Hidden Killers Live! Daily True Crime News & Breakdowns

Luigi Mangione walked into federal court on August 14 and confessed to killing UnitedHealthcare CEO Brian Thompson. He pleaded guilty to two stalking charges. The murder charge had already been dismissed. There was no agreement with prosecutors.Jennifer Coffindaffer, a retired FBI Special Agent, joins Tony Brueski on Hidden Killers Live to cover what the plea means and where this case goes from here.Mangione described the planning in open court. He said he emailed UnitedHealthcare posing as an investor managing billions to get the exact conference location. The company responded within an hour. He arrived before Thompson and waited for him outside the venue.His defense filed to block the state murder case on double jeopardy grounds within hours. The state had set jury selection for September 8. The defense requested the federal hearing three days earlier.Since his arrest in December 2024, Mangione has avoided terrorism charges, the federal death penalty, and a federal murder conviction. He is twenty-eight. The sentencing guidelines suggest twenty-four to thirty years. Federal prosecutors say they want life.Coffindaffer covers whether the timeline of the hearing request, the plea, and the double jeopardy filing looks improvised or choreographed, and whether the legal system has failed to hold Mangione accountable or failed to keep up with a defense that has outpaced it at every turn.Tony Brueski and retired FBI Special Agent Jennifer Coffindaffer.Listen Anywhere You Get Podcasts: https://pod.link/1655749292Want to comment and watch this podcast as a video? Check out our YouTube Channel. https://www.youtube.com/@UC8-vxmbhTxxG10sO1izODJgJoin Our SubStack For AD-FREE ADVANCE EPISODES & EXTRAS!: https://hiddenkillers.substack.com/Instagram https://www.instagram.com/hiddenkillerspod/ Facebook https://www.facebook.com/hiddenkillerspod/ Tik-Tok https://www.tiktok.com/@hiddenkillerspod X Twitter https://x.com/tonybpodThis publication contains commentary and opinion based on publicly available information. All individuals are presumed innocent until proven guilty in a court of law. Nothing published here should be taken as a statement of fact, health or legal advice.#LuigiMangione #BrianThompson #HiddenKillersLive #JenniferCoffindaffer #GuiltyPlea #DoubleJeopardy #TrueCrime #UnitedHealthcare #FederalCourt #CriminalJustice

Not one of the four providers treating Lindsay Clancy before January 24, 2023, ever contacted another to compare notes on her care. Her psychiatrist saw her fourteen times. Her nurse practitioner had no record of those visits. When Clancy admitted herself to a locked psychiatric ward, her outpatient providers were not informed.Retired FBI Special Agent Jennifer Coffindaffer joins Tony Brueski on Hidden Killers Live to cover what the trial testimony at Plymouth Superior Court has shown about a fractured mental health system and a mother who fell through it.Clancy messaged her treatment team about thoughts she had never experienced before. She searched for "hallucinations" on her phone. Published research puts postpartum psychosis at one in a thousand births and documents a four percent infanticide rate within that population. Her defense argues she was psychotic when she killed Cora, five, Dawson, three, and Callan, eight months.She attempted to take her own life immediately after. She jumped from a window, broke her spine, and is permanently paralyzed. She cut her own neck and wrists. Her blood pressure dropped in the ICU and she went into cardiac arrest.The prosecution says she planned it. Coffindaffer examines whether planning and psychosis can exist in the same person at the same time, and what thirteen psychiatric medications, four disconnected providers, and a treatment program refusal tell an investigator.Lindsay Clancy has pleaded not guilty. She is presumed innocent.Tony Brueski and retired FBI Special Agent Jennifer Coffindaffer.Listen Anywhere You Get Podcasts: https://pod.link/1655749292Want to comment and watch this podcast as a video? Check out our YouTube Channel. https://www.youtube.com/@UC8-vxmbhTxxG10sO1izODJgJoin Our SubStack For AD-FREE ADVANCE EPISODES & EXTRAS!: https://hiddenkillers.substack.com/Instagram https://www.instagram.com/hiddenkillerspod/ Facebook https://www.facebook.com/hiddenkillerspod/ Tik-Tok https://www.tiktok.com/@hiddenkillerspod X Twitter https://x.com/tonybpodThis publication contains commentary and opinion based on publicly available information. All individuals are presumed innocent until proven guilty in a court of law. Nothing published here should be taken as a statement of fact, health or legal advice.#LindsayClancy #PatrickClancy #HiddenKillersLive #JenniferCoffindaffer #PostpartumPsychosis #PlymouthSuperiorCourt #TrueCrime #InsanityDefense #MentalHealth #CriminalJustice

Week 3 of the Lindsay Clancy murder trial produced psychiatric witnesses who undercut the prosecution's case, autopsy testimony that left the courtroom in tears, and a conspiracy theory about Patrick Clancy that has no basis in the evidence.Clancy has pleaded not guilty to three counts of first-degree murder in the deaths of Cora, 5, Dawson, 3, and Callan, 8 months. She admits to killing her children. Her defense argues she was overmedicated and in a postpartum psychotic state. Prosecutors say she was deliberate.Criminal defense trial attorney Bob Motta of Defense Diaries was present throughout the week at Plymouth Superior Court. He examines the prosecution's problem with its own witnesses, what the jury is experiencing as the emotional weight of the trial escalates, and the distance between what the evidence shows about Patrick Clancy and what TikTok claims he did.Listen Anywhere You Get Podcasts: https://pod.link/1655749292Want to comment and watch this podcast as a video? Check out our YouTube Channel. https://www.youtube.com/@UC8-vxmbhTxxG10sO1izODJgJoin Our SubStack For AD-FREE ADVANCE EPISODES & EXTRAS!: https://hiddenkillers.substack.com/Instagram https://www.instagram.com/hiddenkillerspod/Facebook https://www.facebook.com/hiddenkillerspod/Tik-Tok https://www.tiktok.com/@hiddenkillerspodX Twitter https://x.com/tonybpodThis publication contains commentary and opinion based on publicly available information. All individuals are presumed innocent until proven guilty in a court of law. Nothing published here should be taken as a statement of fact, health or legal advice.#LindsayClancy #LindsayClancyTrial #BobMotta #PatrickClancy #KevinReddington #PlymouthSuperiorCourt #TrueCrime #HiddenKillers #DefenseDiaries #TrueCrimeToday

Every person in the Lindsay Clancy murder trial agrees that Lindsay killed her three children. She admitted it. Her attorney Kevin Reddington admitted it. Patrick Clancy confirmed it on the witness stand. The prosecution built their entire case around it. No one disputes what happened inside that Duxbury home in January 2023.On TikTok, millions of people have decided Patrick is the killer. The conspiracy says he framed Lindsay and pushed her from the window. The evidence behind the theory is a pair of boots.Clancy has pleaded not guilty to three counts of first-degree murder in the deaths of Cora, 5, Dawson, 3, and Callan, 8 months. The defense argues postpartum psychosis and overmedication.Criminal defense trial attorney Bob Motta of Defense Diaries has been inside Plymouth Superior Court all week. He breaks down the gap between what the courtroom evidence shows and what social media believes, and what it means when an audience constructs a new villain because the real story is too painful to accept.Listen Anywhere You Get Podcasts: https://pod.link/1655749292Want to comment and watch this podcast as a video? Check out our YouTube Channel. https://www.youtube.com/@UC8-vxmbhTxxG10sO1izODJgJoin Our SubStack For AD-FREE ADVANCE EPISODES & EXTRAS!: https://hiddenkillers.substack.com/Instagram https://www.instagram.com/hiddenkillerspod/Facebook https://www.facebook.com/hiddenkillerspod/Tik-Tok https://www.tiktok.com/@hiddenkillerspodX Twitter https://x.com/tonybpodThis publication contains commentary and opinion based on publicly available information. All individuals are presumed innocent until proven guilty in a court of law. Nothing published here should be taken as a statement of fact, health or legal advice.#LindsayClancy #PatrickClancy #LindsayClancyTrial #BobMotta #TikTok #TrueCrime #HiddenKillers #PlymouthSuperiorCourt #MurderTrial #DefenseDiaries

Twenty-one days of testimony. Sixty-plus witnesses. Autopsy photographs of her children shown to the jury. A birthday spent in a wheelchair inside Plymouth Superior Court. And Lindsay Clancy's murder trial is not close to finished.Clancy has pleaded not guilty to three counts of first-degree murder in the deaths of Cora, 5, Dawson, 3, and Callan, 8 months. Her defense argues postpartum psychosis and overmedication. The prosecution says she was deliberate.This week Clancy broke down during the autopsy testimony. She sobbed and said she couldn't continue. The judge ordered recesses. Her father was in tears in the gallery. Some jurors cried when they saw the photographs.Bob Motta of Defense Diaries has been in the courtroom watching it all. He describes what Lindsay looks like now, how defense attorney Kevin Reddington is handling the emotional weight, and whether the jury that walked in three weeks ago is the same jury sitting in those chairs today.Listen Anywhere You Get Podcasts: https://pod.link/1655749292Want to comment and watch this podcast as a video? Check out our YouTube Channel. https://www.youtube.com/@UC8-vxmbhTxxG10sO1izODJgJoin Our SubStack For AD-FREE ADVANCE EPISODES & EXTRAS!: https://hiddenkillers.substack.com/Instagram https://www.instagram.com/hiddenkillerspod/Facebook https://www.facebook.com/hiddenkillerspod/Tik-Tok https://www.tiktok.com/@hiddenkillerspodX Twitter https://x.com/tonybpodThis publication contains commentary and opinion based on publicly available information. All individuals are presumed innocent until proven guilty in a court of law. Nothing published here should be taken as a statement of fact, health or legal advice.#LindsayClancy #LindsayClancyTrial #BobMotta #KevinReddington #PlymouthSuperiorCourt #TrueCrime #HiddenKillers #MurderTrial #DefenseDiaries #TrueCrimeToday

Defense attorney Kevin Reddington read Dr. Jennifer Tufts's own medical records back to her on the witness stand. She had documented pressured speech in Lindsay Clancy's chart — a potential indicator of mania. On the stand, Tufts told the jury she did not mean what her notes said. Her exact words: "I don't care what it says. I know what I meant."Tufts treated Clancy through telehealth for four months before the January 2023 deaths of her three children. She never met her patient face to face. She did not request records from another provider. She did not know Clancy had contacted a suicide crisis line twice during treatment.Clancy has pleaded not guilty to three counts of first-degree murder. The defense argues she was overmedicated and experiencing postpartum psychosis. The prosecution alleges she acted intentionally.Criminal defense attorney Bob Motta, host of Defense Diaries, has been inside Plymouth Superior Court watching the prosecution present its case. He walks through what Tufts's testimony means for the jury, what the other psychiatric witnesses revealed, and whether the prosecution's own evidence is telling the defense's story.Listen Anywhere You Get Podcasts: https://pod.link/1655749292Want to comment and watch this podcast as a video? Check out our YouTube Channel. https://www.youtube.com/@UC8-vxmbhTxxG10sO1izODJgJoin Our SubStack For AD-FREE ADVANCE EPISODES & EXTRAS!: https://hiddenkillers.substack.com/Instagram https://www.instagram.com/hiddenkillerspod/Facebook https://www.facebook.com/hiddenkillerspod/Tik-Tok https://www.tiktok.com/@hiddenkillerspodX Twitter https://x.com/tonybpodThis publication contains commentary and opinion based on publicly available information. All individuals are presumed innocent until proven guilty in a court of law. Nothing published here should be taken as a statement of fact, health or legal advice.#LindsayClancy #LindsayClancyTrial #BobMotta #PlymouthSuperiorCourt #TrueCrime #HiddenKillers #PostpartumPsychosis #MurderTrial #DefenseDiaries #TrueCrimeToday

Months before her children died, a nurse practitioner sat down with Lindsay Clancy and her husband and raised something that never changed the treatment that followed. Psychotherapist Shavaun Scott explains what got missed — and defense attorney Eric Faddis tackles a very different problem now facing that same husband. Lindsay has pleaded not guilty to three counts of first-degree murder after the deaths of five-year-old Cora, three-year-old Dawson, and eight-month-old Callan. Her defense doesn't dispute that she killed them — it argues severe postpartum illness left her not criminally responsible. Prosecutors argue she acted intentionally. In 2022, nurse practitioner Rebecca Jollotta told Lindsay and Patrick that bipolar disorder was a possibility, based partly on a reported forty-eight hours without sleep after starting an antidepressant. She added an antipsychotic used for bipolar disorder and insomnia, but the antidepressant kept going. Dr. Jennifer Tufts testified she considered bipolar disorder that December and set it aside for lack of mania — no euphoria, no high energy, no grandiosity. At McLean Hospital, staff discussed sleep loss tipping a patient hypomanic before discharging her with a diagnosis of major depressive disorder. Shavaun breaks down how long an accurate bipolar diagnosis usually takes, why depression almost always gets diagnosed first, and whether the clinical checklist even fits a mother of three young children. Then the conversation turns to Patrick himself, now facing TikTok creators who are accusing him of murdering his own children and claiming he pushed Lindsay from a window — even as Lindsay's own defense has conceded she did it. Faddis explains what legal recourse actually looks like against anonymous accusers with a massive online reach. LINKS, DISCLAIMER & HASHTAGS Join Our SubStack For AD-FREE ADVANCE EPISODES & EXTRAS!: https://hiddenkillers.substack.com/ Want to comment and watch this podcast as a video? Check out our YouTube Channel. https://www.youtube.com/channel/UC8-vxmbhTxxG10sO1izODJg?sub_confirmation=1 Instagram https://www.instagram.com/hiddenkillerspod/ Facebook https://www.facebook.com/hiddenkillerspod/ Tik-Tok https://www.tiktok.com/@hiddenkillerspod X Twitter https://x.com/TrueCrimePod This publication contains commentary and opinion based on publicly available information. All individuals are presumed innocent until proven guilty in a court of law. Nothing published here should be taken as a statement of fact, health or legal advice. #LindsayClancy #PatrickClancy #HiddenKillers #RebeccaJollotta #ShavaunScott #EricFaddis #BipolarDisorder #ClancyTrial #TrueCrime #PostpartumPsychosis 

A prosecutor stood in court and dropped the one charge that existed because Jared Bridegan's two-year-old daughter was in the car when he was shot. Four days later, that same prosecutor told the judge the state has overwhelming evidence of a conspiracy — and that someone else drove away from the murder scene in a pickup truck. Nobody has been charged with driving it. That contradiction sits at the center of the Bridegan murder-for-hire trial, which opened in Jacksonville after its star witness upended the case. Henry Tenon confessed to being the gunman and agreed to testify against Mario Fernandez and Shanna Gardner as part of a plea deal. Four years and one day after the shooting, he asked a judge for a trial instead, and prosecutors didn't object. Fernandez's defense has spent three years cutting into the state's case — half the original charges dropped, the death penalty removed, and a judge blocking testimony under a spousal privilege ruling. Their explanation for the money is simple: checks from a family rental company covered landscaping and roof repairs, and nothing was paid before Bridegan died. One of those checks, for $5,000, allegedly carried the memo "Kickstarter" and "Good luck!" The state answers with more than three dozen calls between Fernandez and Tenon during the month of the killing, and a jailhouse informant who says Fernandez laid out the conspiracy himself and tried to pin the murder on Jared's widow. Fernandez has pleaded not guilty. His trial runs August 17 through 28, with Gardner's case and Tenon's own March 2027 date still to come. LINKS, DISCLAIMER & HASHTAGS Join Our SubStack For AD-FREE ADVANCE EPISODES & EXTRAS!: https://hiddenkillers.substack.com/ Want to comment and watch this podcast as a video? Check out our YouTube Channel. https://www.youtube.com/channel/UC8-vxmbhTxxG10sO1izODJg?sub_confirmation=1 Instagram https://www.instagram.com/hiddenkillerspod/ Facebook https://www.facebook.com/hiddenkillerspod/ Tik-Tok https://www.tiktok.com/@hiddenkillerspod X Twitter https://x.com/TrueCrimePod This publication contains commentary and opinion based on publicly available information. All individuals are presumed innocent until proven guilty in a court of law. Nothing published here should be taken as a statement of fact, health or legal advice. #JaredBridegan #MarioFernandez #HiddenKillers #ShannaGardner #HenryTenon #MurderForHire #JacksonvilleBeach #TrueCrime #DuvalCounty #JuryTrial 

A psychiatrist testified Lindsay Clancy showed no signs of psychosis. Then it came out she'd missed something twice. Defense attorney and former prosecutor Eric Faddis joins Tony Brueski to walk through the moment that turned a prosecution witness into a problem for the prosecution itself. Dr. Jennifer Tufts treated Lindsay through fourteen telehealth sessions over months and never met her in person. She testified without Lindsay's complete medical record. On cross-examination from Kevin Reddington, she admitted she hadn't known Lindsay called a suicide hotline on two separate occasions, and that she'd become board-certified the same day Lindsay filled out her intake paperwork. Faddis breaks down why the state put Tufts on the stand in the first place — to establish that Lindsay was competent and aware — and why three hours of cross-examination may have accomplished the opposite. The prosecution's broader case leans on Lindsay's actions that day: sending her husband out, timing his errand, and a specific phrase she searched on her phone beforehand, a detail Faddis says the jury will keep coming back to during deliberations. On the other side, the defense has spent weeks building a picture of a woman on thirteen psychiatric medications, messaging providers almost daily begging for changes, describing intrusive thoughts and brain fog in her own journal. No provider diagnosed postpartum psychosis before her children died. That diagnosis came later, from a forensic psychiatrist retained by the defense. Faddis lays out what the state has to prove beyond a reasonable doubt in Massachusetts, and where its own witness list may be working against it. Three weeks into the trial, both sides are still calling witnesses who cut in unexpected directions and reshape the case in real time. LINKS, DISCLAIMER & HASHTAGS Join Our SubStack For AD-FREE ADVANCE EPISODES & EXTRAS!: https://hiddenkillers.substack.com/ Want to comment and watch this podcast as a video? Check out our YouTube Channel. https://www.youtube.com/channel/UC8-vxmbhTxxG10sO1izODJg?sub_confirmation=1 Instagram https://www.instagram.com/hiddenkillerspod/ Facebook https://www.facebook.com/hiddenkillerspod/ Tik-Tok https://www.tiktok.com/@hiddenkillerspod X Twitter https://x.com/TrueCrimePod This publication contains commentary and opinion based on publicly available information. All individuals are presumed innocent until proven guilty in a court of law. Nothing published here should be taken as a statement of fact, health or legal advice. #LindsayClancy #EricFaddis #HiddenKillers #JenniferTufts #KevinReddington #PostpartumPsychosis #ClancyTrial #TrueCrime #CriminalResponsibility #DuxburyMassachusetts 

Fourteen video appointments. Sessions scheduled for thirty minutes. Lindsay Clancy's outpatient psychiatrist testified about exactly how those sessions worked in the months before her three children died — and psychotherapist Shavaun Scott joins Tony Brueski to explain what that timeline actually means. Clancy has pleaded not guilty to three counts of first-degree murder after the children died at home in Duxbury in January 2023. Her defense doesn't dispute that she caused their deaths — it argues postpartum psychosis and bipolar disorder left her not criminally responsible. Prosecutors argue she acted with intention and clarity. Shavaun, a licensed psychotherapist with more than thirty years treating trauma and studying the psychology of violence, breaks down what postpartum psychosis looks like clinically — the gap between an intrusive thought and a voice issuing commands, and why the condition can leave someone looking composed while still being dangerously unwell. Estimates put it at roughly one or two cases per thousand births, typically emerging within weeks of delivery. The conversation then turns to the providers themselves — the psychiatrist who signed off on Clancy's hospital release, and the outpatient doctor who treated her afterward. What each was later asked on the stand, and how they answered, sits at the center of this episode. Shavaun also unpacks how Clancy's own background as a labor and delivery nurse may have shaped the way her providers read her — and points to one moment where a provider did right by her, a small detail worth holding onto. Clancy attempted suicide the same day her children died and now attends her trial in a wheelchair. The record left behind by the people responsible for her care is now part of what a jury has to weigh. LINKS, DISCLAIMER & HASHTAGS Join Our SubStack For AD-FREE ADVANCE EPISODES & EXTRAS!: https://hiddenkillers.substack.com/ Want to comment and watch this podcast as a video? Check out our YouTube Channel. https://www.youtube.com/channel/UC8-vxmbhTxxG10sO1izODJg?sub_confirmation=1 Instagram https://www.instagram.com/hiddenkillerspod/ Facebook https://www.facebook.com/hiddenkillerspod/ Tik-Tok https://www.tiktok.com/@hiddenkillerspod X Twitter https://x.com/TrueCrimePod This publication contains commentary and opinion based on publicly available information. All individuals are presumed innocent until proven guilty in a court of law. Nothing published here should be taken as a statement of fact, health or legal advice. #LindsayClancy #AliaGoodheart #HiddenKillers #JenniferTufts #ShavaunScott #PostpartumPsychosis #ClancyTrial #McLeanHospital #TrueCrime #PlymouthSuperiorCourt 

Polygraph results can't be used as evidence in court. That hasn't stopped them from becoming a flashpoint heading into Alex Murdaugh's retrial, after his own attorneys once told a court that Curtis Eddie Smith failed one when asked about the murders of Maggie and Paul. Tony Brueski and retired FBI Special Agent Robin Dreeke take listener questions on why prosecutors are moving to bar the subject entirely. That motion is part of a larger filing. Prosecutors want a new jury to hear Murdaugh's own 2023 testimony, including his admission that he lied to investigators for roughly eighteen months about being at the kennels the night his wife and son were killed, and his denial of the killings themselves. The state is also renewing a motion to keep third-party guilt evidence from the jury, pushing for a fresh review of digital evidence, and opposing the defense's request for independent DNA testing. Murdaugh's defense has answered with its own filing: a supplemental Brady and Giglio motion demanding prosecutors search again for favorable evidence generated since the first trial and certify in writing, within thirty days, that the search was complete. Ten categories are listed, covering everything from plea deals to lab proficiency testing, and the motion doesn't name a single witness or document. Judge Debra McCaslin has tentatively set the retrial for April 5, 2027. Dreeke weighs what the polygraph fight and the certification demand both say about where this case stands. Murdaugh is presumed innocent. Join Our SubStack For AD-FREE ADVANCE EPISODES & EXTRAS!: https://hiddenkillers.substack.com/ Want to comment and watch this podcast as a video? Check out our YouTube Channel. https://www.youtube.com/channel/UC8-vxmbhTxxG10sO1izODJg?sub_confirmation=1 Instagram https://www.instagram.com/hiddenkillerspod/ Facebook https://www.facebook.com/hiddenkillerspod/ Tik-Tok https://www.tiktok.com/@hiddenkillerspod X Twitter https://x.com/TrueCrimePod This publication contains commentary and opinion based on publicly available information. All individuals are presumed innocent until proven guilty in a court of law. Nothing published here should be taken as a statement of fact, health or legal advice. #AlexMurdaugh #MaggieMurdaugh #HiddenKillers #MurdaughRetrial #TrueCrime #SouthCarolina #MurdaughMurders #BradyMotion #DebraMcCaslin #DickHarpootlian 

Dr. Alia Goodheart treated Lindsay Clancy at McLean Hospital. On cross-examination, she couldn't say how many patients with postpartum depression she'd seen across twenty years of practice, and acknowledged she doesn't believe she's ever treated a patient with postpartum psychosis at all. Tony Brueski and retired FBI Special Agent Robin Dreeke take listener questions on what that means for her testimony. Goodheart, like Dr. Jennifer Tufts, Clancy's outpatient psychiatrist, testified she observed no signs of psychosis and had no idea Clancy called a crisis line twice, calls documented in Clancy's own civil filings. A separate prosecution witness, Dr. Sejal Shah, agreed on cross-examination that a person can communicate and make plans while in a state of psychosis and called Clancy an honest patient. The conversation also covers Day 10 of the trial, when defense attorney Kevin Reddington spent hours cross-examining Tufts. He established that all fourteen of her appointments with Clancy happened over video, that she never spoke to Clancy's parents, and that she never asked Clancy to sign a release that would have opened her file from a separate perinatal clinic. He pressed her on a 2021 study linking thyroid function to postpartum psychosis she hadn't read and blood testing she declined to order. The prosecution countered that Clancy booked her own appointments and drove herself to an emergency room. Clancy has pleaded not guilty to three counts of first-degree murder and is presumed innocent unless the state proves its case. Support is available around the clock at 988. Join Our SubStack For AD-FREE ADVANCE EPISODES & EXTRAS!: https://hiddenkillers.substack.com/ Want to comment and watch this podcast as a video? Check out our YouTube Channel. https://www.youtube.com/channel/UC8-vxmbhTxxG10sO1izODJg?sub_confirmation=1 Instagram https://www.instagram.com/hiddenkillerspod/ Facebook https://www.facebook.com/hiddenkillerspod/ Tik-Tok https://www.tiktok.com/@hiddenkillerspod X Twitter https://x.com/TrueCrimePod This publication contains commentary and opinion based on publicly available information. All individuals are presumed innocent until proven guilty in a court of law. Nothing published here should be taken as a statement of fact, health or legal advice. #LindsayClancy #JenniferTufts #HiddenKillers #LindsayClancyTrial #PostpartumPsychosis #PlymouthSuperiorCourt #KevinReddington #TrueCrime #MentalHealthCare #CriminalResponsibility 

Eight days into Lindsay Clancy's trial, listeners keep asking Tony Brueski the same question: if the jury returns a not-criminally-responsible verdict, could Lindsay actually walk free one day? Tony answers it directly, along with seven more questions pulled straight from the mailbag. The rest of the set covers the trial's biggest open threads. The takeout order and the errand that reads as a plan to half the audience and as illness to the other half. The pill bottles prosecutors emptied out one by one to argue Lindsay skipped her medication, against a defense built entirely on that same medication. The psychiatric hospital that discharged her nineteen days before her children died. The sobbing that stopped the courtroom cold during the medical examiner's testimony, and prosecution witnesses, including friends, the family's nanny, and even people on Patrick's side, who keep describing Lindsay as a devoted mother from the stand. This episode also opens Patrick Clancy's wrongful death lawsuit, filed in January 2026, which alleges providers misprescribed a stack of psychiatric medications and added new drugs without a coordinated plan behind them. The civil filings count nine medications in Lindsay's final months against thirteen counted by her own criminal defense, and a simple lab test that would have shown whether her body was processing those drugs was never ordered. Lindsay's last psychiatric appointment came the day before her children died. The complaint claims that with adequate care, it's more likely than not they would still be alive. Two courtrooms, one family, and a verdict in one case that could decide what the other jury ever hears. Join Our SubStack For AD-FREE ADVANCE EPISODES & EXTRAS!: https://hiddenkillers.substack.com/ Want to comment and watch this podcast as a video? Check out our YouTube Channel. https://www.youtube.com/channel/UC8-vxmbhTxxG10sO1izODJg?sub_confirmation=1 Instagram https://www.instagram.com/hiddenkillerspod/ Facebook https://www.facebook.com/hiddenkillerspod/ Tik-Tok https://www.tiktok.com/@hiddenkillerspod X Twitter https://x.com/TrueCrimePod This publication contains commentary and opinion based on publicly available information. All individuals are presumed innocent until proven guilty in a court of law. Nothing published here should be taken as a statement of fact, health or legal advice. #LindsayClancy #PatrickClancy #HiddenKillers #LindsayClancyTrial #TrueCrime #WrongfulDeath #Duxbury #PlymouthCounty #TrialWatch #CrimeNews 

The white shirt Alex Murdaugh wore the night Maggie and Paul were killed was supposed to settle the question of blood spatter. SLED's own testing came back negative for human blood, then a chemical applied during that testing destroyed the shirt's usability for good. No retest. No second lab. Ever. Retired FBI Special Agent Jennifer Coffindaffer tells Tony Brueski straight whether she buys that as an accident. That single piece of evidence sits inside a much bigger picture this episode lays out in full. A federal judge dismissed Murdaugh's $600,000 lawsuit against former clerk Becky Hill on August 5, 2026, ruling he'd have paid for his defense regardless of her jury tampering. Hill has pleaded guilty to obstruction, perjury, and misconduct tied to a book photo, self-paid bonuses, and lying about sealed exhibits, and walked away with no prison time. The same day, Murdaugh's defense filed a Brady motion demanding prosecutors search every file, agency, and personnel record connected to the case and swear in writing that nothing favorable remains hidden. The motion leans on lead investigator David Owen's history: a separate 2015 murder case where a judge quashed the indictment after the state withheld evidence for nearly a decade, and where Owen denied under oath something the victim's mother says she told him directly. Coffindaffer also addresses agent Ryan Kelly, who told Murdaugh's jury nothing tied alternate suspect Eddie Smith to the murders before he was fired from an unrelated job this year. Judge Debra McCaslin hears arguments August 14, 2026. Murdaugh is presumed innocent heading into his 2027 retrial, and this episode asks whether the investigation deserves that same presumption. Join Our SubStack For AD-FREE ADVANCE EPISODES & EXTRAS!: https://hiddenkillers.substack.com/ Want to comment and watch this podcast as a video? Check out our YouTube Channel. https://www.youtube.com/channel/UC8-vxmbhTxxG10sO1izODJg?sub_confirmation=1 Instagram https://www.instagram.com/hiddenkillerspod/ Facebook https://www.facebook.com/hiddenkillerspod/ Tik-Tok https://www.tiktok.com/@hiddenkillerspod X Twitter https://x.com/TrueCrimePod This publication contains commentary and opinion based on publicly available information. All individuals are presumed innocent until proven guilty in a court of law. Nothing published here should be taken as a statement of fact, health or legal advice. #AlexMurdaugh #BeckyHill #HiddenKillers #TrueCrime #MurdaughRetrial #DavidOwen #SLED #SouthCarolina #MurdaughMurders #JusticeForMaggieAndPaul 

Patrick Clancy has a timeline verified by CVS surveillance and phone records. His wife's own attorney told a jury she killed their three children. And a growing internet mob is convinced he's the real killer anyway. Tony Brueski asks retired FBI behavioral analyst Robin Dreeke a direct question: is there any evidence that would actually satisfy this crowd? Robin ran the FBI's Counterintelligence Behavioral Analysis Program, and he walks through what's driving the instinct to suspect the husband — the alibi read through a trained investigator's eyes, the way people interpret Patrick's composure on the stand as guilt, and the remarriage three years later that some have turned into a motive. Then the episode gets specific. NMS Laboratories toxicologist Justin Brower testified to four medications found in Lindsay Clancy's blood. A state trooper's testimony about fingerprints has been misread into a claim it never supported. The interior bedroom lock at the center of one theory only turns one direction. And there's the anniversary phone call — two years old, sitting in plain sight — where Patrick asked his wife the exact question people assume he's avoided. The remarriage detail didn't leak from a tabloid. Lindsay's own attorney raised it in Plymouth Superior Court and told the judge Patrick had endured one of the worst tragedies a person can survive and was trying to move forward. Nobody with the authority to subpoena a phone record has ever pointed at him. Robin's answer to what it would take for the online crowd to finally drop the theory is the one worth sticking around for — and it might not be what you'd guess. Join Our SubStack For AD-FREE ADVANCE EPISODES & EXTRAS!: https://hiddenkillers.substack.com/ Want to comment and watch this podcast as a video? Check out our YouTube Channel. https://www.youtube.com/channel/UC8-vxmbhTxxG10sO1izODJg?sub_confirmation=1 Instagram https://www.instagram.com/hiddenkillerspod/ Facebook https://www.facebook.com/hiddenkillerspod/ Tik-Tok https://www.tiktok.com/@hiddenkillerspod X Twitter https://x.com/TrueCrimePod This publication contains commentary and opinion based on publicly available information. All individuals are presumed innocent until proven guilty in a court of law. Nothing published here should be taken as a statement of fact, health or legal advice. #LindsayClancy #PatrickClancy #HiddenKillers #LindsayClancyTrial #TrueCrime #Duxbury #RobinDreeke #TrialWatch #PostpartumPsychosis #ConspiracyTheories 

Two ransom notes now exist in the Nancy Guthrie case, released by the Pima County Sheriff's Department on July 31, and they read like they came from two different people. Tony Brueski, retired FBI behavioral analyst Robin Dreeke, and retired FBI Special Agent Jennifer Coffindaffer break down why. The first letter opens with 'Hello Savannah,' demands four million dollars in Bitcoin, and knows specific details inside the house, including a white smart watch on the floor by the bed and a destroyed flood light out back. It reads like a script: deadlines, threats, demands. The second asks for nothing. It claims Nancy died shortly after she was taken, that she's buried in nature, and that the writer hopes her children find peace, and it reads like someone who was actually inside that house, apologizing. The financial trail adds another layer. Coffindaffer's trace of the alleged kidnapper's Bitcoin wallet shows the only funds that ever arrived were roughly three hundred dollars, sent by the FBI itself, and untouched since February 10. No ransom was ever paid, which contradicts Savannah Guthrie's own public statement that the family did their part. Messages written directly to that wallet include the exact words Savannah said on camera, meaning a line to whoever controls it has existed the entire time and gone unanswered. Six months into the case, Sheriff Nanos calls his relationship with the FBI great while thousands of hours of video sit unreviewed, and search teams have returned to the brush behind Nancy's own home since the monsoons. Hear the full breakdown of both notes and the money trail behind them. Join Our SubStack For AD-FREE ADVANCE EPISODES & EXTRAS!: https://hiddenkillers.substack.com/ Want to comment and watch this podcast as a video? Check out our YouTube Channel. https://www.youtube.com/channel/UC8-vxmbhTxxG10sO1izODJg?sub_confirmation=1 Instagram https://www.instagram.com/hiddenkillerspod/ Facebook https://www.facebook.com/hiddenkillerspod/ Tik-Tok https://www.tiktok.com/@hiddenkillerspod X Twitter https://x.com/TrueCrimePod This publication contains commentary and opinion based on publicly available information. All individuals are presumed innocent until proven guilty in a court of law. Nothing published here should be taken as a statement of fact, health or legal advice. #NancyGuthrie #SavannahGuthrie #HiddenKillers #RansomNote #TrueCrime #Tucson #FBI #Bitcoin #MissingPerson #PimaCounty 

Three weeks of testimony in the Lindsay Clancy trial have created three separate stories. Inside the courtroom, the prosecution's witnesses keep helping the defense — the nanny, the pediatrician, and Patrick Clancy himself all described a loving mother falling apart. The prosecution's psychiatrist admitted she never met Lindsay in person across fourteen sessions.The defense has conceded Lindsay killed her children and is arguing postpartum psychosis. Reddington has dismantled every provider on the stand and told the jury Lindsay heard voices that day. The psychosis diagnosis came after the crime, from a forensic psychiatrist.Outside the courtroom, TikTok creators have built a conspiracy theory accusing Patrick of being the real killer. They're comparing him to Chris Watts. They're treating his remarriage as evidence. Both sides in the courtroom agree Lindsay did it.Defense attorney and former prosecutor Eric Faddis breaks down the prosecution's case, the defense's strategy, and whether Patrick Clancy has any legal recourse against the creators who are accusing him of murder on platforms with millions of viewers.Listen Anywhere You Get Podcasts: https://pod.link/1655749292Want to comment and watch this podcast as a video? Check out our YouTube Channel. https://www.youtube.com/@UC8-vxmbhTxxG10sO1izODJgJoin Our SubStack For AD-FREE ADVANCE EPISODES & EXTRAS!: https://hiddenkillers.substack.com/Instagram https://www.instagram.com/hiddenkillerspod/Facebook https://www.facebook.com/hiddenkillerspod/Tik-Tok https://www.tiktok.com/@hiddenkillerspodX Twitter https://x.com/tonybpodThis publication contains commentary and opinion based on publicly available information. All individuals are presumed innocent until proven guilty in a court of law. Nothing published here should be taken as a statement of fact, health or legal advice.

TikTok creators are posting videos accusing Patrick Clancy of murdering his own children. They're calling him the next Chris Watts. They're claiming he pushed Lindsay out the window. Both the prosecution and Lindsay's own defense team agree that Lindsay killed the children — the only dispute is whether she was criminally responsible.Patrick has become one of the most discussed figures on social media during the trial. Creators are scrutinizing his remarriage, analyzing his testimony, and building alternate narratives that contradict the evidence in court. He's not a public figure by choice. He's a father who lost three children and testified in the case that took them from him.Defense attorney and former prosecutor Eric Faddis breaks down Patrick's legal options. Whether these accusations constitute defamation. Whether calling something a theory or asking questions protects a creator from liability. What the Alex Jones verdict means for content creators who build audiences on false claims about real people. Whether Patrick is a public or private figure in the eyes of the law. And the bottom-line question the audience wants answered: should he sue, can he win, and is it even worth it?Listen Anywhere You Get Podcasts: https://pod.link/1655749292Want to comment and watch this podcast as a video? Check out our YouTube Channel. https://www.youtube.com/@UC8-vxmbhTxxG10sO1izODJgJoin Our SubStack For AD-FREE ADVANCE EPISODES & EXTRAS!: https://hiddenkillers.substack.com/Instagram https://www.instagram.com/hiddenkillerspod/Facebook https://www.facebook.com/hiddenkillerspod/Tik-Tok https://www.tiktok.com/@hiddenkillerspodX Twitter https://x.com/tonybpodThis publication contains commentary and opinion based on publicly available information. All individuals are presumed innocent until proven guilty in a court of law. Nothing published here should be taken as a statement of fact, health or legal advice.

Thirteen medications. Daily messages to her nurse practitioner begging for changes. Journal entries describing intrusive thoughts she'd never had before and a desperate desire to get well. Not one clinician diagnosed Lindsay Clancy with postpartum psychosis before January 24, 2023.Every provider who treated her documented anxiety and depression. The psychosis diagnosis came afterward, from a forensic psychiatrist working with the defense. Lindsay's attorney Kevin Reddington told the jury she heard voices that day — "This is your last chance" — and that the medical system failed to identify what was happening to her.Reddington has spent three weeks in Plymouth Superior Court building that argument through cross-examination. He dismantled Lindsay's psychiatrist over fourteen telehealth-only sessions. He exposed gaps in her medical records. He read her journal entries aloud to the jury. The defense conceded on day one that Lindsay killed her children. The entire case turns on whether the jury believes she was someone else when it happened.Defense attorney and former prosecutor Eric Faddis breaks down the defense's approach — what's working, where the diagnosis gap creates risk, and whether Reddington's strategy of putting the providers on trial can overcome the historical reluctance of juries to accept insanity defenses in cases involving children.Listen Anywhere You Get Podcasts: https://pod.link/1655749292Want to comment and watch this podcast as a video? Check out our YouTube Channel. https://www.youtube.com/@UC8-vxmbhTxxG10sO1izODJgJoin Our SubStack For AD-FREE ADVANCE EPISODES & EXTRAS!: https://hiddenkillers.substack.com/Instagram https://www.instagram.com/hiddenkillerspod/Facebook https://www.facebook.com/hiddenkillerspod/Tik-Tok https://www.tiktok.com/@hiddenkillerspodX Twitter https://x.com/tonybpodThis publication contains commentary and opinion based on publicly available information. All individuals are presumed innocent until proven guilty in a court of law. Nothing published here should be taken as a statement of fact, health or legal advice.

The prosecution's psychiatric witness didn't know Lindsay Clancy had called a suicide hotline twice. Dr. Jennifer Tufts treated Lindsay through fourteen telehealth sessions in the months before her children died and told the jury she never observed psychosis. Defense attorney Kevin Reddington spent three hours on cross pulling apart that claim.Tufts admitted she never met Lindsay face to face. She didn't have access to her complete medical record. She never requested hospital records. She received her board certification on the same day Lindsay started the intake process. The prosecution called her to establish that Lindsay was competent and sane. The cross-examination turned that testimony into the defense's strongest moment of the trial.Defense attorney and former prosecutor Eric Faddis breaks down the prosecution's case three weeks in. Every provider the state has put on the stand has given the defense ammunition on cross. The nanny called Lindsay a wonderful mother. The pediatrician saw nothing wrong. Patrick Clancy described a Seroquel spiral and thirteen medications. The prosecution argues Lindsay planned the killings. The state's own evidence suggests a woman who was falling apart while her providers missed it.Listen Anywhere You Get Podcasts: https://pod.link/1655749292Want to comment and watch this podcast as a video? Check out our YouTube Channel. https://www.youtube.com/@UC8-vxmbhTxxG10sO1izODJgJoin Our SubStack For AD-FREE ADVANCE EPISODES & EXTRAS!: https://hiddenkillers.substack.com/Instagram https://www.instagram.com/hiddenkillerspod/Facebook https://www.facebook.com/hiddenkillerspod/Tik-Tok https://www.tiktok.com/@hiddenkillerspodX Twitter https://x.com/tonybpodThis publication contains commentary and opinion based on publicly available information. All individuals are presumed innocent until proven guilty in a court of law. Nothing published here should be taken as a statement of fact, health or legal advice.

A screening result is only worth something if it travels. Lindsay Clancy scored 23 out of 30 on a ten-question postpartum screen administered by a nurse practitioner in November 2022. Her outpatient psychiatrist testified she never requested records from other providers. McLean Hospital obtained none either.Three children died in Duxbury on January 24, 2023. Every count drew a not guilty plea. The killings are not what the jury has to decide. Her attorney says postpartum psychosis and bipolar disorder are why she is not criminally responsible. Prosecutors argue she should be held criminally accountable for intentional acts.Tony Brueski and psychotherapist Shavaun Scott run the full three-part conversation here.The first part is the illness — how rare it is, how it moves between disorientation and clarity, and where psychosis parts company with psychopathy.The second is the clinicians. Fourteen video appointments and no in-person visit. A McLean psychiatrist who testified she had encountered none of these cases. A patient who was herself a labor and delivery nurse and was taken at her word by everyone.The third is bipolar disorder — raised by a nurse practitioner in 2022, ruled out by a psychiatrist for lack of mania, and recorded on the McLean discharge as major depressive disorder, severe, without psychotic features.Shavaun credits what worked too, including a nurse practitioner who handed Clancy her personal cell number. Neither accepts liability in the civil suits.The nurse practitioner who administered that screen, Julie Paul, launched South Shore Hospital's perinatal program in 2018 and saw Clancy for about ten days before leaving for another position. Clancy's lawsuit says a Columbia psychiatrist later diagnosed bipolar disorder with psychosis after an eight-hour evaluation.END LINKSJoin Our SubStack For AD-FREE ADVANCE EPISODES & EXTRAS!: https://hiddenkillers.substack.com/ Want to comment and watch this podcast as a video? Check out our YouTube Channel. https://www.youtube.com/channel/UC8-vxmbhTxxG10sO1izODJg?sub_confirmation=1 Instagram https://www.instagram.com/hiddenkillerspod/ Facebook https://www.facebook.com/hiddenkillerspod/ Tik-Tok https://www.tiktok.com/@hiddenkillerspod X Twitter https://x.com/TrueCrimePodDISCLAIMERThis publication contains commentary and opinion based on publicly available information. All individuals are presumed innocent until proven guilty in a court of law. Nothing published here should be taken as a statement of fact, health or legal advice.HASHTAGS#LindsayClancy #ShavaunScott #HiddenKillers #PostpartumScreening #ClancyTrial #TrueCrime #McLeanHospital #BipolarDisorder #MentalHealthSystem #PlymouthSuperiorCourt

The most uncomfortable fact in the medical testimony is not that nobody thought of bipolar disorder. It is that somebody did.Rebecca Jollotta, a psychiatric nurse practitioner at South Shore Health, testified she told Lindsay Clancy and her husband that Clancy might have an underlying bipolar disorder, months before the children died. She prescribed an antipsychotic used to treat it. She remained on antidepressant medication.Clancy's plea on every one of the three first-degree murder counts is not guilty. Her children died in Duxbury on January 24, 2023. What happened is not the disputed part. Her lawyers argue the illness, not the woman, drove what happened, and that she is not criminally responsible. The Commonwealth's theory is intentional, rational conduct.Psychotherapist Shavaun Scott joins Tony Brueski for the last of three conversations.Dr. The bipolar question came up in December 2022 and Tufts testified she closed it, citing no mania. The signs she described looking for were euphoria, very high energy, and grandiosity. At McLean, staff testified they observed symptoms that could indicate bipolar disorder and discussed sleep loss tipping a person into hypomania, then discharged her with a diagnosis of major depressive disorder, severe, without psychotic features.Shavaun explains what bipolar I is, why research puts the average diagnostic delay at six to ten years, and why depression is almost always what gets written down first. She takes on whether the textbook picture of mania describes a mother at home with an infant.The antidepressant question gets an honest answer rather than a convenient one. The studies conflict, and a toxicology expert testified Clancy's drug levels were low.Jollotta wrote to Clancy that everything she was describing sounded like postpartum depression. Clancy wrote back that starting new medications with side effects frightened her, and at another point that she could not keep going the way she was. Shavaun also covers why hypomania so rarely brings a patient through the door, since nobody schedules an appointment to report feeling capable and energetic.END LINKSJoin Our SubStack For AD-FREE ADVANCE EPISODES & EXTRAS!: https://hiddenkillers.substack.com/ Want to comment and watch this podcast as a video? Check out our YouTube Channel. https://www.youtube.com/channel/UC8-vxmbhTxxG10sO1izODJg?sub_confirmation=1 Instagram https://www.instagram.com/hiddenkillerspod/ Facebook https://www.facebook.com/hiddenkillerspod/ Tik-Tok https://www.tiktok.com/@hiddenkillerspod X Twitter https://x.com/TrueCrimePodDISCLAIMERThis publication contains commentary and opinion based on publicly available information. All individuals are presumed innocent until proven guilty in a court of law. Nothing published here should be taken as a statement of fact, health or legal advice.HASHTAGS#LindsayClancy #BipolarDisorder #HiddenKillers #Misdiagnosis #ClancyTrial #TrueCrime #PostpartumPsychosis #Antidepressants #MentalHealth #PlymouthSuperiorCourt

A psychiatric hospital decides a patient is safe to go home. Weeks later, three children are dead. In Lindsay Clancy's case, the psychiatrist who made that call later testified she had never treated a patient with postpartum psychosis.Not guilty is the plea on all three counts of first-degree murder in the deaths of Cora, Dawson, and Callan at their Duxbury home. That much both sides accept. Reddington argues postpartum illness stripped her of criminal responsibility. Prosecutors maintain the killings were intentional and rational acts.Psychotherapist Shavaun Scott joins Tony Brueski for the second of three conversations, and this one goes at the clinicians.Dr. Alia Goodheart testified she had no concerns about Clancy's safety or anyone else's at discharge, and that Clancy had never stated any thoughts of harming another person. Asked how many women with postpartum psychosis she had treated, she paused and said she had not seen any.Dr. Jennifer Tufts, who treated Clancy by video from September 2022 through the day before the children died, testified she did not obtain records from any other provider and did not have Clancy sign releases. She testified she was not certain how rare postpartum psychosis even is.Shavaun works through what happens when a patient is herself a clinician. Clancy was a labor and delivery nurse, and every provider took her at her word.The conversation does not run one direction. Shavaun credits the nurse practitioner who gave Clancy her personal cell number and called on a day off, and explains what separated that care from the rest.The civil defendants deny they did anything wrong.The five-day McLean stay ran from January 1 to January 5, 2023. Goodheart testified she wanted to keep observing Clancy's sleep after discharge, and that sleep deprivation can contribute to a manic episode. Tufts testified she had finished her residency in July 2022, a month before Clancy's first appointment with her.END LINKSJoin Our SubStack For AD-FREE ADVANCE EPISODES & EXTRAS!: https://hiddenkillers.substack.com/ Want to comment and watch this podcast as a video? Check out our YouTube Channel. https://www.youtube.com/channel/UC8-vxmbhTxxG10sO1izODJg?sub_confirmation=1 Instagram https://www.instagram.com/hiddenkillerspod/ Facebook https://www.facebook.com/hiddenkillerspod/ Tik-Tok https://www.tiktok.com/@hiddenkillerspod X Twitter https://x.com/TrueCrimePodDISCLAIMERThis publication contains commentary and opinion based on publicly available information. All individuals are presumed innocent until proven guilty in a court of law. Nothing published here should be taken as a statement of fact, health or legal advice.HASHTAGS#LindsayClancy #JenniferTufts #HiddenKillers #McLeanHospital #ClancyTrial #TrueCrime #AliaGoodheart #PostpartumCare #MedicalMalpractice #PlymouthSuperiorCourt

Nobody can play back what happened inside Lindsay Clancy's head on January 24, 2023. Her defense says a voice told her to kill her children and then herself. Prosecutors say she acted intentionally and rationally. A jury in Plymouth Superior Court has to choose between those readings.Clancy has pleaded not guilty to three counts of first-degree murder in the deaths of Cora, Dawson, and Callan at their Duxbury home. Nobody in the courtroom disputes that she did it.Psychotherapist Shavaun Scott joins Tony Brueski for the first of three conversations built to help a general audience understand what is actually being argued. Shavaun has more than thirty years in practice across trauma, anxiety, depression, and the psychology of violence.She opens with prevalence. Researchers describe episodes that move between disorientation and complete lucidity within the same day.The timing gets addressed head on. This condition usually arrives within days or weeks of delivery, and Callan was eight months old.Shavaun untangles psychosis from psychopathy, two words the public treats as interchangeable and clinicians do not. She marks the boundary between an intrusive thought and a voice issuing instructions. She explains why a patient would hide the worst of it from the people treating her. And she takes on whether this illness damages a person's grip on right and wrong, which is the question the insanity defense actually turns on.She is the author of Nightbird.The trial is running in Plymouth Superior Court before Judge William Sullivan. Shavaun works through why a jury of twelve people who have never seen this condition is being asked to decide whether it was present, and what that asks of expert testimony on both sides.END LINKSJoin Our SubStack For AD-FREE ADVANCE EPISODES & EXTRAS!: https://hiddenkillers.substack.com/ Want to comment and watch this podcast as a video? Check out our YouTube Channel. https://www.youtube.com/channel/UC8-vxmbhTxxG10sO1izODJg?sub_confirmation=1 Instagram https://www.instagram.com/hiddenkillerspod/ Facebook https://www.facebook.com/hiddenkillerspod/ Tik-Tok https://www.tiktok.com/@hiddenkillerspod X Twitter https://x.com/TrueCrimePodDISCLAIMERThis publication contains commentary and opinion based on publicly available information. All individuals are presumed innocent until proven guilty in a court of law. Nothing published here should be taken as a statement of fact, health or legal advice.HASHTAGS#LindsayClancy #ShavaunScott #HiddenKillers #PostpartumPsychosis #ClancyTrial #TrueCrime #MentalHealth #PlymouthSuperiorCourt #InsanityDefense #Duxbury

Robin Dreeke spent a career at the FBI working out what people are not saying. That is the exact skill this combined cut needs. Tony Brueski runs listener questions on two very different cases past him in one sitting.The Lindsay Clancy material is medical. Her outpatient psychiatrist finished residency in July 2022 and joined a private practice the month before Clancy became a patient. The McLean physician who cleared her to go home said she does not think she has treated a case of the condition at issue. Neither knew about two calls Clancy made to a crisis line.The Alex Murdaugh material is paper. The state wants his own prior testimony read to a new jury. The defense wants a signed certification that the files have been searched again, and it wants DNA from under Maggie Murdaugh's fingernails sent to an outside lab before the state's analysts touch what is left.Underneath both sits one behavioral question. When a professional testifies they saw nothing, how do you tell an absence from a blind spot?Dreeke spent years assessing exactly that in counterintelligence interviews, where the useful signal was rarely in what a subject volunteered.On all three first-degree murder counts, Clancy pleaded not guilty and is presumed innocent. Murdaugh's verdicts fell over what a court clerk said to jurors, and with them vacated he is presumed innocent at the retrial. Judge Debra McCaslin has tentatively set that trial for April 5, 2027.Three segments, one conversation, and listeners running the agenda. If the mental health material is close to home for you, 988 connects you to someone trained.END LINKSJoin Our SubStack For AD-FREE ADVANCE EPISODES & EXTRAS!: https://hiddenkillers.substack.com/ Want to comment and watch this podcast as a video? Check out our YouTube Channel. https://www.youtube.com/channel/UC8-vxmbhTxxG10sO1izODJg?sub_confirmation=1 Instagram https://www.instagram.com/hiddenkillerspod/ Facebook https://www.facebook.com/hiddenkillerspod/ Tik-Tok https://www.tiktok.com/@hiddenkillerspod X Twitter https://x.com/TrueCrimePodDISCLAIMERThis publication contains commentary and opinion based on publicly available information. All individuals are presumed innocent until proven guilty in a court of law. Nothing published here should be taken as a statement of fact, health or legal advice.HASHTAGS#LindsayClancy #AlexMurdaugh #HiddenKillers #MurdaughRetrial #LindsayClancyTrial #PostpartumPsychosis #SLED #TrueCrime #ExpertTestimony #RobinDreeke

There is a limited amount of DNA left from under Maggie Murdaugh's left hand, and both sides want to test it first. Tony Brueski takes your questions on that fight with retired FBI Special Agent Robin Dreeke.SLED previously determined the material belonged to an unknown, unrelated male, but did not identify him. The state uses STR analysis, which checks samples against law enforcement databases and cannot name someone who is not already in the system. The defense wants the reserve samples sent first to Othram, a Texas laboratory that runs SNP testing and forensic genetic genealogy, the approach that can build out a family tree from an unknown contributor.In a July filing, Murdaugh's attorneys told the court something new. Prosecutors had just disclosed that reserve samples from two evidence items remain unprocessed, and that SLED wants to run repeat testing on them. Every test consumes material. The defense argues a retest risks exhausting the only sample capable of producing a name. Othram, they say, could finish in sixty to ninety days.The same filing accuses SLED of mishandling the white T-shirt Murdaugh wore the night of the killings. Testing returned negative for human blood on the stained areas, and the shirt was later rendered unavailable for additional testing after a chemical enhancement agent was applied. The defense calls that a reason to doubt the agency's good faith. That is their allegation, not a court finding.Prosecutors oppose the defense's access request. Judge Debra McCaslin decides the sequence. A July conference on the testing brought defense attorneys, prosecutors, SLED forensic scientists and Othram's chief executive into the same call.The verdicts against him were reversed on appeal, and Murdaugh returns to trial presumed innocent. Robin Dreeke takes the mail on what a name under those fingernails would and would not prove.END LINKSJoin Our SubStack For AD-FREE ADVANCE EPISODES & EXTRAS!: https://hiddenkillers.substack.com/ Want to comment and watch this podcast as a video? Check out our YouTube Channel. https://www.youtube.com/channel/UC8-vxmbhTxxG10sO1izODJg?sub_confirmation=1 Instagram https://www.instagram.com/hiddenkillerspod/ Facebook https://www.facebook.com/hiddenkillerspod/ Tik-Tok https://www.tiktok.com/@hiddenkillerspod X Twitter https://x.com/TrueCrimePodDISCLAIMERThis publication contains commentary and opinion based on publicly available information. All individuals are presumed innocent until proven guilty in a court of law. Nothing published here should be taken as a statement of fact, health or legal advice.HASHTAGS#AlexMurdaugh #MurdaughRetrial #HiddenKillers #SLED #BradyMotion #MaggieMurdaugh #DickHarpootlian #TrueCrime #MurdaughMurders #SouthCarolina

The South Carolina Supreme Court did not only fault the clerk of court when it threw out Alex Murdaugh's convictions. The justices also flagged how much of the 2023 trial was spent on the money he stole. Tony Brueski takes your questions on what that means for the retrial with retired FBI Special Agent Robin Dreeke.Prosecutors spent close to two weeks of the first trial on Murdaugh's financial crimes. That evidence was not tied to the murder charges directly. It was offered to establish motive: his thefts were about to be exposed, and the state argued the killings bought him sympathy and time.Judge Debra McCaslin now decides how much of that comes in the second time. She has told the attorneys she knows nothing about the first trial and wants them complete when they explain it to her.The state's newest filings run the other direction. Prosecutors moved to admit Murdaugh's own 2023 testimony at the retrial, renewed motions to exclude polygraph evidence and third-party guilt, requested a fresh review of digital evidence, and opposed the defense's push for independent DNA analysis.Listeners are asking a sharp question about the arithmetic. If the financial evidence gets trimmed and the third-party door stays shut, what is the state walking into April 2027 with, and is it enough for twelve people who have never heard any of this.Murdaugh has denied the killings of Maggie and Paul Murdaugh since 2021. His convictions were vacated, he awaits retrial, and he is presumed innocent. He pleaded guilty to dozens of financial crimes and remains in prison on those sentences.Robin Dreeke handles the mail on motive, money, and what a jury actually does with a man's finances.END LINKSJoin Our SubStack For AD-FREE ADVANCE EPISODES & EXTRAS!: https://hiddenkillers.substack.com/ Want to comment and watch this podcast as a video? Check out our YouTube Channel. https://www.youtube.com/channel/UC8-vxmbhTxxG10sO1izODJg?sub_confirmation=1 Instagram https://www.instagram.com/hiddenkillerspod/ Facebook https://www.facebook.com/hiddenkillerspod/ Tik-Tok https://www.tiktok.com/@hiddenkillerspod X Twitter https://x.com/TrueCrimePodDISCLAIMERThis publication contains commentary and opinion based on publicly available information. All individuals are presumed innocent until proven guilty in a court of law. Nothing published here should be taken as a statement of fact, health or legal advice.HASHTAGS#AlexMurdaugh #MurdaughRetrial #HiddenKillers #MaggieMurdaugh #PaulMurdaugh #DebraMcCaslin #SouthCarolina #TrueCrime #MurdaughMurders #CreightonWaters

What actually happens when someone calls a crisis line? Nothing about that call routes automatically to the psychiatrist writing your prescriptions. Tony Brueski brings your questions on that gap to retired FBI Special Agent Robin Dreeke.A crisis line is not a medical record. It is not a referral. Nothing about the call guarantees the clinician managing someone's care ever learns it happened. In the Lindsay Clancy trial, that structure stopped being theoretical.Clancy's civil lawsuit describes a woman who sought treatment, went to emergency rooms, called crisis hotlines and admitted herself to hospitals. Both psychiatrists who have testified for the prosecution said the hotline calls were news to them. One testified it surprised her.Goodheart, the McLean physician, also testified she did not know Clancy had gone roughly two days without sleep after starting a medication earlier in her treatment. She told the court sleep deprivation can contribute to a manic episode, and that she would have wanted to keep observing Clancy's sleep after discharge.That is the part listeners keep writing in about. Several outpatient providers, one inpatient stay, two hotline calls, and no single person holding all of it.Clancy pleaded not guilty to the murder charges against her and is presumed innocent. Prosecutors argue she acted with intent and that her care team is not responsible. Her defense argues postpartum psychosis and a lack of criminal responsibility. The providers deny negligence.Robin Dreeke answers what listeners are asking about warning signs, handoffs, and who is supposed to be holding the whole picture. If you need someone, 988 is answered every hour of the day.END LINKSJoin Our SubStack For AD-FREE ADVANCE EPISODES & EXTRAS!: https://hiddenkillers.substack.com/ Want to comment and watch this podcast as a video? Check out our YouTube Channel. https://www.youtube.com/channel/UC8-vxmbhTxxG10sO1izODJg?sub_confirmation=1 Instagram https://www.instagram.com/hiddenkillerspod/ Facebook https://www.facebook.com/hiddenkillerspod/ Tik-Tok https://www.tiktok.com/@hiddenkillerspod X Twitter https://x.com/TrueCrimePodDISCLAIMERThis publication contains commentary and opinion based on publicly available information. All individuals are presumed innocent until proven guilty in a court of law. Nothing published here should be taken as a statement of fact, health or legal advice.HASHTAGS#LindsayClancy #LindsayClancyTrial #HiddenKillers #PostpartumPsychosis #PlymouthSuperiorCourt #MaternalMentalHealth #CriminalResponsibility #TrueCrime #MentalHealthCare #RobinDreeke

Full live session with Tony Brueski and retired FBI behavioral analyst Robin Dreeke, covering the two stories dominating the mailbag. First, the Nancy Guthrie ransom notes. Then the Lindsay Clancy trial, including the conspiracy theory that refuses to release Patrick Clancy.Everything is on the table live. Whether the Guthrie family should accept a letter claiming their mother is buried in nature, from a writer who walked away from $4 million and wished her children peace. Whether a sheriff who denied having that note one day before releasing it still has the room's trust. Whether Lindsay Clancy's prosecution is quietly helping her defense, one loving-mother witness at a time. And whether any amount of CVS footage and phone records will ever satisfy the crowd convinced Patrick did it.The chat drives all of it. Every question tonight was built to split the room, Robin has a professional read on each one, and the disagreements are the show. Show up with an opinion — or lose one.Join Our SubStack For AD-FREE ADVANCE EPISODES & EXTRAS!: https://hiddenkillers.substack.com/ Want to comment and watch this podcast as a video? Check out our YouTube Channel. https://www.youtube.com/channel/UC8-vxmbhTxxG10sO1izODJg?sub_confirmation=1 Instagram https://www.instagram.com/hiddenkillerspod/ Facebook https://www.facebook.com/hiddenkillerspod/ Tik-Tok https://www.tiktok.com/@hiddenkillerspod X Twitter https://x.com/TrueCrimePodThis publication contains commentary and opinion based on publicly available information. All individuals are presumed innocent until proven guilty in a court of law. Nothing published here should be taken as a statement of fact, health or legal advice.#LindsayClancy #NancyGuthrie #HiddenKillersLive #TrueCrime #TrueCrimePodcast #SavannahGuthrie #PatrickClancy #RansomNote #TrialWatch #CrimeNews

Live with Tony Brueski and retired FBI behavioral analyst Robin Dreeke. On the table: the ransom notes in the Nancy Guthrie case, released by the Pima County Sheriff's Department on July 31. Underneath them sits the question no family should ever face, whether to believe a letter that says their mother is gone.This session runs on listener submissions, and they don't hold back. The $4 million demand that simply vanished from the second note. The proof details, the white smart watch and the broken flood light, that put the writer inside that house. The apology and the wish for peace, which Robin can read like a case file. The sheriff who told CBS he had no note indicating death, twenty-four hours before releasing one, while a Wall Street Journal report questions his department's early moves. And the federal search teams back in the brush behind Nancy's own home.The chat carries this one. Whether you believe the notes are real, a hoax, or something in between, bring your reasoning — because the room will not agree, and that's exactly why this case needs a live hour.Join Our SubStack For AD-FREE ADVANCE EPISODES & EXTRAS!: https://hiddenkillers.substack.com/ Want to comment and watch this podcast as a video? Check out our YouTube Channel. https://www.youtube.com/channel/UC8-vxmbhTxxG10sO1izODJg?sub_confirmation=1 Instagram https://www.instagram.com/hiddenkillerspod/ Facebook https://www.facebook.com/hiddenkillerspod/ Tik-Tok https://www.tiktok.com/@hiddenkillerspod X Twitter https://x.com/TrueCrimePodThis publication contains commentary and opinion based on publicly available information. All individuals are presumed innocent until proven guilty in a court of law. Nothing published here should be taken as a statement of fact, health or legal advice.#NancyGuthrie #SavannahGuthrie #HiddenKillersLive #TrueCrime #TrueCrimePodcast #RansomNote #Tucson #FBI #MissingPerson #PimaCounty

Live listener Q&A on the Lindsay Clancy trial with Tony Brueski. Eight days of testimony, and the state's own witnesses keep describing a loving mother — so the audience took over the questioning, and this session runs on your submissions.On the table: whether the takeout order and the timed errand read as a plan or as illness, and whether a person in psychosis can plan at all. The pill bottles counted out for the jury and the collision between skipped-medication and overmedication. The hospital discharge 19 days before it happened, from a listener who asked her own doctor for help and got a pamphlet. The moment Lindsay's sobbing stopped the trial, and the listener who admitted she doesn't know what to feel. And the endgame question — if the verdict is not criminally responsible, does a state hospital ever open its doors?The chat decides where this one goes. Every question tonight splits the room on purpose. The last one, about who stands up for Cora, Dawson, and Callan, belongs to everybody. Come argue.Join Our SubStack For AD-FREE ADVANCE EPISODES & EXTRAS!: https://hiddenkillers.substack.com/ Want to comment and watch this podcast as a video? Check out our YouTube Channel. https://www.youtube.com/channel/UC8-vxmbhTxxG10sO1izODJg?sub_confirmation=1 Instagram https://www.instagram.com/hiddenkillerspod/ Facebook https://www.facebook.com/hiddenkillerspod/ Tik-Tok https://www.tiktok.com/@hiddenkillerspod X Twitter https://x.com/TrueCrimePodThis publication contains commentary and opinion based on publicly available information. All individuals are presumed innocent until proven guilty in a court of law. Nothing published here should be taken as a statement of fact, health or legal advice.#LindsayClancy #PatrickClancy #HiddenKillersLive #TrueCrime #TrueCrimePodcast #LindsayClancyTrial #PlymouthCounty #Massachusetts #CrimeNews #TrialWatch

Live with Tony Brueski and Robin Dreeke: the conspiracy theory chasing Patrick Clancy through his wife's murder trial. Lindsay Clancy's attorney conceded to the jury that she killed their three children, prosecutors laid out Patrick's movements minute by minute, and thousands of people online still insist the husband did it.Robin spent his FBI career studying belief — why people form it, why evidence bounces off it, and what actually changes a mind. Tony puts the whole theory in front of him live. The airtight timeline versus the conspiracy read of it. The crowd's certainty that Patrick's grief looked wrong, and the remarriage they call a tell. The lawsuit against Lindsay's doctors that makes her defense's argument for her.Bring your take to the chat. Whether you've dismissed this theory from day one or you've caught yourself wondering, the room is going to be split — and that's the point. The question that ends the segment goes to everyone watching: what would it take to let it go?Join Our SubStack For AD-FREE ADVANCE EPISODES & EXTRAS!: https://hiddenkillers.substack.com/ Want to comment and watch this podcast as a video? Check out our YouTube Channel. https://www.youtube.com/channel/UC8-vxmbhTxxG10sO1izODJg?sub_confirmation=1 Instagram https://www.instagram.com/hiddenkillerspod/ Facebook https://www.facebook.com/hiddenkillerspod/ Tik-Tok https://www.tiktok.com/@hiddenkillerspod X Twitter https://x.com/TrueCrimePodThis publication contains commentary and opinion based on publicly available information. All individuals are presumed innocent until proven guilty in a court of law. Nothing published here should be taken as a statement of fact, health or legal advice.#LindsayClancy #PatrickClancy #HiddenKillersLive #TrueCrime #TrueCrimePodcast #LindsayClancyTrial #Duxbury #Massachusetts #RobinDreeke #TrialWatch

Three cases. One live conversation. And a chat that is not going to agree on any of them. Retired FBI Special Agent Jennifer Coffindaffer joins Tony Brueski for a Hidden Killers Live triple covering Nancy Guthrie, Alex Murdaugh, and Lindsay Clancy: three investigations where the loudest question is aimed at the investigators.The Guthrie segment is built on Coffindaffer's own blockchain trace, run after the Pima County Sheriff's Office accidentally released the alleged kidnapper's Bitcoin wallet address. What she found: no ransom was ever paid. The only deposit in the wallet's history is roughly three hundred dollars from the FBI. Messages written directly to that wallet, a standing line to whoever took Nancy, were never answered. Why does someone who allegedly demanded four million dollars go silent? The room gets that one.The Murdaugh segment starts with the question his audience keeps yelling: why isn't Becky Hill in prison? Her jury interference forced the retrial; her guilty plea covered a book photo, self-paid bonuses, and sealed exhibits, with no prison time, and a federal judge just dismissed Murdaugh's lawsuit against her. Then the new defense motion demanding SLED's files be certified clean in writing, the fired agent whose word cleared Eddie Smith, and the shirt that tested negative for human blood before becoming untestable forever. Accident or convenience — the chat votes.The Clancy segment takes week two head-on: the defense stipulating to the forensics, the state's calm-patient snapshot from six days after the deaths of Cora, Dawson, and Callan, and the diary both sides claim proves their case. Can a mind be organized enough to plan and still be broken? Bring your answer.Murdaugh and Clancy are presumed innocent. Nancy Guthrie is still missing. Pull up a chair. This one runs hot.LINKSJoin Our SubStack For AD-FREE ADVANCE EPISODES & EXTRAS!: https://hiddenkillers.substack.com/ Want to comment and watch this podcast as a video? Check out our YouTube Channel. https://www.youtube.com/channel/UC8-vxmbhTxxG10sO1izODJg?sub_confirmation=1 Instagram https://www.instagram.com/hiddenkillerspod/ Facebook https://www.facebook.com/hiddenkillerspod/ Tik-Tok https://www.tiktok.com/@hiddenkillerspod X Twitter https://x.com/TrueCrimePodDISCLAIMERThis publication contains commentary and opinion based on publicly available information. All individuals are presumed innocent until proven guilty in a court of law. Nothing published here should be taken as a statement of fact, health or legal advice.HASHTAGS#NancyGuthrie #AlexMurdaugh #LindsayClancy #BeckyHill #HiddenKillers #TrueCrime #FBI #MurdaughRetrial #ClancyTrial #JenniferCoffindaffer

Prosecutors put Lindsay Clancy's diary in front of her jury. Brain fog. Can't make a plan. Terror. Living moment to moment. The state's argument: look at these pages — no voices, no delusions, no break from reality. A woman documenting her own mind, and the documentation shows a mind still there. It might be the most double-edged evidence in this entire trial, and it's where retired FBI Special Agent Jennifer Coffindaffer starts on this Hidden Killers Live conversation with Tony Brueski.Because the defense reads the same pages and sees the illness itself: a nurse who spent her career in labor and delivery reduced to recording fog and fear, day after day, while the medical system adjusted her medications around her. And underneath both readings sits the clinical reality the jury has to wrestle with: postpartum psychosis doesn't hold still for a diary. A mind can be present in the morning and gone that night. Pinning any single day's entry to January 24 assumes a stability the condition doesn't have.Week two gave this jury everything at once. The defense stipulated to the forensics, since Clancy's lawyers don't dispute she caused the deaths of Cora, Dawson, and Callan, so the physical evidence stopped being a fight. The state's toxicologist testified about medication levels. A psychiatrist described Clancy six days afterward as calm and organized. Every piece asks the same question from a different angle: whose version of her mind does the jury believe?Coffindaffer has watched juries navigate exactly this, and the live chat gets a voice in it too, because this audience does not agree on Lindsay Clancy, and this is the case where that disagreement is the whole point.She is presumed innocent of murder. Cora, Dawson, and Callan are why we keep showing up.LINKSJoin Our SubStack For AD-FREE ADVANCE EPISODES & EXTRAS!: https://hiddenkillers.substack.com/ Want to comment and watch this podcast as a video? Check out our YouTube Channel. https://www.youtube.com/channel/UC8-vxmbhTxxG10sO1izODJg?sub_confirmation=1 Instagram https://www.instagram.com/hiddenkillerspod/ Facebook https://www.facebook.com/hiddenkillerspod/ Tik-Tok https://www.tiktok.com/@hiddenkillerspod X Twitter https://x.com/TrueCrimePodDISCLAIMERThis publication contains commentary and opinion based on publicly available information. All individuals are presumed innocent until proven guilty in a court of law. Nothing published here should be taken as a statement of fact, health or legal advice.HASHTAGS#LindsayClancy #PatrickClancy #HiddenKillers #TrueCrime #ClancyTrial #Massachusetts #PostpartumPsychosis #CriminalJustice #JenniferCoffindaffer #TrialCoverage

Ryan Kelly stood between Eddie Smith and the Murdaugh murder case. On the stand at the first trial, the SLED agent said there was none whatsoever — zero evidence connecting Smith to the killings of Maggie and Paul. That clearance held for three years. Now Kelly is out of law enforcement, fired in June from his internal affairs job at the Charleston County Sheriff's Office after an investigation into harassment and conduct allegations. To be fair: the public records don't describe what he did, and nothing ties his firing to his SLED work. But Alex Murdaugh's defense is demanding disciplinary files on every officer connected to this case, and Kelly's file is sitting right there.Retired FBI Special Agent Jennifer Coffindaffer joins Tony Brueski on Hidden Killers Live to answer the question underneath all of it. Did anyone ever actually rule out Eddie Smith, or did one agent's word become the whole clearance?The conversation runs through both filings that just reshaped this case. A federal judge dismissed Murdaugh's $600,000 lawsuit against Becky Hill on August 5, ruling the former clerk owes him nothing for his defense costs even though her jury interference triggered the retrial. Hill pleaded guilty to obstruction, perjury, and misconduct, none of it for the tampering itself, and received no prison time. And the defense's new motion demands prosecutors certify in writing that no favorable evidence remains buried in any file, any agency, any lab.Coffindaffer also takes the shirt head-on: SLED testing negative for human blood, then a chemical that made retesting impossible forever. Accident or convenience: she picks a side, and the chat will pick theirs.Murdaugh is presumed innocent with an April retrial coming. Bring your read on Eddie Smith. This one gets loud.LINKSJoin Our SubStack For AD-FREE ADVANCE EPISODES & EXTRAS!: https://hiddenkillers.substack.com/ Want to comment and watch this podcast as a video? Check out our YouTube Channel. https://www.youtube.com/channel/UC8-vxmbhTxxG10sO1izODJg?sub_confirmation=1 Instagram https://www.instagram.com/hiddenkillerspod/ Facebook https://www.facebook.com/hiddenkillerspod/ Tik-Tok https://www.tiktok.com/@hiddenkillerspod X Twitter https://x.com/TrueCrimePodDISCLAIMERThis publication contains commentary and opinion based on publicly available information. All individuals are presumed innocent until proven guilty in a court of law. Nothing published here should be taken as a statement of fact, health or legal advice.HASHTAGS#AlexMurdaugh #BeckyHill #HiddenKillers #TrueCrime #MurdaughRetrial #SouthCarolina #SLED #MurdaughMurders #JenniferCoffindaffer #JusticeSystem

Someone allegedly demanded four million dollars for Nancy Guthrie — and then never came back for it. That's the mystery at the center of this Hidden Killers Live conversation with retired FBI Special Agent Jennifer Coffindaffer. She traced the alleged kidnapper's Bitcoin wallet after the Pima County Sheriff's Office accidentally released the address in its own media materials.The trace shows a direct line existed this whole time. Messages were written onto the blockchain, straight to that wallet, including the exact words Savannah Guthrie said on camera about the family's willingness to pay. Anyone controlling that wallet could see them. Nobody ever answered. Coffindaffer walks Tony Brueski through the question that haunts this case: why does a person who allegedly took a woman from her home for money go silent when the money is offered?The numbers make it stranger. Coffindaffer's trace shows no ransom was ever paid. The only deposit was roughly three hundred dollars in Bitcoin, moved by the FBI on February 10 as an apparent test, still sitting untouched. The four million never moved because it was never sent. That reframes every public statement the family has made, including that they did their part.Coffindaffer also breaks down why she believes the two ransom notes came from two different authors: one writing threats like a script, one writing something closer to an apology from inside that house. And she reacts to Sheriff Nanos marking six months by praising the FBI relationship while admitting thousands of hours of video are still unreviewed.Live chat drives this one. Bring your theory on the silence, because the room will not agree. That's the point. Nancy Guthrie was taken from her home in Tucson, and the trail her case left behind is written in a currency that never lies.LINKSJoin Our SubStack For AD-FREE ADVANCE EPISODES & EXTRAS!: https://hiddenkillers.substack.com/ Want to comment and watch this podcast as a video? Check out our YouTube Channel. https://www.youtube.com/channel/UC8-vxmbhTxxG10sO1izODJg?sub_confirmation=1 Instagram https://www.instagram.com/hiddenkillerspod/ Facebook https://www.facebook.com/hiddenkillerspod/ Tik-Tok https://www.tiktok.com/@hiddenkillerspod X Twitter https://x.com/TrueCrimePodDISCLAIMERThis publication contains commentary and opinion based on publicly available information. All individuals are presumed innocent until proven guilty in a court of law. Nothing published here should be taken as a statement of fact, health or legal advice.HASHTAGS#NancyGuthrie #SavannahGuthrie #HiddenKillers #TrueCrime #Tucson #FBI #Bitcoin #RansomNote #MissingPerson #JenniferCoffindaffer

A prosecution witness in the Lindsay Clancy trial said something on the stand that sounds like it belongs in the defense's closing argument. I go through exactly what was admitted and why it matters more than the state probably wanted it to.The Commonwealth's case leans hard on one fact: all thirteen of Lindsay Clancy's psychiatric medications were within therapeutic range when her children died. To the prosecution, that means clarity. But their own psychiatrist told the jury that someone deep in psychosis can still present as calm and put-together — normal on the outside doesn't rule out a break happening underneath.Day 8 of the trial brought eleven witnesses, every one called by the state, and the day didn't go the way prosecutors probably scripted it. A medical examiner explained how 8-month-old Callan died, autopsy photos went up on screen, and Lindsay sobbed hard enough that the judge stopped the hearing. The pediatrician described a routine, unremarkable checkup with 5-year-old Cora just hours before the killings. Coworkers described insomnia, brain fog, a stack of medications, a stay at McLean Hospital. Then the case detective confirmed a search warrant on her Facebook, looking for signs of abuse, came back empty.Her journal entries were read aloud — words about drowning, about barely functioning. Defense attorney Kevin Reddington isn't arguing about what happened; he's conceded it. The only question left for this jury is whether the state can prove she was legally sane, and that burden belongs entirely to the prosecution. I break down where this leaves the case.Join Our SubStack For AD-FREE ADVANCE EPISODES & EXTRAS!: https://hiddenkillers.substack.com/Want to comment and watch this podcast as a video? Check out our YouTube Channel. https://www.youtube.com/channel/UC8-vxmbhTxxG10sO1izODJg?sub_confirmation=1Instagram https://www.instagram.com/hiddenkillerspod/Facebook https://www.facebook.com/hiddenkillerspod/Tik-Tok https://www.tiktok.com/@hiddenkillerspodX Twitter https://x.com/TrueCrimePodThis publication contains commentary and opinion based on publicly available information. All individuals are presumed innocent until proven guilty in a court of law. Nothing published here should be taken as a statement of fact, health or legal advice.Hashtags (same set, all four channels): #LindsayClancy #LindsayClancyTrial #HiddenKillers #KevinReddington #PostpartumPsychosis #PlymouthSuperiorCourt #CriminalResponsibility #MassachusettsTrial #TrueCrime #TrueCrimePodcast

Duane "Keffe D" Davis sat down with the LAPD in 2008 and described his alleged role in the murder of Tupac Shakur, on the record, in a proffer session his own defense team is now trying to use as a shield. He told a similar story on BET's "Death Row Chronicles." He wrote an even more detailed version in his 2019 memoir, claiming he provided the gun and gave the order that got Tupac killed over a fight at the MGM Grand. None of that stopped Las Vegas police from sitting on his statements for over a decade. They had what they needed by 2009. The arrest didn't come until 2023.  Now Davis says all of it was a lie to sell books, that he wasn't even in Las Vegas the night Tupac died, contradicting the account he published under his own name. There's no murder weapon in this case and no DNA. The man Davis says fired the shots, Orlando "Baby Lane" Anderson, denied any involvement before he was killed in Compton in 1998. Judge Carli Kierny has already ruled Davis's own statements admissible, and his immunity claim tied to that 2008 proffer was rejected.  Defense attorney and former prosecutor Eric Faddis breaks down whether a jury can convict on nothing but a defendant's own words, whether that immunity argument had any real teeth, and what it takes to prosecute a case this cold, three decades after the murder and fourteen years after police first had what they needed. Davis is 63, facing life without parole, and he's pleaded not guilty in a trial his own recorded history may end up deciding. Every major defense motion filed since his 2023 arrest has been rejected, leaving his own words as the centerpiece of the state's case. Links & Legal Footer Join Our SubStack For AD-FREE ADVANCE EPISODES & EXTRAS!: https://hiddenkillers.substack.com/ Want to comment and watch this podcast as a video? Check out our YouTube Channel. https://www.youtube.com/channel/UC8-vxmbhTxxG10sO1izODJg?sub_confirmation=1 Instagram https://www.instagram.com/hiddenkillerspod/ Facebook https://www.facebook.com/hiddenkillerspod/ Tik-Tok https://www.tiktok.com/@hiddenkillerspod X Twitter https://x.com/TrueCrimePod This publication contains commentary and opinion based on publicly available information. All individuals are presumed innocent until proven guilty in a court of law. Nothing published here should be taken as a statement of fact, health or legal advice. Hashtags #TupacShakur #KeffeD #HiddenKillers #TrueCrime #DuaneDavis #LasVegas #MurderTrial #2Pac #ComptonStreetLegend #TrueCrimePodcast 

Three and a half years of silence, and this is what Bryan Kohberger chose to say first: the case against him is "a work of fiction." He invited the state to seek the death penalty again. He thanked the people who believe he's innocent. He named the public, the state, his own family, his supporters online. He did not name Kaylee, Madison, Xana, or Ethan. Not once, in the entire statement. Live, psychotherapist Shavaun Scott and Tony Brueski go through it line by line — how the opening reframes Kohberger as the one who's been wronged, what "my actual innocence is my truth" is actually doing rhetorically, and the new affidavit where he accuses his own defense attorneys of telling him guilt wasn't an important factor in the plea. Then the conversation turns to where some of that language actually came from. Reporters traced "broken plea" and "clumps of hair" — phrases central to Kohberger's petition — directly to a true crime book, not to any court filing. His own defense team once sent that book's author a cease-and-desist letter. A DNA expert his defense hired had already tested the hair in question and found it consistent with Ethan Chapin's own, according to PEOPLE. Criminal defense attorney Bob Motta joins to explain what Kohberger is actually facing if a judge lets any of this move forward, and why Steve Goncalves, who fought this plea deal harder than anyone, is now the one saying he wants a trial. It's a live breakdown of a statement built to sound like a man fighting for the truth — and what got left out to make that sound convincing. Hashtags #BryanKohberger #IdahoStudentMurders #HiddenKillersLive #ShavaunScott #BobMotta #DefenseDiaries #EthanChapin #BrokenPlea #KohbergerCase #TrueCrime Links & Legal Footer Join Our SubStack For AD-FREE ADVANCE EPISODES & EXTRAS!: https://hiddenkillers.substack.com/ Want to comment and watch this podcast as a video? Check out our YouTube Channel. https://www.youtube.com/channel/UC8-vxmbhTxxG10sO1izODJg?sub_confirmation=1 Instagram https://www.instagram.com/hiddenkillerspod/ Facebook https://www.facebook.com/hiddenkillerspod/ Tik-Tok https://www.tiktok.com/@hiddenkillerspod X Twitter https://x.com/TrueCrimePod This publication contains commentary and opinion based on publicly available information. All individuals are presumed innocent until proven guilty in a court of law. Nothing published here should be taken as a statement of fact, health or legal advice. 

Eight years after Maggie and Paul Murdaugh were shot to death, there's still unidentified male DNA sitting under Maggie's fingernails, and the prosecutors preparing to retry Alex Murdaugh for their murders are fighting to keep an independent lab away from it. SLED tested it once, said it wasn't a family member, and moved on. Nobody ever tried to find out whose it actually was. The defense wants the same forensic genealogy lab that identified Bryan Kohberger in Idaho to finish what SLED started before the remaining sample is gone. The state wants to test it themselves first, with the same method that already failed once, in a process the defense says risks using up the evidence for good.  If the prosecution is as confident as they sound that this DNA is meaningless, an outside confirmation should be the easiest yes of their case. Instead they're fighting it in court. That tells you something.  It's happening alongside another loss for the defense. On August 5th, a federal judge dismissed Alex Murdaugh's lawsuit against former clerk of court Becky Hill, a case built specifically to force her under oath and get her personal records into evidence before the retrial. Those records were the defense's best shot at tracing the anonymous email that got a juror pulled from deliberations during the original murder trial, and at making the investigators who cleared Hill of tampering explain that decision on the record.  Both fights point the same direction, toward a retrial set for April 5th, 2027, with prosecutors seeking the death penalty and Alex Murdaugh's team refusing to take a deal. The judge assigned to the retrial has already pressed prosecutors on how long independent testing would take, a sign this fight over the DNA isn't getting resolved quietly before April. Links & Legal Footer Join Our SubStack For AD-FREE ADVANCE EPISODES & EXTRAS!: https://hiddenkillers.substack.com/ Want to comment and watch this podcast as a video? Check out our YouTube Channel. https://www.youtube.com/channel/UC8-vxmbhTxxG10sO1izODJg?sub_confirmation=1 Instagram https://www.instagram.com/hiddenkillerspod/ Facebook https://www.facebook.com/hiddenkillerspod/ Tik-Tok https://www.tiktok.com/@hiddenkillerspod X Twitter https://x.com/TrueCrimePod This publication contains commentary and opinion based on publicly available information. All individuals are presumed innocent until proven guilty in a court of law. Nothing published here should be taken as a statement of fact, health or legal advice. Hashtags #AlexMurdaugh #MaggieMurdaugh #HiddenKillers #TrueCrime #MurdaughRetrial #SLED #BeckyHill #JuryTampering #SouthCarolina #ColdCaseDNA 

Here's the question that's been sitting underneath the Lindsay Clancy trial all week: did she know exactly what she was doing? Both sides agree she killed her three children. Plymouth Superior Court just spent three days trying to answer whether she understood it while it happened — Patrick Clancy on the stand for two of those days, his 911 call played for jurors who could barely sit through it, first responders describing the scene they walked into. Then prosecutors laid nine prescription bottles on the table. Most of them were still mostly full. If the defense rests on a woman drowning in medication her doctors kept switching, that's a hard detail to explain away. So is the twenty-five-minute errand prosecutors keep coming back to, and the takeout order they say she placed like nothing was wrong. Tony Brueski puts that against a case people keep comparing it to: Nick Reiner, who told reporters he cycled through roughly seventeen rehab stays his family arranged and paid for, including a yearlong conservatorship, and is now charged with killing Rob Reiner and Michele Singer Reiner. Lindsay Clancy, a labor and delivery nurse, sought help once in December of 2022 and was discharged in a day. Live, Tony breaks down what those pill bottles actually prove, what a jury is supposed to do with a father who spent two days defending the woman who killed his kids, and what happens to this family if the jury decides she isn't criminally responsible at all — and takes the hardest questions viewers have been sending in all week about who really failed those three children. Reiner has pleaded not guilty. Clancy's jury has not returned a verdict, and prosecutors argue she acted intentionally. Hashtags #LindsayClancy #NickReiner #HiddenKillersLive #PatrickClancy #PostpartumPsychosis #PlymouthSuperiorCourt #MurderTrial #TrueCrime #InsanityDefense #RobReiner Links & Legal Footer Join Our SubStack For AD-FREE ADVANCE EPISODES & EXTRAS!: https://hiddenkillers.substack.com/ Want to comment and watch this podcast as a video? Check out our YouTube Channel. https://www.youtube.com/channel/UC8-vxmbhTxxG10sO1izODJg?sub_confirmation=1 Instagram https://www.instagram.com/hiddenkillerspod/ Facebook https://www.facebook.com/hiddenkillerspod/ Tik-Tok https://www.tiktok.com/@hiddenkillerspod X Twitter https://x.com/TrueCrimePod This publication contains commentary and opinion based on publicly available information. All individuals are presumed innocent until proven guilty in a court of law. Nothing published here should be taken as a statement of fact, health or legal advice. 

Bryan Kohberger stood in an Idaho courtroom and told a judge, four separate times, that he deliberately killed each of his victims. Asked if he was pleading guilty because he was guilty, he said yes. Asked if anyone had forced him, he said no. Thirteen months later, from a maximum security cell, he's asking a judge to let him take it all back. Live, Tony Brueski and retired FBI Special Agent Jennifer Coffindaffer go through Kohberger's handwritten petition line by line against the actual unsealed record. His central claim — that "clumps of hair" found in a victim's hand prove his innocence — traces back to a published book, not to any forensic report. His own defense team already had a hair from that hand tested. It came back consistent with the victim's own. Then there's the line in the petition that may matter more than the hair: Kohberger's claim about exactly who was present during his private meetings with his own attorneys. Coffindaffer breaks down why prosecutors and defense teams alike take that kind of allegation seriously, and why it could cut against him instead of helping his case. They also cover the amended witness list naming a hundred and eighty people prosecutors were prepared to call, what got recovered from the crime scene, what never got tested, and why nearly every legal expert who has looked at petitions like this one says they fail — even when, on paper, the law allows them to be filed at all. It's a live breakdown of where the actual evidence ends and where the petition starts filling in its own version of events. Hashtags #BryanKohberger #IdahoStudentMurders #HiddenKillersLive #JenniferCoffindaffer #EthanChapin #GuiltyPlea #UniversityOfIdaho #MoscowIdaho #KohbergerCase #TrueCrime Links & Legal Footer Join Our SubStack For AD-FREE ADVANCE EPISODES & EXTRAS!: https://hiddenkillers.substack.com/ Want to comment and watch this podcast as a video? Check out our YouTube Channel. https://www.youtube.com/channel/UC8-vxmbhTxxG10sO1izODJg?sub_confirmation=1 Instagram https://www.instagram.com/hiddenkillerspod/ Facebook https://www.facebook.com/hiddenkillerspod/ Tik-Tok https://www.tiktok.com/@hiddenkillerspod X Twitter https://x.com/TrueCrimePod This publication contains commentary and opinion based on publicly available information. All individuals are presumed innocent until proven guilty in a court of law. Nothing published here should be taken as a statement of fact, health or legal advice. 

Nolan Wells' own family paid for a second autopsy, and it came back "undetermined" — partly because parts of his throat were missing by the time their pathologist examined the body. The official state autopsy is still sealed, and the DA has only said a grand jury will eventually look at it, with no date attached. Nolan was eighteen. He went to a July 4 boat party on Horn Island, Mississippi, and never came home. His body was found two days later in the water. The sheriff called it no foul play before the autopsy, toxicology, or the FBI's phone review were finished. His mother, Christine Wells-Wonsley, wasn't even told he was missing until almost midnight, hours after the boat docked and his friends left with his phone and his keys still in their hands. When Christine got that phone back, both of Nolan's Snapchat accounts were completely empty — for a kid who documented everything. There's also a contradiction on the record: the girl he allegedly stayed behind to talk to says Nolan told her he was getting on the boat with the boys. The boys say he stayed behind with her. On the day the family buried him, their attorneys sent preservation-of-evidence letters to every party connected to the case. Nine days after that, Christine filed court-ordered subpoenas against five tech companies for GPS data, login histories, direct messages, and password reset records. Tony Brueski walks through every open thread in this case — the missing tissue, the empty phone, the hours nobody can account for, and a mother who isn't waiting on anyone to hand her answers. Join Our SubStack For AD-FREE ADVANCE EPISODES & EXTRAS!: https://hiddenkillers.substack.com/ Want to comment and watch this podcast as a video? Check out our YouTube Channel. https://www.youtube.com/channel/UC8-vxmbhTxxG10sO1izODJg?sub_confirmation=1 Instagram https://www.instagram.com/hiddenkillerspod/ Facebook https://www.facebook.com/hiddenkillerspod/ Tik-Tok https://www.tiktok.com/@hiddenkillerspod X Twitter https://x.com/TrueCrimePod This publication contains commentary and opinion based on publicly available information. All individuals are presumed innocent until proven guilty in a court of law. Nothing published here should be taken as a statement of fact, health or legal advice. HASHTAGS #NolanWells #ChristineWonsley #HiddenKillersLive #TrueCrime #HornIsland #Mississippi #JusticeForNolan #BenCrump #GrandJury #TrueCrimeCommunity 

Here's what the prosecution didn't count on in the Lindsay Clancy trial: their own witness might be their biggest problem. Patrick Clancy took the stand in Plymouth Superior Court to help the state prove his wife was rational enough to plan what happened to their three children. He described one of her best days — a snowman, normal texts, nothing that looked like a woman in crisis. Prosecutors leaned into it hard. Jurors sat through a seven-minute 911 call. They saw the pajamas. They saw the exercise bands. They heard about the fourteen-second phone call Patrick got after the children were already gone, a call where he had no idea anything had happened. Then cross-examination flipped the room. Lindsay had checked herself into McLean Hospital on New Year's Eve. She'd gone to the ER. She'd told providers, more than once, about intrusive thoughts involving her own children. And Women and Infants Hospital had already flagged overmedication and a possible misdiagnosis — a warning that went nowhere. And then came the detail nobody in that courtroom saw coming: Patrick Clancy filed a civil lawsuit against the doctors. Lindsay filed her own, separately. The father who just testified for the prosecution is, outside those courtroom doors, telling a different story about who's actually responsible. Tony Brueski sits down live with criminal defense attorney Bob Motta of Defense Diaries to go through it in real time — what ADA Buckingham's opening statement bet on, what the defense pulled out of Patrick on cross, and whether a jury asked to judge a mother's mind can ignore what her own husband believes happened to her. They also get into how Massachusetts law defines criminal responsibility for someone the state's own witness may not fully believe was in control. Hashtags #LindsayClancy #PatrickClancy #HiddenKillersLive #BobMotta #DefenseDiaries #PostpartumPsychosis #PlymouthSuperiorCourt #MurderTrial #TrueCrime #CriminalResponsibility Links & Legal Footer Join Our SubStack For AD-FREE ADVANCE EPISODES & EXTRAS!: https://hiddenkillers.substack.com/ Want to comment and watch this podcast as a video? Check out our YouTube Channel. https://www.youtube.com/channel/UC8-vxmbhTxxG10sO1izODJg?sub_confirmation=1 Instagram https://www.instagram.com/hiddenkillerspod/ Facebook https://www.facebook.com/hiddenkillerspod/ Tik-Tok https://www.tiktok.com/@hiddenkillerspod X Twitter https://x.com/TrueCrimePod This publication contains commentary and opinion based on publicly available information. All individuals are presumed innocent until proven guilty in a court of law. Nothing published here should be taken as a statement of fact, health or legal advice. 

Nancy Guthrie's ransom note is public now, and the language in it doesn't sit right. Pima County released both notes the kidnapper sent, and psychotherapist Shavaun Scott, author of The Minds of Mass Killers, goes through them on this episode word by word. The first note demanded four million dollars in bitcoin, gave Savannah Guthrie a deadline, and included a line about Nancy's mother that reads more like leverage than reassurance. Scott flags the proof-of-presence details — a smartwatch on the floor, a busted floodlight — and a single slip from "we" to "me" that changes how the whole letter sounds. Then the second note lands: it says Nancy died shortly after she was taken. If the timeline holds, that four-million-dollar demand was sent for someone who was no longer alive to ransom. Retired FBI Special Agent Jennifer Coffindaffer joins to unpack the investigation itself. Sheriff Chris Nanos publicly got the only conviction in this case wrong — he said ten years; the real plea deal is five years of probation on two harassment counts, and sentencing hasn't even happened. Coffindaffer explains what that mistake signals about the coordination, or lack of it, between local and federal investigators who have never spoken directly. Savannah Guthrie's latest public statement uses language that hints at something moving behind the scenes. And not far from where Nancy disappeared, another woman was attacked by someone who walked through an unlocked door in the middle of the night, matching the general build of the figure on Nancy's porch. This is a note built to control a family, and an investigation that can't get its own facts straight. Tony Brueski hosts. Join Our SubStack For AD-FREE ADVANCE EPISODES & EXTRAS!: https://hiddenkillers.substack.com/ Want to comment and watch this podcast as a video? Check out our YouTube Channel. https://www.youtube.com/channel/UC8-vxmbhTxxG10sO1izODJg?sub_confirmation=1 Instagram https://www.instagram.com/hiddenkillerspod/ Facebook https://www.facebook.com/hiddenkillerspod/ Tik-Tok https://www.tiktok.com/@hiddenkillerspod X Twitter https://x.com/TrueCrimePod This publication contains commentary and opinion based on publicly available information. All individuals are presumed innocent until proven guilty in a court of law. Nothing published here should be taken as a statement of fact, health or legal advice. HASHTAGS #NancyGuthrie #SavannahGuthrie #HiddenKillersLive #ShavaunScott #JenniferCoffindaffer #RansomNote #PimaCounty #SheriffNanos #TrueCrime #Kidnapping 

Dr. Staci Turner has Nolan Wells' sealed autopsy results in her hands right now, and this isn't the first time her office's conclusions haven't matched the evidence. In 2021, Turner ruled Damien Cameron's in-custody death "undetermined" — despite documenting neck injuries in her own autopsy consistent with compression. The New York Times and Mississippi Today brought in three independent forensic pathologists to review the same file. All three disagreed with her. Dr. Michael Baden, former chief medical examiner of New York City, called it "homicide, absolutely." A Rutgers pathologist said there was nothing undetermined about it at all. A grand jury leaned on Turner's ruling and declined to charge the deputies who restrained Cameron. One of them, Hunter Elward, is now in federal prison — convicted as part of the Rankin County "Goon Squad" torture cases, though not for Cameron's death. Retired FBI Special Agent Jennifer Coffindaffer joins this episode to break down what Turner's history means for the Wells investigation, why the district attorney — not a court, not a deadline — controls when Nolan's results become public, and why Christine Wells-Wonsley filed subpoenas on the day she buried her son. Attorney Ben Crump represented Cameron's family. He represents the Wells family now, in the same state, in front of the same examiner. Tony Brueski and Jennifer Coffindaffer lay out exactly why this family has reason to doubt the results before they've even seen them. Join Our SubStack For AD-FREE ADVANCE EPISODES & EXTRAS!: https://hiddenkillers.substack.com/ Want to comment and watch this podcast as a video? Check out our YouTube Channel. https://www.youtube.com/channel/UC8-vxmbhTxxG10sO1izODJg?sub_confirmation=1 Instagram https://www.instagram.com/hiddenkillerspod/ Facebook https://www.facebook.com/hiddenkillerspod/ Tik-Tok https://www.tiktok.com/@hiddenkillerspod X Twitter https://x.com/TrueCrimePod This publication contains commentary and opinion based on publicly available information. All individuals are presumed innocent until proven guilty in a court of law. Nothing published here should be taken as a statement of fact, health or legal advice. HASHTAGS #NolanWells #StaciTurner #HiddenKillersLive #TrueCrime #Mississippi #DamienCameron #GoonSquad #JenniferCoffindaffer #JusticeForNolan #MedicalExaminer

Defense attorney and former prosecutor Eric Faddis sits down for a full session covering three of the country's most watched criminal cases.Bryan Kohberger's post-conviction petition to withdraw his guilty plea in the Idaho student murders has put the death penalty back on the table. He signed a nine-page questionnaire, told a judge he was guilty, and took four life sentences. Now he says his own lawyers coerced a false confession.Lindsay Clancy's murder trial at Plymouth Superior Court has reached its testimony phase. The prosecution's first week produced evidence that may hurt the state's case more than it helps — including the revelation that Clancy was on thirteen psychiatric medications and the state's own expert admitting psychosis can present as outward calm.Duane "Keffe D" Davis goes on trial in Las Vegas for the 1996 murder of Tupac Shakur. The case is built on statements Davis made over fifteen years — to police, on camera, and in a published book. He now says he invented the entire story.Faddis covers the legal mechanics, the strategic calculations, and the risks each defendant faces — drawing on his experience as both a prosecutor and a defense attorney.END_LINKSJoin Our SubStack For AD-FREE ADVANCE EPISODES & EXTRAS!: https://hiddenkillers.substack.com/ Want to comment and watch this podcast as a video? Check out our YouTube Channel. https://www.youtube.com/channel/UC8-vxmbhTxxG10sO1izODJg?sub_confirmation=1 Instagram https://www.instagram.com/hiddenkillerspod/ Facebook https://www.facebook.com/hiddenkillerspod/ Tik-Tok https://www.tiktok.com/@hiddenkillerspod X Twitter https://x.com/TrueCrimePodDISCLAIMERThis publication contains commentary and opinion based on publicly available information. All individuals are presumed innocent until proven guilty in a court of law. Nothing published here should be taken as a statement of fact, health or legal advice.HASHTAGS#BryanKohberger #LindsayClancy #KeffeD #TupacShakur #HiddenKillers #IdahoMurders #TrueCrime #EricFaddis #LindsayClancyTrial #TupacMurderTrial

The Tupac Shakur murder trial is about to begin in Las Vegas, and the prosecution's case is unlike any other murder case in modern memory. The defendant allegedly got himself arrested by spending over a decade publicly describing his role in the killing.Duane "Keffe D" Davis provided a proffer to the LAPD in 2008. He appeared on BET's "Death Row Chronicles." He published his account in a book. He gave interviews. In each one, he placed himself in the white Cadillac, described providing the gun, and detailed the motive — retaliation for a physical altercation at the MGM Grand hours before the shooting on September 7, 1996.Las Vegas police had all of this by 2009. They did not charge Davis until September 2023 — fourteen years later. The arrest came after a grand jury indictment triggered in part by the publication of his own memoir.Davis now claims innocence. He says he made up the entire story for financial gain. He has even claimed he was not in Las Vegas the night of the shooting — a statement that contradicts his own book, his own documentary, and his own words to police.Defense attorney and former prosecutor Eric Faddis examines whether a jury can convict on confessions the defendant now calls fiction, and what a thirty-year gap does to a murder prosecution.END_LINKSJoin Our SubStack For AD-FREE ADVANCE EPISODES & EXTRAS!: https://hiddenkillers.substack.com/ Want to comment and watch this podcast as a video? Check out our YouTube Channel. https://www.youtube.com/channel/UC8-vxmbhTxxG10sO1izODJg?sub_confirmation=1 Instagram https://www.instagram.com/hiddenkillerspod/ Facebook https://www.facebook.com/hiddenkillerspod/ Tik-Tok https://www.tiktok.com/@hiddenkillerspod X Twitter https://x.com/TrueCrimePodDISCLAIMERThis publication contains commentary and opinion based on publicly available information. All individuals are presumed innocent until proven guilty in a court of law. Nothing published here should be taken as a statement of fact, health or legal advice.HASHTAGS#TupacShakur #KeffeD #HiddenKillers #TupacMurderTrial #DuaneDavis #LasVegas #ComptonStreetLegend #EricFaddis #TrueCrime #TrueCrimePodcast

Bryan Kohberger pleaded guilty to murdering four University of Idaho students and took four life sentences without parole. The deal removed the death penalty. He signed every document. He confirmed under oath the plea was voluntary. Then thirteen months later, he filed a handwritten petition claiming he was coerced.The timing is difficult to separate from the media cycle. His first public statement went to the New York Times the same weekend Netflix dropped its documentary. His petition echoes language from a book whose author says they never communicated.But the legal question underneath the spectacle is real: can a defendant undo a guilty plea by claiming his own lawyers scared him into confessing? Idaho law requires manifest injustice — a standard legal experts call near-impossible to meet after sentencing, especially when the defendant endorsed the plea under oath.The gamble is life and death. If the plea is withdrawn, the deal evaporates. Idaho has a firing squad. The state has signaled it will pursue the death penalty. The Goncalves family says they're ready.Defense attorney and former prosecutor Eric Faddis breaks down the legal mechanics, the state's options, and whether Kohberger just made the worst strategic decision of his life.END_LINKSJoin Our SubStack For AD-FREE ADVANCE EPISODES & EXTRAS!: https://hiddenkillers.substack.com/ Want to comment and watch this podcast as a video? Check out our YouTube Channel. https://www.youtube.com/channel/UC8-vxmbhTxxG10sO1izODJg?sub_confirmation=1 Instagram https://www.instagram.com/hiddenkillerspod/ Facebook https://www.facebook.com/hiddenkillerspod/ Tik-Tok https://www.tiktok.com/@hiddenkillerspod X Twitter https://x.com/TrueCrimePodDISCLAIMERThis publication contains commentary and opinion based on publicly available information. All individuals are presumed innocent until proven guilty in a court of law. Nothing published here should be taken as a statement of fact, health or legal advice.HASHTAGS#BryanKohberger #IdahoMurders #HiddenKillers #GuiltyPlea #KayleeGoncalves #UniversityOfIdaho #EricFaddis #PostConvictionRelief #TrueCrime #TrueCrimePodcast

Plymouth Superior Court is hearing the Lindsay Clancy murder trial, and the prosecution's first week of testimony has produced evidence that cuts both ways. The state wants this jury to believe Lindsay Clancy was calculating enough to plan the deaths of her three children on January 24, 2023. The defense says she was a woman drowning in psychiatric crisis who did everything right — and the system failed her anyway.The toxicologist testified that Lindsay was on thirteen medications simultaneously, all at therapeutic levels individually. The prosecution frames that as proof she was medically managed and functioning. The defense frames it as proof she was buried under a pharmaceutical avalanche no single doctor was tracking.Then the prosecution's own expert made an admission on cross-examination that could haunt the state's case for the rest of this trial: a person experiencing psychosis can appear calm, cooperative, and coherent. The jury heard that from the state's witness, not the defense's.Lindsay's own journal was read aloud. She wrote about drowning. She wrote about wanting to die. The question is whether those entries prove she was lucid — or prove she was in freefall.Defense attorney and former prosecutor Eric Faddis breaks down what the prosecution proved in its opening days, what it accidentally handed to the defense, and who's actually winning this trial.END_LINKSJoin Our SubStack For AD-FREE ADVANCE EPISODES & EXTRAS!: https://hiddenkillers.substack.com/ Want to comment and watch this podcast as a video? Check out our YouTube Channel. https://www.youtube.com/channel/UC8-vxmbhTxxG10sO1izODJg?sub_confirmation=1 Instagram https://www.instagram.com/hiddenkillerspod/ Facebook https://www.facebook.com/hiddenkillerspod/ Tik-Tok https://www.tiktok.com/@hiddenkillerspod X Twitter https://x.com/TrueCrimePodDISCLAIMERThis publication contains commentary and opinion based on publicly available information. All individuals are presumed innocent until proven guilty in a court of law. Nothing published here should be taken as a statement of fact, health or legal advice.HASHTAGS#LindsayClancy #LindsayClancyTrial #HiddenKillers #PostpartumPsychosis #PlymouthSuperiorCourt #EricFaddis #CriminalResponsibility #MassachusettsTrial #TrueCrime #TrueCrimePodcast