Shake the Tree

The fast moving Chagos Archipelago affair..?? And how Sir Keir Starmer, being the UK’s P.M. & his Labour cronies, use such events, & the lawless UK, which they created; to fund a lavish lifestyle. As did multi-millionaire, ex-Prime Minister Tony Blair, now worth circa £400 million. Surely, the public don’t think such as Blair or Starmer? Could legitimately earn such vast sums? I say legally, very unlikely..! It can be seen that parliamentarians such as, Sir Keir Starmer & Lord Hermer, the UK’s Attorney General, don’t adhere to the parliamentary NOLAN Principals, whilst they whinge about others adhering to international law, while nobody is prosecuted for lying in parliament. In fact, nobody is prosecuted for lying, period, being close to the  truth, all be it the CPS don’t keep figures. Whilst in Scotland, excluding Nicola Sturgeon, just 3 Scots per year lie, what an honest bunch, those Scots are, l o l.. It is further seen that the Metropolitan, London, & the Charing Cross Police, have fallen foul of (Section 8) of The Accessories & Abettors Act of 1861, as knowing of a crime, and assisting in it, “by allowing it to continue”. I know they knew, as I handed the Met’s HQ & the Charing Cross Police, an evidence file on Friday 6th June 2025, clearly, deception in the Police Service is now also common.

Rupert Lowe’s; UK Mass Deportation Policy. - Parts 1-4. - YES, only the deluded would say. “Mass deportation isn’t extreme!” Nor is it desired, nor is it expected in a well run civilised society.! As such will be awkward, difficult, lead to staff shortages, split families, cause civil unrest, anxiety and reprisals against the UK. And of course, this would be very costly.So why would the UK have a mass deportation policy.? Well poor foresight, poor planning & ignorance comes to mind, as detailed in the further sectors pinned to STT’s feed. Read on to gain the alerts & options!This content was generated by ShakeTheTreeUK who has the global copyright.

With; Starmer, Hermer & Sands, being amongst the UK’s leading lawyers, it is in conceivable, they have not with intent, hoodwinked Parliament, the House of Lords & the Police, by any other than intent as their liberty relies on doing so.Let us not forget, these are the guys who compose UK law.    Which makes Starmer, Hermer, Sands & Lammy, in breach  of the 2006 Fraud Act. Such requires that I visit the Metropolitan Police’s H.Q. forth width. To advise the Met’ what is occurring under their nose, in 10 Downing Street & our Parliament, being the UK’s corridors of power.One, couldn’t make this up, your concern should be, I haven’t.!!! I’ve no doubt, Starmer’s arrogance will end his premiership, my question is, will it also end Sir Mark Rowley’s & Sir Sadiq Khan’s. As they’ve stood back, while Starmer & his cronies aim to steal, £50 Billion, from UK tax payers.     

Let’s be clear, modern, western Islam. Is not, a race or a religion, as defined by UK law. As coercive, dominant & aggressive acts, towards a flock or another, are illegal, in the United Kingdom...STT...

Podcast Header - On listening you will grasp; non Muslim’s, do not have a choice, as at this time, being March 2025, voting for Reform UK, headed by Nigel Farage, is our only option. As it is for Britain as a whole. Not for the few, but for the many, being the British & Christian way. So, why are Muslims, in the political arena, a problem? That is easy to quantify; Muslims, follow the Prophet Muhammed, who’s God, a k a, Allah, demands his followers, adhere to a monotheistic religion. Allah is deemed, as the creator, the sustainer, & the World’s restorer. Of course all being; “tosh”, as if true. Muslims, “wouldn’t” be flocking to the cold & wet UK, with the sole intention, of taking over UK northern towns & our epic, UK cities. Of course created, sustained & restored by Christians, after the last invasion attempt, by Germans. If Allah was so; Muslims would be, on the beaches of Indonesia, & the Maldives. But it’s seen, Allah has failed to create, or sustain, or restore, even the most basic of facilities. And the same can be said of the Sunni, Shia & Ahmadi Muslins in Gaza. And the same, in Afghanistan, Pakistan, Bangladesh, India, Syria and Turkey. Whilst praying up to 5 times a day, may work on the plains of the Serengeti, European society depends on; progress, productivity, profit & tax. STT....

This detail shows; the atrocious state of the UK legal process, rotten to the core, of which Starmer was the CEO. Now he runs the firm, “whoops” the country. It further shows why; Elon Musk, says, we have to, kill the blob. And the same confirms why; British voters, are putting their trust, & faith in, Nigel Farage & ReForm UK. So the Chagos Islands, where are they. And are they important! Well forget about geo-politics, and the Islands location. Them being 5,848 miles from the UK, and circa 1,500 miles from Mauritius. In fact the Chagos Islands, are closer to the Maldives. And as I know having been to the Maldives a dozen times, they used a twin runway on Diego Garcia in the past, to reach the southern atolls. For the avoidance of doubt, they’ve not been previously owned, by Mauritius or the Maldives. Which both have, an airport. The Chagos Islands have in fact been a British territory, for the last 200 years.

Part 3 - To assist a commercial property tenant, with decision making. The wrong decision could burden them with a £150,000 legal bill, & the same in dilapidation fee. Taking in the detail could avoid such risks. Drafted by Kevin Lamin.

To assist a commercial property tenant, with decision making. The wrong decision could burden them with a £150,000 legal bill, and the same in dilapidation fees. Taking in the detail could avoid such risks. Drafted by Kevin Lamin.

To assist a commercial property tenant, with decision making. The wrong decision could burden them with a £150,000 legal bill, and the same in dilapidation fees. Taking in the detail could avoid such risks. Drafted by Kevin Lamin.

This application is no other, than a spurious attempt to defraud me. And should be thrown out in its entirety, with the applicant paying their cost. On continuation, the following 5,700 words, that detail fraud, and likely money laundering, will be passed to Action Fraud London. Para 53, details the cost, incurred by just 1 of the 4 people, who’ve supported me, in my defence, absorbing 300 earth hours. Are solicitors, destroying UK society... ?? You tell me...

And what is a MeKenzie Friend, able to do for you..? And how helpful is that likely to be..? Feel free to enquiy...

42. ( Para 21 ) A paragraph, simply beyond belief, inferring the bar on the legal process is in the gutter. In that one can accuse a female, who’s life’s focus has been to raise the applicants children, & their, children. Who’s also had to gift, a 400,000 euro property legacy, to her bodge-it, this will do, I’m a builder ex husband. The respondent has on top of, no pun intended, additionally providing the applicant with an exit from financial oblivion, via the endearment of the respondents sister. 43. The applicant’s done substantial works to the family home, but hasn’t attained the required papers to sell the property, which will be repossessed in 2025, as the capital will be outstanding. Being the situation the applicant has imposed on the respondent. Yet the concern of their advocate Layla Babadi, conveyed in para 18, is the respondent has not provided proof, of her unemployment & her Tax Credit. But Layla Babadi accepts, she knows her status. Can you imagine Layla’s frustration. 44. Layla Babadi, in the applicants statement, makes the same inference, on the respondent’s effort to sell the property, as done about her Tax Credit, thus Layla is complicit in fraud, via deception. 45. Fact; the family home has had, circa 14 viewings, & it’s on its 5th estate agent, (as demanded by the applicant), despite how bazaar that, and his other demands are. (To include sacking a friendly, helpful, low cost, estate agent with historic data. Replacing with, an expensive, with no historic data). Regardless, the respondent’s done her very best, to comply with the applicant’s demands. 46. The Portugal property, managed by the applicant, is not even up for sale, some 10 months after the consent order. Yet the applicant, has absolute control, of the sales direction. Yet here we are, on the demand of the applicant, via his advocate, to discuss in court, the respondent’s adherence, to a court consent order. Such being both audacious & arrogant. 47. This is a clear example, of court misuse. Ironically the evidence indicates, such is being funded by laundered money, (save the applicant producing their last 3 years accounts). Or indeed, any year in the last decade, or even the name of his accountant. I’ll repeat, this legal action, is being funded by laundered money, paid to a solicitor, a barrister and the court. You, really couldn’t make it up, and I haven't..

Grasp; Karen the respondent, is 63.. and; (1) whilst married, was kept away from finance & bills, (2) has no skills or qualifications. ( 3 ) was pregnant at 17, married the applicant at 20, had 4 children, & now has 9 grandchildren. ( 4 ) Correction, her energy, skills & concern, for 40 years have been as a devoted mother, to her, and the applicant’s children, and their, 9 grandchildren. ( 5 ) She is now without work, living on state aid, being £378.08 a month, (I’ve seen the Giro). She get’s by, via the help of her family & friends. ( 6 ) The respondent, has told the applicant, she may have to leave the family home, as there’s only dregs of the central heating oil left. She also has to accommodate, the 2 family pets. On doing so, the state utility caps will cease, & the property will be uninsurable, as unoccupied & insecure. The garage door, doesn’t lock, so provides access, to the home. Currently the respondent has little option, than reside as is, & adhere to every demand, of the applicant’s. Other than destroy, the respondent financially, her self esteem & spirit. What do the applicant, solicitor & barrister, with the aid of the UK court, aim too achieve. Via evidence of an applicant, who with Macular Degeneration, C, takes lead from his solicitor, to navigate the court. Then he’ll drive home & start working. Of course he’ll deny all that, as he’s falsified his residential address, as he’ll deny moving in with the respondent’s sister, & defrauding the Inland Revenue, & falsifying data, put in front of the Financial Remedy Judge, via the assistance, of Layla his Roythones Ltd. solicitor. The applicant’s credibility, & motive will be further questioned when considered relevant. E. The evidence of applicant; David John Cragg, 22 Coniston Close, NG2 6ND. There’s no evidence it’s self composed. So the overwhelming influence of his advocate, is assumed. Save being presented with, the applicants draft, when I’d of course apologise, for a sound assumption.

Ask yourself; other than destroy the respondent financially, her self esteem, & spirit. What are the applicant, their solicitor & barrister, & the UK courts aiming to achieve. Via the evidence of a male applicant, who holds the arm of his solicitor to guide himself safely into court, then drives home. The applicants, and their advocates credibility, and motives are further questioned as considered relevant.

1). So, the detail; Two of Mansfield’s finest, arrested Bob, at the 2024 Walesby, Big Fake Festival. Being on the last of 5 nights, being Sunday, 1st September, at circa 19:00. Bob’s detention being unlawful, as an instinct to protect another human from harm, is commendable, not unlawful. 2). Bob was held at, Mansfield Police Station, Great Central Rd, Mansfield NG18 2HQ. From circa; 8pm Sunday, to circa; 3pm on Monday 2nd, being 18 hours. With no food or water, for 12 hours, & Bob had to stay in Mansfield, Monday night, to comply with the bail terms, which remain until further notice. 3). All, to include the Big Fake Festival’s security; treated Bob like, a deposit in the tread of their shoe. As not one, listened to Bob, as to what had actually occurred. Do ask, why would that be.? On attending court, they maybe, able to justify their behaviour. Where as Bob will simply state, what occurred. 4). The Big Fake Festival’s security, advised Bob he’d aught to exit the festival grounds, as the parents of Bev the accuser, & their friends, would likely attack him. The Big Fake Festival team stated, they simply couldn’t guarantee Bob’s safety. As there were too many of them, & they had been drinking. Is that not a HATE crime, along with Drunken & Disorderly, over to Mansfield’s finest! Yet Bob, was ultimately arrested, for talking to a group of children, about noise, that had prevented them sleeping. Bob suggested ear plugs, maybe a solution. You simply couldn’t make this stuff up... 5). If you go to such festivals, you really do need to grasp this detail... as the action of the Big Fake Festival management, and the Mansfield Police, could destroy, life as you know it... Compo' by: Shake the Tree...

4. Justification: They did so to appease, 2 Howes Percival solicitors, a London barrister, Evie Barden, & the deceptive John Bateman, of Franklin Silencers Ltd. An Act of judicial perjury, leading to the deplorable fraud of a landlord. Who Howes Percival deemed, should fund a 2 year claim, fund 100% of the dilapidations, fund the mandatory surveyor’s defect list, & pay the defendant’s, £85k, legal bill. Of course being nice, but putting the landlord, at a loss, when even a risk of a loss, is fraud. Wishing to pass a landlord a total loss of £120k. Being 10 times, the £12k settlement offer. A pointer to the non compos mentis. In the UK, imposing a loss, on another, is Fraud (period). With such being blatantly obvious, pre-trial.!

The Defence of Barclays Possession Order – Para’s 53-65. 07 Would you prefer to be Screwed, or Shafted, no sex involved, as this occurs, court side. (BBPO Para’s 53-65). This final paragraph also includes a refresher of the parties actions. Call me biased, but Barclays Bank have shown zero concern for a customer, who is also a substantial shareholder, well they were. Barclays only concern is to regain their capital sum. I’m hoping the Judge takes a pragmatic view, that as a landlord and home owner, I have many responsibilities and commitments and neither a Judge, nor Barclays are best placed to dictate how I best deal with the same. The document leavers no doubt, Judges are not qualified to rule over financial issues, or judge those who do. I have often said the obvious to Barclays operatives. As I’m paying 6.65% interest on the capital, that debt will be paid off when timely to do so. Barclays cannot expect me to go through hardship, at my time of life, just to gain a head pat, and so Barclays can lend the same money, to another younger person, at a lower rate. Kevin Lamin.

The Defence of Barclays Possession Order - Para's 28-52. This section includes para’s 5 to 9 of the original UK’s Defence of a Possession Order. Everybody is going to have different views on its terms, but one has to assume Barclays simply desiring the loans immediate repayment, may not be enough. As they have used deception to infer there are arrears and conflict with the borrower. When the borrow has in fact now provided over 30,000 words of detail on their situation. And all the interest, as agreed in the loan is paid. Barclays have decided to designate the principal capital sum as arrears, when of course it is the principal capital sum, as it has been for 26 years. And Barclays has a process in place that to an outsider may appear they mean to assist, when they don’t. They fabricate what they think others will fall for. When Barclays own letters show that to be the case. I liken such a situation to the Post Office scandal, where it appears that UK Judges accept whatever a solicitor puts in front of them... I’ve news for the many, that is precisely what does occur, well lets see what occurs in the instance. This section also covers detail on the: Equality Act 2010 (para 45). The Perjury Act of 1911 (para 49). The Fraud Act of 2006 (para 50). All of which Barclays have breached, and the detail of how, and why is clear. The question is, will such be clear to a Judge.. ?? Who give the public the perception they are the holders of knowledge and wisdom, well lets see. Kevin Lamin.

The Defence of Barclays Possession Order - Para 27. I have a loft full of box files, that leave no doubt I’ve so tried to retain faith in the UK justice process. Sadly on taking account of the results, all would come to my conclusion, the UK justice process has but one aim. To take from the blue collar worker, and pass to the white collar worker. Frankly I’m realistic, those in the judiciary often have long stressful days, of course they won’t be sleeping on a concrete floor at the delivery end of a Heidelberg, but they do work hard, all the same. But the corruption and deception cannot be disguised, the noticeable change in recent years, like most of UK society, it is worse, or better, being dependant what side of the fence you are on. Kevin Lamin.

The Defence of Barclays Possession Order - Para's 26. It is impossible to put into context how one feels about being forced to leave ones home of 26 years. I could say at the moment that is just a threat, but it feels real enough to me. I believe you better understand situations if you have been through them, so here I am understanding how those to be evicted may feel. Hopefully it will make me a better landlord, although my two commercial tenant’s, that haven’t paid a single penny in rent for 3 months, are not likely to gain my sympathy. As they, and the likeminded, are partly the reason I’m in this situation. Kevin Lamin.

The Defence of Barclays Possession Order - Para's, Several. Every thing in life has to be in context. And these few paragraphs put my position and stance into context. If I say I have been screwed by the judiciary, I will have provided detail that justifies that comment. Kevin Lamin.

The Defence of Barclays Possession Order - Para's 2-10. As it says on the tin, but all is not how it appears, there is in fact zero arrears, in fact over payments have been made, since the mortgage was taken out. But that is not how Barclays want it to look. Kevin Lamin.

The Defence of Barclays Possession Order - Para's A-K. This is the background to the environment, that the UK judiciary expects landlord’s to operate within. Which is simply not sustainable. What the government has allowed the judiciary to do, is to pass the cost of a tenants failure to the landlord. Most of what is written here is so absurd it is not believable. But it leaves no doubt the judiciary are not the solution, they are part of the problem. I am absolutely willing to have anybody tell me I have this all wrong and just need to open my eyes to the good the judiciary are doing, please do help me see that if you are able to do so. Kevin Lamin.

Ironically this is not about arrears, in fact to the contrary, as despite a 4 fold increase in the monthly interest due, over payments were maintained. But Barclays Bank’s stance is, the term has expired, and we want the loan repaid, now.. Yep that is right, Barclays are a Bank, thus they will, on the repayment of the money, via Barclays gaining possession of another home, they will simply lend the money to someone else... It’s very likely, someone with a higher risk of default, and at a lower rate. In fact for comparison, today I saw HSBC where offering the same rate, being 6.6%, on a period loan, likely being unsecured. So, Shake the Tree, has looked into this situation, done sums, comparisons and equations. And taken a view on the deception and advised the court and the Judges, they need to be mindful, of their complicity in perjury and fraud. The BIG question is, will the Judges heed the warning, all fall in line with the multi nationals, as the courts and Judges did with Fujitsu and the Post Office... You will of course, have a grasp on the Post Office scandal, which showed how woefully poor the UK justice process is. So how will a UK Judge respond, to the deception used by Barclays Bank, in their blatant aim to re-possess a borrowers home.. In this case the borrower has offered vast quarterly repayments, which Barclays have declined, yet they have told the court they have sought a resolution. That is an act of perjury and fraud, thus the courts have been advised of such, and they will be observed from every angle... Judges consider they are untouchable, trust me they are not.. Judges are no other then highly paid servants of the state, and they must serve the state is what they are expected to do.. Or they will end up behind bars, just as the common person does, who fall’s foul of that expected of them.. This Pod, like many on STT, illustrates just how poor the UK justice process is.. Content by; Shake the Tree.. Email at will: [email protected]

In England, fraud is a criminal offence. To the extent, a colleague gained a substantial prison sentence, for gaining reward; that (may), have gone to another. In reality the reward, would have (likely gone nowhere). But putting others, (at risk of a loss), was deemed by a London city Judge & Jury, as an act of Fraud. The claimant assumes, the same laws apply, in Northampton, as in London. As the only UK’s Fraud reporting hub, Action Fraud London, is evidently stretched. The claimant work’s, with intent to maintain, a cohesive society, to reflect UK law.

Barclays Bank plc, take a customer of 25 years, to the precipice..!! After ignoring their customer’s 20,000 words of detail, providing a situation explanation, and on Barclays further refusing several offers, to pay off a circa  ¼ of 1 million pound historic loan. Barclays response has been; only the whole immediate repayment will suffice, regardless of however that is achieved. The borrower has offered substantial sums, which have gained, no other than a generic response from Barclays. Barclays in preference to accepting one of multiple offers, have opted to evict their customer, from their home, a client who, from June 2023, paid Barclays £17,000 interest, in 12 months. So lets see where this stance gets Barclays, and how UK Judges, respond to Barclays desire to regain a capital sum, gained by the procession of a property, (the home of 25 years, of one of their clients), so Barclays can then lend, the same sum to another, at a likely lower rate. It is a strange world we live in... but we do need to ask such questions, of those who manage society on our behalf...

Parts 1, 2 & 3, detail corporate deception, by West Northants Council, and shows how their highway policy, breaches the 2006 Fraud Act. It further shows, the council have ironically encouraged their engaged, (to include their employees), to be complicit in thousands of acts of Fraud. The Parts also leave no doubt, the UK judiciary are also seen to encourage deception & fraud. Such consequentially shows, that the UK’s own judiciary, are creating societal may-ham. But of most importance, is that this detail and other of Shake the Tree’s detail shows. The UK government, is absent of what is required to build & sustain a cohesive society. And that the last thing the UK need’s is another Barrister as our  PM... So please vote REFORM, as the UK, desperately need such, as evidently the Cons, Labs & Libs, are soiled goods, also being clueless. If you take issue of that said, please do email; [email protected]             

Parts 1, 2 & 3, detail corporate deception, by West Northants Council, and shows how their highway policy, breaches the 2006 Fraud Act. It further shows, the council have ironically encouraged their engaged, (to include their employees), to be complicit in thousands of acts of Fraud. Parts 1, 2, & 3, also leave no doubt, the UK judiciary are also seen to encourage deception & fraud. Such consequentially shows, that the UK’s own judiciary, are creating societal may-ham. But of most importance, is that this detail and other of Shake the Tree’s detail shows. The UK government, is absent of what is required to build & sustain a cohesive society. And that the last thing the UK need’s is another Barrister as our  PM... So please vote REFORM, as the UK, desperately need such, as evidently the Cons, Labs & Libs, are soiled goods, also being clueless. If you take issue of that said, please do email; [email protected] .             

This is; an Audio & Readable version, of a individual’s private action, being taken against council engaged, who’s defrauded a citizen. The defendants costs, just to read & respond, will cost many times their, momentary benefit. The Councils policy and process is so, that most citizens, simply could do no other than mitigate their loss. So such is blatant deception by the state, carried out by the named individuals, who will be seen, to have knowingly colluded, to defraud thousands of citizens. The claimant has found, when dispute detail, is  in the public domain, the time and costs of the dispute are reduced. Do ensure you take in Parts 2 and 3..

Rent can be likened to HP payments. As so, it is not the monthly payment that define the overall cost. Its the term and agreement conditions which define the cost. As one would not expect to pay the same amount on having a fully repairing and insuring lease, when compared to one not have the same obligation. And the following podcast illustrates how a tenants focus can be focused on the short term, with an expectation that that the two alternative options can be directly compared.. When it is simply not pragmatic to do so.. This podcast should leave one in no doubt, there is clear water between the tow parallels..

The detail in the documents, provides reason, why such action has been taken. But in the round, (1) citizens should respect, the reasonable rights of others. (2) citizens should respect the environment they use and occupy, which they will pass on to others. (3) citizens should not, further their progress, at a cost to others, via corruption & deception. (4) citizens on seeing such is occurring, should report such to the authority, in the hope that the authorities, have the resource to discourage, that which UK rules, & laws deem, is as a minimum, anti social behaviour. (5) Hopefully on citizens reporting such, UK society, will not, continue to decline.

I’ve decided to take this dilemma out of your hand’s. Thus I’ve detailed my analysis of the situation, and relayed it to the D V S A. Who will likely investigate, how your most recent MOT test station, has certified a vehicle, as road worthy and compliant, when it was evident, that the vehicle, whether in motion or static, could do no other, than constantly leak oil onto the highway. And as that on its own, defines a fail, I will hound the D V S A, until they for fill their societal responsibility. Clearly, my agenda, is to have your Land Rover, K573 URY, moved off the highway, & certainly out of Lichfield Close, Kislingbury, Northants. Save your vehicle, being parked, on your own property.

We the DVSA, investigate reports, to make sure MOT testers, and operators, meet the rules set out in the.. Road Traffic Act of 1988. Well, "lets see if that is what they do.." ??

This is a brief 5 minute open letter, to Council’s, & UK citizens. It’s best absorbed with, or before, “How to sue the Council, Part’s 1 & 2”. Which provides guidance on why & how, those imposing & encouraging the deception, (being the Council & Judiciary), must be tackled. There’s now multiple UK wide entities, doing that detailed, by imposing a loss on UK citizens. On a council, having or composing such a policy, they are breaching the fraud act of 2006, & enticing their employees & contractors, to be complicit in fraud. Yet to enforce, a highway repair policy, flouting U.K. law, is beyond stupidity, being arrogant, when it’s existence, breaches the Fraud Act. If you wonder, who’s going to prevent such deception..??. then read on..

This episode, explains how the UK judiciary, view and treat a claimants evidence.. You'll likely be disappointed, how highly paid servants of the state, aka, UK County Court Judges... Do tell Shake the Tree, what you think.. ??

1.       This is an open letter, that contains the detail required; to take a council to the county court, on a council having breached the fraud act of 2006. Councils, across the country, are doing so, by imposing a loss on U.K. citizens. Yet no council, should have, compose, or aim to enforce, a highway repair policy, that flouts U.K. law. 2.       The detail further clarifies, how the UK has got itself into this dire mess. With many examples of highly paid servants of the state, repeatedly failing to measure their own performance, whilst dictating how other citizens, should measure theirs. 3.       On reading between the lines, you will note, there is no difference, in the delivery of justice, between the major parties. You will further see, education and intelligence, have little to do with the delivery, of reasonable and just, societal rules and laws. 4.       For a council, to defend a fraud claim, it may cost them circa £20,000. But it may, also cost a council, significantly more.  At some point the penny will drop, I’ll keep all updated on that. The risk to the claimant is less, than when using the small claims, money claim process, for multiple, complex reasons. Again updates will be provided as the clock ticks. 5.       However, I’m not after the council per-say, it’s their employees, or contractors who action the fraud, thinking as a council operative, they’ve an entitlement, to defraud their relatives, neighbours, friends & any unfortunate citizen, (some of whom, will be working 2 or 3 jobs, just to survive). Fraud is carried out by people, not by an entity. 6.       A delivery driver, on stepping into a company van, still has to adhere to the law. Likewise an administrator, needs to adhere to the law, even when in front of a works, P. C. I could better illustrate that, but I’m sure the recipient of this detail, gets the inference. 7.       In my home town of Northampton, it has got to the point, drivers anxiety levels & their mental health, are being impacted, as well as their pockets. I am hearing of increased numbers of citizens, selling, or changing their vehicles, for truck type transport. 8.       Sadly as with so many issues, Judges & the judiciary as a whole, are seen to encourage poor behaviour, (being complicit) in anything which may help grow the solicitors & barristers money tree. And like many other sectors, those within, Zip it, or their career’s would be over. But do have no doubt, their are many, from the judiciary, from Judges downwards, in prison for abuse of their position, but evidently, not enough. 9.       When I promoted, it was evident, that a top London barrister, with 1 of the largest UK solicitor firms, under the eyes of 7 county court judges, had ignored the industry standard dilapidation, PAP CD rules, in addition to flouting other rules & laws. And their evidence, showed, they’d severe impairments, or their actions, should earn them a prison term. 10.    The solicitor’s firm responded; by serving a bankruptcy order, for a £35,000 bill, they had just issued. That bill was only due, as the solicitors firm, a London barrister & 8 county court Judges, flouted government rules, and used blatant deception and fraud, simply to line the pockets of the same.. The same will gain, court papers during 2024... 11.    It goes without, few, have the time or financial resource, to explore or promote, such as state corruption. But when one sees the likes of Paula Vennels, & Fujitsu, slaughtering vulnerable, Post Office Masters. A spot-light, needs to be put on the states process, that allows & encourages, such to occur.  The fault mainly lies, at the door of the UK Judiciary. 12.    Don’t blame the government, as with the dilapidation PAP CD rules. A Gov' department can publish, simple & concise guidance. But on arrogant, self-serving solicitors, barristers & Judges, ignoring the rules, to suit them. It would need a very articulate being to counter the Judiciary.

Since my losses, my dogs, and I, have been trying to rebuild our lives, and find purpose and happiness. My main purpose in life since, has been to look after the babies, Abby and Reuben. As I’d promised, my wife Christine, I’d do just that! My role was to keep them both happy, and safe...!

a. This is a Procast to: Expose; how West Northamptonshire Council, (aka WNC), steals our days, the equivalent of, some folks annual holiday, while charging us for all their services, which they don’t adequately provide. WNC, deem, each time we venture out in our vehicles, we are at risk of a greater cost, than our likely weekly earnings. WNC, deem, they have a right to cause drivers extreme anxiety and cost, without any redress. WNC, say, their policy deems that is reasonable. b.      We can either suck-it-up, or we can stand up. Most will have to do the forma, as they won’t have the resource to stand up, to the WNC’s onerous process. In other words, those hard at work will be exploited, by their own Council, who say. You can use the highway at your own risk, & WNC expect, your monitory & time budget, to be limitless. This is a council, who are buying up homes, solely to house those, who have likely paid zero tax, since illegally arriving on our island..    c.       WNC say, a journey in your car, may deprive you, of 2, 3, 4, or as much as, the equivalent of your annual holiday in time, or the option of a circa £1,000 bill. Shake the Tree says, enough, let’s see, what our UK Judges, have to say about that situation. Shake the Tree say, WNC are exploiting their position, and WNC are defrauding those unfortunate, to have collided with a highway pothole. d.      Facts to contemplate, almost without exception, highway repairs, cost less, the sooner they are dealt with. And cost more, the longer they are left. What they never do, is repair them self. What they always do, is damage vehicles, to varying extents, that collide with them.   e.      Further the vehicle damage, will likely cost more, than the pothole repair, and if WNC defend a vehicle damage claim, they will gain legal costs, likely 10 times the vehicle repair sum, which is likely 3 times, the likely pothole repair sum. f.        This is a situation, the Council can fix, or County Court Judges can fix, or it will be likely fixed by disgruntled vehicle owners, likely throwing, their blown-out, burning tyres, at council buildings. g.      What can’t continue, is for potholes on the highway, that as a minimum will damage vehicles, at their worst will result in the deaths of those, likely to be travelling on two wheels. Naturally potholes represent, a very high risk, to the ever more popular, small wheeled scooters. h.      One should ask the question, does the councils insurance policy, pay out for deaths on the highway, but not, the multiple vehicle damage claims, which promote, deaths by potholes, are imminent.?  i.        An adverse effect of a poor highway surface, is the public will gradually transition to huge, heavy vehicles, with huge pothole busting wheels & tyres, which produce, 2 to 3 times, the emissions of a small town car, and of course, such heavy vehicles will result in even greater highway decay. So, that’s the associated facts, and covers, as the following podcast’s forward..

My, Barclays, communications to date, total 33 pages, circa 20,000 words, promote Barclays, are in no position, to dictate how I best manage my finances. Also provided, doc’; KL’s In’s & Out’s of 23-11. It’s content being, as per it’s title. Regardless, Barclays post to me, a further budget planner, despite such having been addressed in, MTE 06 & 07, with audio links provided of all the Doc’s. I received a further Barclays letter, of 15th January 2024, after a lengthy conversation with a Barclays operative on the same date. The letter with clarity, indicated Barclays have not even bothered to consider any, of the repayment proposals, with the Barclays letter, detailing, me missing a time envelope, was their futile reason, for discounting all my, substantial offers to date. KL, Their comes a point when one has to follow their conviction. As providers can take the view that their T&C's are the law, when they are not, they are what they say, their T&C's, and at a mortgage term end, a mortgage simple becomes a debt, and if Barclays were smart, they'd save themself lots of cost, and bad feeling, and do as Natwest Bank offer, to extended the agreement, which neutralises the debt, getting it off their balance sheet. So lets see where Barclays lack of foresight takes them.. KL by STT.

1st Contributor: Paula, Vennells, CBE – positions held; CEO of the Post Office, resigning in 2021, she had worked for; L’Oreal, Dixons, Argos, & Whitbread. Whilst in leadership roles requiring dedication, Paula took time-out, to train & become a Deacon in 2005, & a Priest in 2006, this is mentioned, as it gives her a likely position, in the House of Lords, (God help us all, comes to mind). That said, Paula’s membership, of the Churches Ethical Investment Advisory Group, has now been terminated.    2nd Contributor: Joanne, Kate Swinson, CBE, F R A S, – positions held; MP, and Liberal Democrat Leader, (all be it, for a short period). Prior to such, Joanne Swinson, was a spokesperson for Women & Equality. Joanne, has been described, as the most inept, of the recent Post Office minister’s.   3rd Contributor: Sir Edward, Jonathan Davey, F R S A – positions held; MP, Post Office Minister, the current Liberal Democrat Leader. Here’s a taster, of Sir Edward Davey’s, principals. When 500 post masters, were fighting a class action, against the Post Office, Sir Edward Davey MP, was paid £5,000 a month, I understand gaining circa £250,000. Simply for, information sharing with Fujitsu... As; www dot law, dot com, said on; 17 Nov 2021, — Liberal Democrat party leader, Ed Davey, resigned from his role at, Herbert Smith Freehills Solicitor’s, as such had become, an unwelcome focus for Parliament. I emphasise, at that time, Herbert Smith Freehills, were defending the Post Office, against a Postmaster’s class action. I say Ed Davey, should be thrown to the wolves, if his digestion is an issue, I’ll eat, Ed, myself. Sir Edward Davey, Liberal Democrat leader, should as a minimum, be sacked, & disqualified as an MP, & then prosecuted, for complicity in perjury, theft & fraud, or are  MP’s, exempt from law breaking. 4th Contributor: Sir Tony, Blair, – positions held; MP, 1994-2007, leader of the Labour party & UK Prime Minister from 97 to 2007. His Fujitsu comparability is detailed later. This is the Sir Tony Blair, who gave us new, PFI hospitals, that 2 decades on, cost half a billion a year, in interest payments, & a further 2.3 billion in, cleaning & maintenance. Ironically, PFI halted in 2018, when the provider Carillion, collapsed.

Barclays Bank, can (in 6 minutes), further explain to the court, the benefit to society, or to Barclays, of Barclays trying to forcibly redeem a loan, from a customer of 2 decades, to loan to a new customer, at a lower rate. The reader should note, all detailed here, has already been conveyed to Barclays Bank, as early as the summer of 2023, and evidently Barclays have continued to ignore what the law of the land asks of them, with Barclays being like the Post Office, preferring to intimidate others via their financial advantage.. Barclays should take note, I am not, a gentle Post Master, open to corporate manipulation...

Just a 4 minute introduction to the detail in DvL Parts 1, 2, & 3, being extensive, & it showing, Susan Rust, Sali Brown, Christian Halls & Edwina Lane, were instrumental & complicit in theft, perjury & fraud. As defined by those Acts, with Fraud, being a loss to Kevin Lamin, being ongoing, as Kevin continues to have sustained a loss, due to the named. This Podcast further advises the named what action will follow and provides links to the three parts. It is anticipted those charged with theft, perjury and fraud will replicate the particular behaviour of a large Australian flightless bird... Blatant lying by professional females, (is now a non event, as Baroness Michelle Mone, has just shown). And the UK judiciary has been rewarding liars since time began, many examples available. DvL, shows with out doubt, you can’t believe a word said by (female) Susan Rust. And on, Edwina (female) & Christian grasping the M.D., Sali Brown’s (female) witness statement, (available on request), they will concur, Sali fabricated pivotal matters, making Edwina & Christian complicit.

4,831 words, 26 minutes - Like many, being a self determinant manager of time. Not the Pot Hole, aka (pot’s), but the one who came across it. I like others have daily tasks & distractions, some foreseen, some imposed, & some spontaneous. But what they all demand, is resource of time or money, being one of the same in this era.  And it is the United Nations, who define that one’s liberty is compromised, on not being able to use one’s time, how one chooses.. Otherwise one is being deprived of liberty. Thus one that deprives another, of their liberty, are in breach of the Human Rights Act of 1998..

Whilst PART 1, drilled down into the character of the defendants, and their motivation. PART 2, associated the defendants, a Sali Brown MD (of Chelton Brown Ltd., D1), a Susan Rust, D2, (of Custard Creative Ltd.), a solicitor Nick Phillips, NP, (of Toller’s LLP) with District Judge Glassbrook, (DJG). All are seen to have used deception, to impose a monetary & time loss, on a claimant, being a plaintiff, PL, being Kevin Lamin, KL, of Northampton. In PART 2, solicitor’s firm Goodchild Vizard & Smart, (GVS), of Northampton, joined the fold, evidently also looking for notoriety, via exposure by, “Shake the Tree”. GVS ironically being another deluded female, also a friend of, Sali Brown, the MD of Chelton Brown Ltd., D1.  Who coincidentally recommended that Susan Rust D2, used GVS, in the sales transaction, in the referred to, jointly owned property.   PART 3, is dependant on that conveyed in Parts 1 & 2, so do PLEASE, adsorb the PARTS in order. As it is seen, the individuals have lied, & or, manipulated processes, or others, to impose a substantial loss, on the property co-owner KL, being D2’s ex-partner, & business associate for 15 years. For no apparent definable reason, other than malice. The legal term for Kevin Lamin, PL’s & Susan Rust, D2’s, relationship was, they were inexplicably linked. As shown, Susan Rust D2, decided in 2010, she no longer valued that link. And as PL often anticipates likelihood, (as that’s been PL’s job for 3 decades), it was of no surprise that D2’s behaviour led her, to be band, as much as one can be banned, from a whole village. As PL is now warning D1 & D2, there behaviour is likely to do as PL, specifically recalls in 2010, advising D2, whilst in PL’s walled garden. That such choices, may change ones life beyond recognition, clearly D2, thought that would be for the better, as D2 chose, to de-couple, in circa 2010, 2011.. But here we are, in 2023, with the stakes for D1 & D2, elevated into the stratosphere, & as all know, you mess with that, & it’s the end of days. they’ve been warned.

Whilst, Deception versus Liberty, PART 1, drilled down into the character of the defendants, and their motivation. PART 2, circa 30 minutes, associates the defendants, a Sali Brown MD (of Chelton Brown Ltd., D1), a Susan Rust D2, (of Custard Creative Ltd.), a solicitor Nick Phillips NP, (of Toller’s LLP), with District Judge Glassbrook, DJG. Who all used deception, to knowingly impose a greater monetary, & a time loss, on a claimant, a Kevin Lamin PL, of Northampton, England. In PART 2, they are joined by another solicitor’s firm, Goodchild Vizard & Smart (GVS), of Northampton, who is evidently looking for notoriety, via exposure by “Shake the Tree”. Ironically another deluded female, being a friend of, Sali Brown, the MD of the rental estate agent, Chelton Brown Ltd., D1 of Northampton. Who recommended that Susan Rust D2, should use GVS. 3.        Other than the stupid, all, will have known, that pre & post their action, at stake was, defrauding another of their liberty. The composer pens, as 1 who’s been adversely effected, particularly by female deception, financially & otherwise. Thus the composer rightly has zero tolerance, with those aiming to gain, by restricting another’s liberty, regardless of their gain, loss, or their status... 4.        To re-quote the orator; Doctor Jorden Peterson, a clinical psychologist said, of his 12 rules of life, prior to a speech at the O2 Arena in London, on 2nd November 2023. “Western Civilisation would benefit, by embracing the truth”. Whilst, Doctor Jorden Peterson, promotes adherence, “Shake the Tree”, provides examples, of how costly, deception is to our civilisation. There will be no winners in this matter, just stressed females, unable to grasp the magnitude of their deception, with a cool male solicitor & a Judge, who collect their Friday pay cheques. All have ignored the risks that the females, are imposing on themselves. Deception & lying, is a scourge on society, & typically associated with those seen as, “low life”. “Shake the Tree” shows, professionals at all levels, use deception & fraud, with zero concern of accountability, for their self gain.

Words 1,200 - Minutes 7. As this matter shows, taking that which is not yours, can be costly. If a property owner, takes what they know to be another’s, then they will have to humble them selves, & return, that which is not theirs, to it’s rightful owner... at no cost to the owner.  Whether that be, another’s chattels, or another’s right of way. If they do not.!! They will learn, that deceiving another in the UK, is against the 2006 Fraud Act, and in the UK, Fraud is a criminal offence..!!

At some point, one needs to halt data submissions, when its evident, its recipients, Barclays Bank plc, are simply ignoring the data. Email Header, for MTE 06, author & copyright: Kevin Lamin. 26 th November 2023...   

At some point, most will be required to submit financial data, & most will simply conform. As did most of RBS’s business customers, to include Chiman Patel, a director of Sykes Chemists, who’d been with RBS for 35 years, building a network of 5 Pharmacies, employing 60 staff. But that mattered not to RBS, who destroyed Chiman Patel’s business, and his life, in the 2008, 2009, financial scandal.  Then there are others, a rare breed, who foresee where a process will lead, & instantly weigh up risk, & benefit, & they can gauge, who will benefit from such compliance.

2,949 words, 20 mins. - Banks lend a client money for 20 years, and they are delighted to do so. But come term end, suddenly, lending money appears an alien process to the Bank, & as the American country music artist, Sammy Kershaw’s song, of January 2003 title says. "I, Want, My Money Back".  The Banks likely have good reason for this, but the Banks behaviour & actions, is contrary to societal cohesion, & what’s more of a surprise, contrary to them gaining profit, likely via a raised interest rate, and via lending at a lower than usual risk, and having a lower associated lending costs.. Which is further explained at the end of this detail.

Gone is the era, when the world’s Black & Brown communities, desire equality. They now yearn, to be ruled by their, more stable white male counterparts, opposed to being governed, by their own race.. To the extent, they almost without exception, commit illegal acts, just to arrive on UK shores. Sadly they continue the same when in Britain. Thus it’s seen they are indoctrinated, by the corrupted regime, they so disliked and deserted. So let’s investigate the draw, of white male supremacy rule. And if & how it can be maintained, & the long term effect, of not stemming, the desires of global black & brown communities (BBC’s). Firstly let’s establish some rules, as Trust-Pilot are yet to, star grade, cultures & races. So the composer has improvised with generic simplicity, to help define how the global, black & brown communities see the UK. Simplistically they are deserting their warm, 1 star homeland, where Brit’s love to holiday, to travel 3,000 miles north, to invade the UK, as they see a 5 star land, which by comparison, is wet & cold. And for that reason, we have to assume, the UK is a superior state, managed by superior people, evidently white males. They are not coming for the weather. History offers no example, where black & brown communities, cross continents, to invade other black & brown communities, without violence, or any state managed, by other than white males. No equality Act, will alter that fact. Let’s now investigate the superior state.