Egocentric nature of moral judgments -  Professor Bogdan Wojciszke episode artwork

EPISODE · Oct 14, 2022 · 43 MIN

Egocentric nature of moral judgments - Professor Bogdan Wojciszke

from Strefa Wiedzy Uniwersytetu SWPS · host Uniwersytet SWPS

Judgments of moral character lay at the core of person- and self-perceptions, people make them incessantly and with great ease. People also widely and strongly believe in the objective nature of their moral judgment. However, the dual-process account of information processing posits that moral judgments are a joint product of two processes – automatic, affect-laden intuitions and controlled, rational decisions. Because the former are fast and continuously active, they may be expected to play a greater role than the latter, which are slower and active only in welcoming conditions. In effect, judgments of moral character should be prone to egocentric biases of the kind “what is good for me is generally good” (i.e. moral). Professor Wojciszke presents a series of studies showing that others’ dishonest behavior is evaluated leniently (up to positive), when the observer profits from this dishonesty. Actors bringing profits are liked by the observer and the increased liking of such actors completely mediates the increases in their moral evaluations. Observers truly believe in their biased moral judgments (and trust in the cheater who brings profits) and they are not aware that their moral judgments are biased by their interests (they believe that their judgments follow moral norms, not interests). Similar influences come from liking, originating from any source, e.g. belief similarity, mimicry, frequency of exposure or political allegiance. Studies on moderators showed that the egocentric bias disappears in conditions triggering rational thought, e.g. accountability, when the judges are expected to justify their judgments. In numerous societies we observe cultural wars accompanied by fierce moral disputes producing more heat than light. The present research suggests that these disputes may become more civilized if the disputants were asked not only for their positions but also for justification of these positions. Bogdan Wojciszke is professor of Psychology at SWPS University of Social Sciences and Humanities. The lecture was held during EASP Summer School 2022 organized by SWPS University, Faculty of Psychology in Wroclaw, European Association of Social Psychology and Social Behavior Research Center. W tym miejscu znajdziesz wszystkie materiały, które powstały w ramach Strefy Psyche, a od listopada 2025 — treści z jeszcze szerszego spektrum tematów. Wejdź do Strefy Wiedzy Uniwersytetu SWPS!

Judgments of moral character lay at the core of person- and self-perceptions, people make them incessantly and with great ease. People also widely and strongly believe in the objective nature of their moral judgment. However, the dual-process account of information processing posits that moral judgments are a joint product of two processes – automatic, affect-laden intuitions and controlled, rational decisions. Because the former are fast and continuously active, they may be expected to play a greater role than the latter, which are slower and active only in welcoming conditions. In effect, judgments of moral character should be prone to egocentric biases of the kind “what is good for me is generally good” (i.e. moral). Professor Wojciszke presents a series of studies showing that others’ dishonest behavior is evaluated leniently (up to positive), when the observer profits from this dishonesty. Actors bringing profits are liked by the observer and the increased liking of such actors completely mediates the increases in their moral evaluations. Observers truly believe in their biased moral judgments (and trust in the cheater who brings profits) and they are not aware that their moral judgments are biased by their interests (they believe that their judgments follow moral norms, not interests). Similar influences come from liking, originating from any source, e.g. belief similarity, mimicry, frequency of exposure or political allegiance. Studies on moderators showed that the egocentric bias disappears in conditions triggering rational thought, e.g. accountability, when the judges are expected to justify their judgments. In numerous societies we observe cultural wars accompanied by fierce moral disputes producing more heat than light. The present research suggests that these disputes may become more civilized if the disputants were asked not only for their positions but also for justification of these positions. Bogdan Wojciszke is professor of Psychology at SWPS University of Social Sciences and Humanities. The lecture was held during EASP Summer School 2022 organized by SWPS University, Faculty of Psychology in Wroclaw, European Association of Social Psychology and Social Behavior Research Center.

NOW PLAYING

Egocentric nature of moral judgments - Professor Bogdan Wojciszke

0:00 43:59

No transcript for this episode yet

We transcribe on demand. Request one and we'll notify you when it's ready — usually under 10 minutes.

Patoarchitekci Łukasz Kałużny, Szymon Warda Patoarchitekci to podcast o IT bez zbędnego bullshitu. Serwujemy solidną dawkę wiedzy z DevOpsa i okolic, okraszoną błazeńską nutą absurdu. Łukasz Kałużny i Szymon Warda rozbierają technologie na czynniki pierwsze – i to takie, o których reszta świata nawet nie słyszała.Naszą misją jest pomóc Ci nie tylko przetrwać w tym szalonym świecie IT, ale wręcz go zdominować i to z beztroskim uśmiechem na twarzy! Chcesz wiedzieć, co naprawdę dzieje się w technologii? Wbijaj! 👉 https://patoarchitekci.io. Dobrze trafiłeś! Słuchasz Patoarchitektów dzięki PROTOPII – firmie, w której Łukasz i Szymon działają na co dzień, wspierając zespoły IT na każdym etapie: od projektowania, przez wdrożenia i migracje, aż po optymalizację i zabezpieczenia. Oferujemy też mentoring i szkolenia dostosowane do potrzeb każdej firmy, niezależnie od wielkości. Sprawdź nas: 👉 <a href="https://protopia.tech" tar Radek Kotarski i Polimaty Radek Kotarski Nowe, świeże, wyperfumowane źródło Twojej wiedzy na temat świata. Bez napinki! Subskrybuj i bądź ze mną! :) Radio Naukowe Radio Naukowe - Karolina Głowacka Nowy odcinek co czwartek, godz. 6:30 || Wirtuale 2025, Podcast Roku 2024 i 2023, Medal Polskiego Towarzystwa Fizycznego 2024, Popularyzator Nauki 2023, Pop Science 2023 || RN to mądre rozmowy o naszym świecie i nas samych. O próbach zrozumienia rzeczywistości na najgłębszym poziomie. Rozmawiam z naukowcami i naukowczyniami, którzy - fenomenalnie! - opowiadają o swoich badaniach i dziedzinach wiedzy. Dyskutujemy nie tylko o tym CO wiemy, ale też SKĄD to wiemy. Zobacz nasze Wydawnictwo RN: https://radionaukowe.pl/wydawnictwo/ 👉 Zostań Patronem: https://patronite.pl/radionaukowe 👉 Wesprzyj jednorazowo: https://suppi.pl/radionaukowe 👉 Więcej: https://radionaukowe.pl/ 👉 Sprawdź nasze WYDAWNICTWO RN https://radionaukowe.pl//wydawnictwo, audiobooki dla naszej publiczności taniej, skorzystaj z kodu: sluchamRN CO NA TO TWÓJ LEKARZ? Dariusz Litera O zdrowiu w przystępny sposób. Ten podcast nie unika trudnych tematów, bo zdrowie oprócz wiedzy, wymaga szczerości. Naszymi gośćmi są lekarze specjaliści. Lata praktyki sprawiają, że potrafią szybko postawić właściwą diagnozę i co najważniejsze, wdrożyć odpowiednią terapię. Pamiętajcie, że podcasty nie leczą. Najlepsza rozmowa nie zastąpi wizyty u lekarza, gdy pojawiają się niepokojące objawy. Jako prowadzący obiecuję, że wykorzystam 25 lat radiowych doświadczeń i zadam wszystkie ważne pytania. Wy za to, nie odkładajcie badań i lekarskich konsultacji!Więcej na www.promocjazdrowia.org.pl

Frequently Asked Questions

How long is this episode of Strefa Wiedzy Uniwersytetu SWPS?

This episode is 43 minutes long.

When was this Strefa Wiedzy Uniwersytetu SWPS episode published?

This episode was published on October 14, 2022.

What is this episode about?

Judgments of moral character lay at the core of person- and self-perceptions, people make them incessantly and with great ease. People also widely and strongly believe in the objective nature of their moral judgment. However, the dual-process...

Can I download this Strefa Wiedzy Uniwersytetu SWPS episode?

Yes, you can download this episode by clicking the download button on the episode player, or subscribe to the podcast in your preferred podcast app for automatic downloads.
URL copied to clipboard!