High n' Dry Podcast

What Movie Should We Do Next?We watch Everything Everywhere All at Once with a mix of cynicism and hope, then score the acting, cinematography, score, plot, and rewatchability until we land on a very fair 3.5. We follow the movie’s “golden path” from traditionalism to nihilism to absurdism, then argue about whether kindness, empathy, and rebellion are the real antidotes to meaninglessness. • our three-part method for reviewing a movie while drunk, high, or whatever • first impressions shaped by multiverse fatigue and Oscar hype • a quick plot breakdown of the immigrant family, the laundromat audit, and the multiverse threat • Ryan’s ratings and why the runtime and “jingle keys” moments drag for him • James’s ratings and why the performances and camera work stay engaging • the philosophical ladder: conservatism, Kant, nihilism, optimistic nihilism, absurdism • the everything bagel as a symbol for despair and the pull of nothingness • Waymond’s kindness as an active way of fighting nihilism • how empathy and autonomy at home connect to broader ethics and politics • inserting ourselves into the film and speedrunning the plot with weed and minimal kung fu Support the show

What Movie Should We Do Next?We rate Coyote Vs. Acme and end up surprised by how well a Looney Tunes movie can hold a real courtroom thriller structure. We dig into what makes the live action animation blend work, then follow the corporate satire into bigger questions about culture, tech, and why the coyote never stops trying. • our three-part method and why we watch movies “under the influence” • quick plot recap of Wile E. Coyote suing Acme with Will Forte as his lawyer • acting highlights and why the humans playing it straight sells the world • cinematography and how the animation integration looks more seamless than expected • score talk, Looney Tunes callbacks, and why memorable themes matter • plot comparison to legal thrillers and the Roger Rabbit connection • deeper themes about corporate power, unfair trials, and being worn down by resources • tech company analogy, data collection, and users becoming the product • the coyote as a parable for persistence even when the win never comes • self-insert chaos, Doritos goons, Tweety revenge, and a WWE courtroom multiverse 4/5Support the show

What Movie Should We Do Next?We argue about Texas Chainsaw Massacre across the 1974 original and the 2022 sequel, then land on a franchise score that feels brutally fair. We dig into why the first film shaped slasher history while also admitting how loud, awkward, and exhausting it can be to actually sit through. • mix-up over which Texas Chainsaw version got watched • opening banter on emo scars, aging, and survival instincts • drinks, toasts, and the show’s rating framework • 1974 plot recap and why the last stretch becomes nonstop screaming • ratings for acting, cinematography, score, plot, and rewatchability for 1974 • 2022 sequel critique on writing, fake-looking gore, and unearned themes • gentrification theme and the missed opportunity of the shooting survivor storyline • “golden path” meanings: slaughterhouse imagery and humans as meat • inserting ourselves into the movie and how a gun changes everything • final notes on camera moves, junk-table pans, and the legendary wrench throw 2.5/5Support the show

What Movie Should We Do Next?We bounce from childhood nostalgia and drink experiments into a blunt debate about acupuncture, pseudoscience, and how trust in medicine gets manipulated. Then we tear into a dinosaur time-slip movie by scoring acting, cinematography, music, plot logic, and the deeper relationship themes it almost nails.• hoarding nostalgia objects and the fantasy of future value • “least resistance” as a way to find sustainable goals • acupuncture skepticism and the placebo timing trap • how pseudoscientific care can erode faith in medicine • the movie’s premise and why “no cell phones” changes everything • acting notes, with specific praise for the lead and frustration with child performances • CGI dinosaurs, suspense shots, and camera choices like diopter lenses • plot holes and weak dialogue that leave the wrong questions • rewatchability despite flaws and hopes for a director’s cut • repair after conflict, trauma bonding, and how audiences read art through their era Support the show

What Movie Should We Do Next?Support the show

What Movie Should We Do Next?Luke returns! We come in hot on Spider-Man: Brand New Day, from dumb jokes and drinks to a real argument about whether this is the best Tom Holland Spider-Man or a messy Disney machine. We land on a 3.5 and then dig into the deeper themes of isolation, self-acceptance, surveillance, and what it means to mourn people who are still alive. • our three-part review method and what we’re “bringing to the table” • quick plot rundown: forgotten Peter Parker, Gene Gray, organic webs, and too many converging storylines • ratings for acting, cinematography, score, plot, and rewatchability plus why our scores split hard • the Punisher and Hulk cameos, what they add, and what they dilute • “flock camera Spider-Man” and the ethics of mass surveillance by a masked hero • the Golden Path read: trauma, regret, growth, and radical empathy • mourning friends who keep living without you and why that hurts more than death sometimes • inserting ourselves into the film and how our rewrites change everything Support the show

What Movie Should We Do Next?A movie can be dumb and still be fun. Psycho Killer on Hulu manages the rare trick of being dumb and exhausting, and we tried, we really tried, to meet it halfway. Ryan Barron North and James Crosslin kick things off with our three part method: we rate the film out of five, we walk the Golden Path to find the deeper message (if it exists), and then we insert ourselves into the story to see how it changes when characters make even one smart choice. From the opening tragedy to the last second conspiracy twist, we break down the biggest plot holes and “wait, what?” decisions, including how the film handles police work, FBI involvement, and a bonkers jump toward Three Mile Island. We also talk craft: flat performances, awkward staging, cheap masking choices, and why the movie feels like it was written by someone who never googled anything, including how people act in danger, in grief, or in a room full of cultists. Then the conversation gets sharper. Psycho Killer leans hard on Satanism as a shorthand for evil, and we unpack how that plays into a modern satanic panic atmosphere and conspiracy flavored storytelling. A bad slasher film is easy to forget, but a bad slasher that echoes real misinformation can hit differently. If you love horror movie podcasts, brutal movie reviews, and dark humor with a point, hit play. Subscribe, share this with a friend who watches every new streaming thriller, and leave us a review with your pick for the worst movie you have ever finished.Support the show

What Movie Should We Do Next?We rate Christopher Nolan’s The Odyssey with a hard-number score, then argue about whether the film finds a real point beyond the hype. We end up in a bigger fight about adaptation, missing gods, sidelined women, and why culture war takes make everyone dumber.• opening banter on pressure, fandom, and why the show relaxes us• quick detour into Vampire the Masquerade and why brooding fails fast• our three-part plan: stars, meaning, then inserting ourselves into the film• drink check, heat dome misery, and toasts to new VPN locations• acting breakdown, including standout performances and roles that drag• cinematography debate on muted color palette, blocking, and uneven effects• score reactions, theater mixing, and what sticks after the credits• plot talk on regret, shame, depression, and what Nolan changes from Homer• disagreement on Odysseus as clever hero vs dude who bros through• Athena as goddess vs PTSD metaphor and what that does to the story• culture war chatter about casting, bots, and real-world takes leaking in• missing gods, missing comeuppance arcs, and what we wanted to see• Troy comparison and why rewatchability matters• our self-insert pitch: Dionysus everywhere and Hades ending the Tom Holland problem3.5/5 Stars!Support the show

What Movie Should We Do Next?We put Evil Dead Burn to the test with a five-category scoring system, then argue over whether its violence feels like classic Evil Dead chaos or a clumsy attempt at a message. The conversation spirals into Deadite personalities, practical effects vs CGI, and why “send them to the mirror realm” might be the cleanest relationship advice we accidentally give. 3/5• quick toast-driven intro plus listener shoutouts and pre-movie banter • spoiler-filled plot recap focused on the funeral setup and Deadite spread • acting breakdown with a clear standout Deadite performance • cinematography talk on memorable gross-out shots plus CGI shortcuts and shaky geography • score reactions that focus on franchise sound cues over a memorable theme • plot and structure criticism including missing payoffs and unfinished beats • golden path take on comedy choices and why likable characters matter in horror • debate on spousal abuse themes and why the metaphor feels muddy • demon cosmology talk on mirrors, suffering, and cosmic order vs randomness • we insert ourselves into the film and pitch alternate arcs Support the show

What Movie Should We Do Next?We review Sheep Detective with our three-part method, then use a talking-sheep murder mystery to get weirdly personal about memory, grief, and what we choose to carry. The jokes land, the whiskey shows up, and the “golden path” turns a simple family film into a sharp rant about algorithm-fed reality. • our mind-altering setup with propranolol and bourbon • quick plot rundown: sheep gain agency, farmer dies, mystery begins • category ratings for acting, cinematography, score, plot, and rewatchability • why the movie works as a kid-friendly bridge to death and loss • missed opportunities with forgetting and the unreliable narrator angle • the “golden path” on trauma, empathy, and the comfort of pain • media silos, TikTok-fed opinions, and how platforms shape beliefs • inserting ourselves into the story with alternate characters and darker stakes • closing spiral on insurance incentives and daily-life absurdity 3/5.Support the show

What Movie Should We Do Next?We rate Supergirl across acting, cinematography, score, plot, and rewatchability, then land on why the movie feels like a stack of missed chances instead of a character-driven breakout. We also call out how misogyny poisons the conversation while still insisting the writing has to earn its moral message. • our three-part review method and what we are taking beforehand • budget and marketing shock compared with what lands onscreen • the plot setup with Kara, Ruthie, Krypto’s 72-hour timer, and Lobo • acting takes on Millie Alcock, Jason Momoa, and the side cast • cinematography highs including the intergalactic bus and truck stop • score choices that either fit the character or break immersion • plot problems with the ticking clock and a thin villain motivation • the culture war problem and why it muddies real film criticism • world building lessons from The Fifth Element and Chekhov’s gun limits • the revenge morality that collapses under its own logic • how we would rewrite Supergirl around trauma, therapy, and consequences Listen to all our other stuff too. Yeah, just go down the list. 2.5/5Support the show

What Movie Should We Do Next?We rewatch The Princess Bride as adults and rate it across acting, cinematography, score, plot, and rewatchability, then argue our way to a definitive 4.5 out of 5. Along the way we get into what makes the movie feel so alive, why modern media often feels soulless, and how money and AI can crush the point of making art. • Our three-part method for reviewing a movie while drinking • Quick plot recap and why the framing device works • Acting highs and lows from Elwes to Shawn to Andre • Cinematography that feels like a storybook on purpose • Mark Knopfler’s score and why it sticks • Plot twists, quotable dialogue, and why it never feels old • Rewatchability as the real “classic” metric • Westley’s harsh lines and how to read them now • Earnestness, low budgets, and the kind of craft money cannot buy • Dropping ourselves into the film and turning it into a background gag Support the show

What Movie Should We Do Next?We start with a raw riff on public hypocrisy and private repression, then pivot into a full Masters of the Universe review that lands at a definitive 2.5 out of 5. We argue about what camp is supposed to do, why the soundtrack either rules or derails the tone, and how “hope core” hero stories can still matter even when the plot is paper thin. • Cold open on politics, spectacle, and hypocrisy • Our three-part method: ratings, deeper meaning, then inserting ourselves into the film • Plot recap: Adam flees Eternia, lands in America, returns with the sword • Acting takes, including standout moments and character choices • Cinematography and CGI that look solid but sometimes feel empty • Score and soundtrack debate: recognizability vs distraction • Plot critique: archetypes, predictable beats, pacing drag • Rewatchability split: vibe and nostalgia vs boredom • “Golden path” themes: hope core, empathy, reframing masculinity • Camp as a tool, and how big budgets change it • Inserting ourselves into the story for a chaotic rewrite Listen To High n' Dry Support the show

What Movie Should We Do Next?We watch Netflix’s Ladies First and give it our locked-in star ratings before we get honest about what the movie tries to say about feminism. We talk through why the gender swap premise feels shallow, why the lesson comes too easy, and what a smarter version of the story could have been. • quick intro and why Ladies First is trending on Netflix • what everyone’s drinking and how the vibe hits • plot recap of Damien’s head injury role reversal • our category ratings for acting, cinematography, sound, plot, and rewatchability • why “role reversal equals empathy” doesn’t match real life • how the movie flattens microaggressions into throwaway jokes • what a matriarchal world would actually need to explore • our “insert ourselves” segment and the rewrites we’d rather watch Support the show

What Movie Should We Do Next?We review Obsession (2026) while drunk and caffeinated, score it category by category, and admit it left us disturbed long after the credits. We use the movie to talk plainly about consent, the “nice guy” villain, and the damage we cause when we manufacture a reality that erases someone else’s autonomy. • Quick detour into Celebrity Ghost Stories skepticism • Our three-part review method plus what we are drinking • Plot recap of the One Wish Willow and the obsession spiral • Trigger warning and why the film is a hard watch • Acting highlights and standout lead performance • Cinematography notes on pace, color, shadows, and demonic movement • Score and sound design debate plus nostalgia fatigue • Why the protagonist’s cowardice is the engine of horror • The Golden Path on red pill culture and learning lessons the hard way • Manufactured reality as the core theme plus the vase scene symbolism • What we would do differently if we were in the story • The bottom line takeaway on accountability and consentSupport the show

What Movie Should We Do Next?We’re running on fumes, so we caffeinate and pour a drink while we take a hard look at We Bury the Dead. We land on a 3/5, praise the acting and visuals, then dig into the grief metaphor that nearly sticks the landing before the ending sends us into a rant spiral. • our quick spoiler synopsis and the three-part review format • Daisy Ridley’s performance and why the cast sells the emotional beats • cinematography highlights including background staging and zombie reveals • soundtrack choices that sometimes fit and sometimes jar • plot gaps, vanishing characters, and why the ending matters most • the Golden Path read of the film as a metaphor for grief and closure • why the zombie baby and Viking funeral undercut the theme for us • what we would do in the dead zone, from tapping out to looting If you argue with us, then uh then you need to come on the program. Support the show

What Movie Should We Do Next?We get a little drunk, a little high, and put Mortal Kombat 2 on trial with our three-part review system, ending with a final score that’s more forgiving than the plot deserves. We dig into what makes the sequel feel more watchable than the last reboot, then spiral into fandom drama, plot armor, and the only question that matters: what would our fatalities be. • our three-part scoring method and why it fits franchise sequels • quick Mortal Kombat 2 setup and what the movie prioritizes • acting highs and lows across the cast • cinematography, VFX, and why some sets feel empty • soundtrack choices and the missing iconic theme problem • plot complaints versus “it’s about the fights” expectations • unpredictability, body count, and whether deaths feel earned • fandom toxicity, Cole’s role, and why plot armor kills stakes • inserting ourselves into the roster with custom powers and fatalities Like, subscribe, follow, do all the things. Let us know in the comments what you think about Cole. Let us know what your fatality is.Support the show

What Movie Should We Do Next?We rate K-Pop Demon Hunters with our five-point rubric and end up split on what works versus what feels like empty hype. Then we dig into the deeper meaning: consumerism, idol purity culture, and why the fandom energy around this movie makes our skin crawl. • cold open chaos and why we are missing Luke • our three-part method: ratings, Golden Path, then inserting ourselves • acting in animation and why “emoji” performances annoy us • cinematography praise and the Spider-Verse style comparison • music backlash and why it sounds like generic Western pop • plot predictability and how “hero’s journey” gets recycled • rewatchability and what we would actually sit through again • Golden Path: nonstop product placement and consumer identity • purity culture, parasocial sexuality, and the “no touching” tension • our ridiculous rewrites when we insert ourselves into the story Make sure, yeah, you follow, like, subscribe, do all the fucking things. Please. If you like this thing, help us out. Support the show

What Movie Should We Do Next?We get drunk and high, rate Whiplash, and argue about why so many people mistake cruelty for genius. We break down how the movie frames abuse as a path to greatness and why the “suffer for your art” mindset still messes up schools, work, and creative life. • Jackie Chan Adventures nostalgia and voice actor rabbit hole • Three-part review format and what we’re drinking and taking • Whiplash plot recap through a former band kid’s lens • Acting, cinematography, score, story, and rewatchability ratings • J.K. Simmons as a believable manipulator and why that matters • Predictable beats, trauma bonding, and the myth of necessary suffering • How hierarchies reward cruelty and teach people to imitate it • Why the ending reads as triumph instead of tragedy • Rewriting the movie by inserting ourselves and forcing accountability Follow us wherever podcasts are fucking free or whatever Support the show

What Movie Should We Do Next?We rate 28 Years Later: The Bone Temple with our three-part system, then chase the few moments where the movie hints at something bigger than blood and spectacle. The conversation runs from acting, cinematography, and diegetic music to cult coercion, warped perception, and why “safety” can be a trap in an isolated world. • rating Bone Temple across acting, cinematography, soundtrack, story, and rewatchability at 3.5/5• comparing Bone Temple to 28 Years Later and the earlier 28 films • Samson’s shift from terror to sympathy through performance and camera language • why the visuals feel competent but less daring • how diegetic music and the record collection shape tone • cult structure, radicalization, and coerced choices posing as free will • isolation, trauma, and perception as the real horror engine • what conditional safety looks like in groups and relationships Remember, catch us wherever podcasts are sold. Support the show

What Movie Should We Do Next?We put The Mummy Returns back on the stand for its anniversary and judge it by what’s on the screen today, not what we remember loving as kids. We land on a 2.5 out of 5 and end up arguing that nostalgia is real, but it can’t patch a messy sequel.• our three-part rating method and what we’re smoking and drinking• why the first Mummy feels tighter and warmer• acting vs dialogue and why chemistry can’t save everything• cinematography and blocking when CGI takes over• the Scorpion King sequence and why it looks unrendered• score repetition and losing the musical punch• plot complaints like retcons flashbacks and chosen-one destiny• rewatchability as comfort viewing even when it’s bad• our rewrite ideas and the movie we’d rather seeSupport the show

What Movie Should We Do Next?We review Undertone, a horror movie built around a remote podcast and a daughter caring for her dying mother, and we keep circling the same feeling: huge potential with too little payoff. We score the acting, cinematography, sound, plot, and rewatchability, then land on a unified 2.5 out of 5 after debating what the film sets up and what it refuses to deliver. • our quick synopsis of Undertone and why the premise hits close to home for podcasters • acting problems across on-screen and voice performances • cinematography choices like Dutch angles and why they feel unmotivated • sound design highlights including silence and headphone transitions • the “fun and games” the movie teases but never plays • vibes-based storytelling versus plot-based horror and why the ending frustrates us • themes we notice around isolation, caregiving, addiction, and consequence • how we would change our behavior if we were the haunted podcasters Make sure to check out our podcast, we come out every week wherever podcasts are sold.Support the show

What Movie Should We Do Next?Three hosts pick apart The Bride with sharp takes on feminist rage, authorship, and whether lavish style can carry a stitched-together plot. We rate acting, visuals, soundtrack, and rewatchability, and debate who this film truly serves.• reframing the Bride of Frankenstein through autonomy and identity• neo-noir cinematography that outshines the script• performances from Jessie Buckley and Christian Bale under a surreal tone• soundtrack swings, including Monster Mash, that split the room• detective subplot versus love story balance breaking the spine• authorship and white feminism questions around wealth and voice• audience fit and why some viewers felt seen while others bounced• final scores averaging to a mid-tier recommendation“you listen to this, you can’t unlisten to it—fucking follow us places… help us out, send us around, do the things”Support the show

What Movie Should We Do Next?We rate Bologna a bleak four out of five and unpack why stellar performances can coexist with near-zero rewatchability. The film’s black comedy bends into class, power, and the costs of choosing violence when systems refuse to change.• tight trio of leads driving tension• swelling score against stark, wide shots• plot twists that test empathy and logic• class allegory of isolation and trespass• physical violence versus systemic harm• symbolism of bees, fossils, and fallout• debate on moral ends and ruined means• final verdict: impressive, heavy, not cozyIf you're liking what we do, please tell your friends, like, subscribe, do all the fucking thingsSupport the show

What Movie Should We Do Next?We rate and debate a new Wuthering Heights adaptation, digging into where it stuns on screen and where the story blinks. We push past the outrage cycle to ask what an adaptation owes the source and what happens when a film hints at heavy themes but refuses to land them.• why tension reads as “lewd” when it’s repression• key deviations from Brontë’s plot and tone• revenge vs romance and what got softened• depiction of sexual violence and missing context• desire, kink, and early exposure shaped by the internet• strong lead chemistry and smart close-ups• uneven soundtrack with a few standout tracks• the outrage machine steering first impressions• communication as the theme the film avoids• final ratings and a playful “fake movie” revealSupport the show

What Movie Should We Do Next?We rate Sam Raimi’s “Send Help” four stars and dig into how an island strips the gloss off corporate ambition, turning tropes into a sharp critique of power, merit, and survival. McAdams owns the screen, the camera bites, and the final stare puts the audience on trial.• acting that turns humiliation into resolve• Raimi signatures in kinetic, queasy camera work• familiar desert‑island tropes used as satire• the rock reveal reframing agency and ethics• competence versus entitlement as core conflict• the last shot reading as judgment, not wink• theater crowd energy enhancing tension• why “women are crazy” is the wrong lens• our insert‑ourselves what‑ifs for dark humor• final verdict: a tight, rewatchable four starsGo see this movie if it's still in theaters near youSupport the show

What Movie Should We Do Next?Three hosts get high, sip whiskey, and sort out why a stylish, 60s-set Fantastic Four feels both gorgeous and strangely soft. We rate the acting, roast the CGI baby, praise Galactus and Silver Surfer, and debate whether retrofuturism is a comforting lie or a clever setup for future conflict.• 60s-set retrofuturism as aesthetic and thesis• Galactus and Silver Surfer visuals landing with weight• Performances: Kirby shines, Pascal contained, Reed underused• Score motif memorable but overplayed• Desire for inventive “team powers” problem-solving• Comparison with Superman’s hopeful grit vs naïve optimism• All art as propaganda; family and compliance messaging• Hopes for X‑Men to introduce social friction and stakes• Final ratings and rewatchability judgments• Teasers for Dolby screenings, Tron and Avatar trailers“Go see this movie. See it in Dolby. It fucking rocked me in Dolby.”Support the show

What Movie Should We Do Next?We rate Rian Johnson’s Wake Up Dead Man, argue what makes a fair-play whodunit, and wrestle with how religion and charisma shape control, community, and consequence. Between jokes and toasts, we land on 3.5 out of 5 and ask for bolder risks next time.• scoring the film by cinematography, acting, score, story, rewatchability• standout shots that map power and space in the church• ensemble performances and tonal hamminess on purpose• pacing drag and the line between twisty and fair-play solvable• faith, cult dynamics, and the soft-pedaled cost of belief• media risk, IP fatigue, and why new voices matter• playful “insert ourselves into the plot” alternate scenes“Always wear your seatbelts”Support the show

What Movie Should We Do Next?We mark our 100th episode by reviewing Wicked 2 with clear eyes and full glasses, weighing standout CGI against flat lighting, soft songs, and a story that stalls whenever the music starts. The Oz lore tie-ins land, but the pacing and depth rarely do.• definitive category ratings across acting, cinematography, score, story and rewatchability• why blanket lighting flattens emotion and kills depth• how song placement undercuts momentum and character beats• propaganda, perspective and who gets to define “good”• CGI creature work that actually impresses• stage vs screen: why act two sag hits harder on film• audience energy, theater vibes and expectations vs delivery• our final verdict at 2.5 out of 5If you enjoyed it, please like and subscribe and do all the thingsSupport the show

What Movie Should We Do Next?We score Predator Badlands, argue whether a simple hero’s journey helps or hurts, and celebrate a creature-forward approach that finally trusts the predator. We toast new “listeners,” confess our vices, and then drop into lore, tropes, and ridiculous self-inserts that break the universe in fun ways.• fan acceptance over fan service• acting under prosthetics landing real emotion• CGI and practical effects blending cleanly• soundtrack as functional atmosphere• shonen-style growth arc and clan worldbuilding• plot simplicity vs desire for narrative ambition• predator culture, toxic norms, matriarchal hints• rewatchability drivers and franchise future• wild crossovers and inserting ourselves into the huntSupport the show

What Movie Should We Do Next?We rate Good Fortune a 3.5 while praising Keanu Reeves and questioning the film’s soft landing on class. Humor and heart land, but the “rich learns a lesson” wrap leaves us hungry for real stakes, worker power, and change that lasts.• Keanu’s performance as a near-human mirror• Why mid-tier cinematography still works• Soundtrack energy without memorability• The ending’s rich-savior problem• Class, shareholders and who the system serves• Gig work, recession fallout and flooded labor markets• What meaningful change might look like• How we’d rewrite the boardroom for workersSupport the show

What Movie Should We Do Next?We rate Darren Aronofsky’s Caught Stealing a clean three, then pull apart why it moves fast but leaves a faint aftertaste. The cast delivers competence, the camera delivers polish, and the story leans on old tropes that drain the emotion it tries to spark.• rating the film across acting, cinematography, soundtrack, story, rewatchability• Austin Butler’s strengths in stylized roles versus interior drama• Matt Smith’s scene-stealing energy and Regina King’s dialed-up cop• trailer shots versus cinematic surprises in set pieces• Guy Ritchie echoes in pacing and needle drops• the fridging trope and why it blunts character stakes• nihilistic ending and symbolic accountability• how chaos films earn meaning when choices drive consequences• our fixes: go full absurdist, or deepen moral cost• a final consensus at three out of fiveSupport the show

What Movie Should We Do Next?We rate Good Boy, salvage a lost recording, and settle into a dog’s-eye horror that hits harder than slashers. Between bourbon, Pineapple Express, and hallway dread, we trace empathy, ownership, and why silence can be the scariest instrument on the board.• rating the categories: acting, cinematography, score, story, rewatchability• dog-as-protagonist and sensory POV through scent and silence• empathy for innocence vs desensitization to human death• the fox image, ghost retriever, and metaphor of illness• long hallways, patience, and when silence works• responsibility of pet ownership and listening to warning cues• alternate cuts: guard dog vs retriever, how the plot changes• shoutouts to listeners, Blade debate, and Air Bud jokes“Thanks to our newest listeners in Springfield—Cadarius, this one’s for you. Cheers to Air Bud and to every nepo baby burning in hell—respectfully.”Support the show

What Movie Should We Do Next?Cameron Kade's journey from promising football recruit to something much darker explores how institutions exploit young athletes and the cult-like devotion sports can demand. The film examines the dangerous allure of fame, fortune, and the cost of tunnel vision when pursuing a dream at all costs.• Marlon Wayans delivers a standout dramatic performance as Isaiah White, breaking from his usual comedic roles• The film uses striking cinematography, including helmet-cam shots and x-ray sequences showing physical trauma• Jim Jeffries makes a surprising appearance in a serious role that adds to the film's exploration of exploitation• Tunnel vision serves as both visual technique and thematic element throughout the movie• The cult-like aspects of sports culture are made explicit through ritualistic imagery and Satan worship metaphors• Third act becomes increasingly chaotic, leaving some viewers with unresolved questions• Commentary on how parents can sell away their children's futures through sports dreams• Examination of CTE and physical toll of football adds real-world relevance to the horror elementsIf you enjoyed our discussion of "Him," please subscribe to High and Dry Podcast wherever you get your podcasts and follow us on social media. Email us your thoughts or suggestions for future episodes!Support the show

What Movie Should We Do Next?James Gunn's Superman delivers a powerful message about radical kindness in a cynical world, earning our highest podcast rating ever with its vibrant visuals and standout performances.• Superman embodies genuine goodness without being naive or simplistic• David Corenswet brings warmth and authenticity to the iconic role• Rachel Brosnahan delivers the most compelling Lois Lane in decades• Nicholas Hoult's Lex Luthor parallels modern tech billionaires with superb depth• Punk rock soundtrack enhances the film's theme of standing up against corrupt systems• Supporting characters including Mr. Terrific and Hawkgirl add rich dimension• Story focuses on doing what's right versus what's politically expedient• Colorful visuals and cinematography mark a refreshing departure from previous DCEU films• Superman chooses to follow his moral compass despite criticism and pushback• Film demonstrates that superhero stories can be optimistic without sacrificing depthThis superhero film proves that good storytelling doesn't require moral ambiguity to be compelling—sometimes what we need most is a reminder that choosing kindness is the most radical act of all.Support the show

What Movie Should We Do Next?We dive into the Naked Gun reboot, a comedy that delivers jokes at breakneck speed while updating the franchise for modern audiences without losing its absurdist roots.• Liam Neeson takes on the Leslie Nielsen role with mixed results, though the film still delivers constant laughs• Pamela Anderson surprises with her comedic talents and willingness to poke fun at herself• The film avoids problematic humor typical of early 2000s comedies while maintaining a high joke-per-second ratio• Standout scenes include a jealous, murderous snowman yelling "Daddy!" and an owl with unexpected personality• The movie literally names a "Plot Device" as its MacGuffin, acknowledging its focus on comedy over storytelling• At 3.5/5 stars, it's a solid comedy that succeeds at what it sets out to do: make people laugh consistently• The film subtly comments on social issues like police brutality and tech billionaires without becoming preachy• Perfect for getting "blasted and just sitting there laughing" rather than analyzing deep narrative structureSupport the show

What Movie Should We Do Next?We dive into Zach Cregger's latest horror film "Weapons," a twisted tale about a small town where multiple children mysteriously disappear simultaneously, leaving only one student behind.• Josh Brolin delivers a standout performance as a desperate father searching for answers• The film brilliantly uses multiple character perspectives to gradually reveal its supernatural mystery• A witch has infiltrated the town, using mind control and manipulation to pursue her sinister agenda• Every character harbors personal flaws and addictions that blind them to the danger until it's too late• The cinematography creates persistent tension through innovative camera work and thoughtful framing• Benedict Wong's character represents one of the few moral anchors in a town descending into chaos• Scenes like the hair-cutting sequence create profound unease without relying on traditional jump scares• The 217 reference and AK-47 dream sequence sparked intense debate about their symbolic meaning• Each character story reveals another puzzle piece, culminating in the final revelation through Alex's eyes• The film earns its 4/5 rating through strong performances, atmospheric direction, and genuine scaresIf you enjoyed our review of "Weapons," be sure to check it out in theaters while you can for the full experience. This is one horror film that deserves to be seen on the big screen!Support the show

What Movie Should We Do Next?The High and Dry Podcast team delivers a scathing review of "Nobody 2," rating it a dismal 1.5 out of 5 stars for its incoherent plot, poor performances, and problematic messaging.• Bob Odenkirk returns as a violent family man whose ultraviolence is inexplicably portrayed as heroic• The film oscillates between serious and campy tones, creating a disorienting viewing experience• Christopher Lloyd appears underutilized, with his character barely developed despite potential• Sharon Stone's villain makes inexplicable choices that defy basic logic• Poor cinematography makes action sequences feel jumpy and lacking impact• The film's treatment of women is particularly problematic, suggesting wives should accept and participate in their husband's violence• The plot contains numerous logical inconsistencies, including the small-town setting having multiple violent crime syndicates• Several characters' motivations and actions make little sense within the narrativeIf you enjoy our reviews, please subscribe and check out our other episodes where we analyze films with a lot more coherence than this one displayed.Support the show

What Movie Should We Do Next?Ryan Coogler's "Sinners" blends vampire horror with a profound exploration of cultural identity through the lens of a 1930s juke joint under siege by Irish vampires. The film's exceptional cinematography and soul-stirring soundtrack elevate it to our highest-rated movie yet.• Michael B. Jordan delivers a standout dual performance as twins, creating two distinct characters who share significant screen time• The film uses aspect ratio changes brilliantly, expanding the screen as the narrative's scope widens• Score and soundtrack integrate blues and Irish music to tell a story about cultural preservation and amalgamation• Vampires as Irish immigrants creates a powerful metaphor about historical racial dynamics in America• The contrasting approaches to cultural blending—sharing versus consuming—forms the core thematic tension• Cinematography shines particularly during musical sequences where visuals and sound become fully integrated• Despite some third-act predictability, the film maintains its artistic integrity and emotional impactWatch Sinners in IMAX if possible for the full intended experience with its expansive visuals and immersive sound design.Support the show

What Movie Should We Do Next?We dive into the recently released zombie thriller 28 Years Later, exploring its place in the franchise and evaluating what makes it stand out in the horror genre.• Film serves as both sequel and standalone story accessible to viewers unfamiliar with earlier films• Strong performances from Aaron Taylor Johnson and Ralph Fiennes anchor the emotional core• Cinematography blends nostalgic handheld camera work with innovative visual techniques• Soundtrack creates unexpected emotional resonance, particularly during pivotal scenes• Story explores coming-of-age themes through a post-apocalyptic lens• Different types of infected expand the franchise mythology in interesting ways• Tracksuit-wearing cult hints at fascinating directions for future sequels• Film makes thoughtful points about death, acceptance, and human nature amid horror• High rewatch value with many subtle details to discover• Earns a solid 4 out of 5 rating from High and Dry PodcastIf you enjoyed our review of 28 Years Later, please subscribe to High and Dry Podcast wherever you get your podcasts and let us know what you thought of the movie.Support the show

What Movie Should We Do Next?Robert Pattinson delivers a masterful dual performance in Bong Joon-ho's Mickey 17, a sci-fi satire that explores identity, expendability, and the dark side of colonial expansion. The film follows a man who is repeatedly cloned and sacrificed for a fledgling colony on an alien planet, ultimately challenging the authoritarian leadership threatening both human settlers and indigenous life.• Pattinson plays both Mickey 17 and Mickey 18, showcasing distinct personalities despite being clones• Mark Ruffalo portrays Kenneth Marshall, a Trump-like authoritarian leader complete with red-cap-wearing supporters• The film features strong performances from Naomi Ackie and Toni Collette in supporting roles• Bong Joon-ho's direction creates a deliberately muted visual palette that brightens only when characters experience freedom• The storyline draws clear parallels to contemporary politics while examining the ethics of colonialism• Originally scheduled for release in 2022, the film faced multiple delays including one following an assassination attempt on Donald TrumpIf you enjoyed our review of Mickey 17, please rate and subscribe to High and Dry Podcast wherever you get your podcasts. We'll be back next week with another film breakdown!Support the show

What Movie Should We Do Next?High n' Dry takes "Nosferatu" and intertwines humor and horror while exploring deeper themes surrounding desire and repression. Through personal anecdotes and critical assessments, the discussion reveals the film's artistic merit and how it resonates with contemporary issues in vampire storytelling.• Examination of cinematic techniques and symbolism • Personal stories linking to key film elements • Discussion of character arcs, particularly Dafoe • Analysis of the film's place in modern vampiric narratives • Exploration of community engagement and shared experiencesSupport the show

What Movie Should We Do Next?Is "Die Hard" the ultimate Christmas movie, or is it just an action-packed romp with a holiday backdrop? Join us this Christmas Eve as we sip on Knob Creek bourbon and indulge in some Black Friday cannabis deals, while tackling this age-old debate with our signature high and dry flair. We reminisce about the 80s, fondly recalling TV classics and new panel shows featuring Michael Ian Black, before diving into our structured three-part method to dissect "Die Hard." From assessing the film's quality, to exploring its deeper themes, and finally imagining ourselves in the movie, it's a conversation filled with whiskey-fueled insights and spirited debates.As the conversation unfolds, we don't shy away from the polarizing reception of films like "Avatar," juxtaposing its storytelling with classics like "Dances with Wolves" and discussing the audience's thirst for mature thrillers akin to "The Thomas Crown Affair." We dissect Bruce Willis's everyman appeal and Alan Rickman's villainous charm, sparking debates over his performances in other films like "Dogma" and "Galaxy Quest." A humorous critique of J.K. Rowling's characterization choices in the Harry Potter series adds a whimsical twist to our analysis, while the iconic elements of "Die Hard" — from its dynamic cinematography to its diagenic music choices — keep us hooked.In the final chapters, we venture into the realm of societal norms, the notion of the ends justifying the means, and the evolution of character dynamics in "Die Hard." We muse over the film's surprising progressiveness, lack of outdated stereotypes, and the complexities of John McClane's relationships. With a speculative twist, we imagine how a new character could shake up the plot, and explore precision in handling dangerous situations, all while humorously reimagining "Die Hard" with fresh perspectives. As we plan our holiday movie lineup, we look forward to "Muppet Christmas Carol" for New Year's, wrapping up our episode with laughter, whiskey, and a nod to the classics.Support the show

What Movie Should We Do Next?Remember the days when X-Play was the highlight of your gaming universe? Neither do we. We spice things up with tales from our personal lives, recounting our recent lobster diving adventures and the sweaty challenge of surviving without air conditioning. As Halloween looms, we dish out our thoughts on the Silent Hill 2 remake, perfect for setting the spooky mood this season.Ever wondered what makes a movie worth watching again? We unpack our unique "Luke method of filmology," evaluating films based on acting, cinematography, score, story, and the elusive rewatchability factor. This leads us to a spirited debate on the recent film "The Creator," where we critique its plot holes and underwhelming performances through a comedic lens. We also explore the enigmatic world of vampire films, arguing passionately that none can transcend a meager six out of ten. Sci-fi films aren't safe from our scrutiny either, as we dissect their unrealistic portrayals of futuristic tech and military strategies, all with a healthy dose of humor.Finally, we dive into the chaotic world of AI depictions and retrofuturistic themes, drawing comparisons to beloved styles like "Fallout" and "The Jetsons." We engage in a whimsical 'what if' scenario, imagining alternate storylines that could have salvaged some of the films we critique. From satirical takes on plot inconsistencies to humorous riffs on character dynamics and military absurdities, this episode delivers laughs and critical insights in equal measure. Whether you're a sci-fi aficionado or just in it for the laughs, there's something here for everyone. So tune in, have a chuckle, and join us as we keep it real in the world of film and gaming nostalgia.Support the show

What Movie Should We Do Next?What if your presence could change the fate of the "Prometheus" crew? In this electrifying episode of the High and Dry Podcast, we beat the San Diego heat with some boogie boarding and nostalgic chats about the animated classic "Home Movies," brought to life by Brendon Small and H. Jon Benjamin. We also zero in on how humor ages, spotlighting Trevor Noah's self-deprecating wit as a timeless example. Personal updates abound: Ryan narrowly escapes a stress migraine, Luke recharges with a movie outing, and James battles the coastal heat sans air conditioning.Feel the thrill as we dissect Ridley Scott's "Prometheus" using our unique three-part method. From discussing our choice blends of smokes and drinks to analyzing societal notions of masculinity portrayed in media, our conversation is anything but dry. We evaluate the film within the context of the "Alien" franchise, comparing its impact on audiences from different eras. Luke shares his experience of watching "Prometheus" as his gateway into the "Alien" series, sparking a lively discussion on storytelling and character evolution.The episode crescendos with an exploration of "Prometheus" themes, from the perils of curiosity to the quest for meaning. We muse on the film's technological predictions and the potential risks of advanced AI. Imagining ourselves in the movie, we humorously ponder how our actions might alter the narrative, and critique the characters' often questionable decisions. Finally, we toast Ridley Scott, lauding his cinematic legacy while offering candid thoughts on his recent works. Don't miss this episode for a fresh, entertaining perspective on a sci-fi classic!Support the show

What Movie Should We Do Next?Ever found yourself cheering for a hero who’s not so heroic? We kick off this episode of the "High and Dry Podcast" with a toast to confusion and camaraderie, reminiscing about "Greg the Bunny" and how humor has aged over time. Amid the sweltering heatwave stories, we raise our glasses (and joints) to the timeless Western, "Tombstone." Dive into our initial impressions while we indulge in Acapulco Gold, strawberry shortcake resin, and Kentucky straight bourbon. Kurt Russell's mustache? Worth every puff and sip.Get ready for a no-holds-barred critique of "Tombstone," where we dissect everything from its pacing quirks to its mixed bag of acting performances. Val Kilmer’s Doc Holliday is a standout, while Bill Paxton didn’t quite hit the mark. We weigh in on the film’s traditional score and its impact on the viewing experience. Our unique blend of technical insights and personal takes offers a fresh perspective on this star-studded Western. And let's be honest, sometimes nostalgia gets in the way, but we’re here to keep it real.As we shift gears, our conversation gets deeper, exploring the romanticization of flawed heroes like Wyatt Earp and Doc Holliday. The episode wraps up with a sardonic reflection on heroism, morality, and those iconic cowboy stories that have shaped our cultural landscape. From the complexities of regret to the impractical yet legendary imagery of cowboys, we tackle it all with humor and honesty. Tune in for an engaging mix of critique, nostalgia, and thought-provoking discussions that will leave you pondering the true nature of heroism.Support the show

What Movie Should We Do Next?What if you found yourself enlisted in a fascist military regime, all while under the influence of Acapulco Gold? Buckle up for a wild ride as we kick off the High and Dry Podcast with a hilarious and unfiltered breakdown of the cult classic "Starship Troopers." With our good friend Luke, an IT wizard and skunk ape enthusiast, we embark on a journey through this satirical sci-fi universe, first with sober minds, and then with our senses enhanced by some choice liquor and cannabis. This episode is packed with laugh-out-loud moments and sharp insights as we dissect the film's special effects, acting, and its biting sociocultural commentary.Ever wondered how a 120-proof whiskey can elevate a movie critique? We raise our glasses for a tasting of Knob Creek Single Barrel Select, both straight and in our custom-made "Klendathu Spritzer." As the whiskey flows, so do our candid thoughts on "Starship Troopers," rating everything from its mesmerizing score to its rewatchability factor. Join us in toasting the film's brilliance and its timeless ability to entertain with its satirical take on militarism, gender roles, and authoritarianism.To round things off, we venture deeper into the absurd yet thought-provoking world of "Starship Troopers." We unwrap the intentional acting choices and narrative subtleties that lampoon fascist ideologies, all while imagining our own roles within this hyper-militarized society. Luke's vision of himself as a spaceship IT tech or barber, James's fantasy of being a sentient bug, and our collective musings on characters’ fitness obsessions will leave you in stitches. Get ready for a blend of humor, fitness talk, and insightful critique that promises to keep you entertained from start to finish.Support the show

What Movie Should We Do Next?Ever wonder what happens when bullies get what's coming to them? On this episode of the High n' Dry Podcast, we reminisce about the wild reality show "Bully Beatdown" before diving headfirst into the eerie world of "It Follows." With potent Acapulco Gold in hand and a 60s-inspired vodka martini at our side, we dissect the film's unique take on horror, providing a mix of humor and sharp insights. From its stationary camera shots to Maika Monroe's gripping performance, our conversation brings out the hidden layers of this low-budget thrill-ride.Our analysis doesn't stop at mere cinematic techniques. We unravel the deeper themes of trauma, fear, and responsibility that make "It Follows" a standout in the horror genre. By comparing it to other films like "Smile" and "Invisible Man," we shed light on the unsettling nature of the entity and its impact on the characters. The moral dilemmas faced by the protagonist, and the allegorical significance of the entity as more than just an 'STD demon,' are laid bare, offering a fresh perspective on the consequences of one's actions.Ever wondered how you'd handle an unstoppable, shape-shifting horror? We do too, with a mix of practicality and humor. From building a community of hunters to conducting scientific experiments, we explore various hypothetical scenarios and even draw parallels to popular memes. Our blend of personal anecdotes, engaging speculation, and light-hearted banter makes this episode a rollercoaster of thoughtful discussion and entertaining hypotheticals. So join us on the High n' Dry Podcast, where we face our fears with a cocktail and a laugh at the ready!Support the show

What Movie Should We Do Next?Ever wondered how a movie can transform our perception of pop culture? We kick things off with a hilarious recount of our rocky relationship with the Titus show, and seamlessly transition into a heartfelt appreciation for "The Fifth Element." Our personal stories, steeped in the chaos of dysfunctional families, offer a unique, candid lens through which we digest our favorite films. This episode is a toast to our new listeners in LA and North Hollywood, fueled by the delightful combo of Kush Mountain cannabis and Knob Creek bourbon.Get ready to laugh as we share our high thoughts on the sci-fi classic "The Fifth Element." From the ingenious world-building and unforgettable performances by Bruce Willis and Mila Jovovich to Chris Tucker's scene-stealing antics, we leave no stone unturned. We poke fun at the outdated CGI, praise the film’s humor, and even draw parallels between Ruby Rhod’s character and modern social media personalities. The chat veers into comparisons with other sci-fi flicks, and we don’t shy away from discussing Mila Jovovich's career trajectory, all while enjoying the flavors and effects of our favorite bourbon and cannabis.Our conversation takes a deeper turn as we dissect the age dynamics in Hollywood and reflect on the dystopian themes that "The Fifth Element" cleverly mirrors from our own societal struggles. We humorously debate the impracticality of an anarchist society, joke about the inevitability of power struggles, and imagine ourselves in the film making better choices. Tune in for a rollercoaster of humor, critique, and nostalgia that celebrates the timeless appeal of this iconic movie.Support the show

What Movie Should We Do Next?Ever wondered what happens when you mix John Wayne swagger with martial arts mayhem? Join us as we bring a nostalgic and slightly tipsy twist to John Carpenter’s cult classic "Big Trouble in Little China." Hosts Ryan Baron North and James Crosslin, along with our guest Reece Merritt, kick things off with a hilarious nod to the game show "Win Ben Stein's Money" before diving headfirst into the quirky world of an ’80s VHS experience. With an ice-clinking toast to our new listeners from Florida and the UK, we share our first impressions—some of us are seeing this wild ride for the very first time, while others are reliving their adolescent movie nights.Get ready for a passionate defense of why "Big Trouble in Little China" deserves a spot in the pantheon of great action films, possibly even outranking "Terminator 2." Reece isn't just a guest; he's a die-hard fan who argues it's one of the top three movies ever. We take you through John Carpenter's brilliant fusion of a John Wayne-style narrative with martial arts, showing how he seamlessly transitioned from horror to create this offbeat gem. We also pay tribute to Carpenter’s wider filmography, celebrating his knack for unforgettable storytelling that has shaped our cinematic tastes. Don’t miss out on the laughs, the insights, and the hypothetical scenarios that will leave you questioning how you ever lived without this cult classic in your life.Support the show