Paulino Ungos III's Podcast podcast artwork

PODCAST · education

Paulino Ungos III's Podcast

Lecture podcast on Philippine Labor Law and Jurisprudence for law students and Bar examinees. Paulino Ungos III is a lawyer, law professor, and co-author of Labor Law books published by Rex Bookstore.

  1. 68

    Episode 68: Whole Again

    #AMYingForExcellence The principles relating to computation of separation pay and backwages are illustrated in a case penned by your Bar Chair.The case of Dumapis v. Lepanto Consolidated Mining Co. (G.R. No. 204060, 15 September 2020) may help you review "II. Jurisdiction and Remedies," specifically subheadings "A(2)" and "A(4)" of your Bar Syllabus in Labor Law.

  2. 67

    Episode 67: Recomputation of Accrued Benefits and Immutability of Judgment

    #AMYingForExcellence May an employee be granted a recomputation of an award of backwages, separation pay, and other benefits that she has already received in full? The case of Tan v. Dagpin (G.R. No. 212111, January 15, 2020) may help you review "II. Jurisdiction and Remedies," specifically subheadings "A," "B," and "C" of your Bar Syllabus in Labor Law.

  3. 66

    Episode 66: The Law Prescribes the Parties’ Employment Relationship

    #AMYingForExcellence Were the complainants in this case declared employees of a fitness company? Check out the case of Escauriaga v. Fitness First, Phil., Inc., G.R. No. 266552, 22 January 2024. This could help you review items IV(A) and IV(C) of your bar syllabus in Labor Law [Work Relationships].

  4. 65

    Episode 65: Appalling Disregard of Physical Safety and Property

    #BarNiJLo2024 The employee was dismissed from employment allegedly because of reckless driving. Was the termination of such employment declared valid? Mariano v. G.V. Florida Transport, G.R. No. 240882, 16 September 2020.

  5. 64

    Episode 64: Nothing Contradictory Between a Definite Employment Period and the Nature of the Employee’s Duties

    #BarNiJLo2024 The complainants in this case claimed to be regular employees of the company since they performed services necessary and desirable to its business. Was this stand upheld? Tuppil, Jr. v. LBP Service Corp., G.R. No. 228407, 10 June 2020.

  6. 63

    Episode 63: I Skipped Work as I Felt Sick

    #BarNiJLo2024 The employee was fired because he was absent for 38 days. Was his dismissal from employment declared valid? Verizon Communications Philippines, Inc. v. Margin, G.R. No. 216599, September 16, 2020.

  7. 62

    Episode 62: Jurisdiction of the Labor Arbiter and the POEA

    #BarNiJLo2024 The employer mentioned that an order of dismissal was issued by the POEA in a case filed by the employees against it. Should such order bind the Labor Arbiter when it rules on the complaint for illegal dismissal filed by said employees against the same employer? U R Employed International Corp. v. Pinmiliw, G.R. No. 225263, March 16, 2022.

  8. 61

    Episode 61: Consequences of Deliberate Concealment

    #BarNiJLo2024 Check whether the seafarer was successful in his claim of permanent total disability benefits against his employer. Trans-Global Maritime Agency, Inc. v. Utanes, G.R. No. 236498, September 16, 2020.

  9. 60

    Episode 60: No Second Contract, No Substitution

    #BarNiJLo2024 Was the employer’s denial of contract substitution in this case given credence by the Supreme Court? Fil-Expat Placement Agency, Inc. v. Lee, G.R. No. 250439, September 22, 2020.

  10. 59

    Episode 59: Genuine Loss of Trust and Confidence

    #BarNiJLo2024 Check whether the employer succeeded in justifying its decision to dismiss an employee on the ground of loss of trust and confidence. Manrique v. Delta Earthmoving, Inc., G.R. No. 229429, November 9, 2020.

  11. 58

    Episode 58: Based on Two Supreme Court Decisions, the Contractor Is Legitimate

    #BarNiJLo2024 Can a contractor be declared legitimate based solely on the doctrine of stare decisis? Conjusta v. PPI Holdings, Inc., G.R. No. 252720, August 22, 2022

  12. 57

    Episode 57: The President’s Approval of the Grant of CBA Benefits Was Presumed Under Article 4

    #BarNiJLo2024 Was the GOCC in this case justified in suspending the implementation of the increases of salary and benefits in the renegotiated CBA? Clark Development Corp. v. Association of CDC Supervisory Personnel Union, G.R. No. 207853, March 30, 2022

  13. 56

    Episode 56: Just a Lessor; Not an Employer

    #BarNiJLo2024 #MostValuableLaban #MarVeLousBar #Bar2024 Abelardo lost the case filed against him before the Office of the Labor Arbiter and was declared the employer of the complainants. Was his appeal before the National Labor Relations Commission perfected? Was he confirmed to be the employer of the complainants? Salazar v. Simbajon, G.R. No. 202374, June 30, 2021.

  14. 55

    Episode 55: Prima Facie Evidence of Employee’s Claim

    #BarNiJLo2024 #MostValuableLaban #MarVeLousBar #Bar2024 Learn whether this employee was granted his claims of overtime pay and premium pay for holidays and rest days. Zonio v. 1st Quantum Leap Security Agency, Inc., G.R. No. 224944, May 5, 2021.

  15. 54

    Episode 54: But the OFW Directly Communicated with the Principal and without the Knowledge of Its Agent

    #HernanDoIt #Bar2023 The local manning agent asserted that the OFW directly transacted with the principal without its knowledge. Did the Supreme Court excuse such agent from the money claims of the OFW? SRL International Manpower Agency v. Yarza, Jr., G.R. No. 207828, February 14, 2022.

  16. 53

    Episode 53: Judicious Admission of Evidence on Appeal

    #HernanDoIt #Bar2023 The employer argued that just cause attended her decision to dismiss the employee from service, but she was able to introduce supporting documents only on appeal. Is the NLRC precluded from receiving such pieces of evidence? Spouses Maynes v. Oreiro, G.R. No. 206109, November 25, 2020.

  17. 52

    Episode 52: The Foreign Company Is a Major Stockholder of the Local Company

    #HernanDoIt #Bar2023 Find out whether the complainants (who were hired by a foreign company) were granted their claim of illegal dismissal allegedly done by its local subsidiary. Gesolgon v. CyberOne PH., Inc., G.R. No. 210741, October 14, 2020.

  18. 51

    Episode 51: But the Employee Assaulted a Co-Worker Inside Company Premises

    #HernanDoIt #Bar2023 The employer claimed that it dismissed its employee for just cause because the latter assaulted a co-employee within company premises. Did the Supreme Court agree with the employer’s claim? G & S Transport Corp. v. Medina, G.R. No. 243768, September 5, 2022.

  19. 50

    Episode 50: The Employee Rejected My Offer of Reinstatement

    #HernanDoIt #Bar2023 The National Labor Relations Commission modified the computation of backwages and separation pay to an illegally dismissed employee, in view of her rejection of an alleged offer of reinstatement by the employer. Was this modification sustained by the Supreme Court? Angono Medics Hospital, Inc. v. Agabin, G.R. No. 202542, December 9, 2020.

  20. 49

    Episode 49: We Were Told That Our Employment Was Terminated

    #HernanDoIt #Bar2023 In asserting that they were illegally dismissed from employment, the employees in this case stated that they were verbally informed of their dismissal from employment and prohibited from further rendering service. Did the Supreme Court rule in their favor? Santos, Jr. v. King Chef, G.R. No. 211073, November 25, 2020.

  21. 48

    Episode 48: But My Motion to Reduce Bond was Impliedly Approved by the NLRC

    #HernanDoIt #Bar2023 In one case, the National Labor Relations Commission was unable to act on the Motion to Reduce Bond filed by the employer, but it proceeded to rule on said employer’s appeal. Was the Commission’s resolution of the substantive controversies in the appeal tantamount to an implied affirmance of the perfection of such appeal? Pacific Royal Basic Foods, Inc. v. Noche, G.R. No. 202392, October 4, 2021.

  22. 47

    Episode 47: Employee Quitclaims vis-à-vis Nominal Damages

    #HernanDoIt #Bar2023 The NLRC and the CA found that the requirements of procedural due process in the employee’s dismissal were not complied with. Will the quitclaim executed by the employee bar his entitlement to nominal damages?  Dela Torre v. Twinstar Professional Protective Services, Inc., G.R. No. 222992, June 23, 2021. 

  23. 46

    Episode 46: Effect of the Death of a Complainant to a Pending Suit for Illegal Dismissal

    In this case, find out why an illegal dismissal complaint cannot be classified like an ordinary civil action insofar as the effect of death of any of the parties is concerned.  Nedira v. NJ World Corp., G.R. No. 240005, December 6, 2022. 

  24. 45

    Episode 45: Regardless of the Cause of Repatriation

    #HernanDoIt #Bar2023 In one case, the LA ruled that the mandatory 3-day reporting requirement does not apply if repatriation results from the expiration of a seafarer's employment contract.  Cabatan v. Southeast Asia Shipping Corp., G.R. No. 219495, February 28, 2022. 

  25. 44

    Episode 44: He Is Not Our Employee

    #HernanDoIt #Bar2023 #WeCanDoIt The complainant presented pay slips and trip itineraries to support his assertion that he was an employee of the company. Were these sufficient to declare the company as his employer? Ginta-Ason v. J.T.A. Packaging Corp., G.R. No. 244206, March 16, 2022.

  26. 43

    Episode 43: But They Agreed to be Engaged as Independent Contractors

    In this case, the Supreme Court held that when the status of the employment is in dispute, the employer bears the burden to prove that the workers are independent contractors rather than regular employees.  Ditiangkin, et al. v. Lazada, et al., G.R. No. 246892, September 21, 2022.

  27. 42

    Episode 42: A Liberal Interpretation of the Rules Is Primarily Granted for the Employee’s Favor

    #HernanDoIt #Bar2023 In its appeal, the employer asserted that it was neither given summons relating to the employee’s amended complaint, nor notified of the scheduled hearings before the Office of the Labor Arbiter. Should it be allowed to present countervailing evidence on appeal?  Reyes v. Rural Bank of San Rafael (Bulacan), Inc., G.R. No. 230597, March 23, 2022. 

  28. 41

    Episode 41: A Prejudicial Transfer

    #HernanDoIt #Bar2023 #WeCanDoIt The employer asserted that its business was slowing down and that it dismissed the complainant on the ground of redundancy. Was the complainant’s dismissal found valid? Teletech Customer Care Management Philippines, Inc. v. Gerona, Jr., G.R. No. 219166, November 10, 2021.

  29. 40

    Episode 40: But the Claims Exceeded Php5,000.00

    #HernanDoIt #Bar2023 #WeCanDoIt Bus drivers and conductors filed a complaint against their employer for money claims before the Office of the Labor Arbiter and alleged that the latter failed to comply with Department Order No. 118, Series of 2012. Does the Office of the Labor Arbiter have jurisdiction over the case?  Del Monte Land Transport Bus, Co. v. Armenta, G.R. No. 240144, February 3, 2021. 

  30. 39

    Episode 39: Admitted the Due Issuance of the Certification

    The accused pointed out that the POEA certification (which the trial court relied on in convicting him of the crime of illegal recruitment in large scale) was not authenticated in court by its signatory. Was this sufficient to overturn his conviction for the crime?  People v. Bautista, G.R. No. 218582, September 3, 2020.  #GetThatBar2022 #Bar2022 

  31. 38

    Episode 38: Employment Status the Day Before the Occurrence of the Strike or Lockout

    The redundancy program was found to be valid and the employer was not found to have committed unfair labor practice. Learn why the employer was still held liable for separation pay and backwages for the dismissed employees. San Fernando Coca-Cola Rank-and-File Union v. Coca-Cola Bottlers Philippines, Inc., G.R. No. 200499, October 4, 2017. #GetThatBar2022 #Bar2022

  32. 37

    Episode 37: Not a Mere Run-of-the-Mill Employee

    #HernanDoIt #Bar2023 #WeCanDoIt The instructor in this case claimed to have completed her probationary period. Learn why the Court did not consider her as a permanent employee.  Palgan v. Holy Name University, G.R. No. 219916, February 10, 2021.

  33. 36

    Episode 36: An Employer’s Last Resort

    #HernanDoIt #Bar2023 #WeCanDoIt Why was the dismissal of this employee declared to be illegal despite proof of her violation of company policy?  Lamadrid v. Cathay Pacific Airways Limited, G.R. No. 200658, June 23, 2021. 

  34. 35

    Episode 35: Lone Act of Hostility

    #HernanDoIt #Bar2023 #WeCanDoIt The employer in this case concluded that the employee, who went on an unapproved leave of absence, had already abandoned his employment. Was the employer correct?  Gososo v. Leyte Lumber Yard and Hardware, Inc., G.R. No. 205257, January 13, 2021. 

  35. 34

    Episode 34: Circumstances Revealed Voluntary Resignations

    #HernanDoIt #Bar2023 #WeCanDoIt Upon being informed that they will be dismissed from employment, the employees tendered their resignation. Will an assertion of involuntariness in their resignation have merit?  Bance v. University of St. Anthony, G.R. No. 202724, February 3, 2021. 

  36. 33

    Episode 33: Stubborn Unwillingness to Return to Work

    #HernanDoIt #Bar2023 #WeCanDoIt Why was constructive dismissal not declared by the Supreme Court in this case?  Dela Torre v. Twinstar Professional Protective Services, Inc., G.R. No. 222992, June 23, 2021. 

  37. 32

    Episode 32: A Blank Form with a Checklist

    Illegal Dismissal was not among the causes of action at issue in the employee's complaint filed before the NLRC. Will the labor tribunals be precluded from resolving such issue?  Burnea v. Security Trading Corp., G.R. No. 231038, April 26, 2021.

  38. 31

    Episode 31: Minimum Salary Rates as a Management Prerogative

    Can the employer in this case refuse to implement its Local Policy which provides for minimum salary rates to regularized employees?  Del Monte Fresh Produce (Philippines), Inc. v. Del Monte Fresh Supervisors Union, G.R. No. 225115, January 27, 2020. 

  39. 30

    Episode 30: Perfection of Appeals and Article 128

    With regard to the visitorial and enforcement power under Article 128 of the Labor Code of the Philippines, does the Department of Labor and Employment have authority to accept an appeal under a reduced bond?  Blazing Star Security and Investigation Agency, Inc. v. Miraflor, G.R. No. 196022, January 22, 2020.

  40. 29

    Episode 29: No Danger to the Safety of the Crew or Vessel

    In justifying its decision to dismiss the employee, the employer claimed that the employee posed a clear and existing danger to the safety of the crew or vessel. Was this claim proven?  Evic Human Resource Management, Inc. v. Panahon, G.R. No. 206890, July 31, 2017.  #GetThatBar2022 #Bar2022

  41. 28

    Episode 28: Existence of the Right to Control the Manner of Doing the Work

    #HernanDoIt #Bar2023 #WeCanDoIt Does the control test call for the actual exercise of the right to control the manner by which a person does his work?  Parayday v. Shogun Shipping Co., Inc., G.R. No. 204555, July 6, 2020. 

  42. 27

    Episode 27: But Their Services Were Coterminous with Their Assigned Projects

    #HernanDoIt #Bar2023 #WeCanDoIt Can an employer’s service contract with another company prove an employee’s project employment status?  Jovero v. Cerio, G.R. No. 202466, June 23, 2021. 

  43. 26

    Episode 26: To Have Enough of Enough...

    #BarNiJLo2024 #MostValuableLaban #MarVeLousBar #Bar2024 Learn whether the car plan provided by the employer had ripened into company practice.  Home Credit Mutual Building and Loan Association v. Prudente, G.R. No. 200010, August 27, 2020. 

  44. 25

    Episode 25: A Verbal Notice of the Seafarer’s Disability Rating Is Not Enough

    Learn why the Supreme Court still awarded permanent total disability benefits despite the employer's claim that the seafarer was informed of his disability rating.  Abella v. Abosta Shipmanagement Corp., G.R. No. 249358, April 28, 2021.  #GetThatBar2022 #Bar2022 

  45. 24

    Episode 24: Appeal Bonds and Insolvency Proceedings

    Find out why the SC ruled the dismissal of the employer’s appeal to be erroneous despite the showing of a failure to post an appeal bond.  Karj Global Marketing Network, Inc. v. Mara, G.R. No. 190654, July 28, 2020.  #GetThatBar2022 #Bar2022 

  46. 23

    Episode 23: Unfit to Work as a Seaman

    The third doctor in this case declared the claimant’s unfitness to work as a seafarer. Should the claimant be granted total permanent disability benefits?  Pacific Ocean Manning, Inc. v. Castillo, G.R. No. 230527, June 14, 2021.  #GetThatBar2022 #Bar2022

  47. 22

    Episode 22: A Long-Standing Practice

    Find out how this employee successfully claimed retirement benefits despite the employer’s lack of a written retirement plan.  Beltran v. AMA Computer College-Biñan, G.R. No. 223795, April 3, 2019.  #GetThatBar2022 #Bar2022

  48. 21

    Episode 21: I Didn’t Report for Work Because You Failed to Answer My Query

    The employee was not found to have committed insubordination and gross and habitual neglect of duty. Find out why her dismissal was still ruled to be with valid cause. Villanueva v. Ganco Resort and Recreation, Inc., G.R. No. 227175, January 8, 2020. #GetThatBar2022 #Bar2022

  49. 20

    Episode 20: But He Only Performed “Non-Core” Functions

    In supporting its assertion of legitimate contracting, the principal alleged that the complainant only performed non-core functions of its business. Was this assertion upheld by the Supreme Court?  Daguinod v. Southgate Foods, Inc., G.R. No. 227795, February 20, 2019.  #GetThatBar2022 #Bar2022

  50. 19

    Episode 19: Considered Neither the Intent Nor the Origin of the Gift

    The employee in this case contended that his dismissal was illegal for being based on a vague company rule. Did the Supreme Court agree?  De Leon v. Philippine Transmarine Carriers, Inc., G.R. No. 232194, June 19, 2019.  #GetThatBar2022 #Bar2022

Type above to search every episode's transcript for a word or phrase. Matches are scoped to this podcast.

Searching…

We're indexing this podcast's transcripts for the first time — this can take a minute or two. We'll show results as soon as they're ready.

No matches for "" in this podcast's transcripts.

Showing of matches

No topics indexed yet for this podcast.

Loading reviews...

ABOUT THIS SHOW

Lecture podcast on Philippine Labor Law and Jurisprudence for law students and Bar examinees. Paulino Ungos III is a lawyer, law professor, and co-author of Labor Law books published by Rex Bookstore.

HOSTED BY

Paulino Ungos III

CATEGORIES

Frequently Asked Questions

How many episodes does Paulino Ungos III's Podcast have?

Paulino Ungos III's Podcast currently has 50 episodes available on PodParley. New episodes are automatically indexed when they're published to the podcast feed.

What is Paulino Ungos III's Podcast about?

Lecture podcast on Philippine Labor Law and Jurisprudence for law students and Bar examinees. Paulino Ungos III is a lawyer, law professor, and co-author of Labor Law books published by Rex Bookstore.

How often does Paulino Ungos III's Podcast release new episodes?

Paulino Ungos III's Podcast has 50 episodes. Check the episode list to see recent publication dates and frequency.

Where can I listen to Paulino Ungos III's Podcast?

You can listen to Paulino Ungos III's Podcast on PodParley by clicking any episode. We provide an embedded audio player for direct listening, and you can also subscribe via your preferred podcast app using the RSS feed.

Who hosts Paulino Ungos III's Podcast?

Paulino Ungos III's Podcast is created and hosted by Paulino Ungos III.
URL copied to clipboard!