac County Supervisor Sue Frost Asks White House Convening on Equity - YouTube Holy Spirit Inspired me to Sing 'Glory Hallelujah' Worship Song - Ronald Owens

"I witnessed 43,000 people get shot with poison… It weighs heavy on my heart but it fuels me." —Julie Threet https://flashlightsproductions.substack.com/p/when-bla-licensure-becomes-a-deadly Throughout 2021, Julie Threet worked as a volunteer at the largest mass vaccination center in the city of Chico in Butte County, California. She was fired at the beginning of January 2022 because she refused to receive a booster shot. In our interview, she describes in detail the center's daily operations and how she turned from trusting the shots to fearing them to tirelessly advocating for their removal from the market. Until today, Julie has warned about the injections over a hundred times in front of 33 different Californian County Boards of Supervisors. CHAPTERS 0:01:08 Setting the Scene: Life in Butte County, California and Julie's Move to Chico 0:01:48 Julie's Background: From Silicon Valley HR Executive to Chico Community Activist 0:04:39 Early Local Activism: Fighting Syringe Distribution in Chico Parks 0:05:54 Character of Butte County: Rural Economy, Disasters, and Community Response 0:07:46 Volunteering at Enloe Medical Center: Role as Patient Ambassador 0:09:05 Enloe as Largest Employer: Comparison with White Plains Hospital and Local Economies 0:10:07 Enloe's History, Foundation, Political Ties, and Influence in Butte County 0:14:48 Volunteers and Covid: Being Sent Home and Inconsistencies in Risk Logic 0:18:42 Arrival of Covid Vaccines and Creation of Mass Vaccination Clinics in Chico 0:23:35 Inside the Draw Room: Storage, Thawing Protocols, and Handling of Moderna Vials 0:31:56 Time, Temperature, and Potential Degradation of Vaccine Doses 0:35:00 Julie's Own Moderna Shots: Arm Reactions, Brain Fog, and Discovery of Brain Lesion 0:40:19 Neurologist Visit, Microangiopathy Diagnosis, and Lack of Linkage to Vaccines 0:42:51 The Whiteboard System: Lot Numbers, Daily Dose Targets, and Throughput Tracking 0:47:38 Appointment System, Age/Occupation Tiers, and Daily Volume per Clinic Day 0:48:43 Funding and Incentives: State Money, Brewery Donations, and Becerra's Grants 0:50:00 Early Manual Data Entry: Paper Forms, Missing Records, and Error Potential 0:53:24 Transition to Tablets: Capturing Dose Details and Lot Numbers Digitally 0:55:47 California's Immunization Registry and Digital Vaccine IDs 1:00:00 State and Federal Data Flows: How Vaccination Statistics Are Built and Used 1:02:53 Comparing Butte vs Santa Clara: Vaccination Rates and Covid Case/Death Rates 1:05:22 Countywide Lot Tracking: FOIA Data on Doses per Lot in Butte County 1:08:05 Manufacturing and Distribution Patterns: Fragmented Lots and Concealment of Harm 1:10:00 Moderna Lot Recall in California and Butte County's Failure to Notify Recipients 1:12:16 Political, Financial, and Institutional Pressures in Butte County Public Health 1:15:23 Conservative Politics, Medical Establishment Power, and Captured Officials 1:18:54 Weekly Testing Pavilion: Segregating Unvaccinated Staff 1:32:00 Mass-Vaccination Floor Layout: Nurse Stations, Patient Flow, and "Disneyland Line"

"This evidence, it was like a light bulb for me when I saw this transcript." —Sasha Latypova   This is the third, the last and, I believe, the most revealing part of my interview with Sasha Latypova about CHD's Citizen Petition to revoke BLA status from Pfizer's and Moderna's Covid-19 shots.   ***   What Was the Purpose of Submitting All These Nonsensical Studies? The purpose, Latypova says, was to "just produce a pile of paper to say, 'we did a lot of things and yeah, maybe it's not totally complete, but it's mostly good.'" It was all for show. The goal was to get the toxic Covid-19 shots into the bodies of hundreds of millions of Americans without any accountability from manufacturers and federal agencies. To reach that goal, the federal government, in collaboration with the pharmaceutical industry, media and big tech, stripped citizens of their civil rights, lied blatantly to the public, deceived the public and forced millions of Americans to be injected. The studies shown are just a few examples among many. In its Citizen Petition, Children's Health Defense goes over lots of other such studies that show no compliance whatsoever with biologic licensing standards. BLA approval was granted to Moderna (and also to Pfizer) on the basis of piles of paper that really were piles of sh*t. Misbranding is way too nice a word for this crime.   CHAPTERS 0:00:05 FDA–Operation Warp Speed meeting and shift to EUA pathway 0:02:52 IND filings, non‑investigational "countermeasures" route, "magic leap" 0:05:20 Legal meaning of IND and investigational status 0:08:28 Introduction to Moderna's nonclinical program: Judicial Watch FOIA records 0:09:54 Non‑GLP pharmacology studies and NIH involvement 0:11:34 Flawed biodistribution study: wrong product, non‑GLP, male‑only rats 0:15:52 Toxicology with non‑representative mRNAs 0:18:21 Systemic BLA non‑compliance and objectives of the citizen petition 0:21:07 PREP Act as governing law & misbranding argument 0:26:23 Informed consent, PREP Act, RFK Jr's role & doctors' ethical dilemma

"What you see is the more children 10 to 14 were injected, the more women died of cancers overall in 2021 compared to the previous year." Hervé Seligmann This is my second interview with biologist Dr. Hervé Seligmann. He has held academic positions at Aix-Marseille University, University of Oslo, Louisiana State University, the University of Chicago, and the Hebrew University of Jerusalem. *** Strong Positive Correlations between Teenage Vaccination Rates and Increased Death Rates in Adult Females About a year ago, Seligmann discovered the University of Washington's Global Health Data Exchange (GHDx). This database, maintained by the University's Institute for Health Metrics and Evaluation (IHME), contains the world's most comprehensive health and demographic data from 1980 to the present. Seligmann said: "For around 200 countries and around 200 or more diseases, they give you the death rates and the yearly incidences of all of these diseases for each country and also by sex and by age classes." When Seligmann discovered this rich data depository in early spring 2025, data were available only until 2021. He found that strange but was nonetheless happy to have at least data for 2020 and 2021. He downloaded the death rates for 2020 and 2021 from 26 countries for about 60 types of diseases - cancers as well as cardiovascular, neurological and gastroenterological diseases - and he also downloaded the injection rates cumulated over the previous month up to mid 2021 for each of the age classes provided. Then he checked for correlations and found strong positive ones between teenage vaccination rates, in particular for ages 10 to 14, and increased death rates from almost all cancer and disease types in adult females - with virtually no such correlation in adult males. CHAPTERS 0:00:04 – Intro and Herve Seligmann's background 0:02:30 – Using GHDx global health data 0:07:59 – Teen injections vs spike in female cancer deaths (2021) 0:11:30 – Interpreting the female-only signal and shedding hypothesis 0:22:30 – Data for 2020–2021 changes between spring and autumn 2025 0:27:35 – Can these updated datasets still be trusted? 0:39:56 – 2022–2023: shifting from shedding to direct injection effects 0:45:22 – "Priming" idea: injections heighten response to later shedding 0:51:31 – Ongoing boosters in older people vs dropping uptake in teens 1:07:26 – Organ-specific cancer deaths vs Pfizer biodistribution data 1:19:40 – Summary: vaccines as main driver, mechanisms remain complex RESOURCES Google Scholar - Hervé Seligmann COVID Vaccination and Age-Stratified All-Cause Mortality Risk, 2025-09-17 ScholarGPS Global Health Data Exchange, University of Washington

"Vaccines can reach the arms of Americans under investigational or non-investigational pathways that are separate and distinct." —Citizen Petition Regarding Covid-19 Vaccine Licensure https://flashlightsproductions.substack.com/p/how-the-fda-lied-to-the-american?utm_source=youtube This is the second part of my interview with Sasha Latypova in which we discuss the petition's arguments in detail. The petition was filed in December 2025 by Children's Health Defense to request that the FDA revoke the Biologics License Application approvals (BLAs) for the Pfizer and Moderna Covid-19 shots. Latypova wrote extensive parts of the petition. THE PETITION'S CORE LEGAL ARGUMENT Products developed under Emergency Use Authorization (EUA) cannot simply be granted Biologics License Applications (BLAs). It's like declaring sewage to be water. But the FDA retroactively granted Pfizer's and Moderna's mRNA Covid-19 vaccines full BLA approval they never legally earned. Therefore, the citizen petition argues, these products have been misbranded. Misbranding is not a minor infraction, Sasha Latypova told me, but a federal crime that can trigger seizure, injunction, criminal penalties, and license revocation. WHY IS MISBRANDING SUCH A BIG DEAL? It's a long and difficult process to obtain BLA approval from the FDA. Under section 351 of the Public Health Service Act, FDA may approve a BLA only if the vaccine is shown to be safe, pure, and potent for its intended use. In addition, it must be manufactured in facilities that consistently meet regulatory standards. Usually, it takes many years to obtain BLA approval. CHAPTERS 0:00:05 Citizen Petition Overview and Claim of Vaccine Misbranding 0:01:38 FDA's Original Mandate: Misbranding, Adulteration, Interstate Commerce 0:02:35 Federal vs State Authority and Possibility of State‑Level Divergence 0:05:04 Misbranding as a Serious Federal Crime and FDA's Dormant Powers 0:05:36 Investigational vs Non‑Investigational (EUA) Pathways 0:09:02 PREP Act Origins and Congressional Justification for EUA Countermeasures 0:13:08 No True Clinical Trials: EUA Products and "The Trial Charade" 0:14:46 Brooke Jackson's Case 0:22:59 Media Framing: "Technicalities" vs Binding Law on Labeling and Pathways 0:27:39 Core Demands of the Petition: Revoke BLAs, Re‑Designate as EUA Products 0:29:43 Informed Consent, Nuremberg Legacy, and the Missing IRB Oversight 0:32:45 EUA Products Cannot Be Mandated – Yet Mandates Were Imposed Anyway 0:34:53 EUA Suspends FDCA Safeguards: cGMP Deviations and Non‑Regulation 0:39:56 Expiration Date Extensions and the 2069 Pfizer Lot Anomaly 0:48:46 Comparing BLA Standards vs EUA: Safety, Purity, Potency, Sterility, Identity 0:54:31 Manufacturing Process Validation and Extreme Lot‑to‑Lot Variability 1:05:30 Petition's Legal Conclusion on FDA Violations

"When we neither punish nor reproach evildoers, we are not simply protecting their trivial old age. We are thereby ripping the foundations of justice from beneath new generations." —Alexander Solzhenitsyn, The Gulag Archipelago For the entire post, click here: https://flashlightsproductions.substack.com/p/deadly-chain-of-command-from-federal Few Americans Know About the Extent of Medical Murders During Covid This is the third and last part of my interview with Ken McCarthy, author of 'What the Nurses Saw - An Investigation Into Systemic Medical Murders That Took Place in Hospitals During the COVID Panic.' It's almost exactly six years since the start of the Covid-19 Pandemic. But way too few people in America know about the extent of the systemic medical murders that the nurses saw. His book, McCarthy told me, is a witness to the crimes that happened during the Pandemic: "If you witness a crime, if you witness somebody being abused, you're sort of obligated as a human being to try to interfere or at a minimum report it to somebody who can intervene and help. So that's the function of this book. It exists. People do read it. It's slowly moving its way through the world. And I hope more and more people become aware of it, become aware of the stories so that they can protect themselves." Medicine's Return to the Middle Ages McCarthy is convinced that medicine is firmly back in the Middle Ages. Back then, he said, there were "a lot of insane medical practices and they were validated or authorized by the ultimate authority, which happened to be the Catholic Church… We are literally back to where medicine is being authorized and promulgated [by an entity] that has nothing to do with medicine, has nothing to do with science, has nothing to do with public health. It is simply a directive from the most powerful forces in the society, which now are the federal governments." Remdesivir Approved for Prematurely Born Babies Remdesivir, one of Fauci's pet drugs, is a good example of such insane practices not rooted in science. Nurses nicknamed Remdesivir 'Run! Death Is Near.' The drug, which is known for its extreme toxicity - it leads to kidney failure among a host of other adverse events - received Emergency Use Authorization (EUA) in April 2020, followed by FDA approval in October 2020 but limited to children older than eleven years. One month later, in November 2020, the WHO advised against the use of Remdesivir for Covid-19 patients. The drug was subsequently discontinued in Europe. But not in America. Not to this day. In the United States, the drug remained under Emergency Use Authorization for children younger than 12 until spring 2022 when it received FDA approval for pediatric use for all children older than 27 days. Yes, you read that right: days. CHAPTERS 0:00:05 Remdesivir's EUA and FDA approval 0:01:30 Remdesivir for Premature Babies 0:03:14 Profits, Fauci, and federal drug royalties 0:05:27 Veklury patient marketing 0:07:22 Modern medieval medicine 0:09:19 Federal protocols & the hospital chain of command 0:13:28 Whistleblower nurses, firings, and blacklisting 0:17:57 The need for medical advocates 0:22:13 Nurse–doctor hierarchy and lost collaboration

"If you're a health monitoring agency like the CDC, it's your job to look at the thing that's staring you right in the face." —John Beaudoin https://flashlightsproductions.substack.com/p/more-than-250000-excess-renal-failure?utm_source=youtube In this third and last part of my interview with John Beaudoin, we're looking at CDC's data for acute kidney or renal failure deaths from 2018 until 2025. For years, Beaudoin has been sounding the alarm about a staggering increase in acute kidney failure deaths beginning in 2020 - but he got little traction. One reason is that these deaths are not apparent when researchers exclusively use Underlying Cause of Death (UCoD) in their analysis of CDC's mortality data. CHAPTERS 0:00:05 Why Acute Renal Failure Matters Now 0:00:31 Death Certificates: Underlying vs Multiple Causes 0:01:25 Acute Renal Failure Deaths 2018–2025: The Spike 0:03:14 Excess Deaths and Life-Years Lost 0:07:20 Renal Failure vs Myocarditis: What's Bigger? 0:09:12 Young People and Acute Renal Failure 0:10:36 20-Year Trends and the Male–Female Split 0:14:22 What Could Be Driving the Renal Failure Surge? 0:17:28 Are Recording Practices Skewing the Data? 0:20:43 What This Data Can — and Cannot — Tell U

"The ideal solution achieves the same result as mass murder (the removal of undesirable elements from society), but without any of the moral stigma." —Curtis Yarvin, 2008 https://flashlightsproductions.substack.com/p/peter-thiels-house-philosopher-proposed?utm_source=youtube "Our goal, in short, is a humane alternative to genocide. That is: the ideal solution achieves the same result as mass murder (the removal of undesirable elements from society), but without any of the moral stigma. Perfection cannot be achieved on both these counts, but we can get closer than most might think. The best humane alternative to genocide I can think of is not to liquidate the wards — either metaphorically or literally — but to virtualize them. A virtualized human is in permanent solitary confinement, waxed like a bee larva into a cell which is sealed except for emergencies. This would drive him insane, except that the cell contains an immersive virtual-reality interface which allows him to experience a rich, fulfilling life in a completely imaginary world." —Curtis Yarvin, 2008 YARVIN's VISION Why, I asked Patrick Wood during our interview about his latest book 'The Final Betrayal: How Technocracy Destroyed America'', would anyone care what Curtis Yarvin thinks?  Turns out we should care a lot since Peter Thiel regards Yarvin as his 'House Philosopher.' And Thiel is not the only one among the billionaire technocrats who has taken a liking to the philosophy of Dark Enlightenment. But does Thiel share Yarvin's vision of a 'humane alternative to genocide'? Maybe. It certainly doesn't bode well that NYT podcaster Ross Douthat had to ask him three times during an interview last year if Thiel wanted humanity to continue. H e got only silence as response until, when asked with much urgency, for a third time, Thiel relented with a 'Yes, but…' The 'but' was: let them survive - but not without some desperately needed technical enhancements inside their bodies and brains. CHAPTERS 0:00:04 – Intro, Curtis Yarvin "Humane Alternative to Genocide" Passage   0:01:41 – Who Is Curtis Yarvin? Dark Enlightenment and Silicon Valley Influence   0:08:56 – Peter Thiel's Role: Funding Yarvin, Technocracy, and Monopoly Mindset   0:14:03 – Post‑9/11 Surveillance, Total Information Awareness, and Birth of Palantir   0:17:40 – Democracy vs Freedom? Thiel, Yarvin, and Technocratic Alternatives   0:23:17 – "You Will Own Nothing and Be Happy": Virtual Bubbles and WEF‑Style Dystopia   0:30:15 – Monarch CEO, Sovereign Corporations, and the End of Private Property   0:32:48 – AI as De Facto Ruler: Centralized Data, Palantir, and Weaponized Governance   0:43:53 – Bilderberg Power: Thiel, Karp, AI Agendas, and Choosing Leaders   0:46:13 – Technocracy as an Economic System: Eliminating Politics and Politicians   0:50:43 – Trump, Technocrats in DC, and Yarvin's RAGE Doctrine (Retire All Government Employees)   0:54:22 – Marxism, Bolshevism, Nazi Germany, China: Historical Roots of Technocratic Control   1:02:11 – AI as New Religion: AI God, Thiel's Antichrist Lectures, and Inverted Theology   1:06:40 – Data Centers, Compute, and Building a Global AI Control Infrastructure   1:18:13 – Why Harvest All This Data? From Wearables and Smartphones to Total Control   1:21:32 – Politicians Behind the Curve and AI's Rapid Capture of Government   1:26:29 – Will the AI Bubble Burst? Societal Strain vs Oligarchs' Race to Finish   1:32:44 – COVID‑19, Lack of Accountability, and the Illusion of Rights in a Technocratic Order   RESOURCES Patrick Wood: The Final Betrayal: How Technocracy Destroyed America https://www.amazon.com/Final-Betrayal-Technocracy-Destroyed-America/dp/B0GD2LCBSB/ref=sr_1_1?s=books&sr=1-1 Patrick Wood's Technocracy News: https://www.technocracy.news/ Nick Land: The Dark Enlightenment https://www.amazon.com/Dark-Enlightenment-Imperium-Press/dp/192260268X/ref=sr_1_1?sr=8-1 Curtis Yarvin/Mencius Moldbug: Patchwork: A Political System for the 21st Century https://www.unqualified-reservations.org/2008/11/patchwork-2-profit-strategies-for-our/

Imagine the following: you wake up one morning to the news that the federal government declared sewage to be in compliance with the Safe Drinking Water Act (SDWA).  https://flashlightsproductions.substack.com/p/fdas-fraudulent-bla-approval-of-pfizers?utm_source=youtube *** It's all pretty confusing with these toxic mRNA Covid shots. At first they were under Emergency Use Authorization, then the FDA gave them BLA approval but continued to give the EUA shots for more than a year after BLA approval to most Americans. And what role does the PREP act play in all this? To quickly understand the basic concept of the BLA approval game that the FDA has played, imagine the following: you wake up one morning to the news that the federal government declared sewage to be in compliance with the Safe Drinking Water Act (SDWA). And the EPA has confirmed that sewage complies with the agency's established health-based standards for contaminants in public drinking water. You turn on your faucet. And, sure enough, sewage comes flowing out of it. If you decided to drink it, you wouldn't be able to sue the government when you get sick because sewage has been declared a medical countermeasure under the protection of the PREP act, granting freedom of liability to all municipalities, waterworks etc. in the entire country. This analogy only goes so far though: after all, before the government declared sewage to be compliant with the Safe Drinking Water Act, it didn't put sewage under some kind of Emergency Use Authorization and it didn't mandate you to drink it in order to keep your job. PS: This analogy is only meant to highlight the difference in regulatory pathways between EUA authorized and BLA licensed biologics. That's all. Because the BLA Covid shots are as toxic as the EUA shots. They served us sewage from the start. CHAPTERS 0:00:05 CHD's Citizen Petition To Revoke Pfizer And Moderna BLAs 0:05:07 Public Response And Record Comment Numbers 0:11:06 What Are Biologics? Basic FDA Categories 0:15:18 From Traditional Biologics To mRNA "Biologics" 0:21:52 NDA vs BLA And Biologics Carve‑outs 0:27:49 Biologics, Vaccines, And Industry Incentives 0:31:19 Growth Of Biologic Drugs And Vaccine Focus 0:31:41 EUA Timeline And 2021 BLA Approvals 0:33:45 Comirnaty Rollout In US vs Europe And Relabeling Claims 0:36:15 Confusion Among Public And Doctors About EUA vs BLA 0:37:28 FOIA Delays And EUA vs EAU Confusion 0:39:40 EUA As Countermeasure Outside Normal FDA Rules 0:43:42 Sewage vs Drinking Water Analogy For EUA vs BLA RESOURCES CHD's Citizen Petition: https://childrenshealthdefense.org/wp-content/uploads/FDA-2025-P-6831-0001_attachment_1.pdf Tell the FDA to Revoke Licenses on COVID Vaccines: https://childrenshealthdefense.org/community/tell-the-fda-to-revoke-licenses-on-covid-vaccines/ Sasha Latypova Breaking: Citizen Petition to the FDA filed by Children's Health Defense with my input. https://sashalatypova.substack.com/p/breaking-citizen-petition-to-the Biologics License Applications (BLA) Process (CBER): https://www.fda.gov/vaccines-blood-biologics/development-approval-process-cber/biologics-license-applications-bla-process-cber

"The link is gone. The paper has been pulled. But there's no information about it. Nothing. It's just gone." *** https://flashlightsproductions.substack.com/p/vanished-study-finds-synthetic-mrna An Israeli study titled 'Detection of Pfizer BioNTech Messenger RNA COVID-19 Vaccine in Human Blood, Placenta and Semen' was published by Gavin Publishers mid October 2025 and made headlines in independent media. However, the paper didn't see the light of day for long. In early December it vanished. It was not retracted, it just quietly disappeared without any explanation whatsoever. After my interview with Haviland, I discovered the paper on the Wayback machine as an archived snapshot from December 5, 2025, shortly before it disappeared: https://web.archive.org/web/20251205172931/https://www.gavinpublishers.com/assets/articles_pdf/Detection-of-Pfizer-BioNTech-Messenger-RNA-COVID-19-Vaccine-in-Human-Blood-Placenta-and-Semen.pdf CHAPTERS 0:00:56 Article Removal and Initial Reactions 0:01:57 Study Overview and Israeli Vaccination Context 0:04:27 Early Findings on mRNA Persistence 0:06:37 Groundbreaking Detection in Placenta 0:07:36 Nested PCR Method Explanation 0:10:29 Sample Collection Timeline 0:12:28 Delays in Publication and Data Analysis 0:15:31 Lipid Nanoparticles and Systemic Distribution 0:18:28 Detection Rates by Time Since Vaccination 0:23:33 Shedding Hypothesis and Children's Mortality Analysis 0:27:20 Vaccination Timing and Pregnancy Outcomes 0:32:07 mRNA Presence in Male Reproductive Cells 0:36:17 Correlation of Detection with Days Since Last Dose 0:37:04 Discussion: Transplacental Transfer and Limitations 0:40:15 Unusual Fetal Deaths and Placental Issues 0:41:07 PCR Method Limitations and Need for Further Research RESOURCES 'Detection of Pfizer BioNTech Messenger RNA COVID-19 Vaccine in Human Blood, Placenta and Semen' Laura Kasner's Substack: Clotastrophe

This is the third part of my interview with biologist Hervé Seligmann. "The structure of these biases is so complex: It's affected by age, by severity rank, it's for missing data, for publication delay. And it always goes in the same direction: hiding injury & death." - Seligmann We discuss how EuroMOMO and VAERS Hide excess deaths in children during the Covid years. CHAPTERS 0:00:05 Euromomo Data and Excess Children Mortality 0:02:31 Age Groups and Vaccine Rollout Timelines 0:03:14 Changing Data and Baseline Comparisons Over Time 0:06:09 Critique of Data Modeling and Information Confusion 0:12:10 Analysis of CDC State-Level Excess Mortality and VAERS Correlations 0:17:03 Missing Data Issues in VAERS Reports 0:20:00 Bias in Administrative Handling of Vaccine Adverse Event Reporting 0:24:30 Evidence of Hiding Severe Harms in Children's Vaccine Reporting 0:32:11 Preview of Upcoming Unpublished Results and Future Discussion RESOURCES Google Scholar - Hervé Seligmann COVID Vaccination and Age-Stratified All-Cause Mortality Risk, 2025-09-17 ScholarGPS Albert Benavides: VAERSAware EuroMOMO

The System That Made the Hospital Murders Possible and Declared Them Covid Deaths Is Still in Place Today. This is the second part of my interview with Ken McCarthy, author of the book 'What the Nurses Saw: An Investigation Into Systemic Medical Murders That Took Place in Hospitals During the COVID Panic.' Here is the first part. One thing that people should definitely take away from the Covid 'pandemic' is that governments should never be in charge of healthcare because this provides them with a potential tool of democide. A lavish incentive structure was created by the U.S. federal health agencies to boost Covid diagnoses and ensure that hospitals would follow the NIH issued treatment protocols which almost always ended in death. For his book 'What the Nurses Saw,' Ken did an in-depth interview with AJ DePriest who researched the treatment protocols' money trail. DePriest found that hospitals in all 50 states received massive payments for every single patient who was admitted to the hospital as a Covid case. No wonder, they'd run the PCR tests over and over again until they got a positive result. What's interesting is that the payout amount for hospital Covid cases varied dramatically from state to state with West Virginia leading them all with almost half a million of dollars paid to hospitals for each admitted case. CHAPTERS 0:00:05 Hospital COVID Payment Disparities Across States 0:01:25 Additional Financial Incentives and State Differences 0:02:30 Incentives for Admitting Medicaid and Medicare Patients 0:04:06 Socioeconomic Factors, High-Cost Patients, and Targeting 0:08:24 Emergency Use Authorization for COVID-19 Tests and Policy Impact 0:10:20 Profiteering from COVID Tests and Government Response 0:13:05 History of Military Involvement in Public Health 0:17:23 U.S. Defense Spending and Economic Implications 0:18:05 Ken's Book "Diabolical Errors" and Systemic Medical Issues 0:24:18 Regulatory Framework, Patient Bill of Rights, and Hospital Abuse RESOURCES Ken McCarthy: What the Nurses Saw: An Investigation Into Systemic Medical Murders That Took Place in Hospitals During the COVID Panic 'What The Nurses Saw' Website Ken McCarthy: Excerpts from Diabolical Errors: The Strange and Unsettling History of Vaccine Science (Medical System Corruption) Ken McCarthy: Fauci's First Fraud: The Foundation of Medical Totalitarianism in America (Medical System Corruption)

Many people believe that there were no excess deaths in the United States in 2020. But is this correct? https://flashlightsproductions.substack.com/p/deadly-hospital-protocols-caused?utm_source=youtube In this episode of my interview with John Beaudoin, we look at the CDC's mortality data from 2018 to 2023 to find out how many people died in 2020, the first Covid year and the last Covid vaccine free year, and compare those deaths with the ones in 2021.  "In keeping silent about evil, in burying it so deep within us that no sign of it appears on the surface, we are implanting it, and it will rise up a thousandfold in the future. When we neither punish nor reproach evildoers, we are not simply protecting their trivial old age, we are thereby ripping the foundations of justice from beneath new generations." ― Aleksandr I. Solzhenitsyn, The Gulag Archipelago 1918–1956 CHAPTERS 0:00:05 US Mortality Rate in 2020   0:00:53 Excess Deaths   0:02:02 Interpreting Death Data   0:02:29 Treatment Protocol Deaths   0:04:34 NIH's Hospital Treatment Guidelines   0:05:02 Vaccine Impact on Mortality   RESOURCES They Weren't Dying of COVID: A System Built to Kill | Ken McCarthy: https://flashlightsproductions.substack.com/p/they-werent-dying-of-covid-a-system The Code That Doesn't Exist: How CDC Disappears COVID Vaccine Deaths | John Beaudoin: https://flashlightsproductions.substack.com/p/the-code-that-doesnt-exist-how-cdc The Data Trick Masking a Surge in Kidney Failure Deaths | John Beaudoin: https://flashlightsproductions.substack.com/p/the-data-trick-masking-a-surge-in John Beaudoin's Substack: https://therealcdc.substack.com/ The Real CdC COVID: Facts for Regular People: https://www.amazon.com/Real-CdC-COVID-Regular-People/dp/B0CZMGB3R7/ref=sr_1_1?sr=8-1 Ken McCarthy: What the Nurses Saw, https://www.amazon.com/What-Nurses-Saw-Investigation-Corruption/dp/B0CPQVTDRT/ref=sr_1_1?sr=8-1 Albert Benavides website: https://www.vaersaware.com/

McCarthy is the author of the book 'What the Nurses Saw.' I asked him: "What do you think: In 50 years and 100 years, will anybody know that this happened?" This is the first part of a three part interview with author Ken McCarthy about his book "What the Nurses Saw: An Investigation Into Systemic Medical Murders That Took Place in Hospitals During the COVID Panic and the Nurses Who Fought Back to Save Their Patients." McCarthy, who became known in the 1990s for commercializing the internet and making crucial contributions to the development of online marketing, told me: "Specifically in the US, they incentivized a protocol which virtually guaranteed that people that came to the hospital with respiratory problems were going to die. Not everyone died, but over a million people died in US hospitals." And he adds: "It was systematized and it was incentivized by the federal government of the United States." One of the people that McCarthy interviewed for his book was AJ DePriest, a medical administrator and researcher who followed the money trail that led to the death of so many Americans. DePriest told him about the waivers that most people do not know about to this day. She told him that "CMS (Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services) issued a series of waivers in early 2020 that allowed hospitals to do things for which they would have been sued and had the funding guts ripped out of them if they had done these things before COVID." What kind of things did these waivers enable the hospitals to do? For example hiring doctors and nurses for ICU units who were in no way qualified to work there. Or banning family members from visiting their loved ones. Or suspending the Patients' Bill of Rights and not giving water and food to Covid patients. "They had nurses working in the ICUs that hadn't even gotten their nursing degree yet. They were still students," he said. The hospital death protocols were systematized via the regulatory frameworks of the PREP Act and Emergency Use Authorizations for the PRC Test, Remdesivir and ventilators. And they were executed through the command chain from federal health agencies to hospital conglomerates to hospital administrators and from there down to doctors and nurses. DePriest told McCarthy when he interviewed her for his book: "We started following the CARES Act money to see where it was going, and we followed it trickling down through Health and Human Services to, eventually, the NIH. We discovered that the NIH published their protocols for inpatient treatment of COVID. From there, we started documenting the medications that were listed in the NIH protocols: remdesivir, Actemra, dexamethasone, baricitinib." Doctors and nurses who didn't play along, lost their jobs. All the nurses McCarthy talked to for his book "What the Nurses Saw" were fired. But almost everyone complied with the protocols. Nurses from other states who applied to work where help was needed received salaries of $10,000 per week. They were hired by medical contractor companies who also made a killing by contracting the nurses. McCarthy learnt from AJ DePriest that the contracted nurses were paid by Homeland Security. He said: "And I guess there were big pots of money available in Homeland Security. And the way it worked was there were private contractors who would arrange for the labor. They would recruit and hire and deliver the workers. Homeland Security would pay those contractors and then the contractors would pay the nurses. So the money ultimately came from Homeland Security." How the Death Protocols Were Incentivized Deaths were incentivized through a plethora of payments and bonuses. McCarthy told me: "They created a financial incentive system that incentivized medical procedures that made no medical, scientific or logical sense that were unprecedented in the history of medicine… I think that's where the vast majority of people I say were killed." For example, hospitals received huge payments for simply admitting people as Covid cases. West Virginia topped all the states with almost half a million dollars payout per Covid case. Then there were payments for administering Remdesivir, intubating people and keeping them intubated for a long time. In fact, usually until death since almost everyone intubated died: "The federal government of the United States and the medical bureaucracy and what I call medical dictatorship decreed that A, hospitals would get paid if they put somebody in intubation and B, they'd get an additional bonus if they kept them on intubation for more than 96 hours." Remdesivir also usually ended in death. Nicole Sirotek, a Nevada based nurse who came to New York City in the spring of 2020, refused to give the drug to patients and that's why she was removed from the ICU of the hospital where she worked. McCarthy said: "She refused after a short time. She said, everybody we give this drug to dies. I'm not giving anybody else this drug anymore." Sirotek was fired - like everyone else who spoke out against the protocols and refused to go along. The carnage in the NYC hospitals was likely the worst in the entire country. Another nurse that McCarthy interviewed, Erin Olszewski, had come to NYC from Florida in March of 2020 and began working at the ICU at Elmhurst Hospital in Queens. Both Sirotek and Olzsewski told McCarthy that patients did not die from Covid but were killed by long periods of intubation and the drug Remdesivir. New York City's Role During The Pandemic According to McCarthy, NYC had two important roles during the so-called pandemic: It was the test case for the country - as Italy had been for Europe. And the many deaths in New York City were needed to whip the rest of America into a panic about the deadliness of Covid-19. What's interesting in this context is that Anthony Fauci, Ken McCarthy said, "not only had a direct line to the governor of the state of New York, he also had a direct line to many of the highest level medical people in Northern Italy based on the fact that so many of them received training at NIH, specifically with him because, you know, he's Italian American, they're Italian, and there was this natural affinity." Fauci did in fact maintain collegial relationships with many Italian infectious‑disease specialists. During COVID, Italian physicians in Lombardy, for example, consulted him. And Italy's president awarded him the Knight Grand Cross of the Order of Merit for his "exceptional career" and contribution to the COVID‑19 response. "So is it a coincidence that Northern Italy was the first place, and they would have been getting their advice personally, directly from Doctor Fauci?," McCarthy asked. Ken also told me that Fauci and the late NY Governor Mario Cuomo, the father of former NY Governor Andrew Cuomo, knew each other well: "Anthony Fauci and Mario Cuomo, the father, were very close. Anthony Fauci was friends of the Cuomo family for decades, and knew the boys, Andrew [and Chris]... Nobody knows this. And they were literally on the phone with Fauci on a daily basis." No Accountability For The Mass Killings In US Hospitals To this day, nobody has been held accountable for the murder of countless people in NYC hospitals and other US states. Not a single official of the federal government, not one member of the military or the medical establishment. It's not even a topic of discussion. Many Americans are probably unaware of what happened in the hospitals during Covid. So I asked McCarthy: "What do you think: In 50 years and 100 years, will anybody know that this happened?" His answer: "Well, if they read my book, they'll know… Which is one of my motivations for writing it. But there's a lot of things that happen in this world that are never documented. And that old saying: If a tree falls in the forest and no one is there to hear it, did it really fall? Does it matter?" CHAPTERS 0:05:04 Motivation Behind "What the Nurses Saw" 0:09:28 Twitter Suspension and Social Media Challenges 0:11:30 The Book's Timing and Institutional Neglect 0:13:49 Nurse Whistleblowers: Nicole Serotek and Erin Olszewski 0:15:33 Nicole's Viral Testimony: ICU Conditions and Advocacy 0:20:45 Medical Response Manipulation and Context of the Pandemic Spread 0:28:02 Unqualified Medical Staff and Government Waivers 0:29:11 Introduction to AJ DePriest: Financial Incentives and Waivers 0:34:20 Patient Rights Suspended: Hospital Waivers During COVID 0:39:13 Homeland Security, Private Contractors, and Staffing 0:44:32 Financial Incentives and Deadly Hospital Protocols 0:49:13 Remdesivir, Intubation, and Incentive Structures 0:55:53 Dangers and Improper Use of Invasive Ventilation 1:01:17 Emergency Use Authorizations and Ventilator Surge 1:03:50 Media Hysteria, Ventilator Demand, and Policy Connections 1:05:53 Anthony Fauci's Influence and the Italy Connection 1:06:58 International Ties and Political Factors in the Pandemic RESOURCES Ken McCarthy: What the Nurses Saw: An Investigation Into Systemic Medical Murders That Took Place in Hospitals During the COVID Panic 'What The Nurses Saw' Website Ken McCarthy: Excerpts from Diabolical Errors: The Strange and Unsettling History of Vaccine Science (Medical System Corruption) Ken McCarthy: Fauci's First Fraud: The Foundation of Medical Totalitarianism in America (Medical System Corruption)

"CDC is nefarious because they set up the system and they know there are a lot more deaths than they're telling the people through data." —John Beaudoin In this interview, John Beaudoin and I dive into the CDC's mortality database that is part of its WONDER platform and find things in there that are, well, wondrous. But only in the sense that what you find makes you wonder. And way more than that: what you find are glaring signs of something horrific being covered up. WONDER, in case you're wondering, is a web based public platform where anyone can query and download U.S. public-health data. The acronym stands for 'Wide-ranging ONline Data for Epidemiologic Research.' They must have started with the oh so cute acronym and then done some serious brainstorming to find a string of words to match. According to WONDER's mortality data, not one American died of adverse effects of the Covid-19 vaccines. Not a single one. Isn't that wonderful? VAERS, The CDC's Vaccine Adverse Event Reporting System is also part of WONDER. But according to VAERS, around 50,000 people so far died of the Covid-19 vaccines. And VAERS has an underreporting factor estimated to be something between 30 and 100. The number of vaccine related deaths exploded in VAERS in 2021 and is way higher than for all vaccine deaths taken together since 1990 when VAERS saw the light of the day. Now, how can it possibly be that there are no Covid-19 vaccine deaths to be found in the U.S. official mortality data and at the same time there are 50,000 Covid-19 vaccine deaths reported, mostly by healthcare professionals, in VAERS? It's simple. In January of 2021, the WHO issued new ICD-10 codes to cover the new mRNA Covid vaccines. And the code U12.9 was designated to be used for vaccine adverse events caused by them. ICD‑10 stands for 'International Classification of Diseases, Revision 10.' It's maintained by the World Health Organization. The ICD system is vast: it contains ~70,000 diagnosis codes, and about the same number of procedure codes. These standardized alphanumeric codes are used worldwide to classify diseases as well as causes of death for statistical and billing purposes. But when you search the CDC's WONDER database, there is not a single death listed under U12.9. In fact, it is impossible for a U12.9 coded death to exist in the WONDER database. And the reason for that is that the WONDER database does not contain the code U12.9 that the WHO especially issued in order for countries around the world to mark deaths as Covid-19 vaccine deaths. And not only that: none of the codes that the WHO added for Covid-19 are to be found in WONDER. Not one: not code U07.1 ('COVID-10, virus identified'), not code U07.2 ('COVID-19, virus not identified'), not code U08.9 ('Personal history of COVID-19, unspecified') and not code U09.9 ('Post COVID-19 condition, unspecified'). And because U12.9 is not in WONDER, health officials across the United States could proclaim that there was not a single Covid-19 vaccine death. For example, the chief of the Bureau of Statistics of New Hampshire said publicly without batting an eye that there are no Covid vaccine related deaths in New Hampshire, zero. But then, you ask, how are Covid-19 vaccine deaths coded if not with U12.9? Because there were some brave doctors who dared to list the mRNA vaccines as cause of death on the death certificate. Such deaths are coded with U12.9's parent code which is Y59.0. Which is meant to be used for adverse events of viral vaccines. Which the mRNA vaccines are not. Death by the mRNA Covid-19 vaccines were simply thrown in with viral vaccines. And thus it's impossible to distinguish whether death was caused by a viral vaccine or an mRNA vaccine. Well then, how many deaths are in WONDER for viral vaccines? And that's another miracle: Before Covid, almost none. That's right, according to U.S. mortality data, almost nobody in the United States died from vaccine adverse events pre-Covid. To be precise: 11 deaths between 1999 and 2020 were coded with Y59.0 as Underlying Cause of Death (UCoD). Eleven. About one every other year. If you run the same query for Multiple Cause of Death (MCoD), then you get 30 deaths (in case you're not familiar with the distinction between the two, watch my previous interview with John Beaudoin 'The Data Trick Masking a Surge in Kidney Failure Deaths.' The link is below under 'Resources'). Does that number match up with what is in VAERS? Of course not. However, in 2021 something extraordinary happens in WONDER: the viral vaccine deaths increase dramatically. In 2020, the number of deaths coded with Y59.0 was so small that it was suppressed in WONDER. For privacy reasons, numbers are not shown when they are between 1 and 9. In 2020, the number of deaths coded with Y59.0 was minuscule, something between 1 and 6. But in 2021, an absolutely astonishing number of deaths is coded with Y59.0: 195. More than all the deaths coded as viral vaccine deaths taken together in the years 1999 to 2020. Granted, the number is still ridiculously tiny but compared to the 0, 1 and 2 yearly deaths in 2020 and prior, it's virtually an explosion. This is a clear signal that something terrible happened in 2021. A signal that those running the CDC could not suppress entirely.   CHAPTERS 0:00:04 Introduction and Overview of ICD-10 Codes for COVID-19 Vaccines 0:01:25 International Use and Limitations of Code U12.9 0:02:02 Origin of Codes and WHO's Role 0:03:41 Coding Differences: Hospital vs. Death Records 0:05:50 Coding Challenges and the CDC's Role in the US 0:08:38 Centralized vs. Decentralized Death Certificate Coding (Germany vs. US) 0:10:22 Explanation of Y59.0 and Code Subcategories 0:11:51 Defining "Viral Vaccine": mRNA and Legal Perspectives 0:14:07 Legal Definitions and Public Perception of Vaccines 0:17:13 Parsing Errors and Misclassification on Death Records 0:18:30 Examining Data: Coding COVID-19 Vaccine Deaths 0:20:05 Historical Trends: Vaccine Death Reporting 1999–2020 0:21:49 Underlying vs. Multiple Causes of Death: CDC WONDER Query 0:24:50 Navigating CDC WONDER Query Options 0:31:15 Discrepancies Between Underlying and Multiple Cause Numbers 0:35:09 Coding Suppression and Data Editing Concerns 0:42:24 Comparing CDC Data with VAERS and VAERS-Aware Dashboard 0:44:04 Analysis of VAERS Reports: Deaths and Serious Adverse Events 0:46:47 Underreporting Factors and Regional Differences 0:48:23 Legal Risks, Advocacy, and Summary   RESOURCES: CDC WONDER John Beaudoin's Substack The Data Trick Masking a Surge in Kidney Failure Deaths | John Beaudoin

"The incentives drove the acute kidney injury. My graphs show that very clearly. The acute kidney injury has been around for years. They should have known it. I've been talking about it for three and a half years." — John Beaudoin *** John Beaudoin has been alerting the CDC and other health agencies about the catastrophic increase in renal failure deaths for more than three years. But he didn't get any interest from the CDC or any other federal health agency or scientists working for any such agency. He thinks, he said to me, that "it's purposeful that they haven't picked up on it. I think they know it and they're afraid because… I can show the timing to the week that this happened and it didn't happen with COVID. It happened with a human intervention, not just when the drugs were approved, but months later when the drugs were incentivized by the federal government with big, big piles of money." Incentivized drugs like Remdesivir that is known to cause kidney failure.  And incentivized devices like ventilators that were a death sentence for huge numbers of people who tested positive and were intubated unnecessarily. Both Remdesivir and ventilators were declared medical countermeasures covered under the PREP Act declaration for COVID-19 - and, shockingly, they still are to this very day.  When they cause death, nobody can be held responsible, nobody can be sued. Not the doctor, not the nurse, not the manufacturer - nobody. Beaudoin is in possession of 1.6 million non-redacted death certificates from the Covid years that he received through multiple FOIA requests. He read thousands of them and that's why he knows how doctors fill them out. Large numbers of death certificates, he told me, are filled out incorrectly or are incomplete. Beaudoin also knows which ICD-10 codes (International Classification of Disease) the death certificates came back with from the CDC's central parser and whether these codes correspond to what doctors or medical examiners wrote. And he understands how CDC analysts are hiding alarming signals in death records related to COVID treatment protocols and mRNA Covid shots. Mortality data in the CDC's WONDER database can be analyzed either by what is called 'Underlying Cause of Death' (UCoD), which is row D in Part 1 on American death certificates - or by 'Multiple Causes of Death' (MCoD) which are listed in Part 2. Analyzing mortality data by looking just at the UCoD doesn't give you a truthful picture of what drives mortality, he says: "I only track MCoD. I stopped using UCoD long ago when I recognized in the death records that it's not a fair and accurate representation and it could really mess up the signals." How can he be so sure that analyzing mortality records in the US based on the underlying cause of death is obscuring what people really die from? He said: "I'm the only one that has 1.6 million non-redacted death records where I can read what the death certifier wrote… I spent three and a half years [looking at them]. I've probably seen 10,000 and, from my experience, that's how I was able to determine the value and integrity of the data of UCoD. And there's not much value in it. There's not much value in it at all, which is why I stopped using it three years ago." However, CDC analysts and many other researchers, according to Beaudoin, use the Underlying Cause of Death to analyze causes of death and by doing so miss the real story. His prime example is the development of renal failure deaths in the United States: according to UCoD, renal failure deaths increased significantly in 2020 and again in 2021 and remained very high. However, this increase pales in comparison to the picture that emerges when MCoD is used to analyze death records: kidney failure exploded in the COVID years and far exceeds the increase shown by looking at UCoD alone. 0:00:05 Underlying and Multiple Causes of Death   0:00:36 Death Certificates and Data Integrity   0:01:12 Structure of US Death Certificates   0:02:23 Walking Through a Sample Death Certificate   0:06:22 Challenges with Properly Filling Death Certificates   0:09:00 CDC Coding Software and Issues with UCoD   0:12:00 Examples of Misrepresentation and Errors in Death Records   0:14:20 Influence of Doctor Habits and Patterns on Death Data   0:17:02 Handling Missing Values When Assigning UCoD   0:18:00 Data Integrity, State Variability, and UCoD vs. MCoD   0:21:30 Meaning of Multiple Causes of Death and Coding Implications   0:24:20 Acute Kidney Injury and Chronic Kidney Disease on Death Certificates   0:28:54 Epidemiological Trends—Increase in Kidney Failure Deaths   0:32:16 Data Analysis—MCoD vs. UCoD, Broader Implications   0:33:10 Reverse Chronology and Doctor Confusion in Death Certificates   0:34:31 ICD-10 and Data Systems 

Subscribe now Share In the second part of my interview with biologist Hervé Seligmann we talk about his analysis of New Zealand's health data records that were leaked in late 2023 by whistleblower Barry Young. Young worked as database administrator for New Zealand's health agency. He was arrested in December, 2023, and is facing 7 years in prison. When Seligmann analysed the leaked treasure trove of over 1 million health records, he found that the mRNA Covid "injections accelerate the annual mortality rate which you can call or interpret as the rate of aging." The data showed that the injections cause aging to accelerate by 2–3 times in people over 50 and that the death exponent increased from 0.07 to 0.11 after two doses. This finding, he told me, "might mean that your physiological age is...greater or you age physiologically faster than if you were not injected. That's very possible, but it's not 100% sure." Shedding effects are also a possibility, however: "The other thing is that we are shedding. It's possible that after two, three years, the non-injected get the same as the injected people… All these options are possible." Seligmann emphasizes he does not know how long accelerated aging and accelerated mortality rates will last: "I'm not sure that this effect is long term. It could be, but we don't have data like those from Barry Young for 2024 and 2025… It might be that there is no long-term effect and that you see an increased rate of death, an acceleration of aging for two or three years after the shots but not after five years and maybe not after 10 years." We also talked about the extreme unreliability of the PCR tests. In Luxembourg, someone very unusual was done with positive PCR tests: every single one of them was retested within 24 hours in Luxembourg's national reference lab. The population was not told about these mysterious retests for years. Using Luxembourg's version of a Freedom of Information request, a friend of Seligmann did eventually receive the retest results for his positive Covid tests: "And he saw that at least one, I don't remember, one or two of his tests were negative the next day or the same day. But he had been asked to stay 10 days at home and so on. So he was very angry: If someone knew that he was negative on the same day, [then] why did he stay 10 days at home twice?" Seligmann and his friend then asked all of their friends to submit freedom of information requests to the Luxembourg authorities to get their retest results: "And in the end, we had in total about 120 people who got that second result… So, on the background of a first positive test, we got a retest test and the retest was in over 80% of the second test negative." In September of 2022, they sent this result to all newspapers in Luxembourg as well as to Luxembourg's Supreme Court and to all members of the government. There was no reaction from anyone - silence from the media, the court and politicians: "We did not get any answer, any reaction from anyone… so it's like we didn't do it. Literally like we didn't do it. No one speaks about it." Another particularity in Luxembourg was that the delay between the first and second mRNA Covid injections was longer than in other countries. Seligmann told me, this longer window between successive injections might have resulted in fewer adverse events in Luxembourg: "It's strange that we have so few very bad...adverse effects in Luxembourg, relative to other countries." Perhaps, he said, officials intentionally delayed the second shot: "And maybe by precaution or because they knew, they tried to minimize the number of adverse events in Luxembourg, because we have, of course, adverse events, but not so many… If the delay is longer, that doesn't mean you won't have any adverse effects. You will simply have fewer." CHAPTERS 0:00:05 Accelerated Aging and Death Rates Linked to Injections 0:06:07 Discussion on Short- and Long-Term Effects of Injections 0:08:35 Barry Young, Data Leaks, and Legal Consequences 0:09:34 Reiner Fuellmich; PCR Testing in Luxembourg 0:13:36 Manipulation and Official Responses to PCR Data 0:16:16 Technical Discussion: PCR Testing Accuracy and Cycle Thresholds 0:21:06 Vaccination Timing, Adverse Events, and Data Sharing in Luxembourg 0:23:51 Presentation and Impact of Excess Mortality Data 0:26:18 Patterns in Mortality Spikes and Public Health Policies 0:29:09 Vitamin D and COVID-19 Severity 0:31:08 Hospital Treatment Practices and Vitamin D Deficiency 0:33:01 Low Mortality in Early 2020, Professor Homburg's Analysis, and Suppressed Data RESOURCES: Google Scholar - Hervé Seligmann COVID Vaccination and Age-Stratified All-Cause Mortality Risk, 2025-09-17 ScholarGPS

Subscribe now Share An Omnibus is a bus for everyone. You choose if you ride in it or not. An Omniwar is a war against everyone. You have no choice whether to be part of it or not. Omniwar's goal is to plug humanity into a technocratic system of control. In which ordinary humans have no say. It's a vertical war: Not between nations but between an uber-wealthy tech-elite and the rest of us. In my interview with renowned Swedish writer and researcher Jacob Nordangård we discuss the many facets of this dystopian type of creeping war we're finding ourselves in. Nordangård is the author of several books, among them 'Rockefeller: Controlling the Game' and 'The Global Coup d'Ètat: The Fourth Industrial Revolution and the Great Reset.' His newest book 'The Digital World Brain' will be published in early 2026. Omniwar, he says, manifests across many domains: Financial control, biosecurity, Agentic AI, cognitive warfare, digital surveillance, environmental control, food systems and reproduction control. Nordangård outlines the historical development that led to Omniwar: "It goes back to the 1930s and the technocratic movement. I think it could be even older than that. It's a society run by scientists and engineers. No politicians, no vote. It's a perfect system for control over people. People will just be cells in a kind of an organism with information about every man and woman to be retrieved immediately." We discuss the tech elites and their companies that are driving Omniwar. Why are so many of them now ensconced in the Trump administration? Why are they and President Trump gung-ho on building thousands of gigantic AI data centers that nobody wants except a minuscule elite? What is the real purpose of the massive half a trillion AI infrastructure project called Stargate? We talk about the neo-reactionary philosopher Nick Land and political theorist Curtis Yarvin whom tech moguls like Peter Thiel and others have embraced as their house philosophers. Land and Yarvin provide the philosophical underpinning and justification for Omniwar. Nick Land coined the expression 'Dark Enlightenment.' What is that? And what is 'Dark MAGA'? Understanding Omniwar is the first step to resistance. PS: There's a surprise visitor joining the interview at the very end. Don't miss it. CHAPTERS 0:01:35 Democracy and Technocratic Influence 0:05:31 The Omniwar Symposium 0:10:10 Technocracy and Transhumanism 0:13:22 Surveillance, and Social Control 0:18:07 Financial Surveillance and Social Credit Systems 0:22:28 Biosecurity, Health Surveillance, and Pandemic Infrastructure 0:23:43 AI, Algorithms, Government, and Pre-Crime 0:27:01 Data Centers and the Role of Elites 0:31:46 Cognitive Warfare, Information Management and Censorship 0:36:46 Digital Surveillance, IDs, and Smart City Infrastructure 0:41:40 Societal Destabilization: Immigration, Violence, and Social Response 0:49:11 Environmental Control, Carbon Management, and Resource Rationing 0:54:08 Food System Control and Dietary Mandates 0:57:31 Reproduction, Population Engineering, and Transhumanism 1:00:39 Weapons of Control: Bio, Social, and Technological 1:02:09 The Ultimate Goal – Scientific Dictatorship and Global Order 1:02:39 Resistance Strategies and Awakening Public Awareness 1:10:29 Dark Enlightenment: Philosophical Underpinnings 1:17:47 Technocrat Billionaires, Governance, and Global Influence 1:22:14 Spiritual Agenda, Esoteric Influences, and Lucis Trust 1:28:39 Ascended Masters, Secret Societies, and Hidden Agendas 1:41:40 Final Reflections, Upcoming Works, and Closing Remarks 1:44:00 Surprise Visitor RESOURCES Jacob Nordangård's substack

Subscribe now Share Recently, I did a series of interviews with renowned biologist Hervé Seligmann who has conducted complex statistical analyses on how the mRNA Covid injections affect all-cause mortality. The interviews with Hervé are exceptionally rich in content and cover many different and complex aspects of his research findings regarding the impact of the mRNA Covid injections. Seligmann also discusses new insights that he hasn't publicly addressed before. He is a biologist whose work centers on evolutionary and theoretical biology. Major themes of his research are genetic code evolution, mitochondrial genomes, tRNA function, overlapping genes, and origin of life research. Over the last years, he has extensively researched and written about Covid related topics. In particular, he has conducted complex and original statistical analyses showing that Covid vaccination as well as shedding from the Covid injections are associated with increased all‑cause mortality. To do his crucial insights justice and to not overwhelm listeners, I decided to divide the interviews into multiple parts. In this first part, Seligmann discusses the chronology of Covid-19 mRNA injection devastation that should have ended the shots in early 2021: "The chronology shows that the injections should have been immediately stopped because there was data, public data that I found already in January and February 2021 that clearly showed that people were dying from the vaccines and especially those people who had [had] COVID." In addition, he provides a high-level overview of his extraordinary findings that he will discuss in depth in subsequent parts of his interviews with me. Here are some of them: Health insurance data from New Zealand leaked by Barry Young in December of 2023 confirm increased mortalities for the injected at least up to two years post-injection. Female fertility decreases proportionally to female injection rates. The less time passed between the first injection and the second injection, the more likely people were to die. The injections cause accelerated aging where the rate of aging as a function of age is exponential. Which means that, for a person 50 or 60 years old, one year ages the person two or three times as much as a non-vaccinated person of the same age. Unvaccinated Children mortality is proportional to adult injection rates. Herve told me that the finding about child mortality in particular devastated him: "So this was very hard for me to believe and it took me about two months until I published it because for psychological reasons I couldn't believe the result, despite it being very clear. So I checked a lot, I waited to get two more months of data and so on, but I had seen it already in April [2021]. And the result is yes, the children who were basically uninjected at the time were dying proportionally to adult injections." CHAPTERS 0:01:23 Early Pandemic Observations 0:07:24 Start of Vaccine Safety Research 0:07:37 Early Concerns About mRNA Vaccines 0:10:50 Vaccine Effectiveness and Antibody Types 0:11:48 Flu Vaccine, Nasal Spray, and Misinformation 0:15:40 Analysis of Israeli Data 0:19:46 Adult and Child Mortality, Fertility Impact 0:24:05 Barry Young's Leader New Zealand Data 0:28:19 Accelerated Aging RESOURCES: Google Scholar - Herve Seligman COVID Vaccination and Age-Stratified All-Cause Mortality Risk, 2025-09-17 ScholarGPS

Subscribe now The United Nations Relief and Works Agency (UNRWA) for Palestinian refugees publicly claims to adhere to UN values of human rights and tolerance. In my interview with Karys Rhea, we take a look at UNRWA written textbooks, classroom exercises and school materials. According to UNRWA itself, the agency "reviews all textbooks used in its schools to identify sections that may not be in line with UN values and UNESCO standards for teaching." http://www.unrwa.org/unrwa-claims-versus-facts-2025 In Gaza, UNRWA has taken on traditional government functions by not only providing education but healthcare, social services, microfinance, and infrastructure to the ~2 million population. UNRWA is one of Gaza's largest employers with ~13,000 employees. This arrangement has freed Gaza's de facto government, Hamas, from governing responsibilities and has made it possible for Hamas to focus on the maintenance and expansion of its military/terror capabilities and operations. Since almost all UNRWA employees in Gaza are Palestinian refugees themselves, they are unlikely to be neutral observers of the conflict between Israel and Palestinians. Therefore, it is not surprising to find much evidence that UNRWA and Hamas are deeply intertwined with significant numbers of UNRWA employees or their immediate family members acting as Hamas operatives. For example, Hamas uses UNRWA facilities (schools, clinics, compounds) for weapons storage, tunnel access, and military activity. Some UNRWA staff celebrate attacks on Israelis on social media. At least 12 of its employees participated in the October 7 massacres, with some of the hostages being held in UNRWA buildings and guarded by its employees. Approximately one billion dollars, about 40% of UNRWA's total annual budget of ~$2.5 billion, is spent in Gaza.​ Since more than half of the budget, around 55-60%, is spent on education, about $600 million goes to schools and education services. What do Palestinian children learn in UNRWA run schools? What we find in UNRWA's reading and comprehension exercises and textbooks directly contradicts UNRWA's claims of being aligned with humans rights and tolerance: Children are taught to "nourish the homeland with blood," and are urged to follow in the footsteps of famous male, and also female, terrorists - like, for example, Dalal Mughrabi. Martyrdom is glorified; attacks on Israeli civilians are celebrated; jihad is promoted as life's highest meaning and a 'divine right.' Jews are depicted in dehumanized ways. Children from elementary grades onward are taught that armed resistance ought to be the root of their identity and that jihad gives their lives meaning. For example, a 9th grade UNRWA-created exercise tells students that if they neglect jihad, they will be cursed by God. Students are asked to complete a sentence regarding the consequences of not caring about jihad. The correctly completed sentence reads: "The punishment of he who neglects jihad is that God curses him, blinds his eyesight, and deafens his hearing." https://www.impact-se.org/wp-content/uploads/UNRWA_Report_2023_IMPACT-se_And_UN-Watch.pdf CHAPTERS 0:03:15 Radicalization and Education in Palestinian Society 0:09:23 Hamas' Control and the Aftermath of the 2006 Elections 0:13:08 Factions and Clans in Gaza; Reformist Efforts 0:14:52 UNRWA as De Facto Government; Overview of Services 0:23:25 Education Under UNRWA: Schools, Curriculum, and Indoctrination 0:28:20 Textbook Examples: Glorification of Terrorism and Martyrdom 0:51:15 War in Gaza: Effects on Schools and Humanitarian Aid 0:56:18 UNRWA's Official Perspective on Its Curriculum 1:01:11 Ties Between UNRWA, Hamas, and the October 7 Attacks 1:07:37 Humanitarian Aid in Post-UNRWA Gaza 1:09:17 Scope of Palestinian Radicalization 1:10:18 Solutions, De-radicalization, International Proposals 1:12:21 Assessing UNRWA's Operational Complicity in the Conflict 1:17:05 Closing Reflections on Complexity and Suffering in Gaza RESOURCES United Nations Relief and Works Agency UN Watch UNRWA Education: Reform or Regression? demystifying the unrwa approach to curriculum jan 2020 UNRWA: Facts Versus Claims UNRWA Terror Ties Extend to Highest Levels of Hamas UPDATED: Evidence Of UNRWA Aid To Hamas On And After October 7th - UN Watch Gaza's Clan Architecture: The Only Alternative to Hamas's Resurgence

Please note: This is the English Voiceover version of my interview with Pierre Obertin. You can find the original version here. *** In 2020 and 2021, many people, if not most, did not realize that what was happening around the entire world was an utterly cynical powergame veiled as 'Health Security' with the goal of disempowering, surveilling and controlling citizens. 'Stay safe!' This was neither the first nor the last powergame of our ever richer, reckless, vain and imperious rulers. But so far it was the most drastic and brutal one. The necessary regulatory and legal frameworks for a sequel remain in place unchanged. In the US as well as in Europe. What HAS changed is people's realization that they were betrayed, lied to, experimented on, physically harmed and killed in a breathtakingly contemptuous and cruel way. Their next episode of powergames won't go as smoothly. I asked Pierre Obertin, who lives in Luxembourg and has been writing about the Covid pandemic since 2021, how he assesses the current situation in Europe and how many people understand what really happened. He told me: "I think that pretty much everyone is either personally affected or knows someone in their circle of friends or family who has had a serious side effect or has even passed away. I think that by now, a lot of people have become aware of this. But they're not walking around with a sign saying: 'Now I understand.' It happens inside them, it's not visible." "And I think," he said, that "the crucial test will come next time. When things start again and the screws are tightened." CHAPTERS [01:56] Why were the EU crisis responses so uniform? [04:04] Historical development of the EU health framework since the 1990s [06:50] Swine flu as a precursor and EU crisis documents [13:13] Military and security services: State of emergency and EU coordination [15:09] Pandemic plans, the influence of Imperial College London [22:37] Lockdown until vaccine: Role of vaccine development [25:51] Medical care, Remdesivir, and control politics [32:26] Joint vaccine procurement and parliamentary powerlessness [37:12] Stella Kyriakides: Responsibility for Health and Food Safety [38:31] EMA, approval pressure, and scandal documents [45:58] EU Advisory Panel: Composition and Influence [01:00:02] Panel Meetings from March 2020 and School Closures [01:04:47] Role of the ECDC and Implementation of Political Decisions as 'Science' [01:11:32] Italy as a Lockdown Test Case [01:12:46] Controlling the Narrative, Fear of Public Resistance [01:15:23] Lockdown Decisions, Exit Strategies, and 'Lines to Take' Documents [01:16:25] EU Framework for Lockdowns and Influence on Individual States [01:33:48] Authoritarian Communication Mechanisms, 'Lines to Take' [01:39:52] mRNA Vaccinations: Excess Mortality and Societal Consequences [01:41:18] Public Sentiment and Vaccine Criticism in Europe [01:43:06] Outlook: Digital ID, Global Public-Private Partnerships RESOURCES: Pierre Obertin "Geliefert wie bestellt: Lockdown & Co." Pierre Obertin: Geheime E-Mails aus Stockholm Cees van den Bos: Corona-Politik von der Europäischen Kommission festgelegt "Profiteure der Angst" ARTE/NDR Dokumentation 2009 Anfrage AsktheEU.org von Sergio Pérez Sangiao List of authorities represented in the Health Security Committee. Directorate-General for Health and Food Safety. European Commission.

Subscribe now Did you know that the only safe medical data is data that is stored inside your own body? I didn't know that either until Nic Hulscher recently discovered some very interesting research papers about 'On Patient Medical Recordkeeping' technology. The quote below is from an article that was published in PubMed six years ago, in December 2019: "Accurate medical recordkeeping is a major challenge in many low-resource settings where well-maintained centralized databases do not exist, contributing to 1.5 million vaccine-preventable deaths annually." It took humans several hundred years to figure out that we are not able to maintain accurate medical records, but now we finally know. And it's a lucky thing that we only figured this out now, because we are finally reaching the stage where we are able to reliably record medical data: by encoding them into every living human body - in particular data about received vaccines. There's even a cute - no, more than cute: a heart warming acronym for this brilliant new record keeping method: OPMR. The following quote is from an article in 'Nature Materials' from February 2025: "We developed a robust on-patient medical record-keeping (OPMR) technology using a dissolvable microneedle patch (MNP) that delivers a quantum dot (QD)-based near-infrared (NIR) fluorescent dye encapsulated in poly(methyl methacrylate) (PMMA) microparticles into the skin to encode medical information. This dye, once deposited into the dermis, is invisible to the naked eye, offering patient data privacy and anonymity, but provides discrete NIR signals that can be detected using a NIR imaging system." Isn't it wonderful that we have found a way to not only make it impossible to lose medical records but to keep our medical records truly private and anonymous - and especially the number of vaccine microneedle patches we got administered? Nobody will ever know - except all the folks who detect the oh so discrete Near Infrared signals with the help of the NIR imaging system. And maybe it won't be folks much longer who detect them but some friendly AI agent. Which makes it even more sublime. We can also stop stressing about our medical records being unavailable when China or some other country cuts the subsea cables to crash the internet: "By depositing the dye in a predefined pattern that correlates to a specific set of information, the technology can be imaged by healthcare workers to support next-dose decisions without requiring internet connectivity or the use of centralized databases." See? Internet connectivity is not required. Marvelous. Life-saving 'next-dose decisions' won't be blocked ever - internet or not. And in case you were wondering whether our scientists remembered to cover the social justice angle, do not fear: "This technology could help healthcare workers make informed decisions in circumstances where reliable record-keeping is unavailable, thus contributing to global healthcare equity." A big thank you to the wonderful people at HHS, NIH, the Koch institute and of course the Gates Foundation whose grant monies made it possible for brave scientists to develop this magnificent new record keeping method. Honestly, where would we be without our dear federal health agencies and the fabulous Gates Foundation? And they understand that only the best is good enough for us: "To enable the OPMR [On Patient Medical Record] with excellent information capacity, security and reliability, we designed the MNP [Micro Needle Patch] architecture and administration for consistent and optimal data transfer and longevity; achieved an information capacity of billions of encoded patterns using an error correcting code; and developed a temporally and spatially reliable information retrieval system using machine learning." An information capacity of billions of encoded patterns - and with an error correcting code! The scientists deserve not just one, but at least two Freedom Medals, maybe more. And the LLMs can finally gorge themselves on data again, just when we thought we were running out. But, wait, it gets more sumptuous: these superb microneedles are not only carrying the dye for imprinting a digital code into the body but they carry a second payload. Maybe you can guess what that payload might be? EXACTLY! It's an mRNA vaccine. Now that's a dream come true. No more painful vaccine injections, the long needles replaced with eensy weensy ones. Infants and toddlers won't even know they're being vaccinated. This is what the February 2025 article says: "We optimize the microneedle design for both a reliable delivery of messenger RNA (mRNA) therapeutics and the near-infrared fluorescent microparticles that encode the on-patient medical record-keeping… Long-term studies in a swine model demonstrate the safety, efficacy and reliability of this approach for the co-delivery of on-patient medical record-keeping and the mRNA vaccine encoding severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2)." Superb. We all know about the safety and efficacy of the amazing mRNA vaccines and to have them co-delivered straight into our bodies in tandem with our precious medical data is a stroke of genius. This elegant new technology will not only turn us into walking bio-digital vaccine passports that will be biosensed by deep learning-based image processing agents, but - even more delicious - we will be loaded with the newest and best mRNA vaccines the science has to offer. How exactly does this biosensing work you want to know? It's simple and can be done from a smartphone: "An Android smartphone application 'IR Record' was custom developed to capture the OPMR NIR dye signal and can save images. The software is designed to take 30 consecutive images with six different exposure settings and five different gain settings. This bracket scanning method allows the capture of NIR signals with varying intensities over time. Among the 30 images, one image with the best reading results gets automatically chosen and processed." Five different gain settings and six (!) different exposure settings! Now you can start scanning yourself first thing in the morning to get your day off to a good start. That's what I call resilience. The researchers also note: "In cases of emergency like in a pandemic or natural disaster, or at refugee or military camps, OPMR patches can be administered on-demand." And not only administered, but possibly self-administered. Since we know that the recent pandemic was just a rehearsal, it is most reassuring to know that we will not have to stand in line during the next pandemic. The dissolvable microneedle patch might come to you by old-fashioned snail mail so that you can administer it in the privacy of your own home. What's more to be wished for? Well, thinking about it, there are more dreams to come true. A bio-digital vaccine passport is a solid start for sure, but we should not let ourselves be limited to the vaccine aspect. A bio-digital passport could be good for all sorts of things that society has to offer. It would make a tremendous 'Open sesame!' for daily life, from the doors to the supermarket to the doors of the restaurant, movie theatre, train and bus. Not to forget the door of one's own apartment. Maybe the relevant authorities need reminding that our own doors require scanning not just from outside to inside but also from inside to outside. To keep us all safe. Because what if you forgot to administer the patch sent to you in the mail? No big deal: you'll be reminded as soon as you try to get out of the door. Voilà! Oh, the awesomeness. CHAPTERS 0:00:08 Introduction to Micro Needle Patch and Quantum Dots 1:01:44 Vaccine Tracking, Societal Control, and Concerns Raised 0:03:50 Technical Foundations: Quantum Dots Longevity and Detection 0:04:10 Smartphone Scanning and Machine Learning Usage 0:08:09 Historical Context: AI, Data Centers, and Early Research 0:09:47 Vaccine Delivery, Co-delivery Methods, and Antibody Response 0:11:14 Envisioning Dystopian Control and Compliance 0:15:38 Decentralized Data Storage and Bio Sensing Discussion 0:16:59 Wearables, Biosensing, and Public Endorsements 0:19:06 Technical, Material, and Health Concerns 0:20:41 How the Patch Works: Schematics and Challenges 0:24:40 Societal Control: AI, Compliance, and Bypass Loopholes 0:28:51 Next-Generation Patch: mRNA, Self-Administration, and Trust Issues 0:35:00 Privacy, Data Storage in the Body, and Centralization 0:41:21 Expansion to mRNA Applications and Potential Harm 0:44:03 Digital Identities and Multipurpose Use Cases 1:01:45 Resistance, Public Compliance, and Civil Rights 1:12:32 Public Awareness, Accountability, and Call to Action RESOURCES: nature materials: 'On-patient medical record and mRNA therapeutics using intradermal microneedles', February 2025 PubMed: 'Biocompatible near-infrared quantum dots delivered to the skin by microneedle patches record vaccination', December 2019 FOCAL POINTS (Courageous Discourse) Microneedle Patch 'Vaccines' By Nicolas Hulscher, MPH… Read more a year ago · 168 likes · 20 comments · Nicolas Hulscher, MPH FOCAL POINTS (Courageous Discourse) New Gates-Funded Microneedle Patch Implant Installs Both mRNA and Quantum Dot Markings Into the Body by Nicolas Hulscher, MPH… Listen now 2 months ago · 315 likes · 122 comments · Nicolas Hulscher, MPH

Subscribe now Share In 2020, the year society was locked down and basic constitutional rights of the entire US population were discarded, civil cases increased by more than 60%. In that year alone, there was an excess of lawsuits compared to prior years of over 180,000 cases: John Beaudoin told me: "Did they hire 62% more people to handle those cases? No. Did everybody in the court system, all the judges and all the clerks, work 62 % more hours? Like 14 hours a day, every day for a year? No. There's only one way to do this: Dismiss, dismiss, dismiss." And that is what happened: mass dismissals of civil lawsuits based on the standing doctrine. To have standing, the plaintiffs must prove harm from the action or conduct they're challenging. And one would think that this should be easy. It is anything but. Beaudoin points to two rather recent landmark Supreme Court Cases that drastically raised the bar for plaintiffs to have sufficient standing so that their case would survive a motion to dismiss: Bell Atlantic Corp. v. Twombly (2007) and Ashcroft v. Iqbal (2009). According to Beaudoin, "Legal doctrines like Twombly and Iqbal let judges dismiss nearly any case if it's deemed implausible or lacking facts, no matter the injustice." To get an idea how often SCOTUS referred to Twombly and Iqbal to dismiss cases, he gathered the numbers of case citations for all cases decided by the Supreme Court: "I gleaned these from Google Scholar. I've since checked it out at Westlaw. And although the numbers are different, they're proportional. So the graph would look exactly the same, but the bottom numbers would be like 380,000 instead of 300,000. But the others would go up, too, proportionally. So Westlaw is counting differently than Google Scholar." Astonishingly, Twombly and Iqbal are the most quoted cases with almost 300,000 citations each. Despite the fact that these cases have only been around for about 16 years: According to Beaudoin, both Twombly and iqbal "were used before COVID, but since COVID came, the courts use these two cases to blow everything out of the water." And he continued: "I can prove that many of these cases were unrighteously dismissed, or I can prove that they used dismissal doctrines in the court and civil procedure to never hear the substance of these cases." The First Amendment of the United States Constitution lists the right to petition the government for a redress of grievances. That right, says Beaudoin, is the most foundational right for citizens to uphold and protect their other core rights like freedom of speech and freedom of religion. But what's the value of a theoretical right to petition for a redress of grievances, if it's near to impossible to get standing, i.e. to have the court acknowledge that grievances did in fact happen to the plaintiff? "If we can't get resolution in the courts, there's nowhere else to go. And the courts refuse to do their jobs," he says. The question then is what happens to a society where the courts are not doing their job of dispute resolution. Where courts dismiss citizens' cases for even the most serious breaches of fundamental constitutional rights. Beaudoin is convinced that as a consequence civil society starts breaking down: "You have people dividing into camps because the issues are not being settled or adjudicated. And so you leave it to society to fight amongst each other, fight on social media, fight in the streets. We're devolving as a civil society based on what's happened with these two cases and the way the courts are operating, extremely inefficiently dismissing righteous cases that should be heard." But societal breakdown is not inevitable, he emphasizes, because the underlying cause is fixable: "What is the root cause where, if you change something, you can fix the whole system? One of the things that you can fix is standing doctrine and that would fix a lot in the United States." And who should fix it? "John Roberts came in in 2005 as Chief Justice. Those cases I just showed you were two years after he got there and four years after he got there. He broke it. His court broke the system, so he's got to fix it. Or the United States will devolve into civil war." CHAPTERS 0:00:00 Introduction and Overview of Graph Data 0:00:50 Explanation of Yearly Data Variation 0:01:09 Highlighting Significant Data Points 0:13:09 Standing Doctrine 0:13:32 Further Analysis of Legal Standing and Case Dismissals 0:14:29 Critique of Judicial System and Focus on Courts 0:18:40 Why The PREP Act Is Unconstitutional 0:20:00 Beaudoin's Petition to the Supreme Court 0:22:19 Root Cause Analysis and Call for Judicial Reform RESOURCES Beaudoin's Substack: The Real CdC's Newsletter

Subscribe now Share "Massachusetts has been committing fraud as a matter of custom and practice every single day when they write COVID on death records when it's not COVID and omit the vaccine as a cause of death, when they know it's the vaccine," John Beaudoin told me. It's not just Massachusetts or other U.S. states that are manipulating death certificate data. According to Beaudoin, the CDC stopped using the proper ICD (Internal Classification of Diseases) code to classify deaths linked to COVID-19 vaccinations. Systems engineer John Beaudoin succeeded in obtaining all official Massachusetts death records from 2015 through 2024: "I was going to the gym one morning and I heard that a seven year old girl, Cassidy Baracka, died from COVID in January of 2022. I thought to myself that there's no way a healthy seven year old girl dies from COVID. Doesn't happen. It hasn't happened. Not a single time. And so I asked for her death record." Massachusetts, where Beaudoin lives, is one of the very few states in America that allows unrestricted public access to death certificates. Nonetheless, his request was denied: "They wouldn't give Cassidy's death certificate to me. I did eight different public records requests for all kinds of stuff. I ran them through other people, so that my name wouldn't be on all of them." Massachusetts refused all his public record requests except the one where he asked for ALL of the state's death records from 2015: "Only one of my eight requests came through. And it was the one that asked for all the death records from 2015 … I was kind of scared. Did they give these to me by accident? Are they going to take them away?" Beaudoin then cross-referenced the Massachusetts death records with VAERS data and uncovered widespread data fraud. According to his findings, the CDC stopped coding deaths related to Covid-19 vaccinations with the appropriate ICD codes. In addition, he uncovered plenty of evidence that doctors and medical examiners in Massachusetts issued fraudulent death certificates, labelling Covid shot deaths and other non-Covid deaths as Covid deaths. Although physicians and medical examiners fill out death certificates, they are not authorized to add the ICD code that corresponds to the cause of death. This is the job of a central federal agency, the CDC. Therefore, all states must send all their death certificates to a central parsing system run by the CDC: "They have two software programs called Transax and ACME. And those two programs read the words, they parse the words, and they spit out codes." There is an ICD code for Covid shot deaths: U12.9. However, this code is apparently hardly ever used by the CDC. Instead, the CDC codes Covid shots as Y59.0, a code that encompasses all 'viral vaccines.' Beaudoin told me: "U12.9 means Covid-19 vaccine specifically. It's not used on death records. There are notations in the literature of England and Germany where there's an asterisk under U12.9 and it says that it's not really used much and it's a subcategory of Y59.0." After the CDC codes the death certificates, they are sent back to the states. And that's how Beaudoin was able to check whether the ICD codes corresponded to the cause of death written on the death certificates by physicians and medical examiners. He said: "I'm betting that the software actually spit out the Y59.0. And on some it went through, but on others they deleted it and they sent it back to the States without the Y59.0. Somebody I believe at the CDC has been deleting Y59.0." Later, when he also got access to death certificates in Connecticut and Minnesota, states where death records are also public, he discovered the same phenomenon: "The first one in Connecticut is coded. The next three in Connecticut, not coded … So you have three states [Massachusetts, Connecticut, Minnesota] in which the first one's coded, the rest aren't. They stopped coding them. Why? They're hiding the vaccine deaths from the American people." When Beaudoin examined the ICD-coded death data for the entire United States using the CDC's WONDER Multiple Cause of Death database, he found fewer than 300 deaths coded under Y59.0 for all the years following the onset of COVID-19: CHAPTERS 0:00:00 John's Childhood Hearing Loss & the 1968 Hong Kong Flu 0:04:33 Early Life Memories and Academic Background 0:05:12 Analyzing CDC Data and Losing Trust 0:09:56 Lawsuit Over Mask Mandate and Experiences with Exemptions 0:12:26 Facing Public Pushback Over Mask Exemption 0:16:21 Strategy Against Mask Policies and Exception Details 0:21:15 Entering Data Analysis and Legal Battles Post-Law School 0:24:54 Obtaining Massachusetts Death Records and First Discoveries 0:29:37 Vaccine Reactions and The Cassidy Case 0:35:40 Death Certificate Certifiers and Patterns in Data 0:40:07 Financial Incentives Driving Hospital COVID Diagnoses 0:47:39 How Evidence-Based Medicine and Coding Changed Healthcare 0:52:17 Doctor-Patient Relationship in the Age of Electronic Records 0:57:13 Investigating Young Vaccine-Related Deaths 1:01:02 Media Suppression and the Cascade of Preventable Tragedies 1:07:44 ICD Codes, Centralization, and CDC Manipulation 1:18:12 Decentralized Coding Practices and Data Errors 1:23:08 Government Censorship and Social Media Control 1:29:14 Professional Threats to Doctors and Board Certifications RESOURCES Beaudoin's Substack: The Real CdC's Newsletter

Subscribe now Share Dr. Joseph Sansone: "People need to really get what I'm saying: Most people that you know will die from these injections." The debate must shift from arguing about mRNA Covid shot mandates and "recommendations" to arguing that these shots are biological weapons of mass destruction, Sansone says: "You can't win by arguing mandates. So you have to take a stake and go right into the vampire's heart. These are weapons of mass destruction." Sansone argues that mRNA injections are already illegal according to existing bioweapon laws and existing weapons of mass destruction laws because it is widely known that the shots are causing carnage among the population: "You're shortening lifespans, you're reducing birth rates … These injections cause neurological problems, heart problems, cancers, and so on. They're associated with increased infant mortality and fertility problems … If you're a 35 year old man or woman and you got this injection and you only live to be 63 instead of 80, they just stole 17 years of your life." Knowing about the harmfulness of the shots, he says, meets the knowingness standard of intent and this creates a criminal and civil liability for anyone having anything to do with the shots. Sansone not only talks the walk but walks the walk: "The court system needs to get flooded with cases. Go think back into the 50s and 60s with all the civil rights cases. They filed case after case after case after case." And that's exactly what he has been doing since early 2023 when he introduced his first 'Ban the Jab' resolution in Lee County, Florida. The resolution declared COVID‑19 and mRNA injections "biological and technological weapons of mass destruction" and called on Governor Ron DeSantis and the Attorney General to ban the Covid shots in Florida. The late Dr. Francis Boyle, main author of the 1989  Biological Weapons Anti‑Terrorism Act, endorsed his resolution. In 2024, Sansone filed a lawsuit, a so-called writ of mandamus, against Florida Governor Ron DeSantis and Attorney General Ashley Moody in the Florida Supreme Court. His goal is to force the Governor to prohibit the Covid-19 mRNA shots in Florida. Subsequently, he drafted the "Sansone mRNA Bioweapons Prohibition Act" which criminalizes the manufacturing, distribution, and possession of any products that make use of mRNA technology. In April this year, several Republican representatives in the Minnesota legislature were the first ones nationwide to introduce his bill. Sansone is asking Americans to get his mRNA Bioweapons Prohibition Act introduced in many more states: "You go find someone who might have the courage to do it and get it introduced because one, it's going to make a splash, even with all the censorship, it's going to get out there and people's heads will spin. This gets introduced in places like New Jersey, New York or California, their heads are going to spin. They're not going to know how to handle that … Let's say we can get this introduced in like a dozen or 15 states. A lot of states don't come back in a session until January. But let's say we can get this introduced in a bunch of states. The writing is going to be on the wall … Eventually the mRNA shots are going to get prohibited in the whole country or we're going to have a revolution." Why has it taken more than 2 years from his first 'Ban the Jab' resolution to having the mRNA Bioweapons Prohibition Act introduced in the first state? He says: "The reason we're not where we should be is because when I did that first 'Ban the Jab'resolution, I got as much pushback from 'our' side as I did from the other side and most of the people in the alternative media are still censoring what I and other people like me have been doing because they don't want to admit these are weapons because they're either afraid of losing access or being canceled." Those who could stop the shots - the President, the head of the FDA, state governors, district attorneys, prosecutors,sheriffs - are not doing it: "These people are either complicit or looking the other way which makes them complicit in biological warfare against the American people … They could literally change the course of human history, but that would require a little courage. These people are afraid." We also talk about the Dutch law case brought by several Dutch citizens harmed by the mRNA shots and the unexplained arrest of Arno van Kessel, one of the lawyers that are representing them. The plaintiffs are suing, among others, Bill Gates, Klaus Schwab, the former Dutch prime minister Mark Rutte as well as the entire Dutch government. CHAPTERS 0:00:17 Clinical Hypnosis Background and Susceptibility 0:01:41 Intelligence, Authority, and Brainwashing 0:04:46 COVID-19 Injections as Bioweapons: Early Awareness and Legal Context 0:09:01 Legal Challenges: Mandamus Case and Procedural Issues 0:16:02 Health Impacts, Shedding, and Filing Appeals 0:22:48 Role of Public Health Officials and Political Responses 0:36:30 Drafting and Promoting Bio-Weapons Prohibition Legislation 0:41:38 Provisions and Implications of the Proposed Law 0:46:27 Overcoming Legal Barriers and Grassroots Advocacy 0:54:54 Scientific Support, Public Perception, and Broader Vaccine Debates 1:02:14 Francis Boyle's Expertise, Affidavit, and His Passing 1:08:16 The Dutch Lawsuit Against Bill Gates 1:12:45 Legal Risks, Arrest of Lawyer Arno van Kessel 1:18:14 Trump, Pfizer Deal, and Political Disappointment RESOURCES Mind Matters and Everything Else with Dr. Joseph Sansone I Am Going To War! Will You Join Me? 50 Different State Versions of the 'Sansone mRNA Bioweapons Prohibition Act'. Mind Matters and Everything Else with Dr. Joseph Sansone is a reader-supported publication. To receive new posts and support my work, consider becoming a free or paid subscriber… Read more 8 months ago · 264 likes · 98 comments · Dr. Joseph Sansone

Subscribe now Share To my English speaking viewers: I will release the interview with English voiceover in a little while. Or you can watch it on YouTube with English subtitles turned on: *** Wieso lief die Inszenierung der Covid-19 Pandemie so reibungslos ab in der EU - ganz so wie in den USA, Kanada, Australien und anderen Ländern? Es war, als wäre das alles schon vorher geprobt und einstudiert worden. Pierre Obertin, Autor des Substacks "Expressis Verbis", sagte mir während unseres Interviews: "Die Sache war schon irgendwie am Laufen. Da ging es eigentlich nur noch darum, das irgendwie zu koordinieren. Und da gab es dann halt auch, wie wir jetzt erfahren haben, Kommunikationswege: da war schon geplant, wie das ablaufen sollte." Obertin schreibt seit 2021 über die Covid Pandemie und hinterfragt das der Weltbevölkerung vorgeschriebene offizielle Narrativ. Er ist Luxemburger und lebt in Luxemburg. An der Technischen Universität in Kaiserslautern hat er seinen Masters Degree in angewandter Mathematik gemacht und momentan arbeitet er als Informatiklehrer. Warum gab - und gibt es - ein weltweites Rahmenwerk, das wie ein gut geöltes Uhrwerk alle Räder, Federn und Regler bereits am richtigen Platz hatte, als im Januar 2020 der Anpfiff kam? Ganz einfach: weil das Machtspiel bühnenreif war. Weil die entscheidungsbefugten Institutionen und deren Vertreter aus den "Fehlern" der anderen nicht ganz so glatt abgelaufenen Pandemien, wie der Schweinegrippe, gelernt hatten. Weil es zig mal geprobt worden war: in den USA (Dark Winter, Atlantic Storm, CLADE X, Event 201) wie in der EU. Generalprobe für die EU war "Blue Orchid" im Februar 2019. In unserem Interview beschreibt Pierre die Strukturen innerhalb der EU, die über die letzten Jahrzehnte für die ganz großen geplanten Machtspiele aufgebaut und getestet wurden - wie eben die Pandemiekrise. Obertin: "Corona kam ja nicht von heute auf morgen. Das ging eigentlich schon los in den 90er Jahren. Nach dem Ende des Kalten Krieges musste irgendwie was Neues kommen. Und dann ging es ja auch los in den 90er Jahren mit dem Klima. Das Thema Klima kam und eben auch das andere Thema: ansteckende Krankheiten. Die sollten wieder kommen." Bei der Schweinegrippe 2010, da klappte es noch nicht so ganz. Aber zehn Jahre später war es dann soweit: Vorhang auf für Corona. Und die Rolle der Bevölkerung? Zuschauen, Eintauchen in das Märchen, "dispense disbelief", Beifall klatschen und immer wieder den Arm hinhalten für regelmäßige "Schutzspritzen." Dass es hier im Namen der "Gesundheitssicherheit" in Wirklichkeit um die Entmachtung der eigenen Bevölkerung ging, das war 2020 vielen nicht klar. Beim zweitenmal wird es wohl nicht ganz so glatt über die Bühne gehen. KAPITEL [00:00] Einführung, Vorstellung von Pierre und Thema des Interviews [00:44] Pierre über seine Artikel, beruflicher Hintergrund und Covid-Fokus [01:56] Warum waren die EU-Krisenreaktionen so einheitlich? [04:04] Historische Entwicklung des EU-Gesundheitsrahmens seit den 1990ern [06:50] Schweinegrippe als Vorlauf und EU-Krisendokumente [09:27] Wissenschaft und Krisenkommunikation: Wer entscheidet? [13:13] Militär und Security Services: Ausnahmezustand und EU-Koordination [15:09] Pandemiepläne, der Einfluss des Imperial College London [19:36] Die Voraussagen und Publikationen zur Pandemie [21:11] Epidemie-Definitionen und erste Covid-Entwicklungen in Europa [22:37] Lockdown until vaccine: Rolle der Impfstoffentwicklung [25:51] Medizinische Versorgung, Remdesivir und Kontrollpolitik [28:56] Politische Struktur der EU: Von der Leyen und Kommissions-Mechanismen [31:14] Ursula von der Leyen und Berateraffäre [32:26] Gemeinsamer Impfstoffeinkauf und parlamentarische Machtlosigkeit [34:46] Entscheidungsstrukturen und Einfluss einzelner Kommissare [37:12] Stella Kyriakides: Verantwortung für Health and Food Safety [38:31] EMA, Zulassungsdruck und Skandal-Dokumente [42:55] DG Health, Unterbehörden, Kernfunktionen der Pandemiepolitik [45:58] EU Advisory Panel: Zusammensetzung und Einfluss [51:16] Interessen, Gain of Function und Vernetzungen im Panel [57:03] Entscheidungsträger und Machtverhältnisse im Panel [01:00:02] Panel-Meetings ab März 2020 und Schulschließungen [01:04:47] Rolle des ECDC und Umsetzung politischer Entscheidungen als "Wissenschaft" [01:11:32] Italien als Lockdown-Testfall [01:12:46] Kontrolle des Narrativs, Angst vor Widerstand der Bevölkerung [01:15:23] Lockdown-Beschlüsse, Exit-Strategien und "Lines to take"-Dokumente [01:16:25] EU-Rahmen für Lockdowns und Einfluss auf Einzelstaaten [01:33:48] Autoritäre Kommunikationsmechanismen, "Lines to Take" [01:39:52] mRNA-Impfungen: Übersterblichkeit und gesellschaftliche Folgen [01:41:18] Gesellschaftliche Stimmung und Impfkritik in Europa [01:43:06] Ausblick: Digitale ID, Global Public Private Partnerships [01:44:21] Fazit und Abschied RESOURCEN: Pierre Obertin "Geliefert wie bestellt: Lockdown & Co." Pierre Obertin: Geheime E-Mails aus Stockholm Cees van den Bos: Corona-Politik von der Europäischen Kommission festgelegt "Profiteure der Angst" ARTE/NDR Dokumentation 2009 Anfrage AsktheEU.org von Sergio Pérez Sangiao List of authorities represented in the Health Security Committee. Directorate-General for Health and Food Safety. European Commission. Crisis communication - HSC Communicators' network. Directorate-General Health and Consumer Protection (SANCO), 2010. ECDC lines-to-take: Novel coronavirus, China, 2019-nCoV. Last update: 21 January 2020, Ursprüngliche URL Global Health Security Initiative - 10 years of collaborative action. 2011.

Subscribe now Share Albert Benavides, the creator of VAERSAware.com, told me: "Of those 200 official dead kids that are officially in there [VAERS], there's actually 600 dead kids, but you don't see them because the age field is not populated." Surprisingly, age is not a required field when submitting a report to the Vaccine Adverse Event Reporting System (VAERS), the database managed by the CDC and FDA to track vaccine-related injuries and deaths. In fact, hardly any fields on the VAERS form are mandatory. Albert explains: "And yet, the age is properly documented in the summary narrative. More than 400 of these actual dead kids are sitting in a bucket of unknown ages." Those 400 reports are still in the system, but without an age attached, they aren't counted in the official total for children's deaths. That's how VAERS ended up concealing the deaths of 400 children who died after the mRNA shots. Albert uncovered this information through meticulous analysis of VAERS data, by reviewing individual reports, and extracting details from the summary narratives. Through this effort, he estimates that the actual number of child deaths linked to mRNA COVID-19 shots is closer to 600, rather than the officially reported 200. However, even that figure may fall short of the true total. VAERS is a passive reporting system, meaning it relies on voluntary reporting. As a result, the actual number of vaccine-related injuries and deaths is uncertain. A 2011 Harvard report found that fewer than 1% of all adverse events are reported to VAERS. However, deaths occurring shortly after vaccination are likely to be reported at a higher rate, though the exact percentage remains unknown. For deaths that occur longer after vaccination, the likelihood of reporting is probably much lower, suggesting an even greater degree of underreporting. Another disturbing 'feature' of VAERS is that a significant number of valid reports are never made publicly available through the CDC's WONDER system, and many reports are later removed. React19, a Covid-19 vaccine injury support group, discovered during a 2022 audit that 1 out of 3 adverse event reports submitted to VAERS by their members were never published. As data analyst Albert Benavides puts it: "It almost makes everything else a moot point if we know that we're basically analyzing curated data and that VAERS basically does not publish all legitimate reports received." The issue isn't simply system failure - it raises the concern that the system may deliberately be structured in a way to conceal the full scope of vaccine-related injuries and deaths. HHS Secretary Robert Kennedy is well aware of the problem. During the interview, Albert recounts how Kennedy came to speak at Albert's church in San Jose, California: "On June 19, 2021, Bobby came to our church. And he's only said it once. I've never heard him say it again. The week before he had met with a group of various CDC adjudicators who came to him as a group and collectively told him that 150,000 reports had disappeared from their queues. And these were all reports that they were working on to adjudicate, to finalize and publish. This is in line with what we're saying that React 19 has people that have published reports and that have never been published. And I have submitted reports that have never been published." The VAERS/CDC adjudicators who came to Robert Kennedy in 2022 to alert him to the 150,000 disappeared reports: who are they? Who made the reports disappear from VAERS? Who gave the order to make them disappear? We do not know. CHAPTERS 0:00:00 Introduction, President's Vaccine Statement, and Letter Plans 0:02:27 Albert Joins and Overview of VAERS Data Analysis 0:05:31 Explanation of React19 and VAERS Report Issues 0:08:51 Deleted and Missing VAERS Reports: Causes and Concerns 0:12:46 Public Visibility and Permanent IDs in VAERS 0:17:34 Underreporting and Hidden Data in VAERS 0:19:46 VAERS adjudicators Tell RFK that 150,000 Reports Disappeared 0:23:13 Temporary vs. Final ID Numbers and Data Discrepancies 0:31:33 VAERSaware Dashboard: Data Overview and Demonstration 0:36:11 Age and State Data Issues in VAERS Reports 0:43:42 Dashboard Features: Gender, Lot Numbers, and Toxic Batches 0:48:50 Lot Sizes, Shipments, and Data Limitations 0:52:45 Data Lags and Delays in Report Publication 0:55:13 Missing Data and Adjudication Problems 1:02:53 What Should Happen to VAERS: Albert's Ideas RESOURCES VAERSAware FDA Conducting 'Intense Investigation' of Child Deaths Following COVID Shot

Subscribe now Share In the concluding part of my interview with Jacob Nordangard, we continue to explore the dystopian future that self-appointed 'Global Leaders' are planning for the rest of us. A White Paper titled 'The Agentic State', published by the Global Government Technology Center Berlin (GGTC Berlin) in May of 2025, lays out a future in which AI agents take control of all functions of government. Luukas Ilves is the lead author of the White Paper. He's also advisor to Ukraine's Deputy Prime Minister, son of Estonia's former President, former Chief Information officer of Estonia and one of WEF's Young Global Leaders. In the White Paper, Ilves describes various features of Agentic AI Governance; he pictures a future where laws will become 'living laws' that AI agents can change at any time. Legislators won't be needed anymore, humans will be monitored continuously, and compliance with regulation is enforced around the clock. 'Polycrises' will be met with a 'Hyper-aware AI-orchestrated first response': "When a crisis begins to unfold, AI initiates the first steps in crisis response before human-in-the-loop structures have time to react." Moreover, such AI agents "will work alongside increasingly autonomous physical systems such as drones and robots, forming the backbone of a responsive, adaptive crisis infrastructure." "Human-in-the-loop structures" will eventually disappear completely from the governing loop. And AI agents will closely observe and manipulate the emotions of its 'out-of-the-loop' humans. That's the vision that the WEF and the Global Government Technology Center Berlin are hoping to realize for billions of people. To reach this goal, Luukas Ilves calls for a "new leadership archetype for the agentic AI era." It stands to reason that Ilves might consider himself as the embodiment of this new leadership archetype. He has political ambitions and already ran, albeit unsuccessfully, for the European Parliament. CHAPTERS 05:52 Exploring the Agentic State and Its Implications 08:38 The Role of Young Global Leaders in Governance 11:31 Deep Dive into the White Paper's Key Concepts 13:37 Agentic Internal Workflows and Their Consequences 16:12 Outcome-Based Governance and Its Risks 19:21 The Dangers of AI in Bureaucratic Systems 22:07 Corruption and AI: A Systemic Issue 25:18 The Future of Human Involvement in Governance 28:02 Crisis Response and Resilience in Governance 36:01 The Power of Panic: Control Through Fear 36:49 Singleton Theory: A Centralized Power Structure 40:19 Simulations and Reality: Testing Crisis Responses 43:12 AI in Crisis Management: The Rise of Autonomous Systems 47:08 Surveillance and Compliance: The New Normal 49:03 The Future of Governance: Living Laws and AI 53:57 Ethics and Compliance: The Tyranny of Agentic Systems 01:11:05 The United Nations and Global Goals 01:13:55 Agentic Policymaking and Democracy 01:19:15 Emotion Detection and Citizen Signals 01:24:54 Leadership in the Age of AI 01:30:18 The Dystopian Future of Governance 01:44:29 Awareness and Resistance Against the Agenda

Subscribe now Share UNRWA. An impossible to pronounce acronym, one of the many United Nations' agencies, is not the worst place to start gaining some understanding of the current situation in Gaza, Israel and beyond. The United Nations Relief and Works Agency was founded in 1949 as a temporary organization to provide emergency relief to Palestine refugees who had fled their homes in the 1948 Arab-Israeli war. But almost 80 years later, it's still around. How did this happen and why? Today, UNRWA is the largest UN Agency by staff size: it employs about 30,000 people, almost all of whom are locally recruited Palestinian refugees themselves. The majority of them work in Gaza and many others live and work in Jordan, Syria, Lebanon and the West Bank. Palestinian Arabs are the only group in the world with a dedicated UN agency. An initial roughly 700,000 Palestinian refugees in 1949 turned into almost 6 million refugees today since the refugee status is passed on from father to child. Who profits from this - not just in terms of money but in terms of political power? In the interview, Karys Rhea, a fellow of the Middle East Forum, talks to me about the history and purpose of UNRWA and discusses the historical background of the Arab-Israeli conflict, the establishment of Israel, and the roots of Arab opposition to Jewish sovereignty. CHAPTER TITLES 03:50 Why UNRWA Was Created: The 1948 Refugee Crisis 07:18 Partition History, British Mandate, and Early Conflict 11:11 Jewish Migration: Russian Pogroms and Ottoman Era 12:16 UN Partition, Arab Opposition, and the Independence War 14:58 Israel's Survival Against the Odds 15:53 Jewish Presence, Arab Reaction, and Sovereignty 17:34 Holocaust Impact and Pan-Arabism 23:46 Haj Amin al-Husseini, Hitler, and Early Massacres 26:39 War Aftermath, Armistice, and Territorial Shifts 28:20 Jewish and Arab Populations: Parallel Refugee Crises 30:39 Arab States: Refugees as Political Pawns 34:06 Citizenship and Refugee Treatment in Arab States 38:42 Propaganda, Radicalization, and Generational Issues 39:21 UNRWA's Role in Perpetuating the Conflict 40:17 Inheritance of Refugee Status 42:08 UNRWA Staffing, Budget, Scope 43:35 When Does Refugee Status End? Right of Return Debates 48:29 Refugee Numbers: Demographics and Registration 51:17 How Definitions and Populations Changed Over Time 53:16 Citizenship and Second-Class Status 56:40 Israeli Arabs: Rights, Integration, and Social Mobility 1:00:53 UNRWA's Funding, Donors, and Accountability 1:03:11 Refugee Camps Today: Living Conditions 1:06:44 UNRWA Services and Lack of Oversight 1:10:13 Employment, Corruption, and Organizational Interests 1:13:03 Daily Life: Wealth, Poverty, and Lack of Rights 1:15:07 Identity Formation and Psychological Impact 1:17:34 Yasser Arafat, the Palestinian Identity, and Nationalism 1:24:57 Education, Hate, and Indoctrination in Schools 1:27:52 Personal Contact, Worker Permits, and The Green Prince 1:29:29 Indoctrination: Martyrdom and the UNRWA Curriculum RESOURCES Total Palestinian Refugees (1950-Present) Population of Israel (1948-Present)