Hidden Killers Live! Daily True Crime News & Breakdowns

Kevin Reddington moved within days of the mistrial. The Rule 25 motion he filed on September 10 asks Judge Sullivan to enter a finding of Not Guilty by Reason of Lack of Criminal Responsibility — an acquittal that would prevent the state from retrying Lindsay Clancy. The hearing is September 29.Defense attorney Bob Motta joins the show to analyze the legal and strategic logic behind Reddington's approach. The motion's core argument: the holdout juror reportedly admitted reasonable doubt but refused to apply the court's instructions, which means the mistrial may not have been a "manifest necessity" — a legal finding that, if Sullivan agrees, would bar retrial under double jeopardy protections. Motta explains why legal analysts have called this a long shot but also why Reddington's argument has real weight given the juror conduct multiple panel members have now described publicly.Motta also examines the power dynamic between Reddington and DA Tim Cruz heading into September 29. The 11-to-1 split gives the defense leverage the prosecution didn't expect. Reddington has been publicly aggressive — telling reporters he "crushed" the prosecution, then telling CNN he'd hear what Cruz has to say but won't agree to incarceration. Cruz has said only that his team will address the case "at the appropriate time."The prosecution's trial theory — that Lindsay staged her suicide attempt while arguing she killed because she wanted to die — was reportedly rejected by the overwhelming majority of the jury. Motta walks through whether the state can survive a retrial with the same approach, whether reduced charges and a bench trial represent a more viable path, and what Reddington's public maneuvering tells us about where this case is actually headed.Listen Anywhere You Get Podcasts: https://pod.link/1655749292Want to comment and watch this podcast as a video? Check out our YouTube Channel. https://www.youtube.com/@hiddenkillerspod?sub_confirmation=1Join Our SubStack For AD-FREE ADVANCE EPISODES & EXTRAS!: https://hiddenkillers.substack.com/Instagram https://www.instagram.com/hiddenkillerspod/Facebook https://www.facebook.com/hiddenkillerspod/Tik-Tok https://www.tiktok.com/@hiddenkillerspodX Twitter https://x.com/tonybpodThis publication contains commentary and opinion based on publicly available information. All individuals are presumed innocent until proven guilty in a court of law. Nothing published here should be taken as a statement of fact, health or legal advice.#LindsayClancy #ClancyCase #HiddenKillers #KevinReddington #TimCruz #Rule25 #PleaDeal #Mistrial #PostpartumPsychosis #BobMotta

The Lindsay Clancy jury split 11 to 1 in favor of acquittal by reason of insanity. The holdout reportedly acknowledged he had reasonable doubt about Clancy's criminal responsibility. Then he allegedly refused to apply the legal standard the court instructed him to follow — collapsing seven weeks of trial into a mistrial on September 4.Defense attorney Bob Motta joins the show to analyze the behavioral and legal dimensions of what happened inside that deliberation room. Multiple jurors have now spoken publicly, describing a holdout who wouldn't review the medical or toxicology evidence, reportedly spent time scrolling his phone during deliberations, and when pressed for any evidentiary basis for his position, allegedly had none.Motta examines what drove a juror to acknowledge doubt and still refuse the verdict that doubt required — whether this reflects a bias against mental illness defenses, a refusal to accept postpartum psychosis as a legitimate medical condition, or something else entirely. He walks through the legal constraints Judge Sullivan faced, why Reddington's emergency appeal to the Massachusetts SJC was denied, and what the defense's argument that this juror showed bias rather than legitimate disagreement actually means under the law.Looking ahead, Motta breaks down the voir dire challenge if this case goes to retrial. In a prosecution where the sole contested issue was whether severe postpartum psychosis negated criminal responsibility, both sides face the problem of identifying prospective jurors whose personal beliefs about mental illness would prevent them from following the court's instructions — and the legal system's limited tools for catching that before it derails another trial.Listen Anywhere You Get Podcasts: https://pod.link/1655749292Want to comment and watch this podcast as a video? Check out our YouTube Channel. https://www.youtube.com/@hiddenkillerspod?sub_confirmation=1Join Our SubStack For AD-FREE ADVANCE EPISODES & EXTRAS!: https://hiddenkillers.substack.com/Instagram https://www.instagram.com/hiddenkillerspod/Facebook https://www.facebook.com/hiddenkillerspod/Tik-Tok https://www.tiktok.com/@hiddenkillerspodX Twitter https://x.com/tonybpodThis publication contains commentary and opinion based on publicly available information. All individuals are presumed innocent until proven guilty in a court of law. Nothing published here should be taken as a statement of fact, health or legal advice.#LindsayClancy #ClancyTrial #HiddenKillers #Mistrial #HoldoutJuror #PostpartumPsychosis #BobMotta #KevinReddington #JurySystem #TrueCrime

A pastor who allegedly terrorized his wife and preached at her memorial. A juror who admitted reasonable doubt and refused to acquit. A mother named in a lawsuit alleging she helped conceal what was happening around her son. Former FBI Special Agent Robin Dreeke puts all three under the behavioral microscope.JP Miller faces federal cyberstalking charges in connection with his alleged treatment of Mica Miller. He has pleaded not guilty. Mica was found dead at a North Carolina state park on April 27, 2024. Her death was ruled a suicide. The congregation at Solid Rock Church allegedly sided with JP while Mica was pushed out of the community she had given her life to.The Lindsay Clancy murder trial at Plymouth Superior Court ended in a hung jury, 11-to-1. Jurors are now speaking publicly. The foreperson says the holdout admitted he had reasonable doubt and still refused to vote for acquittal. Other jurors described leaving the courthouse sick and crying every night after listening to testimony about the deaths of Cora, Dawson, and Callan.The family of Celeste Rivas Hernandez filed a wrongful death lawsuit in Los Angeles against D4vd, his mother Colleen Burke, his managers, and his business entities. The complaint alleges an inner circle that knew about the relationship with a minor and helped maintain it. David Burke has pleaded not guilty to first-degree murder and other charges.Dreeke breaks down the psychology of each figure and asks who poses the greatest danger going forward.Listen Anywhere You Get Podcasts: https://pod.link/1655749292Want to comment and watch this podcast as a video? Check out our YouTube Channel. https://www.youtube.com/@hiddenkillerspod?sub_confirmation=1Join Our SubStack For AD-FREE ADVANCE EPISODES & EXTRAS!: https://hiddenkillers.substack.com/Instagram https://www.instagram.com/hiddenkillerspod/Facebook https://www.facebook.com/hiddenkillerspod/Tik-Tok https://www.tiktok.com/@hiddenkillerspodX Twitter https://x.com/tonybpodThis publication contains commentary and opinion based on publicly available information. All individuals are presumed innocent until proven guilty in a court of law. Nothing published here should be taken as a statement of fact, health or legal advice.#MicaMiller #LindsayClancy #D4vd #HiddenKillers #RobinDreeke #JPMiller #CelesteRivasHernandez #CoerciveControl #HungJury #TrueCrimePodcast

Blair Berk and Marilyn Bednarski represented some of the most high-profile defendants in entertainment law. They took D4vd's murder case. Then they quit.The withdrawal came weeks before the family of Celeste Rivas Hernandez filed a wrongful death lawsuit in Los Angeles County Superior Court naming not just David Anthony Burke, but his mother Colleen Burke, his managers, his recording company, and his publishing company. The complaint alleges a system of enablement: company funds allegedly used to pay for housing and security, a bodyguard who allegedly transported a minor, and managers who the family says knew what was happening.Burke was determined to qualify for a public defender. Walid Kandeel of the LA County Public Defender's Office now represents him. Burke pleaded not guilty to first-degree murder, continuous illegal conduct involving a person under 14, and mutilation of remains. The DA's office says the death penalty remains on the table.Celeste Rivas Hernandez's remains were found in the trunk of Burke's Tesla at a Hollywood impound lot in September 2025. She was 14. Prosecutors allege she was killed after she threatened to come forward about the relationship. Text messages presented at the preliminary hearing allegedly showed she had become pregnant and undergone a procedure.Former FBI Special Agent Robin Dreeke examines what it signals when elite defense attorneys walk away from a paying client, the psychology of an inner circle under legal pressure, and what the civil discovery process could force into the open.Listen Anywhere You Get Podcasts: https://pod.link/1655749292Want to comment and watch this podcast as a video? Check out our YouTube Channel. https://www.youtube.com/@hiddenkillerspod?sub_confirmation=1Join Our SubStack For AD-FREE ADVANCE EPISODES & EXTRAS!: https://hiddenkillers.substack.com/Instagram https://www.instagram.com/hiddenkillerspod/Facebook https://www.facebook.com/hiddenkillerspod/Tik-Tok https://www.tiktok.com/@hiddenkillerspodX Twitter https://x.com/tonybpodThis publication contains commentary and opinion based on publicly available information. All individuals are presumed innocent until proven guilty in a court of law. Nothing published here should be taken as a statement of fact, health or legal advice.#D4vd #CelesteRivasHernandez #HiddenKillers #DavidBurke #RobinDreeke #CivilLawsuit #ColleenBurke #LosAngeles #TrueCrime #TrueCrimePodcast

JP Miller stood at the pulpit of Solid Rock Church and preached at the memorial service for his estranged wife, Mica Miller. Witnesses described his language as possessive. He spoke about her body. He centered the moment around himself. For the people who had spent months watching Mica report harassment and beg for help, the performance was the final confirmation.Mica Miller died on April 27, 2024, at a North Carolina state park. Her death was ruled a suicide. She was 30 years old. She had served JP with divorce papers two days before. In the months leading up to her death, she filed police reports describing GPS tracking, razor blades in her tires, and a pattern of behavior she called coercive control.Federal prosecutors charged JP Miller with cyberstalking and making false statements to investigators. The indictment alleges a harassment campaign that lasted from November 2022 until her death. He has pleaded not guilty.Mica's family says the congregation at Solid Rock Church closed ranks around JP while Mica was systematically pushed out. The people who should have been her support system became part of the cage.Former FBI Special Agent and behavioral analyst Robin Dreeke breaks down what a memorial performance like that reveals about the person delivering it, how narcissistic control works inside tight-knit communities, and what the behavioral evidence tells us about what Mica was living through.Listen Anywhere You Get Podcasts: https://pod.link/1655749292Want to comment and watch this podcast as a video? Check out our YouTube Channel. https://www.youtube.com/@hiddenkillerspod?sub_confirmation=1Join Our SubStack For AD-FREE ADVANCE EPISODES & EXTRAS!: https://hiddenkillers.substack.com/Instagram https://www.instagram.com/hiddenkillerspod/Facebook https://www.facebook.com/hiddenkillerspod/Tik-Tok https://www.tiktok.com/@hiddenkillerspodX Twitter https://x.com/tonybpodThis publication contains commentary and opinion based on publicly available information. All individuals are presumed innocent until proven guilty in a court of law. Nothing published here should be taken as a statement of fact, health or legal advice.#MicaMiller #JPMiller #HiddenKillers #CoerciveControl #RobinDreeke #SolidRockChurch #DeathOfThePastorsWife #MicasLaw #TrueCrime #TrueCrimePodcast

JP Miller and D4vd interview — two men whose alleged conduct spans different states and industries. What they share, according to former FBI Special Agent Jennifer Coffindaffer, is the alleged infrastructure that let it continue.JP Miller goes to federal trial in October 2026 on cyberstalking and false statements charges. The indictment alleges a campaign against Mica Miller from November 2022 through her death on April 27, 2024 — surveillance, a tire deflation device, over fifty calls in one day, and an intimate image distributed without consent. Before any of it, Miller positioned himself as the authority in Mica's life.The family of fourteen-year-old Celeste Rivas Hernandez filed a twelve-count wrongful death lawsuit against D4vd and the people closest to him.Coffindaffer breaks down what happens when enablers face their own reckoning.Listen Anywhere You Get Podcasts: https://pod.link/1655749292Want to comment and watch this podcast as a video? Check out our YouTube Channel. https://www.youtube.com/@hiddenkillerspod?sub_confirmation=1Join Our SubStack For AD-FREE ADVANCE EPISODES & EXTRAS!: https://hiddenkillers.substack.com/Instagram https://www.instagram.com/hiddenkillerspod/Facebook https://www.facebook.com/hiddenkillerspod/Tik-Tok https://www.tiktok.com/@hiddenkillerspodX Twitter https://x.com/tonybpodCheck out Robin Dreeke’s Master Class http://masterclass.com/robindreeke This publication contains commentary and opinion based on publicly available information. All individuals are presumed innocent until proven guilty in a court of law. Nothing published here should be taken as a statement of fact, health or legal advice.#JPMiller #MicaMiller #D4vd #CelesteRivasHernandez #JenniferCoffindaffer #HiddenKillers #FBI #TrueCrime #WrongfulDeath #CoerciveControl

D4vd inner circle lawsuit — the family of Celeste Rivas Hernandez did not limit their civil action to the musician. They went after the adults who allegedly watched it happen.The wrongful death lawsuit, filed September 8, 2026, names Colleen Burke, manager Josh Marshall, security guard Sheldon Jacques, and business entities. Twelve causes of action. The family alleges these adults knew or should have known what was happening to a fourteen-year-old and failed to act.Burke's former financial manager testified to earnings exceeding ten million dollars. Weeks after Celeste's remains were discovered, Burke transferred two Texas homes to his mother to shield assets. He now uses a public defender and is held without bail.Former FBI Special Agent Jennifer Coffindaffer analyzes what happens when the inner circle faces its own legal reckoning.Listen Anywhere You Get Podcasts: https://pod.link/1655749292Want to comment and watch this podcast as a video? Check out our YouTube Channel. https://www.youtube.com/@hiddenkillerspod?sub_confirmation=1Join Our SubStack For AD-FREE ADVANCE EPISODES & EXTRAS!: https://hiddenkillers.substack.com/Instagram https://www.instagram.com/hiddenkillerspod/Facebook https://www.facebook.com/hiddenkillerspod/Tik-Tok https://www.tiktok.com/@hiddenkillerspodX Twitter https://x.com/tonybpodCheck out Robin Dreeke’s Master Class http://masterclass.com/robindreeke This publication contains commentary and opinion based on publicly available information. All individuals are presumed innocent until proven guilty in a court of law. Nothing published here should be taken as a statement of fact, health or legal advice.#D4vd #CelesteRivasHernandez #WrongfulDeath #Lawsuit #JusticeForCeleste #DavidBurke #Murder #TrueCrime #JenniferCoffindaffer #HiddenKillers

JP Miller pastor case — he stood at the altar and officiated her wedding to another man. Years later, she was caring for his children. Then she was his wife.Mica was a teenager when she joined JP's youth ministry at Solid Rock Church. JP was fifteen years older. He officiated her marriage to Jeremy. After it ended, she became his employee. In 2015, he confessed to an affair with Mica from his pulpit. She was twenty. He was thirty-five. Both marriages ended. JP set the wedding terms. They wed in November 2017.Mica was thirty when she died on April 27, 2024. JP Miller faces federal cyberstalking and false statements charges. Trial is set for October 2026.Former FBI Special Agent Jennifer Coffindaffer examines how institutional authority gets weaponized.Listen Anywhere You Get Podcasts: https://pod.link/1655749292Want to comment and watch this podcast as a video? Check out our YouTube Channel. https://www.youtube.com/@hiddenkillerspod?sub_confirmation=1Join Our SubStack For AD-FREE ADVANCE EPISODES & EXTRAS!: https://hiddenkillers.substack.com/Instagram https://www.instagram.com/hiddenkillerspod/Facebook https://www.facebook.com/hiddenkillerspod/Tik-Tok https://www.tiktok.com/@hiddenkillerspodX Twitter https://x.com/tonybpodCheck out Robin Dreeke’s Master Class http://masterclass.com/robindreeke This publication contains commentary and opinion based on publicly available information. All individuals are presumed innocent until proven guilty in a court of law. Nothing published here should be taken as a statement of fact, health or legal advice.#JPMiller #MicaMiller #DeathOfThePastorsWife #Netflix #CoerciveControl #SolidRockChurch #Pastor #RedFlags #MyrtleBeach #TrueCrime

JP Miller Mica Miller interview — the former Myrtle Beach pastor faces federal trial in October 2026 on cyberstalking and false statements charges. Netflix's Death of the Pastor's Wife has the world watching.Prosecutors allege Miller carried out a campaign against Mica from November 2022 until her death on April 27, 2024 — a hired PI, a tire deflation device on her car, over fifty calls in one day, and an intimate image posted online without consent.Mica reported the harassment to Horry County police. The case stalled. The Robeson County Sheriff's Office requested federal involvement.Miller pleaded not guilty and posted bond. He faces up to seven years in prison.Former FBI Special Agent Jennifer Coffindaffer breaks down the FBI's involvement and the alleged coercive control campaign.Listen Anywhere You Get Podcasts: https://pod.link/1655749292Want to comment and watch this podcast as a video? Check out our YouTube Channel. https://www.youtube.com/@hiddenkillerspod?sub_confirmation=1Join Our SubStack For AD-FREE ADVANCE EPISODES & EXTRAS!: https://hiddenkillers.substack.com/Instagram https://www.instagram.com/hiddenkillerspod/Facebook https://www.facebook.com/hiddenkillerspod/Tik-Tok https://www.tiktok.com/@hiddenkillerspodX Twitter https://x.com/tonybpodCheck out Robin Dreeke’s Master Class http://masterclass.com/robindreekeThis publication contains commentary and opinion based on publicly available information. All individuals are presumed innocent until proven guilty in a court of law. Nothing published here should be taken as a statement of fact, health or legal advice.#JPMiller #MicaMiller #DeathOfThePastorsWife #Netflix #FBI #Cyberstalking #FederalTrial #SolidRockChurch #MyrtleBeach #TrueCrime

The Lindsay Clancy jury could not reach a verdict, but Kevin Reddington says the split was 11-1 for acquittal. Minutes after the mistrial, Plymouth County DA Tim Cruz defended the case and described the deaths as the “cruel and calculated killing of three innocents.” That contrast is where the next fight begins. Judge William Sullivan ended the trial September 4 after more than 38 hours of deliberation over seven days. The defense argued Clancy was experiencing postpartum psychosis and was not criminally responsible. The Commonwealth argued the evidence showed planning, awareness, and control. Cruz said the evidence suggested to his office that Clancy remained in control of her actions. Eric Faddis, a defense attorney and former prosecutor, joins Tony Brueski to examine the choices available after a mistrial like this. Prosecutors can retry the same theory, adjust the way the case is presented, reconsider charges, explore a plea, or decide another trial will not produce a better result. Faddis also looks at how much weight an office should give a reported 11-1 split when jurors never returned a unanimous verdict. Psychotherapist Shavaun Scott joins the conversation from a different direction. She looks at why the Clancy case has become so personal for viewers and why postpartum psychosis is being argued as a moral identity question instead of only a medical and legal issue. Her focus is on what that atmosphere communicates to parents who may already be frightened by their own thoughts and symptoms. Patrick Clancy’s lawyer has described another trial as extraordinarily painful for Patrick and his family. Cruz has not announced a retrial decision. With a September 29 court date scheduled, the prosecution has to decide what justice looks like after a jury reportedly came within one vote of acquittal. Listen Anywhere You Get Podcasts: https://pod.link/1655749292 Want to comment and watch this podcast as a video? Check out our YouTube Channel. https://www.youtube.com/@hiddenkillerspod?sub_confirmation=1 Join Our SubStack For AD-FREE ADVANCE EPISODES & EXTRAS!: https://hiddenkillers.substack.com/ Instagram https://www.instagram.com/hiddenkillerspod/ Facebook https://www.facebook.com/hiddenkillerspod/ Tik-Tok https://www.tiktok.com/@hiddenkillerspod X Twitter https://x.com/tonybpod This publication contains commentary and opinion based on publicly available information. All individuals are presumed innocent until proven guilty in a court of law. Nothing published here should be taken as a statement of fact, health or legal advice. #LindsayClancy #EricFaddis #HiddenKillersLive #TimCruz #ShavaunScott #PostpartumPsychosis #Mistrial #Retrial #CriminalJustice #TrueCrimeLive 

The Lindsay Clancy mistrial came after a jury-room complaint that raised a harder question than ordinary disagreement. Defense attorney Kevin Reddington said the foreperson identified a juror who had acknowledged doubt but was refusing to apply the court’s reasonable-doubt instruction to the verdict. Judge William Sullivan did not remove the juror. He questioned jurors about whether they could follow his legal instructions, reminded them of the reasonable-doubt standard, and sent them back to deliberate. The panel still could not reach a unanimous verdict, and Sullivan declared a mistrial on September 4 after seven days of deliberations. Then the conflict moved outside the courthouse. Patrick Clancy’s attorney Howard Cooper issued a September 8 statement condemning online claims that Patrick was involved in the deaths of his children, warning of possible legal consequences, and confirming that law enforcement had been notified. Former FBI counterintelligence behavioral expert Robin Dreeke joins Tony Brueski to look at the human mechanics of a pressured group. He examines what happens when eleven people believe the twelfth is not reasoning from the same rules, without turning limited information into a diagnosis of motive. Defense attorney and former felony prosecutor Eric Faddis handles the legal mechanics, including the narrow circumstances for questioning a juror and the protections surrounding deliberations. Eric also breaks down the defamation fight around Patrick: what lawyers would need to prove, how anonymous creators can become identifiable in litigation, and why notifying police is different from proving a crime occurred. The September 29 hearing sits at the intersection of a mistrial, a possible retrial, and an online fallout that has developed its own legal consequences. Listen Anywhere You Get Podcasts: https://pod.link/1655749292 Want to comment and watch this podcast as a video? Check out our YouTube Channel. https://www.youtube.com/@hiddenkillerspod?sub_confirmation=1 Join Our SubStack For AD-FREE ADVANCE EPISODES & EXTRAS!: https://hiddenkillers.substack.com/ Instagram https://www.instagram.com/hiddenkillerspod/ Facebook https://www.facebook.com/hiddenkillerspod/ Tik-Tok https://www.tiktok.com/@hiddenkillerspod X Twitter https://x.com/tonybpod This publication contains commentary and opinion based on publicly available information. All individuals are presumed innocent until proven guilty in a court of law. Nothing published here should be taken as a statement of fact, health or legal advice. #LindsayClancy #PatrickClancy #HiddenKillersLive #HoldoutJuror #Mistrial #RobinDreeke #EricFaddis #Defamation #JuryRoom #TrueCrimeLive 

Lindsay Clancy's mistrial has turned into a public legal chess match, and Kevin Reddington just added President Donald Trump to it. He asked for a pardon even though presidential clemency does not apply to Massachusetts state charges, then explained that he hoped outside attention could help influence how the local case is resolved. The move comes after Reddington spent the final stretch of trial attacking the Commonwealth's treatment of Clancy's injuries. Medical testimony described the neck and wrist wounds as superficial, but the second-story fall caused a spinal injury and paralysis. Reddington said prosecutors had tried to use the wound evidence to argue that Clancy's attempt on her own life was fake. The jury deliberated for roughly 38 hours over seven days before Judge William Sullivan declared a mistrial on September 4. Reddington has characterized the split as 11-1 for acquittal based on lack of criminal responsibility, and jurors who later spoke publicly described the same basic divide. District Attorney Timothy Cruz has not announced a retrial decision. An emergency Supreme Judicial Court bid over the holdout juror failed, and a spectator was arrested after allegedly filming jurors outside the courthouse. A presidential request may dominate the headline, but the next enforceable move belongs in Plymouth Superior Court. The September 29 proceeding is set for status, trial assignment, and the defense's Rule 25 request for a required finding of not guilty. That motion asks Sullivan to decide whether the Commonwealth's proof was legally sufficient, rather than asking him to choose which psychiatric experts he personally believed. Bob Motta of Defense Diaries and defense attorney and former prosecutor Eric Faddis join Tony Brueski to separate courtroom leverage from public leverage. They examine the injury argument, the reported 11-1 split, the renewed Rule 25 fight, and Reddington's public refusal to accept a deal requiring jail time. Listen Anywhere You Get Podcasts: https://pod.link/1655749292 Want to comment and watch this podcast as a video? Check out our YouTube Channel. https://www.youtube.com/@hiddenkillerspod?sub_confirmation=1 Join Our SubStack For AD-FREE ADVANCE EPISODES & EXTRAS!: https://hiddenkillers.substack.com/ Instagram https://www.instagram.com/hiddenkillerspod/ Facebook https://www.facebook.com/hiddenkillerspod/ Tik-Tok https://www.tiktok.com/@hiddenkillerspod X Twitter https://x.com/tonybpod This publication contains commentary and opinion based on publicly available information. All individuals are presumed innocent until proven guilty in a court of law. Nothing published here should be taken as a statement of fact, health or legal advice. #LindsayClancy #KevinReddington #HiddenKillersLive #BobMotta #EricFaddis #Mistrial #Rule25Motion #ClancyCase #LegalAnalysis #TrueCrimeLive

Donna Adelson's Dan Markel murder trial produced a handwritten script that prosecutors said was designed to manufacture testimony against Katherine Magbanua. Drina Bernhardt testified that Donna wrote the question-and-answer material for her to study and repeat in court, and an FDLE handwriting analyst testified that Donna was the writer. Bernhardt said Donna offered $10,000 and a grand piano as part of the arrangement. The defense challenged Bernhardt's motives, criminal exposure, and account of how the writing happened. Jurors also heard from another jailhouse witness who claimed Donna admitted involvement in Markel's murder, an accusation Donna's lawyers contested. The financial evidence gave jurors another fight to resolve. Prosecutors pointed to 44 checks Donna signed to Katherine Magbanua after the murder and argued they were tied to the plot. The defense said Donna signed the checks because Charlie told her he was being extorted and she believed him. One week after Charlie's 2023 conviction, authorities arrested Donna at Miami International Airport as she and Harvey prepared to travel to Vietnam on one-way tickets. Wendi Adelson's section of the case carries a different kind of dispute. Jeffrey Lacasse testified that five days before Markel was shot, Wendi told him Charlie had explored "all options" for the "Danny Markel problem," including hiring a hitman for about $15,000. Wendi testified that she did not recall the conversation and denied saying it. Lacasse also said Wendi questioned him about his planned Friday drive and route in the days before the murder, then asked him not to contact her for a week. Wendi was home for a Geek Squad repair on the television tied to Charlie's hitman joke and denied that the TV was code. Donna was later convicted on all three counts, while Wendi remains uncharged. Listen Anywhere You Get Podcasts: https://pod.link/1655749292 Want to comment and watch this podcast as a video? Check out our YouTube Channel. https://www.youtube.com/@hiddenkillerspod?sub_confirmation=1 Join Our SubStack For AD-FREE ADVANCE EPISODES & EXTRAS!: https://hiddenkillers.substack.com/ Instagram https://www.instagram.com/hiddenkillerspod/ Facebook https://www.facebook.com/hiddenkillerspod/ Tik-Tok https://www.tiktok.com/@hiddenkillerspod X Twitter https://x.com/tonybpod This publication contains commentary and opinion based on publicly available information. All individuals are presumed innocent until proven guilty in a court of law. Nothing published here should be taken as a statement of fact, health or legal advice. #DanMarkel #DonnaAdelson #HiddenKillersLive #WendiAdelson #JeffreyLacasse #AdelsonCase #MurderForHire #CourtroomTestimony #Tallahassee #TrueCrimeLive 

Nick Reiner and Lindsay Clancy are being compared in the same online conversations because addiction, psychosis, and criminal responsibility are emotionally loaded words. The facts behind the two cases force a harder comparison than the internet usually allows. Reiner is accused of killing his parents, Rob and Michele Reiner, in their Brentwood home. He has pleaded not guilty. A grand jury indictment adds a lying-in-wait special circumstance, an allegation prosecutors will have to prove if the case reaches trial. Long before the charges, Reiner publicly discussed repeated treatment for addiction, homelessness in several states, relapse, and an episode in which he wrecked his parents' guest house while using drugs. Clancy's defense did not dispute that she caused the deaths of her children. The trial question was whether postpartum psychosis left her legally unable to appreciate the wrongfulness of her actions. Prosecutors said she remained criminally responsible. The first jury never reached a verdict, and several jurors later said eleven of them favored a finding of not guilty by reason of insanity. Those distinctions have not kept the argument inside a courtroom. A TikTok creator claimed a disagreement over Clancy led him to cancel a $200,000 wedding, and he described his fiancee as a monster because of her view of the case. The viral reaction showed how quickly a legal disagreement can become a verdict on another person's character. Psychotherapist Shavaun Scott, author of Nightbird, joins Tony Brueski to examine the psychology underneath that reaction. They look at why people treat addiction and psychosis as if they carry the same information about choice. They also examine why compassion is often mistaken for excusing conduct, and why true-crime audiences can start judging each other more aggressively than they judge the evidence. Reiner's next hearing is set for September 15. Clancy's case remains active after the September 4 mistrial. Listen Anywhere You Get Podcasts: https://pod.link/1655749292 Want to comment and watch this podcast as a video? Check out our YouTube Channel. https://www.youtube.com/@hiddenkillerspod?sub_confirmation=1 Join Our SubStack For AD-FREE ADVANCE EPISODES & EXTRAS!: https://hiddenkillers.substack.com/ Instagram https://www.instagram.com/hiddenkillerspod/ Facebook https://www.facebook.com/hiddenkillerspod/ Tik-Tok https://www.tiktok.com/@hiddenkillerspod X Twitter https://x.com/tonybpod This publication contains commentary and opinion based on publicly available information. All individuals are presumed innocent until proven guilty in a court of law. Nothing published here should be taken as a statement of fact, health or legal advice. #NickReiner #LindsayClancy #HiddenKillersLive #ShavaunScott #RobReiner #Addiction #PostpartumPsychosis #TrueCrime #Mistrial #Nightbird 

Lindsay Clancy's attorney was asked to address conspiracy theories accusing Patrick Clancy after the September 4 mistrial. Kevin Reddington said he had not accused Patrick, then said he did not dismiss internet investigators and praised the ability of TikTok and Instagram users to ferret out facts. Four days later, Patrick's attorney said law enforcement had been notified about what he called a destructive defamation campaign. Patrick was not a defendant in this case. He was the Commonwealth's first witness. He testified about Lindsay's mental-health decline, the night their children died and the 911 call he made after returning home. Lindsay's defense did not contest that she killed Cora, Dawson and Callan; it argued that severe mental illness left her without criminal responsibility. No public evidence has established that Patrick participated in the deaths. The online case against him has instead been built from grief, appearance and personal choices. His relocation to New York became suspicious to some users. His remarriage became suspicious. His public forgiveness of Lindsay became suspicious. Even the way he testified became material for people trying to decide whether he looked like the kind of father they expected to see. Tony Brueski, retired FBI behavioral analyst Robin Dreeke and psychotherapist Shavaun Scott pull apart that process from two directions. Dreeke looks at how choosing a suspect first can make ordinary behavior look like supposed evidence. Scott examines why people impose rigid scripts on grief and punish survivors who do not perform pain in the expected way. Reddington's words and Cooper's warning now sit on opposite sides of the same online storm. How much responsibility comes with feeding curiosity when real people are absorbing the consequences? Listen Anywhere You Get Podcasts: https://pod.link/1655749292 Want to comment and watch this podcast as a video? Check out our YouTube Channel. https://www.youtube.com/@hiddenkillerspod?sub_confirmation=1 Join Our SubStack For AD-FREE ADVANCE EPISODES & EXTRAS!: https://hiddenkillers.substack.com/ Instagram https://www.instagram.com/hiddenkillerspod/ Facebook https://www.facebook.com/hiddenkillerspod/ Tik-Tok https://www.tiktok.com/@hiddenkillerspod X Twitter https://x.com/tonybpod This publication contains commentary and opinion based on publicly available information. All individuals are presumed innocent until proven guilty in a court of law. Nothing published here should be taken as a statement of fact, health or legal advice. #LindsayClancy #PatrickClancy #HiddenKillersLive #RobinDreeke #ShavaunScott #TrueCrime #KevinReddington #ConspiracyTheories #Mistrial #Grief 

Anna Kepner’s case is heading toward a federal trial while the family around Timothy Hudson is still fighting in a separate courtroom. Shauntel Hudson is Timothy’s mother and Anna’s stepmother. She has asked a judge to enforce and recalculate child support against her ex-husband, Thomas Hudson. Shauntel’s filing says the support order started at $2,129 per month for three children and later dropped as fewer children remained covered. She says Thomas failed to pay for several months and argues the current amount should be revisited because she believes his earnings are higher. Thomas disputes both points, and the child-support petition is still pending. A federal filing explains why this family dispute carries more weight than an ordinary support argument. Timothy’s defense says it cannot finish important preparation because access to certain relatives has been limited. His lawyers are gathering information for a Miller hearing, a proceeding that requires a judge to examine a juvenile defendant’s background before life without parole can be imposed. The defense compared that work to the detailed personal-history investigation used in the sentencing phase of a capital case. Judge Beth Bloom granted the defense request for additional time after prosecutors did not object. The trial is scheduled for November 2, 2026, and any plea agreement is due by October 23. Timothy, who was 16 when Anna died, has pleaded not guilty to first-degree murder and a second serious federal charge. The defense says family access matters to its preparation. The civil docket shows the same family arguing over payments and past parenting arrangements while Timothy remains in federal custody. By November, those separate fights may collide in one practical question: who will give the defense the history it says the federal judge may need? Listen Anywhere You Get Podcasts: https://pod.link/1655749292 Want to comment and watch this podcast as a video? Check out our YouTube Channel. https://www.youtube.com/@hiddenkillerspod?sub_confirmation=1 Join Our SubStack For AD-FREE ADVANCE EPISODES & EXTRAS!: https://hiddenkillers.substack.com/ Instagram https://www.instagram.com/hiddenkillerspod/ Facebook https://www.facebook.com/hiddenkillerspod/ Tik-Tok https://www.tiktok.com/@hiddenkillerspod X Twitter https://x.com/tonybpod This publication contains commentary and opinion based on publicly available information. All individuals are presumed innocent until proven guilty in a court of law. Nothing published here should be taken as a statement of fact, health or legal advice. #AnnaKepner #TimothyHudson #HiddenKillersLive #ShauntelHudson #ThomasHudson #CarnivalHorizon #FederalTrial #MillerHearing #CruiseShipCase #TrueCrime 

Kevin Reddington says Lindsay Clancy never received a plea offer before a jury was asked to decide whether she was criminally responsible for the deaths of her three children. Because the indictment charged first-degree murder, a conviction on those counts would mean mandatory life without parole.The trial ended without a verdict on September 4, 2026. Judge William Sullivan declared a mistrial after seven days of deliberations, leaving District Attorney Timothy Cruz’s office to decide what comes next. Reddington has said he would listen if prosecutors revisit the charges and propose a resolution, but no new deal has been announced.That unanswered criminal question now sits beside two civil lawsuits aimed at the care Lindsay received before the deaths. Patrick Clancy’s wrongful-death suit names psychiatrist Jennifer Tufts, nurse practitioner Rebecca Jollotta, Aster Mental Health, and South Shore Health System. Lindsay Clancy’s malpractice suit includes those defendants and additional providers. The complaints allege her care was fragmented, her worsening condition was not handled adequately, and providers failed to coordinate treatment.Patrick’s filing says eight different medications were prescribed over a three-week period. The defense used Clancy’s psychiatric history and treatment record to support its postpartum-psychosis argument, while prosecutors maintained that she remained able to understand the wrongfulness of her conduct and control her actions.Tony Brueski joins Bob Motta of Defense Diaries and Robin Dreeke for a combined discussion about the decision to push the criminal case to trial and the separate effort to hold medical providers financially responsible. Does justice require another jury, a negotiated criminal resolution, deeper scrutiny of the care system, or some combination the law can actually support?Listen Anywhere You Get Podcasts: https://pod.link/1655749292Want to comment and watch this podcast as a video? Check out our YouTube Channel. https://www.youtube.com/@hiddenkillerspod?sub_confirmation=1Join Our SubStack For AD-FREE ADVANCE EPISODES & EXTRAS!: https://hiddenkillers.substack.com/Instagram https://www.instagram.com/hiddenkillerspod/Facebook https://www.facebook.com/hiddenkillerspod/Tik-Tok https://www.tiktok.com/@hiddenkillerspodX Twitter https://x.com/tonybpodThis publication contains commentary and opinion based on publicly available information. All individuals are presumed innocent until proven guilty in a court of law. Nothing published here should be taken as a statement of fact, health or legal advice.#LindsayClancy #KevinReddington #HiddenKillersLive #RobinDreeke #BobMotta #PleaDeal #PostpartumPsychosis #MedicalNegligence #PatrickClancy #TrueCrimeLive

The Lindsay Clancy mistrial came after seven days of deliberations, and the number Kevin Reddington gave outside court changed the entire retrial conversation. Reddington said the jury was split 11-1, with eleven favoring a finding that Clancy was not criminally responsible and one juror holding out. Reddington supplied the direction of the split; the court announced no verdict. The court did receive a foreperson's note raising concern that one juror acknowledged doubt but was not applying the reasonable-doubt instruction. Judge William Sullivan refused to remove or further question the juror, and the defense's emergency appeal to the Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court did not stop the mistrial. Tony Brueski sits down with criminal defense attorney Bob Motta to work through the pressure points left behind by that deadlock. Bob explains why eleven reported votes can matter enormously to a prosecutor without carrying the legal force of an acquittal, and why replacing a deliberating juror is one of the most sensitive moves a trial judge can make. The defense is also asking for another path out. Reddington said he would pursue a Rule 25 motion seeking a required finding of not guilty, which asks Sullivan to end the case without sending it to another jury. Reddington wanted that argument heard quickly and said he was ready to select a new jury almost immediately if he lost. Sullivan instead set the matter for September 29, 2026, and suggested any retrial would have to fit the court, lawyers, witnesses, and a later fall calendar.Plymouth County District Attorney Timothy Cruz said no retrial decision had been made on September 4. Patrick Clancy's attorney described another trial as "extraordinarily painful" for Patrick and his family. Bob Motta weighs whether a prosecution that reportedly lost eleven jurors should try again, and what another twelve-person panel could change. Listen Anywhere You Get Podcasts: https://pod.link/1655749292 Want to comment and watch this podcast as a video? Check out our YouTube Channel. https://www.youtube.com/@hiddenkillerspod?sub_confirmation=1 Join Our SubStack For AD-FREE ADVANCE EPISODES & EXTRAS!: https://hiddenkillers.substack.com/ Instagram https://www.instagram.com/hiddenkillerspod/ Facebook https://www.facebook.com/hiddenkillerspod/ Tik-Tok https://www.tiktok.com/@hiddenkillerspod X Twitter https://x.com/tonybpod This publication contains commentary and opinion based on publicly available information. All individuals are presumed innocent until proven guilty in a court of law. Nothing published here should be taken as a statement of fact, health or legal advice. #LindsayClancy #BobMotta #HiddenKillersLive #KevinReddington #Mistrial #HungJury #ElevenToOne #CriminalResponsibility #PatrickClancy #TrialAnalysis 

FSU law professor Dan Markel won a custody battle that kept his two sons in Tallahassee, over his ex-wife's family's objections. Prosecutors say that ruling triggered a plan: Donna Adelson, the boys' grandmother, allegedly offered Markel a million dollars to reverse it. When he refused, two men drove five hours from Miami in a rented Prius and shot him twice in the head in his own garage, the same morning he'd dropped his sons at preschool. He was 41 years old. Investigators followed the money to a family dental office near Fort Lauderdale — 44 checks signed by Donna, $138,000 routed through a woman with no job there, and a toll transponder receipt tracking the killers' entire drive. The practice belonged to Charlie Adelson, Donna's son and a Fort Lauderdale periodontist pulling in three million a year. Prosecutors say Charlie orchestrated the murder of his former brother-in-law and paid for it through his own office, with his mother signing the checks and washing the cash. At trial, Charlie claimed he was the one being extorted — that the hitmen threatened him after the fact and he paid them off in monthly installments to survive. The prosecutor asked why an extortionist would send the victim's own girlfriend, Katherine Magbanua, to pick up the money. The jury deliberated three hours before convicting him. Five people are now behind bars, and Charlie's July 2026 appeal was denied after his attorney filed the wrong motion. Listen Anywhere You Get Podcasts: https://pod.link/1655749292 Want to comment and watch this podcast as a video? Check out our YouTube Channel. https://www.youtube.com/@hiddenkillerspod?sub_confirmation=1 Join Our SubStack For AD-FREE ADVANCE EPISODES & EXTRAS!: https://hiddenkillers.substack.com/ Instagram https://www.instagram.com/hiddenkillerspod/ Facebook https://www.facebook.com/hiddenkillerspod/ Tik-Tok https://www.tiktok.com/@hiddenkillerspod X Twitter https://x.com/tonybpod This publication contains commentary and opinion based on publicly available information. All individuals are presumed innocent until proven guilty in a court of law. Nothing published here should be taken as a statement of fact, health or legal advice. Hashtags #CharlieAdelson #DanMarkel #KatherineMagbanua #MurderForHire #AdelsonTrial #TrueCrimeToday #HiddenKillers #TrueCrime #DolceVita #Tallahassee 

The Lindsay Clancy mistrial created three live pressure points before the September 29 hearing: Kevin Reddington's no-jail stance, Patrick Clancy's legal warning to online accusers, and Tim Cruz's still-unanswered retrial decision. Defense attorney and former prosecutor Eric Faddis joins Hidden Killers Live to put each one in plain English.The jury deliberated for about 38 hours over seven days before Judge William Sullivan declared a mistrial on September 4, 2026. Reddington says the vote stood 11-1 for acquittal. He followed that result with a national television appeal asking President Trump to consider a pardon, even though presidential pardon power does not reach a Massachusetts state prosecution. He has also said he would not plead Lindsay Clancy to a day in jail.Patrick Clancy's attorney Howard Cooper made a different kind of move. His September 8 statement targeted accounts spreading allegations that Patrick was involved in the deaths of his children. Cooper called the campaign defamatory and destructive, said legal accountability would be pursued, and confirmed that law enforcement had been notified.Cruz answered the mistrial by defending the prosecution's view of the case. He said the evidence suggested to his office that Lindsay Clancy was in control of her actions and described the deaths as cruel and calculated. He has not announced whether his office will retry her.Eric Faddis explains what each move can actually do. A lawsuit can force an anonymous account into discovery. A public pardon request can send a political message even when the requested legal remedy is unavailable. A reported 11-1 split can change the leverage in conversations no camera sees.Those pressures follow the case into the September 29 hearing, where the court calendar begins forcing choices.Listen Anywhere You Get Podcasts: https://pod.link/1655749292Want to comment and watch this podcast as a video? Check out our YouTube Channel. https://www.youtube.com/@hiddenkillerspod?sub_confirmation=1Join Our SubStack For AD-FREE ADVANCE EPISODES & EXTRAS!: https://hiddenkillers.substack.com/Instagram https://www.instagram.com/hiddenkillerspod/Facebook https://www.facebook.com/hiddenkillerspod/Tik-Tok https://www.tiktok.com/@hiddenkillerspodX Twitter https://x.com/tonybpodThis publication contains commentary and opinion based on publicly available information. All individuals are presumed innocent until proven guilty in a court of law. Nothing published here should be taken as a statement of fact, health or legal advice.#LindsayClancy #KevinReddington #HiddenKillersLive #EricFaddis #TimCruz #PatrickClancy #September29 #Mistrial #ClancyTrial #TrueCrimeLive

A jury could not convict Lindsay Clancy, and District Attorney Tim Cruz has not dropped the case, has not announced a retrial, and has not offered a plea in public. Eric Faddis, defense attorney and former prosecutor, joins Hidden Killers Live to explain what is happening inside that office.The mistrial came September 4, 2026, after 38 hours of deliberation over seven days. Kevin Reddington says the jury split 11-1 for not guilty. Cruz's response was that the facts are Lindsay Clancy killed her three children, the evidence suggested she was in control of her actions, and the case is the cruel and calculated killing of three innocents. He said he has not decided on a second trial. The next hearing is September 29.The state's evidence of planning was a timeline. A 4:13 p.m. Apple Maps search for a Plymouth restaurant on January 24, 2023. A takeout order Lindsay placed at 5:10 p.m. Patrick Clancy leaving to pick it up at 5:54 p.m. Prosecutors said she was clearing the house. The defense said postpartum psychosis and conceded she caused the deaths. The jury could not agree on criminal responsibility.Tony asks Eric the questions the chat is already fighting over. What went wrong for the state? Did first-degree murder ask too much of a jury looking at a mother in psychiatric crisis? Can the expert testimony be fixed? At what point does an elected DA say the county cannot do this again? And does Patrick Clancy, whose attorney says another trial would be extraordinarily painful for him, get a vote?Lindsay Clancy is charged with three counts of first-degree murder in the deaths of Cora, Dawson, and Callan. She remains at Tewksbury Hospital.Listen Anywhere You Get Podcasts: https://pod.link/1655749292Want to comment and watch this podcast as a video? Check out our YouTube Channel. https://www.youtube.com/@hiddenkillerspod?sub_confirmation=1Join Our SubStack For AD-FREE ADVANCE EPISODES & EXTRAS!: https://hiddenkillers.substack.com/Instagram https://www.instagram.com/hiddenkillerspod/Facebook https://www.facebook.com/hiddenkillerspod/Tik-Tok https://www.tiktok.com/@hiddenkillerspodX Twitter https://x.com/tonybpodThis publication contains commentary and opinion based on publicly available information. All individuals are presumed innocent until proven guilty in a court of law. Nothing published here should be taken as a statement of fact, health or legal advice.#LindsayClancy #TimCruz #HiddenKillers #TrueCrime #TrueCrimePodcast #EricFaddis #Retrial #Mistrial #PatrickClancy #PlymouthCounty

After a jury could not convict Lindsay Clancy, her attorney told a national audience what he will and will not accept from the state. Eric Faddis, defense attorney and former prosecutor, joins Hidden Killers Live to break down Kevin Reddington's post-mistrial playbook.Judge William Sullivan declared the mistrial on September 4, 2026, after 38 hours of deliberation. Reddington says the jury was 11-1 for not guilty. He then went on Good Morning America and asked President Trump to consider a pardon, a request he knows the president cannot grant in a state case. He told CBS Boston the goal was to seek Trump's help and described DA Tim Cruz as a hard-charging conservative he hopes will reconsider. On a plea, he said: "I would not plead Lindsay Clancy to a day in jail." On September 29 he will ask the judge for a required finding of not guilty, which means a ruling that the evidence was too weak to convict.Tony asks Eric what the audience wants to know. What is a pardon request to Washington supposed to do to a county DA? Is a public no-jail promise a bluff or real leverage after an 11-1 split? What are the two sides actually saying to each other? Why file a motion judges rarely grant? And if prison is off the table, how does a defense lock in psychiatric care without a guilty plea?Lindsay Clancy is charged with three counts of first-degree murder in the January 2023 deaths of her three children. She is held at Tewksbury Hospital. DA Cruz has not decided on a retrial, and his office had no comment on Reddington's statements.Listen Anywhere You Get Podcasts: https://pod.link/1655749292Want to comment and watch this podcast as a video? Check out our YouTube Channel. https://www.youtube.com/@hiddenkillerspod?sub_confirmation=1Join Our SubStack For AD-FREE ADVANCE EPISODES & EXTRAS!: https://hiddenkillers.substack.com/Instagram https://www.instagram.com/hiddenkillerspod/Facebook https://www.facebook.com/hiddenkillerspod/Tik-Tok https://www.tiktok.com/@hiddenkillerspodX Twitter https://x.com/tonybpodThis publication contains commentary and opinion based on publicly available information. All individuals are presumed innocent until proven guilty in a court of law. Nothing published here should be taken as a statement of fact, health or legal advice.#LindsayClancy #KevinReddington #HiddenKillers #TrueCrime #TrueCrimePodcast #EricFaddis #TrumpPardon #Mistrial #ClancyTrial #PostpartumPsychosis

The warning went out on September 8, 2026, and it was aimed at the accounts that spent months claiming Patrick Clancy had something to do with his own children's deaths. Eric Faddis, defense attorney and former prosecutor, joins Hidden Killers Live to explain what that warning means for the people it was written to.Patrick's attorney, Howard Cooper, calls it a "relentless, escalating and destructive defamation campaign." His statement says the claims are outright falsehoods and that the people spreading them appear to be doing it for followers. It says every appropriate measure will be pursued to hold them accountable, including legally. It closes with four words that change the stakes for anyone posting under a screen name: law enforcement has been notified.Tony asks Eric the questions the audience is already asking. Can a lawyer actually find out who is behind a TikTok or Reddit account? At what point does a hot take become defamation a court will punish? What does an influencer have to turn over once they get sued? When does a smear campaign become a crime instead of a lawsuit? And if Patrick's team wins against a few of the biggest names, does this corner of true crime finally change?Patrick Clancy testified as the prosecution's first witness at the trial of his former wife, Lindsay Clancy, who was charged with three counts of first-degree murder in the January 2023 deaths of their three children. The jury deadlocked after 38 hours and the judge declared a mistrial on September 4, 2026. Whether there will be a second trial is now up to Plymouth County DA Tim Cruz.Listen Anywhere You Get Podcasts: https://pod.link/1655749292Want to comment and watch this podcast as a video? Check out our YouTube Channel. https://www.youtube.com/@hiddenkillerspod?sub_confirmation=1Join Our SubStack For AD-FREE ADVANCE EPISODES & EXTRAS!: https://hiddenkillers.substack.com/Instagram https://www.instagram.com/hiddenkillerspod/Facebook https://www.facebook.com/hiddenkillerspod/Tik-Tok https://www.tiktok.com/@hiddenkillerspodX Twitter https://x.com/tonybpodThis publication contains commentary and opinion based on publicly available information. All individuals are presumed innocent until proven guilty in a court of law. Nothing published here should be taken as a statement of fact, health or legal advice.#LindsayClancy #PatrickClancy #HiddenKillers #TrueCrime #TrueCrimePodcast #EricFaddis #Defamation #ClancyTrial #Duxbury #TrueCrimeCommunity

The Lindsay Clancy mistrial was declared September 4 after the jury split eleven to one. Three days later, the courtroom was empty and the damage was everywhere else.A man canceled a $200,000 wedding on TikTok because his fiancée expressed sympathy for Lindsay. He called her a monster in front of four million people. TikTok and Instagram creators accused Patrick Clancy of being the real killer using astrology and trial footage while the jury was still deliberating. Lindsay admitted through her defense that she killed the children.On September 8, Patrick's attorney Howard Cooper released a statement calling the accusations a defamation campaign and confirming law enforcement has been notified. Lindsay's own attorney Kevin Reddington, asked about the conspiracy theories, praised internet investigators' ability to "ferret out facts."Psychotherapist Shavaun Scott sits down with Tony Brueski for the full interview. Why the case is destroying relationships. How a grieving father became a TikTok suspect. What Reddington's comments did to the conspiracy. And why the fear underneath the Clancy rage is one most people watching refuse to confront.Listen Anywhere You Get Podcasts: https://pod.link/1655749292Want to comment and watch this podcast as a video? Check out our YouTube Channel. https://www.youtube.com/@hiddenkillerspod?sub_confirmation=1Join Our SubStack For AD-FREE ADVANCE EPISODES & EXTRAS!: https://hiddenkillers.substack.com/Instagram https://www.instagram.com/hiddenkillerspod/Facebook https://www.facebook.com/hiddenkillerspod/Tik-Tok https://www.tiktok.com/@hiddenkillerspodX Twitter https://x.com/tonybpodThis publication contains commentary and opinion based on publicly available information. All individuals are presumed innocent until proven guilty in a court of law. Nothing published here should be taken as a statement of fact, health or legal advice.#LindsayClancy #PatrickClancy #ShavaunScott #PostpartumPsychosis #ConspiracyTheories #TrueCrime #Mistrial #HiddenKillers #Nightbird #TrueCrimePodcast

Six weeks of testimony. Thirty-eight hours of deliberation. Eleven jurors believed Lindsay Clancy was not criminally responsible due to postpartum psychosis. One did not. The mistrial was declared September 4.The case is over. The fear it exposed isn't.Psychotherapist Shavaun Scott, author of Nightbird, joins Tony Brueski for a conversation about what the Lindsay Clancy trial is actually testing in the people watching it. Why mothers are recognizing something in this case they've never talked about. Why the word "monster" is a psychological shield and not a conclusion. Why the public treats a brain illness differently from a heart attack when both can end lives.Shavaun addresses the woman listening right now who experienced frightening thoughts after having a baby and has never told her partner, her doctor, or her closest friend. When the public conversation around this trial turns compassion into a character flaw and honesty into a risk, she explains what that silence means for the next mother in crisis.The trial asked whether Lindsay understood what she was doing. This conversation asks whether the rest of us understand what we're doing to each other.Listen Anywhere You Get Podcasts: https://pod.link/1655749292Want to comment and watch this podcast as a video? Check out our YouTube Channel. https://www.youtube.com/@hiddenkillerspod?sub_confirmation=1Join Our SubStack For AD-FREE ADVANCE EPISODES & EXTRAS!: https://hiddenkillers.substack.com/Instagram https://www.instagram.com/hiddenkillerspod/Facebook https://www.facebook.com/hiddenkillerspod/Tik-Tok https://www.tiktok.com/@hiddenkillerspodX Twitter https://x.com/tonybpodThis publication contains commentary and opinion based on publicly available information. All individuals are presumed innocent until proven guilty in a court of law. Nothing published here should be taken as a statement of fact, health or legal advice.#LindsayClancy #PostpartumPsychosis #ShavaunScott #Nightbird #MentalHealth #Motherhood #TrueCrime #Mistrial #HiddenKillers #TrueCrimePodcast

After Judge William Sullivan declared a mistrial in the Lindsay Clancy case on September 4, a reporter asked defense attorney Kevin Reddington about the conspiracy theories accusing Patrick Clancy of being the real killer. Reddington said he "certainly doesn't dismiss" the internet investigators and praised their ability to "ferret out facts." When the reporter pointed out that Patrick has been accused of his own children's deaths, Reddington replied "not by me."Four days later, Patrick's attorney Howard Cooper released a statement calling the online accusations a "relentless, escalating and destructive defamation campaign" driven by influencers and conspiracy theorists. Cooper confirmed law enforcement has been notified and warned that legal consequences will follow.Lindsay admitted through her defense that she killed the children. The trial's only question was criminal responsibility. Patrick testified as the prosecution's first witness.Psychotherapist Shavaun Scott joins Tony Brueski to examine what a defense attorney's refusal to shut down a conspiracy does to the person it targets, how false accusation becomes a business model on social media, and what happens to Patrick Clancy's ability to grieve when the internet turns his life into content.Listen Anywhere You Get Podcasts: https://pod.link/1655749292Want to comment and watch this podcast as a video? Check out our YouTube Channel. https://www.youtube.com/@hiddenkillerspod?sub_confirmation=1Join Our SubStack For AD-FREE ADVANCE EPISODES & EXTRAS!: https://hiddenkillers.substack.com/Instagram https://www.instagram.com/hiddenkillerspod/Facebook https://www.facebook.com/hiddenkillerspod/Tik-Tok https://www.tiktok.com/@hiddenkillerspodX Twitter https://x.com/tonybpodThis publication contains commentary and opinion based on publicly available information. All individuals are presumed innocent until proven guilty in a court of law. Nothing published here should be taken as a statement of fact, health or legal advice.#PatrickClancy #LindsayClancy #ConspiracyTheories #TrueCrime #Mistrial #HiddenKillers #ShavaunScott #Nightbird #Defamation #TrueCrimePodcast

The Lindsay Clancy mistrial left the legal question unresolved — and the personal ones got worse. A man claims he ended a $200,000 engagement after his fiancée expressed sympathy for Clancy and told him he would never understand postpartum illness. He put the breakup on TikTok and called her a monster. Four million people watched and picked sides.The jury heard six weeks of evidence and couldn't reach a verdict after thirty-eight hours of deliberation. People at home are ending relationships over the same question in a single conversation.Psychotherapist Shavaun Scott, author of Nightbird, joins Tony Brueski to examine why the Clancy case turns disagreement into a verdict on someone's character, why grief and compassion have become mutually exclusive in this conversation, and what happens to mothers right now who are afraid to admit what they recognize in Lindsay's story.The mistrial sent the jury home. It sent the rest of us to war.Listen Anywhere You Get Podcasts: https://pod.link/1655749292Want to comment and watch this podcast as a video? Check out our YouTube Channel. https://www.youtube.com/@hiddenkillerspod?sub_confirmation=1Join Our SubStack For AD-FREE ADVANCE EPISODES & EXTRAS!: https://hiddenkillers.substack.com/Instagram https://www.instagram.com/hiddenkillerspod/Facebook https://www.facebook.com/hiddenkillerspod/Tik-Tok https://www.tiktok.com/@hiddenkillerspodX Twitter https://x.com/tonybpodThis publication contains commentary and opinion based on publicly available information. All individuals are presumed innocent until proven guilty in a court of law. Nothing published here should be taken as a statement of fact, health or legal advice.#LindsayClancy #ShavaunScott #PostpartumPsychosis #TrueCrime #Mistrial #HiddenKillers #Nightbird #MentalHealth #Motherhood #TrueCrimePodcast

The mistrial did not end Lindsay Clancy’s legal fight. It expanded it. The criminal case is now frozen while DA Timothy Cruz decides on a retrial. Two civil lawsuits against the same medical providers are moving forward. And the defense is already setting the terms for a second trial — sequestration, a tainted jury pool, and a prosecution strategy that reportedly alienated eleven of twelve jurors.Clancy had pleaded not guilty to three counts of first-degree murder in the deaths of Cora, 5, Dawson, 3, and Callan, 8 months. The jury split eleven to one after seven days. The prosecution argued her injuries were insincere. The defense argued postpartum psychosis.Bob Motta of Defense Diaries covers the deadlock mechanics, the civil malpractice claims, and the strategic battles that will define the next phase of this case.Listen Anywhere You Get Podcasts: https://pod.link/1655749292Want to comment and watch this podcast as a video? Check out our YouTube Channel. https://www.youtube.com/@hiddenkillerspod?sub_confirmation=1Join Our SubStack For AD-FREE ADVANCE EPISODES & EXTRAS!: https://hiddenkillers.substack.com/Instagram https://www.instagram.com/hiddenkillerspod/Facebook https://www.facebook.com/hiddenkillerspod/Tik-Tok https://www.tiktok.com/@hiddenkillerspodX Twitter https://x.com/tonybpodThis publication contains commentary and opinion based on publicly available information. All individuals are presumed innocent until proven guilty in a court of law. Nothing published here should be taken as a statement of fact, health or legal advice.#LindsayClancy #LindsayClancyTrial #BobMotta #Mistrial #MedicalMalpractice #KevinReddington #TrueCrime #HiddenKillers #DefenseDiaries #TrueCrimeToday

Prosecutors argued to the jury that Lindsay Clancy’s fall from a second-story window was not sincere and that her injuries were superficial. Clancy, paralyzed and in a wheelchair, sat in the courtroom as the state made that case.The characterization was part of the prosecution’s theory that the killings of Cora, 5, Dawson, 3, and Callan, 8 months, were premeditated and that Clancy staged the scene to support an insanity defense. The defense argued the fall was a genuine psychotic act.The jury deadlocked eleven to one. Reddington filed an emergency petition with the state supreme court. It was denied. A woman was arrested for filming jurors. Sullivan declared a mistrial. And Reddington has already said he wants the next jury sequestered.Bob Motta of Defense Diaries examines the prosecution’s strategy, the emergency legal filings, and whether a retrial can produce a different result under the same insanity standard.Listen Anywhere You Get Podcasts: https://pod.link/1655749292Want to comment and watch this podcast as a video? Check out our YouTube Channel. https://www.youtube.com/@hiddenkillerspod?sub_confirmation=1Join Our SubStack For AD-FREE ADVANCE EPISODES & EXTRAS!: https://hiddenkillers.substack.com/Instagram https://www.instagram.com/hiddenkillerspod/Facebook https://www.facebook.com/hiddenkillerspod/Tik-Tok https://www.tiktok.com/@hiddenkillerspodX Twitter https://x.com/tonybpodThis publication contains commentary and opinion based on publicly available information. All individuals are presumed innocent until proven guilty in a court of law. Nothing published here should be taken as a statement of fact, health or legal advice.#LindsayClancy #LindsayClancyTrial #BobMotta #KevinReddington #DATimothyCruz #Retrial #TrueCrime #HiddenKillers #DefenseDiaries #TrueCrimeToday

At least nine psychiatric medications in the months before her children died. Eight of them prescribed in a three-week window. No coordinated care plan between providers. That is what the lawsuits filed by both Patrick and Lindsay Clancy allege against the doctors, nurse practitioners, and health systems that treated her.Lindsay’s own lawsuit alleges she was suffering from undiagnosed Bipolar I disorder with postpartum onset and that her providers’ uncoordinated prescribing caused the psychotic break. The criminal trial at Plymouth Superior Court ended in a mistrial with the jury deadlocked eleven to one.Dueling psychiatric experts at trial gave the jury irreconcilable testimony about her mental state. The prosecution’s experts said she appreciated what she was doing. The defense’s experts said psychosis made that impossible.Bob Motta of Defense Diaries examines the medication timeline, the civil lawsuits, and why the medical system’s role in this tragedy may only get a full hearing in a malpractice courtroom.Listen Anywhere You Get Podcasts: https://pod.link/1655749292Want to comment and watch this podcast as a video? Check out our YouTube Channel. https://www.youtube.com/@hiddenkillerspod?sub_confirmation=1Join Our SubStack For AD-FREE ADVANCE EPISODES & EXTRAS!: https://hiddenkillers.substack.com/Instagram https://www.instagram.com/hiddenkillerspod/Facebook https://www.facebook.com/hiddenkillerspod/Tik-Tok https://www.tiktok.com/@hiddenkillerspodX Twitter https://x.com/tonybpodThis publication contains commentary and opinion based on publicly available information. All individuals are presumed innocent until proven guilty in a court of law. Nothing published here should be taken as a statement of fact, health or legal advice.#LindsayClancy #LindsayClancyTrial #BobMotta #MedicalMalpractice #PostpartumPsychosis #PatrickClancy #TrueCrime #HiddenKillers #DefenseDiaries #TrueCrimeToday

The jury in Lindsay Clancy’s murder trial held together for seven days. They sent notes. They asked questions. The judge sent them back three times. And when they finally told Judge William Sullivan they could not reach a unanimous verdict, the count was eleven to one.Reddington said the eleven wanted to acquit and accused the holdout of bias against people with mental illness. He filed an emergency appeal to the Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court. The court rejected it. Sullivan declared the mistrial.Clancy had pleaded not guilty to three counts of first-degree murder in the deaths of Cora, 5, Dawson, 3, and Callan, 8 months. The defense argued postpartum psychosis. Prosecutors alleged deliberate action.Several female jurors broke down when the mistrial was announced. DA Timothy Cruz said he would decide on a retrial shortly. Patrick Clancy’s lawyer called the prospect of a second trial extraordinarily painful.Bob Motta of Defense Diaries breaks down the holdout juror’s impact, the retrial calculus for Cruz, and the emotional cost of asking families to do this again.Listen Anywhere You Get Podcasts: https://pod.link/1655749292Want to comment and watch this podcast as a video? Check out our YouTube Channel. https://www.youtube.com/@hiddenkillerspod?sub_confirmation=1Join Our SubStack For AD-FREE ADVANCE EPISODES & EXTRAS!: https://hiddenkillers.substack.com/Instagram https://www.instagram.com/hiddenkillerspod/Facebook https://www.facebook.com/hiddenkillerspod/Tik-Tok https://www.tiktok.com/@hiddenkillerspodX Twitter https://x.com/tonybpodThis publication contains commentary and opinion based on publicly available information. All individuals are presumed innocent until proven guilty in a court of law. Nothing published here should be taken as a statement of fact, health or legal advice.#LindsayClancy #LindsayClancyTrial #BobMotta #Mistrial #HungJury #PlymouthSuperiorCourt #TrueCrime #HiddenKillers #DefenseDiaries #TrueCrimeToday

The Lindsay Clancy trial is technically about criminal responsibility. Culturally, it has become a referendum on almost everything else.A jury unable to agree has been scrutinized from outside the room. Patrick Clancy has been scrutinized for rebuilding his life and forgiving Lindsay. Prosecutors are being questioned about a first-degree murder strategy that Lindsay’s attorney says never included a plea offer.Tony Brueski asks what these reactions have in common.We dislike uncertainty.We want the jury to agree. We want psychiatric experts to give us one clean answer. We want Patrick to grieve in a recognizable way. We want “justice” to mean something obvious.This case refuses to provide any of that.And maybe that is why the public response has become nearly as revealing as the legal fight itself.END LINKSListen Anywhere You Get Podcasts: https://pod.link/1655749292Want to comment and watch this podcast as a video? Check out our YouTube Channel: https://www.youtube.com/@hiddenkillerspod?sub_confirmation=1Join Our SubStack For AD-FREE ADVANCE EPISODES & EXTRAS!: https://hiddenkillers.substack.com/Instagram: https://www.instagram.com/hiddenkillerspod/Facebook: https://www.facebook.com/hiddenkillerspod/Tik-Tok: https://www.tiktok.com/@hiddenkillerspodX Twitter: https://x.com/tonybpodCheck out Robin Dreeke’s Master Class http://masterclass.com/robindreeke This publication contains commentary and opinion based on publicly available information. All individuals are presumed innocent until proven guilty in a court of law. Nothing published here should be taken as a statement of fact, health or legal advice.#LindsayClancy #TrueCrimeToday #PatrickClancy #LindsayClancyTrial #JuryDeadlock #CriminalResponsibility #PostpartumPsychosis #TrueCrimeEthics #TrueCrimeNews #TonyBrueski

Lindsay Clancy did not turn down a plea deal, according to Kevin Reddington. He says prosecutors never offered one.That means the spectacle we eventually watched was not the result of failed negotiations publicly known to us. The state pursued first-degree murder while the defense pursued lack of criminal responsibility.Both positions carried enormous consequences.A first-degree conviction means mandatory life without parole. A finding that Clancy lacked criminal responsibility could instead place her inside the state mental-health system, subject to evaluation and potential confinement.Tony Brueski examines what justice is supposed to mean when mental illness is not disputed but its legal effect is.Should punishment dominate? Treatment? Public safety?And does the enormous emotional weight of three children’s deaths make prosecutors politically incapable of entertaining an outcome that might be legally defensible but publicly unpopular?END LINKSListen Anywhere You Get Podcasts: https://pod.link/1655749292Want to comment and watch this podcast as a video? Check out our YouTube Channel: https://www.youtube.com/@hiddenkillerspod?sub_confirmation=1Join Our SubStack For AD-FREE ADVANCE EPISODES & EXTRAS!: https://hiddenkillers.substack.com/Instagram: https://www.instagram.com/hiddenkillerspod/Facebook: https://www.facebook.com/hiddenkillerspod/Tik-Tok: https://www.tiktok.com/@hiddenkillerspodX Twitter: https://x.com/tonybpodCheck out Robin Dreeke’s Master Class http://masterclass.com/robindreeke This publication contains commentary and opinion based on publicly available information. All individuals are presumed innocent until proven guilty in a court of law. Nothing published here should be taken as a statement of fact, health or legal advice.#LindsayClancy #TrueCrimeToday #LindsayClancyTrial #PleaDeal #JusticeSystem #PostpartumPsychosis #CriminalResponsibility #MassachusettsCourt #TrueCrimeNews #TonyBrueski

Patrick Clancy was not charged in his children’s deaths, and there is no public evidence implicating him.You would not know that from portions of social media.Online communities have dissected his move to New York, remarriage, testimony and personal history while unsupported theories attempt to turn the surviving father into another suspect in a case where the evidence does not establish that.Why?Tony Brueski examines something increasingly common in high-profile true crime: the belief that tragedy makes every surviving relative public property.Patrick forgave Lindsay. He did not publicly transform himself into an avatar for vengeance. He eventually rebuilt a private life.Instead of accepting that grief can coexist with survival, some observers treat recovery itself as suspicious.Maybe that says considerably more about what audiences want from tragedy than it says about Patrick Clancy.END LINKSListen Anywhere You Get Podcasts: https://pod.link/1655749292Want to comment and watch this podcast as a video? Check out our YouTube Channel: https://www.youtube.com/@hiddenkillerspod?sub_confirmation=1Join Our SubStack For AD-FREE ADVANCE EPISODES & EXTRAS!: https://hiddenkillers.substack.com/Instagram: https://www.instagram.com/hiddenkillerspod/Facebook: https://www.facebook.com/hiddenkillerspod/Tik-Tok: https://www.tiktok.com/@hiddenkillerspodX Twitter: https://x.com/tonybpodCheck out Robin Dreeke’s Master Class http://masterclass.com/robindreeke This publication contains commentary and opinion based on publicly available information. All individuals are presumed innocent until proven guilty in a court of law. Nothing published here should be taken as a statement of fact, health or legal advice.#PatrickClancy #TrueCrimeToday #LindsayClancy #OnlineConspiracies #TrueCrimeCommunity #GriefPolicing #LindsayClancyTrial #TrueCrimeNews #MassachusettsCourt #TonyBrueski

After more than thirty-five hours of deliberations, Lindsay Clancy’s jury faced something more complicated than disagreement.Her attorney says the foreperson told Judge William Sullivan that one juror was not applying the court’s reasonable-doubt instruction. The defense asked Sullivan to remove that juror. He declined.That decision puts the jury system itself under the microscope.A juror cannot be removed simply because eleven people dislike the twelfth person’s conclusion. That would destroy the entire purpose of unanimity. But what if the dispute is genuinely about refusing to follow the law?Then add dueling psychiatric experts, emotionally devastating evidence and six days of confinement with the same eleven people.Tony Brueski examines where legitimate dissent ends, where obstruction begins, and whether the pressure to produce a verdict can eventually become part of the problem.Check out Robin Dreeke’s Master Class http://masterclass.com/robindreeke Listen Anywhere You Get Podcasts: https://pod.link/1655749292Want to comment and watch this podcast as a video? Check out our YouTube Channel: https://www.youtube.com/@hiddenkillerspod?sub_confirmation=1Join Our SubStack For AD-FREE ADVANCE EPISODES & EXTRAS!: https://hiddenkillers.substack.com/Instagram: https://www.instagram.com/hiddenkillerspod/Facebook: https://www.facebook.com/hiddenkillerspod/Tik-Tok: https://www.tiktok.com/@hiddenkillerspodX Twitter: https://x.com/tonybpodThis publication contains commentary and opinion based on publicly available information. All individuals are presumed innocent until proven guilty in a court of law. Nothing published here should be taken as a statement of fact, health or legal advice.#LindsayClancy #TrueCrimeToday #JuryDeadlock #LindsayClancyTrial #HungJury #ReasonableDoubt #PostpartumPsychosis #MassachusettsCourt #TrueCrimeNews #TonyBrueski

Type "another Lindsay Clancy" into a search bar and watch how fast it autocompletes. That phrase now follows every headline about a mother and dead children — and it might be doing more damage than the case that inspired it.  Clancy, 34, of Duxbury, Massachusetts, was on trial for the January 24, 2023 killings of Cora, 5, Dawson, 3, and Callan, 7 months, allegedly strangled with exercise resistance bands inside the family's home. She's charged with three counts of murder and three counts of strangulation, and has pleaded not guilty. Her attorney's insanity defense leaned on documented postpartum psychosis and, reportedly, psychiatric overmedication — a hospital that allegedly saw the warning signs and didn't act. Clancy survived a suicide attempt after the killings and has been paralyzed from the waist down since. Her husband, Patrick Clancy, was out running errands when it happened.  After five weeks, eighty-plus witnesses, and three hundred exhibits, the jury told the judge three times they couldn't agree. Her attorney tried to remove a holdout juror; the state's highest court said no. The judge declared a mistrial.  Here's where it gets bigger than one case. Andrea Yates was the shorthand before Clancy — convicted, then found not guilty by reason of insanity on retrial. Roughly two-thirds of mothers who kill their children had a documented mental health history, and researchers say a large share were symptomatic at the time. More than twenty countries legally separate postpartum psychiatric crisis from premeditated murder. The United States doesn't. Tony breaks down what "another Lindsay Clancy" actually costs the next family standing where Clancy's stood, and why the comparison itself might be part of the failure. Links Join Our SubStack For AD-FREE ADVANCE EPISODES & EXTRAS!: https://hiddenkillers.substack.com/ Want to comment and watch this podcast as a video? Check out our YouTube Channel. https://www.youtube.com/channel/UC8-vxmbhTxxG10sO1izODJg?sub_confirmation=1 Instagram https://www.instagram.com/hiddenkillerspod/ Facebook https://www.facebook.com/hiddenkillerspod/ Tik-Tok https://www.tiktok.com/@hiddenkillerspod X Twitter https://x.com/TrueCrimePod Legal Disclaimer This publication contains commentary and opinion based on publicly available information. All individuals are presumed innocent until proven guilty in a court of law. Nothing published here should be taken as a statement of fact, health or legal advice. Hashtags #LindsayClancy #KevinReddington #HiddenKillers #TrueCrime #Mistrial #PostpartumPsychosis #DuxburyMassachusetts #PlymouthCounty #AndreaYates #AnotherLindsayClancy 

A jury that's already split on whether a mother is criminally responsible for killing her three children just found out someone was filming them on their way out of the courthouse. That's where the Lindsay Clancy trial stands right now. The panel spent five weeks hearing eighty witnesses and reviewing more than three hundred exhibits, all circling one unresolved question — was Lindsay Clancy psychotic on January 24, 2023, or wasn't she. The defense doesn't dispute what happened; Kevin Reddington has already told the court his client killed her kids with the exercise bands, and the DNA backs that up. The entire case now rests on criminal responsibility, and Massachusetts puts the burden of proving sanity on the prosecution once the defense raises it. When the jury told Judge Sullivan they couldn't reach a verdict, he read them the Tuey-Rodriguez charge — essentially telling them no future jury will have better evidence, so go back and keep trying. They did. They're still stuck. And somewhere in the middle of that impasse, a woman was arrested outside the courthouse accused of secretly filming jurors, with deleted footage of the panel recovered from her phone. Sullivan had to individually question every juror before letting deliberations continue. If this jury ultimately hangs, nothing about Lindsay Clancy's status changes. No acquittal, no conviction. She stays charged with three counts of murder, held at Tewksbury State Hospital, paralyzed from the waist down, while Plymouth County DA Timothy Cruz weighs what comes next. Defense attorney and former prosecutor Eric Faddis breaks down how close this case is to a mistrial, what the secret filming does to either side's appeal options, and why a jury this deadlocked was always going to be a coin flip.  Links & Footer Join Our SubStack For AD-FREE ADVANCE EPISODES & EXTRAS!: https://hiddenkillers.substack.com/ Want to comment and watch this podcast as a video? Check out our YouTube Channel. https://www.youtube.com/channel/UC8-vxmbhTxxG10sO1izODJg?sub_confirmation=1 Instagram https://www.instagram.com/hiddenkillerspod/ Facebook https://www.facebook.com/hiddenkillerspod/ Tik-Tok https://www.tiktok.com/@hiddenkillerspod X Twitter https://x.com/TrueCrimePod Check out Robin Dreeke’s Master Class http://masterclass.com/robindreeke  This publication contains commentary and opinion based on publicly available information. All individuals are presumed innocent until proven guilty in a court of law. Nothing published here should be taken as a statement of fact, health or legal advice. 

Six weeks. That's how long Nolan Wells' phone has sat with his family, untouched by a single forensic examiner, while two of the loudest voices in this case kept talking instead of waiting for evidence. The family agreed with the Jackson County DA back on July 15 to a joint exam at a community college lab — their experts, the DA's experts, maybe the FBI. Nobody locked in a date. Then the friends' attorney went on national radio and accused the family of refusing to cooperate. The DA's office answered with a 44-hour deadline to hand the phone over to her office instead, timed while Nolan's parents were out of state. The family called it bad faith and countered with any day between August 18 and 21. Meanwhile, Al Sharpton had already told the country this was suspicious — four days after Nolan's body was found, before the sheriff had ruled anything out, before an independent autopsy came back with no fractures, no lacerations, no deep-tissue injuries. He asked on camera if the friends were racist. He announced a six-figure reward at the funeral before cause of death was known. His attorneys now say he never accused the friends of anything. Go back and read what he actually said, in order, and see if you agree. Three strangers in three different states are now facing federal charges for threatening those friends over words that were never actually proven. And the phone that could end the guessing is still sitting in Ocean Springs, waiting on paperwork instead of a forensic lab. Listen Anywhere You Get Podcasts: https://pod.link/1655749292 Want to comment and watch this podcast as a video? Check out our YouTube Channel. https://www.youtube.com/@hiddenkillerspod?sub_confirmation=1 Join Our SubStack For AD-FREE ADVANCE EPISODES & EXTRAS!: https://hiddenkillers.substack.com/ Instagram https://www.instagram.com/hiddenkillerspod/ Facebook https://www.facebook.com/hiddenkillerspod/ Tik-Tok https://www.tiktok.com/@hiddenkillerspod X Twitter https://x.com/tonybpod This publication contains commentary and opinion based on publicly available information. All individuals are presumed innocent until proven guilty in a court of law. Nothing published here should be taken as a statement of fact, health or legal advice. Hashtags #NolanWells #AlSharpton #HornIsland #BenCrump #TrueCrime #HiddenKillers #Mississippi #JacksonCounty #Investigation #JusticeForNolan 

FITSNews published two of Mica Miller's 911 calls from February 2024, and together they show a household spiraling out of control. In the first, Mica tells a dispatcher that her husband's adult son made an unwanted advance toward her in her own kitchen while John-Paul Miller wasn't home. In the second, she says that same son — Logan Ryan Hardee, JP's oldest — has been following her across town in his work truck, that he's armed, and that he's living in the house she fled to escape JP. Logan was already facing a felony domestic violence charge after a different woman was hospitalized with a head injury; he's never been charged with anything involving Mica. Psychotherapist Shavaun Scott joins to explain the pattern underneath all of it — how every time Mica called police reporting harassment, tire slashing, or surveillance, JP had already told officers she was bipolar, schizophrenic, having an episode, then confiscated her phone, laptop, purse, and car. Federal prosecutors allege he tracked her car and posted an intimate photo of her online without consent. Two 2025 civil lawsuits allege JP and his father used their churches and a school to gain access to underage girls for two decades; his father never answered and lost by default. JP has pleaded not guilty to federal cyberstalking charges, with trial set for October 2026. Listen Anywhere You Get Podcasts: https://pod.link/1655749292 Want to comment and watch this podcast as a video? Check out our YouTube Channel. https://www.youtube.com/@hiddenkillerspod?sub_confirmation=1 Join Our SubStack For AD-FREE ADVANCE EPISODES & EXTRAS!: https://hiddenkillers.substack.com/ Instagram https://www.instagram.com/hiddenkillerspod/ Facebook https://www.facebook.com/hiddenkillerspod/ Tik-Tok https://www.tiktok.com/@hiddenkillerspod X Twitter https://x.com/tonybpod Check out Robin Dreeke’s Master Class http://masterclass.com/robindreeke This publication contains commentary and opinion based on publicly available information. All individuals are presumed innocent until proven guilty in a court of law. Nothing published here should be taken as a statement of fact, health or legal advice. Hashtags #MicaMiller #JPMiller #LoganHardee #ShavaunScott #DeathOfThePastorsWife #SolidRockChurch #HiddenKillers #TrueCrime #Netflix #CoerciveControl 

Eighteen minutes of a voice nobody else ever heard. Twenty minutes alone with three children. Those two windows of time are the entire case against — and for — Lindsay Clancy, and a Plymouth County jury is now deciding which one actually explains what happened in that Duxbury basement.  Patrick Clancy left for CVS and Thai food. When he came back, Cora, Dawson, and Callan were gone. Prosecutors say Lindsay used exercise bands, used the basement, and did it three separate times — once for each child — before missing a phone call, calling back, and having a completely ordinary conversation. ADA Jennifer Sprague argues that isn't consistent with a woman who wasn't in control of herself, and told the jury exactly that in closing.  Lindsay told forensic evaluators otherwise. A male voice she'd never heard before appeared that January afternoon and told her this was her last chance. It lasted about eighteen minutes and disappeared the moment the children were dead. She says it hasn't come back. Defense psychiatrists Paul Zeizel and Phillip Resnick both testified to postpartum psychosis and zero appreciation of wrongdoing — Resnick, notably, testified for Andrea Yates using nearly identical language decades ago. The state's own psychiatrist, Gregory Saathoff, told jurors that hallucinations don't usually clock out the second the act is finished.  Defense attorney Reddington's closing pointed somewhere else entirely: thirteen psychiatric medications, stacked on top of each other by providers who never once compared notes or coordinated Lindsay's care.  Retired FBI Special Agent Jennifer Coffindaffer and defense attorney Bob Motta sit down with Tony Brueski to argue out both sides of a case where the forensic experts can't agree — and neither, this time, can the hosts. Links & Disclaimer Join Our SubStack For AD-FREE ADVANCE EPISODES & EXTRAS!: https://hiddenkillers.substack.com/ Want to comment and watch this podcast as a video? Check out our YouTube Channel. https://www.youtube.com/channel/UC8-vxmbhTxxG10sO1izODJg?sub_confirmation=1 Instagram https://www.instagram.com/hiddenkillerspod/ Facebook https://www.facebook.com/hiddenkillerspod/ Tik-Tok https://www.tiktok.com/@hiddenkillerspod X Twitter https://x.com/TrueCrimePod Check out Robin Dreeke’s Master Class http://masterclass.com/robindreeke This publication contains commentary and opinion based on publicly available information. All individuals are presumed innocent until proven guilty in a court of law. Nothing published here should be taken as a statement of fact, health or legal advice. Hashtags #LindsayClancy #BobMotta #HiddenKillers #JenniferCoffindaffer #LindsayClancyTrial #PostpartumPsychosis #DuxburyMurders #TrueCrime #VerdictWatch #CommandHallucination 

Five drugs, one chart, zero coordination. That's how defense attorney Kevin Reddington framed Lindsay Clancy's psychiatric care for a Plymouth County jury — lorazepam, sertraline, hydroxyzine, buspirone, trazodone, stacked on a new mother by providers who never once talked to each other. He paired it with her handwritten journal from December 2022, a month before the killings, pages he said had collapsed into chicken scratches because her mind was already gone.  The defense closed with forensic psychiatrist Phillip Resnick, who evaluated Andrea Yates decades earlier and told this jury Clancy was clearly psychotic when she killed Cora, Dawson, and Callan.  Then there's what the prosecution's own witnesses said. Forensic psychologist Kirk Heilbrun told jurors this was a serious suicide attempt accompanied by killing her children out of love, because she couldn't bear to leave them behind. Forensic psychiatrist Gregory Saathoff, pressed by the defense, agreed the state's own opening statement had minimized what Clancy was going through, while also flagging inconsistencies in her account of the voice she says ordered the killings.  ADA Jennifer Sprague's closing pushed back hard: Clancy made a rational choice, her children were the only thing keeping her from taking her own life, and she left them in the basement and went upstairs to finish what she'd planned for herself.  Nine women and three men deliberated three and a half hours on their first day and went home without a verdict. Retired FBI Special Agent Jennifer Coffindaffer and defense attorney Bob Motta join Tony Brueski to argue over whether the state's own witnesses ended up handing the defense its case. Links & Disclaimer Join Our SubStack For AD-FREE ADVANCE EPISODES & EXTRAS!: https://hiddenkillers.substack.com/ Want to comment and watch this podcast as a video? Check out our YouTube Channel. https://www.youtube.com/channel/UC8-vxmbhTxxG10sO1izODJg?sub_confirmation=1 Instagram https://www.instagram.com/hiddenkillerspod/ Facebook https://www.facebook.com/hiddenkillerspod/ Tik-Tok https://www.tiktok.com/@hiddenkillerspod X Twitter https://x.com/TrueCrimePod Check out Robin Dreeke’s Master Class http://masterclass.com/robindreeke This publication contains commentary and opinion based on publicly available information. All individuals are presumed innocent until proven guilty in a court of law. Nothing published here should be taken as a statement of fact, health or legal advice. Hashtags #LindsayClancy #KevinReddington #HiddenKillers #JenniferCoffindaffer #LindsayClancyTrial #PostpartumPsychosis #InsanityDefense #TrueCrime #VerdictWatch #ClosingArguments 

Tupac Shakur's murder just got a verdict, and it's not the one Duane “Keffe D” Davis's own defense team was hoping for. A Las Vegas jury took roughly three hours to convict Davis of first-degree murder — after his lawyers spent almost two of those hours in closing arguments trying to undo eighteen years of Davis talking. A 2008 federal proffer. A 2009 police interview. A 2017 documentary. A 2019 memoir sold as the unfiltered truth. Prosecutors never recovered a weapon, never found the Cadillac, never pulled phone records or surveillance. They didn't need to. Davis had already told the story himself, repeatedly, on the record. The jury believed him enough to convict. His own attorneys argued he'd been lying the entire time. Both can't be fully true, and that's the mess this verdict leaves behind — because Davis is also the source of the biggest name attached to this case outside his own: Sean “Diddy” Combs, who Davis has accused since 2008 of offering a million dollars for the hit. Combs has denied it. Police have said he's never been named a suspect. And the people who could independently back up or shoot down Davis's version are dead — his alleged Harlem contact, the other men said to be in that Cadillac, all gone. Davis faces life in prison at sentencing and says he'll appeal. He's also asked for his phone and laptop back. What he does with either one, and what it means for the Diddy allegation he's spent eighteen years repeating, is where this story goes next. Join Our SubStack For AD-FREE ADVANCE EPISODES & EXTRAS!: https://hiddenkillers.substack.com/ Want to comment and watch this podcast as a video? Check out our YouTube Channel. https://www.youtube.com/@hiddenkillerspod?sub_confirmation=1 Instagram https://www.instagram.com/hiddenkillerspod/ Facebook https://www.facebook.com/hiddenkillerspod/ Tik-Tok https://www.tiktok.com/@hiddenkillerspod X Twitter https://x.com/tonybpod Check out Robin Dreeke’s Master Class http://masterclass.com/robindreeke This publication contains commentary and opinion based on publicly available information. All individuals are presumed innocent until proven guilty in a court of law. Nothing published here should be taken as a statement of fact, health or legal advice. Hashtags #TupacShakur #KeffeD #Diddy #SeanCombs #TupacMurderTrial #TrueCrime #HiddenKillers #GuiltyVerdict #LasVegas #Justice 

Psychotherapist Shavaun Scott joins Tony Brueski to explain what clinicians call the deadliest window — the period right after a victim tries to leave, when an abuser facing what's known as a narcissistic injury becomes most dangerous. Mica Miller served her husband, pastor John-Paul Miller, divorce papers on April 25, 2024. She was found dead forty-eight hours later at a North Carolina state park, in a death ruled a suicide. She had told a friend JP threatened to put a bullet in her head and make it look self-inflicted. He was verified to be in Charleston at the time and has not been charged. The next morning, JP delivered a full Sunday sermon to his congregation before saying a word about his wife's death, and later claimed he'd tried to raise her from the dead. Four days after that, he was seen drinking at a bar with congregant Suzie Skinner — whose wheelchair-bound Army veteran husband drowned in a community pool in September 2021 after confronting JP about an alleged affair. He married Suzie thirteen months later, with armed guards and no children present. Scott also addresses psychological homicide — the theory that a person can be driven to death without a hand ever being raised. Mica had told police JP controlled her since she was a child, filed at least eight police reports, and was still under his healthcare power of attorney when a December 2025 federal indictment detailed seventeen months of alleged cyberstalking. JP's trial is set for October 2026. Listen Anywhere You Get Podcasts: https://pod.link/1655749292 Want to comment and watch this podcast as a video? Check out our YouTube Channel. https://www.youtube.com/@hiddenkillerspod?sub_confirmation=1 Join Our SubStack For AD-FREE ADVANCE EPISODES & EXTRAS!: https://hiddenkillers.substack.com/ Instagram https://www.instagram.com/hiddenkillerspod/ Facebook https://www.facebook.com/hiddenkillerspod/ Tik-Tok https://www.tiktok.com/@hiddenkillerspod X Twitter https://x.com/tonybpod Check out Robin Dreeke’s Master Class http://masterclass.com/robindreeke This publication contains commentary and opinion based on publicly available information. All individuals are presumed innocent until proven guilty in a court of law. Nothing published here should be taken as a statement of fact, health or legal advice. Hashtags #MicaMiller #JPMiller #ShavaunScott #PsychologicalHomicide #SuzieSkinner #HiddenKillers #TrueCrime #Netflix #DeathOfThePastorsWife #CoerciveControl 

Criminal defense attorney Bob Motta of Defense Diaries spent five weeks and more than eighty witnesses inside the gallery at Lindsay Clancy's murder trial — close enough to watch her face change in real time, close enough to see what nine mothers sitting on that jury did when prosecutors described how each of her three children died. He joins Tony Brueski to describe what the broadcast cameras never captured: Patrick Clancy's family and Lindsay's own parents sitting feet apart in the same gallery for five straight weeks, the tension in the hallways during recess, and one specific moment when the entire room shifted at once. From there, Bob breaks down the prosecution's central argument — that Lindsay used a twenty-minute window, while Patrick was out for CVS and Thai takeout, to kill Cora, Dawson, and Callan with calculation, not confusion. The defense answered that organized behavior and psychosis coexist constantly in hospitals nationwide, pointing to Lindsay's documented history: more than a dozen psychiatric medications in the months before, a journal tracking her symptoms, and repeated warnings to her doctors that she was having intrusive thoughts about harming her children. Bob explains which version the jury seemed to believe, based on what he watched play out in real time from the seat next to her. Listen Anywhere You Get Podcasts: https://pod.link/1655749292 Want to comment and watch this podcast as a video? Check out our YouTube Channel. https://www.youtube.com/@hiddenkillerspod?sub_confirmation=1 Join Our SubStack For AD-FREE ADVANCE EPISODES & EXTRAS!: https://hiddenkillers.substack.com/ Instagram https://www.instagram.com/hiddenkillerspod/ Facebook https://www.facebook.com/hiddenkillerspod/ Tik-Tok https://www.tiktok.com/@hiddenkillerspod X Twitter https://x.com/tonybpod Check out Robin Dreeke’s Master Class http://masterclass.com/robindreeke This publication contains commentary and opinion based on publicly available information. All individuals are presumed innocent until proven guilty in a court of law. Nothing published here should be taken as a statement of fact, health or legal advice. Hashtags #LindsayClancy #BobMotta #LindsayClancyTrial #PostpartumPsychosis #PlymouthCourt #HiddenKillers #TrueCrime #MurderTrial #DefenseDiaries #Courtroom 

There's a woman who already lived through the exact legal question hanging over the Lindsay Clancy case — she killed her five children, was found not guilty by reason of insanity, and has stayed locked up for more than two decades since. Her name is Andrea Yates, and defense trial attorney Bob Motta says her outcome is the closest thing to a preview of what happens to Lindsay Clancy next. Motta sat through all five weeks of the Clancy trial and breaks down the five verdicts this jury was choosing between — not guilty, not guilty by reason of lack of criminal responsibility, first-degree murder, second-degree murder, manslaughter — and what each one actually means day to day. Some paths lead to prison with no parole. Others lead to a psychiatric commitment with no maximum sentence, annual evaluations, and a locked ward that looks a lot like the one Lindsay Clancy has been living in since her children — Cora, Dawson, and Callan — died and she tried to take her own life on January 24, 2023. Motta also unpacks the malpractice lawsuits she and her husband Patrick filed against her medical providers, and what a criminal verdict could mean for those cases. Defense attorney and former prosecutor Eric Faddis covers what happens if the jury can't get there at all. A retrial is the obvious move — Massachusetts just retried Karen Read within minutes of her own deadlock — but Lindsay Clancy also has the option to waive a jury completely and let a single judge decide. Faddis explains why that changes everything, and why Kevin Reddington's already-denied bifurcation motion might get a second look. Two guests, one case, and a defendant who may already know how this ends. Links & Footer Join Our SubStack For AD-FREE ADVANCE EPISODES & EXTRAS!: https://hiddenkillers.substack.com/ Want to comment and watch this podcast as a video? Check out our YouTube Channel. https://www.youtube.com/channel/UC8-vxmbhTxxG10sO1izODJg?sub_confirmation=1 Instagram https://www.instagram.com/hiddenkillerspod/ Facebook https://www.facebook.com/hiddenkillerspod/ Tik-Tok https://www.tiktok.com/@hiddenkillerspod X Twitter https://x.com/TrueCrimePod Check out Robin Dreeke’s Master Class http://masterclass.com/robindreeke   This publication contains commentary and opinion based on publicly available information. All individuals are presumed innocent until proven guilty in a court of law. Nothing published here should be taken as a statement of fact, health or legal advice. Hashtags #LindsayClancy #BobMotta #HiddenKillersPodcast #EricFaddis #AndreaYates #InsanityDefense #BenchTrial #PlymouthSuperiorCourt #TrueCrime #TrueCrimePodcast 

Nine women and three men walked into a Plymouth Superior Court deliberation room on August 27 to decide Lindsay Clancy's fate. Three and a half hours later, they walked out with no verdict. Lindsay has admitted to killing her three children — the only question left is whether postpartum psychosis erases her criminal responsibility for it. Five options sit on the verdict slips: first-degree murder, second-degree murder, manslaughter, not criminally responsible, or not guilty, each carrying a completely different outcome, from life without parole down to indefinite psychiatric commitment. Retired FBI Special Agent Jennifer Coffindaffer joins Tony Brueski live as the jury deliberates, and the two of them don't agree on where this lands. Can nine mothers sentence another mother suffering a documented mental health crisis to life in prison? Is manslaughter the middle ground this jury reaches for? What does a hung jury even mean after four weeks of testimony? Meanwhile, criminal defense attorney Bob Motta — who watched Patrick Clancy testify in person — addresses the surveillance footage placing Patrick outside the home and whether it gives any real oxygen to the online conspiracy theories accusing him instead of Lindsay. Patrick's wrongful death lawsuit against her medical providers is already filed, and if a civil jury finds those providers liable for the same three deaths this criminal jury is weighing, the two verdicts could end up telling completely different stories about what happened. Listen Anywhere You Get Podcasts: https://pod.link/1655749292 Want to comment and watch this podcast as a video? Check out our YouTube Channel. https://www.youtube.com/@hiddenkillerspod?sub_confirmation=1 Join Our SubStack For AD-FREE ADVANCE EPISODES & EXTRAS!: https://hiddenkillers.substack.com/ Instagram https://www.instagram.com/hiddenkillerspod/ Facebook https://www.facebook.com/hiddenkillerspod/ Tik-Tok https://www.tiktok.com/@hiddenkillerspod X Twitter https://x.com/tonybpod Check out Robin Dreeke’s Master Class http://masterclass.com/robindreeke This publication contains commentary and opinion based on publicly available information. All individuals are presumed innocent until proven guilty in a court of law. Nothing published here should be taken as a statement of fact, health or legal advice. Hashtags #LindsayClancy #JenniferCoffindaffer #LindsayClancyTrial #JuryDeliberations #PostpartumPsychosis #HiddenKillers #TrueCrime #NineWomen #BobMotta #MaternalMentalHealth 

A man who confessed to four murders and gave up his right to appeal is going back in front of a judge — and it's not for the reason you'd expect. Bryan Kohberger filed a handwritten petition from jail in July 2026 claiming his own defense attorneys, Anne Taylor, Elisa Massoth, and Bicka Barlow, coerced him into confessing. He says they promised prison conditions that never happened and hid evidence he considers exculpatory, including hair found in Ethan Chapin's hand that was excluded through physical analysis but never actually DNA tested. Prosecutors wanted the whole thing dismissed without a hearing. Judge Steven Hippler — the same judge who accepted Kohberger's guilty plea back in July 2025 — said no. A status conference is set for June 3, 2027, with a full evidentiary hearing on June 17. Here's where it gets stranger: Sy Ray, the digital forensics expert Kohberger's own defense team hired, told reporters investigators missed even more incriminating cellphone geolocation data placing Kohberger near the house before the murders — and said flat out he believes Kohberger would be convicted again. Ray wants the death penalty back in play. Kohberger's new attorney, Greg Rauch, was appointed in August 2026 and hadn't read the case file or even spoken to his client yet. He has ten months to prepare for a hearing where Kohberger's former lawyers could be put under oath and forced to say, on the record, exactly what they told their client and when. Listen Anywhere You Get Podcasts: https://pod.link/1655749292 Want to comment and watch this podcast as a video? Check out our YouTube Channel. https://www.youtube.com/@hiddenkillerspod?sub_confirmation=1 Join Our SubStack For AD-FREE ADVANCE EPISODES & EXTRAS!: https://hiddenkillers.substack.com/ Instagram https://www.instagram.com/hiddenkillerspod/ Facebook https://www.facebook.com/hiddenkillerspod/ Tik-Tok https://www.tiktok.com/@hiddenkillerspod X Twitter https://x.com/tonybpod Check out Robin Dreeke’s Master Class http://masterclass.com/robindreeke This publication contains commentary and opinion based on publicly available information. All individuals are presumed innocent until proven guilty in a court of law. Nothing published here should be taken as a statement of fact, health or legal advice. Hashtags #BryanKohberger #KohbergerHearing #SyRay #IdahoMurders #EvidentiaryHearing #HiddenKillers #TrueCrime #UniversityOfIdaho #MoscowIdaho #PostConvictionRelief 

Psychotherapist Shavaun Scott, author of Nightbird, joins Tony to walk through a timeline most people watching “Death of the Pastor's Wife” can see but may not fully understand. According to a police report Mica Miller filed in February 2024, pastor John-Paul Miller had been pursuing her since she was ten years old — fourteen years her senior, already married, already her pastor. His attorney has denied the allegation. What the Netflix documentary lays out next is its own kind of evidence: JP officiated Mica's first wedding at eighteen, brought her on as his personal assistant, started an affair with her while she was babysitting his own children, and married her himself in 2017. Every role in her life — wife, employee, worship leader at Solid Rock Church — ran through the same man. Friends allege he demanded compliance from her multiple times a day and withheld sleep when she refused. They allege he pushed her onto testosterone that damaged her singing voice. Family attorney Regina Ward alleges he later put her on his own lithium without her knowledge. Siblings allege an involuntary hospitalization followed, and that her car, phone, and laptop were seized while she was locked inside. Federal prosecutors allege an intimate photo from that laptop surfaced online without her consent. JP has pleaded not guilty to federal cyberstalking charges, with trial set for October 2026. Scott breaks down what that full timeline clinically represents — and why a pattern like this so often goes unrecognized until it's too late. Listen Anywhere You Get Podcasts: https://pod.link/1655749292 Want to comment and watch this podcast as a video? Check out our YouTube Channel. https://www.youtube.com/@hiddenkillerspod?sub_confirmation=1 Join Our SubStack For AD-FREE ADVANCE EPISODES & EXTRAS!: https://hiddenkillers.substack.com/ Instagram https://www.instagram.com/hiddenkillerspod/ Facebook https://www.facebook.com/hiddenkillerspod/ Tik-Tok https://www.tiktok.com/@hiddenkillerspod X Twitter https://x.com/tonybpod Check out Robin Dreeke’s Master Class http://masterclass.com/robindreeke This publication contains commentary and opinion based on publicly available information. All individuals are presumed innocent until proven guilty in a court of law. Nothing published here should be taken as a statement of fact, health or legal advice. Hashtags #MicaMiller #JPMiller #ShavaunScott #DeathOfThePastorsWife #SolidRockChurch #SpiritualAbuse #HiddenKillers #TrueCrime #Netflix #CoerciveControl 

The foreperson of the Lindsay Clancy murder trial jury is speaking publicly, and what she is describing from inside that deliberation room challenges the assumption that a hung jury means the evidence was close.Roni Carlson told NBC Boston that the holdout juror admitted he had reasonable doubt about Clancy's guilt. She began filling out the verdict forms. Three separate documents. She signed each one. Then the holdout said he was not going to vote not guilty by reason of insanity, despite his own admission.The jury was deadlocked 11-to-1 at Plymouth Superior Court. Eleven jurors favored acquitting Clancy on the grounds that she was not criminally responsible due to postpartum psychosis. One would not move. Jurors sent a note to Judge William Sullivan saying the holdout was not following the court's reasonable doubt instructions. Sullivan questioned each juror individually and denied Kevin Reddington's motion to remove the holdout.Juror Kellie Farina said the 911 call from Patrick Clancy will stay with her permanently. Other jurors described leaving the courthouse physically ill after listening to testimony about the deaths of Cora, Dawson, and Callan on January 24, 2023.Former FBI Special Agent Robin Dreeke examines how a single holdout can shut down an 11-person consensus, what the behavioral markers are when someone has checked out of deliberation, and whether secondary trauma from evidence makes an objective verdict impossible.Listen Anywhere You Get Podcasts: https://pod.link/1655749292Want to comment and watch this podcast as a video? Check out our YouTube Channel. https://www.youtube.com/@hiddenkillerspod?sub_confirmation=1Join Our SubStack For AD-FREE ADVANCE EPISODES & EXTRAS!: https://hiddenkillers.substack.com/Instagram https://www.instagram.com/hiddenkillerspod/Facebook https://www.facebook.com/hiddenkillerspod/Tik-Tok https://www.tiktok.com/@hiddenkillerspodX Twitter https://x.com/tonybpodThis publication contains commentary and opinion based on publicly available information. All individuals are presumed innocent until proven guilty in a court of law. Nothing published here should be taken as a statement of fact, health or legal advice.#LindsayClancy #LindsayClancyTrial #HiddenKillers #HungJury #RobinDreeke #PlymouthSuperiorCourt #PostpartumPsychosis #KevinReddington #TrueCrime #TrueCrimePodcast

Defense attorney and former prosecutor Eric Faddis covers the full scope of what is happening in and around the Lindsay Clancy murder trial at Plymouth Superior Court.The jury has been stuck for days. They sent deadlock notes. The judge gave them the Tuey-Rodriguez instruction. They went back in and still could not agree. The impasse appears rooted in a medical dispute—dueling psychiatric experts who examined the same woman and reached opposite conclusions—that twelve people with no medical training cannot resolve.Outside the courthouse, a woman was arrested for filming the jurors as they left. She told reporters she came to see Lindsay. Police found deleted videos on her phone. The judge questioned each juror one by one before letting them continue. The arrest creates potential grounds for appeal if a verdict is reached and complicates any future proceeding if it is not.If a mistrial is declared, the defense has options the public has not heard about. A bench trial would let a judge decide instead of a jury. A renewed bifurcation motion could narrow a retrial to the single question this jury could not answer. Massachusetts precedent points toward a retry, but the combination of the deadlock's depth, the outside interference, and the defense's available moves makes this a more complex calculation.Faddis breaks down all three developments—the deadlock, the arrest, and what comes next.Listen Anywhere You Get Podcasts: https://pod.link/1655749292Want to comment and watch this podcast as a video? Check out our YouTube Channel. https://www.youtube.com/@hiddenkillerspod?sub_confirmation=1Join Our SubStack For AD-FREE ADVANCE EPISODES & EXTRAS!: https://hiddenkillers.substack.com/Instagram https://www.instagram.com/hiddenkillerspod/Facebook https://www.facebook.com/hiddenkillerspod/Tik-Tok https://www.tiktok.com/@hiddenkillerspodX Twitter https://x.com/tonybpodThis publication contains commentary and opinion based on publicly available information. All individuals are presumed innocent until proven guilty in a court of law. Nothing published here should be taken as a statement of fact, health or legal advice.#LindsayClancy #LindsayClancyTrial #HiddenKillers #EricFaddis #HungJury #JuryFilming #BenchTrial #PostpartumPsychosis #TrueCrime #TrueCrimePodcast