Movement Logic: Strong Opinions, Loosely Held

A lot of people think sarcopenia means age-related loss of muscle mass. But this is not what it means!This week on the Movement Logic podcast, Laurel and Sarah unpack sarcopenia: what it actually is, why the definition has changed over time, and why losing strength and power matters more than losing muscle mass. They walk through the evolution from a tissue-focused understanding of sarcopenia to a function-focused one. Learn how the nervous system plays a major role in aging-related decline, and how this explains a far more rapid loss of strength and an even more rapid loss of power. They discuss why resistance training is essential if you want to maintain independence, reduce fall risk, and preserve the ability to do the things you love as you age. They also discuss why yoga, Pilates, walking, and cardio alone are not enough to prevent sarcopenia, and why training strength and power is non-negotiable for long-term physical function.ABOUT Power PlayFOLLOW @MovementLogicTutorials on InstagramWATCH Movement Logic on YouTubeLEARN MORE on the Movement Logic websiteFOLDABLE HOME BARBELL RACK by Verse, use coupon code MovementLogic10%OFF at checkoutRESOURCESGUARDIAN ARTICLE - We were asked to weigh in about Stacy Sims adviceEPISODE - Barbell Medicine on Sarcopenia127: ASCM says K.I.S.S.94: Capacities for Longevity - PowerCLARK, 2008 - PMID: 18772470CLARK, 2012 - PMID: 22469110MITCHELL, 2012 - PMID: 22934016REID, 2012 - PMID: 22016147European Working Group position stand 2018 - PMID: 30312372European Working Group position stand 2010 - PMID: 20392703BHASIN, 2020 (SDOC Paper) - PMID: 32150289TØIEN, 2023 - PMID: 37881849WIEGMANN, 2021 - PMID: 33657752TØIEN, 2023 - PMID: 36442699

In this episode, we break down what drives fall risk, and why the common advice to “just work on your balance” falls short. We explore how falls are measured, what balance tests really tell us (and what they don’t), and why improving a test score doesn’t automatically mean you’re less likely to fall in real life.We dig into the evidence on exercise and fall prevention, and explain why simpler, consistent exercise programs often outperform more complex approaches. We also look at surprising findings, like a randomized trial where a yoga group fell more than the control group, and what that reveals about confidence vs actual capacity.From there, we focus on what matters most: power, reaction time, and the ability to recover from instability. Most falls aren’t failures of static balance; they’re failures to respond quickly when something goes wrong.Finally, we cover what almost no one talks about: what happens after you fall. We discuss “long lies,” why getting up off the floor is a critical independence skill, and how a small amount of targeted practice can make a meaningful difference.Power Play Course available soon! FREE Barbell Mini Course when you get on our mailing listFOLLOW Movement Logic on IGWATCH Movement Logic on YouTubeLEARN MORE on the Movement Logic websiteFoldable Home Barbell Rack by Verse, coupon code MovementLogic10%OFF at checkoutRESOURCES CDC data on falls in older adults 2024 Korean study on fear of falling 2024 JAMA / USPSTF systematic review 2025 SAGE RCT, Iyengar yoga and falls 2020 Sherrington et al. Cochrane      Review 2017 Sherrington et al. Cochrane      Review 2022 Simpkins et al. power vs strength 2025 Zhu et al. power and fall      prediction 2021 Okubo et al. stepping impairments      and fall risk 2022 Devasahayam et al. reactive      balance training Sheffield Long Lies Study Floor Rise Training Trial

In this episode, we break down the new 2026 American College of Sports Medicine position stand on resistance training—and why it’s not what the internet gurus were hoping for.Instead of doubling down on rigid rules, this update does the opposite: it expands the evidence base, loosens the prescriptions, and makes one thing very clear—there is no single “best” way to train. Most resistance training works. What matters more is consistency, effort, and aligning your training with your actual goals.We unpack what the ACSM looked at (including 137 systematic reviews and over 30,000 participants), what’s changed since 2009, and what the evidence actually says about strength, hypertrophy, power, endurance, and physical function. We also break down why “optimization” is often overhyped, why going from nothing to something is still the biggest win, and how power training may play a bigger role in real-life function than you think.If you’ve ever felt overwhelmed by conflicting fitness advice—or like you’re doing it “wrong”—this episode will simplify what actually matters and what you can safely ignore.FREE Barbell Mini Course when you sign up for our mailing listFOLLOW Movement Logic on IGWATCH Movement Logic on YouTubeLEARN MORE on the Movement Logic websiteFoldable Home Barbell Rack by Verse, coupon code MovementLogic10%OFFat checkoutResources:ACSM 2026 Position StandACSM 2009 Position StandPOST about “strength span” from Stronger by Science(Nuzzo, 2024) PMID: 38781472

In this episode, Sarah looks at two broad pain patterns, people who tend to push through pain and people who tend to avoid it, and explains how each one can shape your relationship with exercise. Before getting into those categories, she lays out a key foundation of modern pain science: pain is not a simple one-to-one signal of tissue damage. Instead, pain is a subjective experience shaped by the brain’s interpretation of threat, context, past experiences, beliefs, and emotions. She also explains why the common zero-to-10 pain scale is often misunderstood, what it is useful for, and why phrases like “I have a high pain tolerance” or “my pain is a 10 out of 10” may not communicate what people think they do.From there, the episode walks through the fear avoidance model, pain catastrophizing, and the avoidance-endurance model to explain why some people stop moving the moment something feels wrong while others ignore pain until it becomes a much bigger problem. Sarah breaks down the strengths and liabilities of both patterns, including how pain avoiders can become deconditioned by steering clear of normal exercise discomfort and how pain endurers can blow past clear warning signs and delay recovery. She also talks through how these patterns show up in real life, how to tell which direction you tend to lean, and how better pain literacy, gradual progression, and thoughtful exercise programming can help you recalibrate your response to pain without swinging all the way to the opposite extreme.FOLLOW @themovementlogic on InstagramFOLLOW @themovementlogic on YouTubeSign up here for the Movement Logic Free Barbell Mini CourseRESOURCESFear Avoidance Model revisitedPain Catastrophizing ModelAvoidance-Endurance ModelPain Catastrophizing ScaleAvoidance-Endurance Questionnaire

Dr. Vanessa Komarek, PsyD joins Laurel for a conversation about strength training, trauma myths, gymtimidation, training through pregnancy, and what it actually means to be trauma informed as a coach. They talk about how lifting can support mental health, why fear-based messaging can backfire, where coaching ends and therapy begins, and which evidence-based PTSD treatments deserve more attention than social media trauma narratives.FOLLOW @TheMovementLogic on InstagramWATCH @TheMovementLogic on YouTubeSign up for our Free Barbell Mini Course HERERESOURCESDr. Vanessa Komarek, PsyDInstagram @HeavyLiftingPychologistWebsite www.weightsforwellbeing.com

In this episode, Laurel and Sarah talk with menopause educator and advocate Amanda Thebe about Midi Health, its public messaging, and what happens when menopause care becomes a venture-backed business model. Amanda shares how she first noticed Midi when a physician moved from a major hospital to join the telemedicine platform, and why she initially saw it as a promising solution to a real problem, women being dismissed, under-treated, and unable to access knowledgeable care. Over time, she describes getting “amber flags” from Midi’s marketing, especially the way hormone therapy was framed as a near-universal fix with benefits that outpaced the evidence, a pattern she contrasts with other companies she feels communicate more responsibly.The conversation digs into the incentives created by venture capital funding and what it can do to a company’s priorities, shifting from careful medical decision-making to selling more, retaining customers longer, and expanding into profitable add-ons. They discuss Midi’s move into wellness-style offerings and unproven products, including rapamycin framed for longevity, compounded and non-evidence-based creams, and the broader drift of menopause platforms into weight loss and longevity medicine to keep people buying beyond the menopause transition. They also unpack why influential clinician-brands can develop intensely loyal followings that resist criticism, and what it signals when platforms partner with high-profile figures like Mary Claire Haver. Throughout, Amanda emphasizes that the real need is ethical, evidence-based care that doesn’t put profit before patients, and she offers practical advice for what a solid menopause appointment looks like, how to prepare, where to look for reputable resources, and how to block the noise.FOLLOW @TheMovementLogic on InstagramWATCH @TheMovementLogic on YouTubeSign up for our Free Barbell Mini Course HERERESOURCESInstagram: Amanda ThebeWebsite: amandathebe.comLinkedIn: Amanda ThebeMovement Logic: Doctor vs Brand IG postAmanda Thebe: Midi Health IG postInstagram: Dr. Pauline MakiInstagram: Professor Susan DavisThe Menopause Society: Provider directory and resources

In this episode, Dr. Sarah Court unpacks scoliosis from the ground up, what it is, how it is diagnosed, the different types, and what we actually know about why it happens. She explains the Cobb angle, idiopathic versus congenital, neuromuscular, and degenerative scoliosis, and why muscle imbalances, heavy backpacks, or “bad posture” are not the root cause. Drawing on her own experience living with scoliosis and her time observing medical care in a pediatric hospital setting, she walks through current medical interventions, including observation, bracing, and spinal fusion, along with the real-world tradeoffs that come with each.The episode then turns to exercise. Do you need scoliosis-specific methods like Schroth or SEAS, and do they meaningfully change outcomes? Sarah reviews the current evidence, which suggests small to modest short-term changes at best, with limited high-quality data, especially in adults. She makes the case that most adults with scoliosis do not need to chase curve correction or cosmetic symmetry. Instead, the focus should be on building strength, addressing meaningful side-to-side capacity differences, supporting breathing where needed, and improving function and confidence. Heavy lifting, including deadlifts and squats, is not inherently dangerous for people with scoliosis, and getting stronger is often the most practical, evidence-informed path forward.FOLLOW @theMovementLogic on Instagram Movement Logic: Free Barbell Mini CourseRESOURCES:The Schroth Method The SEAS MethodVIDEO: Schroth in action

In this episode, Laurel and Sarah are joined by Dr. Joe Schwarcz, Director of the Office for Science and Society at McGill University and one of the most experienced science communicators working today. They explore why pseudoscientific health claims spread so effectively, even among educated and well-intentioned people, and why wellness culture is so drawn to simple explanations for complex biological problems.The conversation moves through three dominant narratives shaping modern health messaging: the obsession with finding a single root cause, the moralization of food, chemicals, and health behaviors, and the pressure to optimize every biological variable imaginable. Dr. Schwarcz explains how these narratives distort public understanding of science, create unnecessary anxiety, and distract from the few behaviors that reliably matter for health, like movement, nutrition, and basic risk management.They also discuss how science actually works, including why it changes over time, how peer review can fail, how industry funding complicates research interpretation, and why cherry-picked studies and observational data are so easily weaponized in marketing. The episode closes with practical guidance on how to evaluate health claims, how to think about trust and expertise, and why asking better questions is often more powerful than finding definitive answers.FREE Barbell Mini Course—SIGN UPFOLLOW @MovementLogicTutorials on InstagramVerse Agile Rack, Foldable Home Barbell Rack coupon code MovementLogic50OFFRESOURCESDr. Schwarz's radio showMcGill University blogMcGill University YouTubeBook: The Certainty Illusion, by Timothy Caulfield

In this solo episode, Sarah takes the “doctor vs brand” framework that went viral on Instagram and runs it as a real-time case study on a real company. The target is Cadense, an adaptive shoe that claims to help with foot drop, toe catch, and neurologic walking difficulties using “variable friction” tech, basically a glide-to-grip outsole design meant to reduce toe snagging while still giving traction during stance and push-off. Sarah breaks down what foot drop is, who this type of device might help, who it might put at risk, and why any rehab-adjacent product should be judged on more than vibe, testimonials, or white-coat authority.Then she gets into incentives, the part everyone wants to ignore until it’s their wallet. She walks through Cadense’s ambassador, coach, and affiliate pathways, and uses the full checklist to evaluate where Cadense lands on the clinician-led spectrum, including what they disclose well, what they oversimplify, and what they should tighten up if they want to be truly “do no harm” about a product that can literally change someone’s fall risk. Finally, Sarah looks at the actual research (yes, it exists, no, it’s not robust yet), explains what a five-person pilot study can and can’t prove, and lays out the line she personally won’t cross, recommending a product case-by-case versus becoming financially tied to a medical-ish purchase decision.FREE Barbell Mini Course—SIGN UPFOLLOW @MovementLogicTutorials on InstagramVerse Agile Rack, Foldable Home Barbell Rack coupon code MovementLogic50OFFRESOURCESInstagram Post: When a Doctor Becomes a BrandCadense, Official WebsiteCadense Coaches Program, Clinician PartnershipPilot Study of Cadence, A Novel Shoe for Patients With Foot Drop, Evora et al. 2019NIH Clinical Trial, Variable Friction Shoe vs AFO (NCT06234124)Global Wellness Economy Reaches $6.8 Trillion, Global Wellness Institute

In this episode of the Movement Logic Podcast, Laurel Beversdorf revisits the advice to eat 30 different plants per week and explains why it sounds scientific while resting on a much shakier foundation than it appears. She reflects on encountering the claim, why her and Sarah’s initial reaction was skepticism, and how listener feedback led to a closer look at where the idea came from and how it spread.Laurel breaks down what the American Gut Project actually showed: an observational association between self reported plant variety and gut microbiome diversity in a specific, self selected, largely affluent cohort. She explains why this type of research cannot identify an optimal number of plants or justify turning a statistical cutoff into a universal lifestyle rule, especially given the limits of how plant intake was measured.She then examines how the venture backed consumer health company Zoe translated this association into a prescriptive target and built products around it, arguing that the clarity and certainty of the message functions as marketing rather than sound, science backed health advice. Finally, Laurel zooms out to the emotional and social impact of this advice, explaining how moralized wellness claims turn health into a performance metric while ignoring access, instability, and other social determinants of health.FREE Barbell Mini Course—SIGN UPFOLLOW @MovementLogicTutorials on InstagramRESOURCES113: Debunking Menopause Grifters118: How Should We Eat To Be Healthy? with Abby Langer, RD102: Moralizing MovementAmerican Gut ProjectMcDonald, 2018; PMID: 29795809Book: The Certainty Illusion, by Timothy CaulfieldGuardian Article: ‘Personalising stuff that doesn’t matter’: the trouble with the Zoe nutrition appZoe + Science + Nutrition interview with Prof. Tim SpectorPost: Dr. Lauren Colenso-Semple's infographic on scientific processPost: What Peter Attia gets wrongPost: Attia & 30 plants/weekPost: Doctor vs. Brand

Testosterone is everywhere in menopause conversations right now, often framed as a solution for everything from low energy and brain fog to bone health and longevity. In this episode, Dr. Sarah Court, PT breaks down what actually matters when it comes to testosterone for menopausal women, separating social media hype from clinical evidence. The real questions are not whether women have testosterone or whether levels change with age, but whether testosterone should be prescribed, for whom, and what the data truly supports.Using current consensus guidelines, this episode explains why testosterone has one narrow, evidence-based indication, hypoactive sexual desire disorder, and why claims about mood, energy, cognition, bone health, and longevity are not supported by high-quality research. Dr. Court also walks through how testosterone is prescribed in the real world, why the lack of FDA-approved products for women creates problems, and what the safety data does and does not tell us about long-term risks. If you have heard confident claims about testosterone as a menopause cure-all, this episode provides the context you need to evaluate those messages with clarity and skepticism.FOLLOW @MovementLogicTutorials on InstagramMovement Logic: Free Barbell Mini CourseInstagram: Professor Susan DavisInstagram: Dr. Kelly CaspersonGlobal Consensus Position Statement on the Use of Testosterone Therapy for Women — Davis et al., 2019, Journal of Clinical Endocrinology & MetabolismISSWSH Clinical Practice Guideline on Systemic Testosterone for Women — Parish et al., 2021Testosterone Therapy for Women, Systematic Review & Meta-analysis(Lancet Review) — Islam et al., 2019Androgen Therapy in Women, A Reappraisal — Davis & Wahlin-Jacobsen, 2015Kelly Casperson blog post — Testosterone Can Help With Libido, Energy, Focus, & More During MenopauseYou Are Not Broken Podcast — Kelly Casperson, MDYouTube Short: Testosterone and Bone HealthYouTube Short: Testosterone, Motivation & Vitality

In this episode of the Movement Logic Podcast, Laurel and Sarah talk with registered dietitian and longtime myth buster Abby Langer, RD, about what it actually means to eat in a healthy, sustainable way. Abby brings clarity to some of the most confusing and overhyped nutrition messages online, explaining the meaningful difference between dietitians and nutritionists, why food guidelines get so much misplaced blame, and why simple habits like eating more fiber, plants, and whole foods still matter far more than clean eating, hormone-balancing diets, or supplement-driven solutions. She breaks down ultra processed foods, weight gain misconceptions, what causes overeating, and why carbs, fruit, sugar, and seed oils have all become targets of unnecessary fear.The conversation also explores protein needs, plant versus animal protein, the role of fiber in digestion and satiety, what gut health is and isn’t, and why probiotic claims are often overstated. Abby shares how her decades of experience in hospitals, primary care, and private practice have shaped her evidence-based approach, and she offers grounded advice on how to build a sane, less anxious relationship with food in a culture that thrives on extremes.SIGN UP for our FREE Barbell Mini CourseFOLLOW @MovementLogicTutorials on InstagramRESOURCESabbylangernutrition.comSubstack: Bite MeInstagram: @abbylanger

In this episode of the Movement Logic Podcast, Sarah discusses two primary methods for measuring bone density: DEXA (Dual-Energy X-ray Absorptiometry) and REMS (Radiofrequency Echographic Multi-Spectrometry). The episode explains what each method measures, their technologies, reliability, and practical applications. It compares their availability, cost, accuracy, and limitations. DEXA is recognized as the clinical gold standard but has some limitations, while REMS, although newer, shows promise with advantages in certain clinical situations.Movement Logic Site Wide Sale now on!Follow Movement Logic on InstagramReferences:77: Are You Getting DEXA Scammed?FRAX toolBest Practices for Dual-Energy X-ray Absorptiometry Measurement and ReportingNew technology REMS for bone evaluationCould radiofrequency echographic multispectrometry (REMS) overcome the overestimation in BMD by dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry (DXA) at the lumbar spine?DXA beyond bone mineral density and the REMS techniqueCost-effectiveness of radiofrequency echographic multi-spectrometry for the diagnosis of osteoporosis in the United States

In this episode of the Movement Logic Podcast, Laurel Beversdorf talks with strength coach James Lederach, MS, CSCS, about the deeper side of coaching and how helping someone get stronger often means helping them grow as a person. Together, they explore the benefits of strength development for adults and kids, training that supports rather than interferes with sport, the downsides of early sport specialization in youth, and the broader life lessons that strength training offers beyond physical health and performance.James and Laurel reflect on how training develops resilience, self-reliance, and emotional steadiness for both kids and adults. They discuss how good coaching balances structure with empathy, how strength training teaches self-trust, and why the most meaningful outcomes of training have less to do with performance and more to do with who we become through the process.SITE WIDE SALE — Save $$ on our Movement Logic TutorialsFOLLOW @MovementLogicTutorials on InstagramRESOURCESBell, 2018; PMID: 30135085DiFiori, 2014;  PMID: 24463910Post, 2017; PMID: 28288281Post, 2016; PMID: 27807260VISIT James Lederach's Gym Heavy Athletics FOLLOW @james_lederach on Instagram

In this episode of the Movement Logic Podcast, Laurel Beversdorf and Dr. Sarah Court examine the enduring myths and misinformation around the aesthetic goal of “getting abs.” They analyze the anatomy and function of the abdominal muscles, the cultural evolution of ab training versus core strength and stability training, and the role mechanical tension, muscle length, and training volume play in hypertrophy (muscle growth). Additionally, they discuss how pursuing the aesthetic goal of "getting abs" is different from performance goals related to abdominal strength.The hosts unpack popular misconceptions, such as “abs are made in the kitchen,” or that body composition changes work differently for women than men, or that core stability means never moving your spine. They contrast these myths with what current research on energy balance and hypertrophy training show. They also trace how Pilates, physical therapy, and social media helped shape the modern core strength and stability narrative—one that, in some circles, shifted from building strength through movement to “protecting” the lumbar spine by avoiding it.Additionally, this episode aims to clarify all of the factors that influence the appearance of the abdominal region, and how gendered, moralized, and shame-based messaging about the midsection continues to distort public understanding of exercise and body image.CART CLOSES Nov 1st for Lift for Longevity—SIGN UPFOLLOW @MovementLogicTutorials on InstagramRESOURCESClip: Mel Robbing Podcast interview with Stacy Sims about abs67: Popular Explanations for SI Joint Pain are Wrong, Says Science78: Behemoth Knee Myths20: Pelvic Floor In-Depth with Stephanie Prendergast, MPT54: Alignment Dogma - Spine58: Alignment Dogma - Shoulders48: Alignment Dogma - Pelvis80: Posture Panic Pt. 3 with Author Dr. Beth Linker, PhD50: Bracing versus BreathingSlouch: Posture Panic in Modern America, by Beth LinkerGHD Sit-UpHodges, 2001; PMID: 11181617Kalantari, 2024; PMID: 38565979Brown, 2011; PMID: 21325932Cholewicki, 1999; PMID: 10521659

In this episode of the Movement Logic podcast, hosts Laurel Beversdorf and Dr. Sarah Court PT dive deep into their six-month online barbell lifting course, 'Lift for Longevity.' They discuss the course structure, including linear periodization, high variation, and impact training. Laurel and Sarah also share insights on the benefits of barbell training for women, challenging societal norms about women's fitness, and emphasizing the importance of strength and self-efficacy. They underscore the transformative power of consistent strength training and offer practical advice for those considering joining their course.Sign up for the live Q&A on Wednesday October 22nd here (or get the replay)Movement Logic on InstagramReferences:Episode 112 Redefining what’s possible: Lift for Longevity Alums Share their Stories

In this episode, Dr. Sarah Court and Laurel Beversdorf delve into the claims and marketing tactics used by two high-profile menopause experts and social media influencers, Dr. Mary Claire Haver and Dr. Vonda Wright. They explore and critique various aspects of their advice, including the advocacy for supplements like turmeric and collagen, the promotion of hormone therapy, and questionable exercise prescriptions. The hosts analyze the scientific validity of their claims, the potential harms, and the prevalence of fearmongering in their messaging. The episode aims to empower listeners to become more critical consumers of health information, especially in the menopause space.Sign Up for Our Free Strength Class THIS FRIDAY!Follow us on InstagramReferences:Episode 37: Plyometrics – Get More Bang for your BonesEpisode 96: Bone Density Grifters – Introducing the Grift-O-Meter!Episode 103: Do Weighted Vests Do Anything For Us?Episode 109: Hot Flashes, Cold Facts: Menopause Myths That Won’t DieEpisode 110: Fact Checking Female-Specific Training & Nutrition Advice with Dr. Lauren Colenso-Semple, PhDEpisode 111: Make Stacy Sims Make SenseThe Pause LifeCalorie Restriction with or without Time-Restricted Eating in Weight LossInflammatory mechanisms linking obesity and metabolic diseaseThe power of creatine plus resistance trainingThe Effects of Creatine Supplementation Combined with Resistance TrainingDose-Response of creatine supplementation on cognitive functionEffects of Collagen Supplements Dietary Supplementation with Specific Collagen PeptidesOral intake of specific bioactive collagen peptidesSpecific Bioactive Collagen PeptidesVonda WrightThe musculoskeletal syndrome of menopauseSingle Leg BalancingManaging Menopausal Skin ChangesTopical estrogen for skin agingDr. Wright Instagram Posts:MSK Syndrome of MenopauseF.A.C.E.Estriol for faceCanyon RanchBone DensityHip FractureStep DownWeighted VestsGrip Strength

Welcome to Episode 112 of the Movement Logic Podcast! In this special episode, Laurel and Sarah talk to four women who recently completed Lift for Longevity about their experiences. Whether it’s overcoming fear of injury, finally finding a program that sticks, breaking free from perfectionism, or realizing barbells belong in their hands, each woman brings a unique and inspiring story.In this episode, you’ll hear from:Karen Klubertanz, an interior designer and yoga therapist who came to us after chronic back pain and years of yoga and kettlebells. Her story is about overcoming fear, learning to train with RPE, and discovering she could get stronger safely and sustainably.Anna Grojec, a freelance writer and editor in New Jersey who found us through the podcast and has now completed the course twice, entirely asynchronously without ever taking a live class. Her story is about making strength training stick for the first time in her life through structure and community support.Terry Littlefield, a longtime yoga teacher and old friend of Sarah’s who came in skeptical, took our free class, and realized she had to join. Her story is about shifting from perfectionism to consistency and finding confidence under the barbell.Janai Leeb, a personal trainer in northern Los Angeles County who first got the impression in her PT cert that barbells weren’t for her. She joined to build her own barbell skills and now teaches them to her clients. Her story is about finding her lane with the barbell and showing others that anyone can lift, at any age.If you’ve ever wondered if you’re too old, too inexperienced, or too "not a gym person" to lift barbells and get stronger, these conversations will change your mind.SIGN UP for our FREE CLASS for Bone Density Course on October 17th WITH REPLAYFOLLOW @MovementLogicTutorials on Instagram

In this episode, Laurel and Sarah take a look at one of the most influential and controversial voices in women’s health: Dr. Stacy Sims. Known for the phrase “women are not small men,” Sims has built her brand on the idea that women need entirely different training and nutrition strategies than men.Laurel and Sarah trace Sims’ rise to prominence, the research she leans on, and the rhetorical playbook she uses on major platforms like the Mel Robbins Podcast, and the Huberman Lab podcast. They examine how Sims’ is able to persuade listeners of her ideas, even though her catchy slogans and bold claims outpace the evidence.Rather than just fact-checking Sims’ most dubious claims on cycle syncing, fasted training, cardio, and how women should train, this episode instead focuses on how Sims’ messages are delivered. You’ll listen for how Sims’ and the hosts of these podcasts frequently employ persuasive tactics like appeals to authority, fearmongering, absolutist framing, pseudo-feminist virtue signaling, and what Laurel and Sarah call “mechanism theater” can make the weak evidence and shaky reasoning behind the claims sound stronger than it is. These strategies aren’t unique to Sims; you’ll start noticing these persuasive tactics everywhere, especially in menopause marketing and wellness content online.SIGN UP for the FREE CLASS for Bone Density CourseFOLLOW @MovementLogicTutorials on InstagramRESOURCESSims’ TedX talk110: Fact-Checking Female-Specific Training & Nutrition Advice with Dr. Lauren Colenso-Semple, PhDDebate between Sims and Colenso-Semple on  Docs Who LiftPost Debate Interview on Barbell Medicine109: Hot Flashes, Cold Facts: Menopause Myths that Won’t Die62: Make McGill Make SenseBulky mugSocial Post from Dr. Colenso-Semple about choice to use mechanistic, rat, or men’s data108: Breathing for Bone Density? YogaU Cannot Be Serious108: Does it Have to be Heavy? Rethinking the Lift Heavy Shit Narrative98: Capacities for Longevity Part 3 - CardioDecoding the GurusFront Page FitnessConspiritualityYoga Meets Movement ScienceBarbell Medicine

In this episode, Laurel and Sarah sit down with  muscle physiology researcher and science communicator Lauren Colenso-Semple to take a hard look at some of the most popular and problematic claims circulating in women’s health and fitness. Together, they unpack the slogan “women are not small men,” and the idea that women need completely different training and nutrition approaches than men. Lauren explains where the evidence actually stands on topics like muscle loss at 30, lifting to failure, cardio recommendations for women, bone density changes at menopause, training fasted versus fed, cycle syncing, cortisol “hacks,” and more.This conversation is a deep dive into separating women's physiology from marketing ploys. Learn why overcomplicating women’s training does more harm than good. You'll gain clear, evidence-based guidance for women in perimenopause, post-menopause, and beyond.Sign up for the Bone Density Course Interest listFollow us @MovementLogicTutorials on Instagram04:30 Why Naming Sources Matters08:15 “Women Are Not Small Men”: What’s True and What’s Branding16:00 How Much Research on Women Actually Exists29:30 Training to Failure, Heavy vs. Light Loads, and Age-Specific Claims31:00 The Case for Keeping Moderate-Intensity Cardio36:15 Bone Loss Myths and What Exercise Really Helps46:30 What “Challenging Sets” Mean in Research49:00 Cortisol, Fasted Training, and Breakfast Timing52:30 Low Energy Availability vs. Simply Skipping Breakfast01:08:00 Cycle Syncing and Monthly Program Overhauls01:15:00 Rapid-Fire Q&A: Creatine, Weighted Vests, Collagen, Protein Targets, Electrolytes01:23:30 How Overcomplicated Rules Keep Women Out of Exercise01:24:00 Has Stacy Sims Done More Good or More Harm?01:26:30 Why Simple, Progressive Training Works for EveryoneDr Lauren Colenso-Semple on InstagramFront Page Fitness PodcastStudy Menstrual cycle phase does not influence muscle protein synthesis or whole-body myofibrillar proteolysis in response to resistanceMel Robbins Podcast interview with Dr. Stacey SimsHuberman Lab Podcast interview with Dr. Stacey Sims

In this episode of the Movement Logic podcast, Sarah and Laurel take on the most persistent—and profitable—myths about menopause and women’s health. From metabolism myths to cortisol panic, creatine hype, and new exercise “rules”, they separate marketing spin from actual science.They also unpack the nuanced role of menopausal hormone therapy (MHT)—who it helps, when it’s useful, and why menopause isn’t a medical emergency needing endless “fixes.”Sign up for the Bone Density Course Interest listFollow us @MovementLogicTutorials on Instagram10:12 8 Menopause Myths and Misconceptions37:08 Cortisol and Menopause43:14 Exercise and Menopause51:33 Muscle Loss and Menopause55:00 Hormone Therapy and Muscle Mass: The Evidence57:56 Debunking the Rapid Bone Loss Myth01:04:31 The Truth About Creatine Supplementation01:18:48 Menopause Symptoms vs. Aging: What's the Difference?01:29:24 Menopause Hormone Therapy: Myths and Realities01:42:25 Concluding Thoughts and RecommendationsEp 8 A Perimenopause Perspective63: Dismantling Long and Lean Pt 2108: Does it Have to be Heavy?Study Daily Energy Expenditure Through the Human Life CourseStudy Changes in Physical Activity and Body Composition in Postmenopausal WomenStudy  Evaluation of sex-based differences in resistance exercise training-induced changes in muscle mass, strength, and physical performanceStudy Changes in body composition and weight during the menopause transitionStudy Association Between Hormone Therapy and Muscle MassStudy Longitudinal changes in BMD during perimenopausal transitionStudy BMD Changes During the Menopause TransitionStudy  Efficacy of Creatine Supplementation Combined with Resistance Training on Muscle Strength and Muscle MassStudy  Creatine Supplementation During Resistance Training Does Not Lead to Greater Bone Mineral DensityThe VajendaNorth American Menopause SocietyDr Lauren Colenso-SempleProfessor Susan Davis

In this episode of the Movement Logic Podcast, Dr. Sarah Court and Laurel Beversdorf critically evaluate the claims made by YogaU Online about the connections between breathing practices and bone health during a recent promotional webinar for a new workshop called “Breath As Medicine: Yogic Breathing for Vital Aging.” They meticulously analyze research studies cited by YogaU, debunking pseudoscientific assertions about nitric oxide production, VO2 max, and the impact of breathing on bone density. The hosts highlight the ethical implications of such misleading information and emphasize the importance of evidence-based practices in the fitness and yoga communities. The discussion also touches on marketing tactics that prey on the fears of older women, underscoring the need for transparency and integrity in health advice.Sign up for the Bone Density Course Interest List here!Movement Logic on Instagram03:48 Calling Out Pseudoscience05:19 Yoga U's Dubious Claims17:47 The Breath as Medicine Workshop18:39 Debunking the Claims32:57 Understanding Breathing Pathologies01:01:56 Lung Function and Bone Mineral Density: A Study Review01:03:57 Debunking Misleading Claims in Yoga Marketing01:09:38 Sleep Apnea Studies and Their Misuse01:17:57 Hypoxia and Bone Health: Misinterpretations01:23:23 Nitric Oxide and Aging: Separating Fact from Fiction01:41:02 Cardiovascular Fitness: Misconceptions and Realities01:50:47 Yoga U's Ethical Dilemma and Call for Accountability01:59:38 Conclusion and Call to ActionReferences:Episode 5 Does Yoga Asana Build Bone Density?Episode 38 Got Bones? Yoga Asana Isn’t EnoughEpisode 79 Make YogaU Make SenseEpisode 92 Make Dr. Loren Fishman Make SenseTwelve-Minute Daily Yoga Regimen Reverses Osteoporotic Bone LossRecognizing and Treating Breathing Disorders: A Multidisciplinary Approach by Leon ChaitowBreath: The New Science of a Lost Art by James NestorAssociation between lung function and bone mineral density in children and adolescentsAssessment of Bone Mineral Density and Bone Metabolism in Young Men with Obstructive Sleep ApneaBone Mineral Density and Changes in Bone Metabolism in Patients with Obstructive Sleep Apnea SyndromeHypoxia is a Major Stimulator of Osteoclast Formation and Bone ResorptionMolecular Mechanisms Involved in Hypoxia-Induced Alterations in Bone RemodelingFront Page Fitness podcastYoga Meets Movement Science podcast

In this episode of the Movement Logic Podcast, we take a hard look at one of our own core messages and ask: does it have to be heavy to build bone? We unpack a landmark systematic review and meta-analysis that compared more than 100 exercise interventions in postmenopausal women, looking at low, moderate, and high intensities across resistance training, impact, and combined programs.We explain the big picture: resistance training works across intensities, moderate intensity often performs just as well as heavy, and impact-only isn’t the standalone solution it’s often made out to be. We also highlight how few truly high-intensity trials exist, why that matters, and what it means for interpreting the data.Along the way, we reflect on why it’s important to update your message when new evidence emerges, and how this research shifts—not our programming, but our language—around lifting heavy. You’ll come away with a clearer understanding of what actually builds bone, what the science says (and doesn’t yet say), and why there’s more than one effective way to get stronger bones.SIGN UP for the Bone Density Course Interest ListFOLLOW Movement Logic on Instagram00:00 Introduction and Episode Overview09:37 New Research on Exercise Intensity and Bone-Building Exercise for Postmenopausal Women37:08 About the Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis52:20 Meta-Analysis Results Overview54:16 Lumbar Spine Analysis59:00 Femoral Neck Analysis01:01:43 Total Hip Analysis01:02:40 Key Takeaways and Summary01:04:17 Meta-Regression Insights01:09:47 Clinical vs. Statistical Significance01:14:14 Discussion on Bias01:17:26 Engaging with the Community and Expert Opinions01:39:46 Debunking Myths About Women and Heavy Lifting01:40:39 Addressing Misconceptions around Lifting Heavy01:47:25 Cultural Shifts and Women in Strength Training02:05:58 Practical Benefits of Heavy Lifting02:11:44 Final ThoughtsREFERENCES:LIFTMOR Trial and YouTube videoKistler-Fischbacher Systematic Review with Meta-Analysis91: LIFTMOR, Not Less: An Interview with Professor Belinda BeckStu Phillips IG page and postKorpelainen paper100: The Hidden Cost of "Just Do Something" Fitness Advice

In this episode of the Movement Logic Podcast, Laurel unpacks what warm ups actually do—and why cool downs aren’t necessary. She explains how warming up sharpens focus, raises tissue temperature, and primes the nervous system, setting you up to perform better and reduce injury risk. Laurel shares five simple principles for effective warm ups, clears up myths about stretching and “activation,” and contrasts them with cool downs, which don’t aid recovery or prevent soreness.SIGN UP for the Bone Density Course Interest ListFOLLLOW Movement Logic on InstagramReferences:Article - (Stronger by Science) Heavier warm-ups are best, new study suggests Paper - Systematic Review with Meta Analysis on Cool Downs (Afonso, 2021)Ep. 90 - Capacities for Longevity: StrengthEp. 39 - RPE, 1 RM, 3 sets of 10, oh my?

In this episode of the Movement Logic Podcast, Dr. Sarah Court explores the fascinating impact of the placebo effect on sports performance and rehabilitation. Dr. Court discusses recent studies, including a unique experiment involving a pink, calorie-free drink that boosted bench press performance among trained lifters. The episode delves into how beliefs and expectations can lead to measurable physiological changes, the historical context of the placebo effect, and its implications in physical therapy and exercise routines. Dr. Court also emphasizes the significance of positive mindsets in overcoming physical challenges and achieving fitness goals.01:31 The Pink Drink Study: Exploring the Placebo Effect02:36 Understanding the Placebo Effect04:03 Historical Context and Research on Placebo06:02 Detailed Analysis of the Pink Drink Study10:19 Implications of the Placebo Effect in Exercise12:08 Placebo Effect in Rehabilitation and Pain Science14:49 Practical Takeaways for Enhancing Performance16:49 Mindset and Belief in Physical Therapy20:25 Encouragement and Final ThoughtsBone Density Course Interest List Sign Up HereMovement Logic on InstagramReferences: The placebo effect of a pink non-caloric, artificially sweetened solution on strength endurance performance and psychological responses in trained individualsMouth Rinsing With a Pink Non-caloric, Artificially-Sweetened Solution Improves Self-Paced Running Performance and Feelings of Pleasure in Habitually Active IndividualsThe Placebo and Nocebo effect on sports performance: A systematic reviewPlacebo effects on kayak sprint performance in child athletes

In this episode of the Movement Logic Podcast, Laurel explores whether you can train fascia, separating myths from facts about this connective tissue. She discusses her personal journey with fascia-focused methods, including self-massage and Yoga Tune Up, and questions commonly held beliefs about fascia adaptation from exercise. Laurel critiques the metaphorical narratives versus physiological mechanisms, examining the roles of muscle, tendon, and the nervous system in recovery and training. She concludes with insights on why calling it "fascia training" might be more about branding than science.Sign up for our FREE Bone Density Mini Course: Barbell 101!Follow us on Instagram @movementlogictutorials00:00 Can you train fascia?02:26 Personal story10:39 Questioning what I'd been taught about fascia12:02 Fascia as values, worldview, group identity16:04 How did we get here – fascia research congress16:48 The reductionism that arose out of rejecting reductionism18:02 The problem with overpromising around significance of fascia or training fascia18:59 Blurring metaphor and mechanism23:24 What is fascia?24:03 Massage mostly stimulates skin24:29 Deep fascia and tendons are different25:18 Fascia not great at force transfer26:39 Visceral massage27:04 Training fascia is not what trains proprioception – motor learning is28:14 What makes a tissue trainable?33:42 Difference between general and specific training38:22 Adhesions, trigger points, scar tissue, fibrosis40:51 Hydrating fascia42:35 Circulation improvements58:19 Wrapping it up

In this episode of the Movement Logic Podcast, Dr. Sarah Court, PT, delves into the trend of walking with weighted vests to improve bone density, especially among perimenopausal and menopausal women.She reviews multiple long-term and short-term studies on the subject, comparing the effectiveness of weighted vests in bone metabolism, bone mineral density, and balance improvement. Sarah argues that while weighted vests do not significantly impact bone density for most people, they could be beneficial for balance and cardiovascular endurance, especially for the deconditioned or frail. She also discusses the importance of proper exercise regimens like progressive overload and impact training for bone growth. The episode concludes with practical advice on when a weighted vest might be suitable.00:43 The Weighted Vest Trend in Menopause Marketing02:38 Debunking the Myths: Evidence on Weighted Vests06:10 Research Study: Long-term Exercise with Weighted Vests13:08 Research Study: Walking Exercise with and without Weighted Vests17:48 Research Study: Short-term Aerobic Exercise with Weighted Vests23:45 Conclusion: The Real Benefits of Weighted Vests28:51 Final ThoughtsSign up for our Bone Density Mini Course: Barbell 101!Follow us on Instagram @movementlogictutorialsReferences:37 Plyometrics - Get More Bang For Your Bones38 Got Bones? Yoga Asana Isn't Enough51 Persistent Myths About Osteoporosis53 Your Bones Are Bored84 Trick or Truth: 6 Ways to Spot Osteoporosis Misinformation91 LIFTMOR, Not Less: An Interview With Professor Belinda Beck96 Bone Density Grifters: Introducing the Grift-O-Meter!Instagram post #1Instagram post #2Long-term Exercise Using Weighted Vests Prevents Hip Bone Loss in Postmenopausal WomenWeighted Vest Exercise Improves Indices of Fall Risk in Older WomenA Comparison between the Effects of the Walking Exercise with and without Weighted Vests on Bone Resorption and Health-Related Physical Fitness in the Working WomenEffects of short-term aerobic exercise with and without external loading on bone metabolism and balance in postmenopausal women with osteoporosis

In this episode of the Movement Logic Podcast, Laurel explores how we’ve come to assign moral value to certain movement concepts—like compression, flexion, anterior tilt, and instability—and why that language does more harm than good. She unpacks how terms that are neutral by definition often get rebranded as “bad,” “dangerous,” or “dysfunctional” in movement and rehab spaces.Rather than offering a list of “better” movement cues, Laurel invites listeners to step outside of binary thinking. This episode explores how our wiring, combined with marketing and group identity, fuels a polarizing narrative—a red-X/green-checkmark mentality that pits “functional” against “dysfunctional.”Whether you’re a teacher, coach, or curious mover, this episode offers a reminder: biomechanical concepts are just descriptions of what’s happening—not value-laden truths. And when we let go of moralizing movement, we open the door to more creativity, exploration, and individualized problem-solving.Sign up for our Bone Density Mini Course: Barbell 101!Follow us on Instagram @movementlogictutorialsResources:The Truth About Good vs Bad Muscles - Results Not Typical Podcast98: Capacities for Longevity Part 3 - Cardio94: Capacities for Longevity Part 2 - Power90: Capacities for Longevity Part 1 - Strength89: Is Dead Butt Syndrome Real?80: Posture Panic Pt. 3 with Author Dr. Beth Linker, PhD79: Make Yoga U Make Sense78: Behemoth Knee Myths76: Posture Panic Part 274: McGill We Go Again73: Posture Panic Pt. 167: Popular Explanations for SI Joint Pain are Wrong, Says Science66: Dismantling Long and Lean Pt. 363: Dismantling Long and Lean Part 262: Make McGill Make Sense58: Alignment Dogma - Shoulders54: Alignment Dogma - Spine48: Alignment Dogma - Pelvis19: Oh, NO! Nose Breathing and Nitric OxideReview: Effect of training and lifting equipment for preventing back pain in lifting and handling: systematic reviewReview: Stoop or squat: a review of biomechanical studies on lifting technique

In this episode of the Movement Logic Podcast, Laurel shares six universal takeaways from training for and running her first marathon—and how they apply to any long term, challenging, exercise-related goal. Whether your goal is to build strength, increase stamina, or just feel more capable in your daily life, this episode explores fundamental training principles, helpful mindset coaching, and empowering tips to help you reach a long-term, physically demanding goal.Rather than focusing on the details of marathon training, Laurel distills what she learned about goal-setting, accountability, program design, recovery, and the fatigue that can sometimes hide progress. She also calls out the overwhelming and often contradictory fitness advice targeted at women, especially during perimenopause and menopause, and urges a more individualized and practical approach to training.Sign up for our Bone Density Mini Course: Barbell 101!Follow us on Instagram @movementlogictutorials00:58 Why I trained for a marathon and what I learned04:17 Takeaway #1: Have a realistic, measurable goal13:34 Takeaway #2: Programming is a hypothesis21:05 Takeaway #3: Accountability helps you follow through27:50 Takeaway #4: Fatigue can mask your progress35:45 Takeaway #5: Recovery reveals your fitness42:00 Takeaway #6: Strength supports everythingRESOURCESEpisode 9: What Are the Best Exercises for Strength?Episode 85: Inbetweenie - Boosting Recovery: What Really WorksEpisode 70: Inbetweenie - Do you need a deload week?Episode 90: Capacities for Longevity Part 1: StrengthEpisode 94: Capacities for Longevity Part 2: PowerEpisode 98: Capacities for Longevity Part 3: Cardio

In this episode of the Movement Logic Podcast, Sarah explores the commonly held belief that any amount of exercise is better than none. Using recent research, she discusses the benefits of minimal exercise on cardiovascular health and longevity but also highlights the limitations of this advice. She emphasizes the need for strength training and power exercises to meet the comprehensive physical needs of the body, especially as we age. Additionally, she discusses the socioeconomic barriers to regular exercise and suggests systemic changes to make meaningful physical activity more accessible to everyone.Sign up for the Wait List for our Bone Density Course!Movement Logic on Instagram00:03 The Common Exercise Advice: Just Do Something02:01 Scientific Evidence Supporting Minimal Exercise06:58 Limitations of Minimal Exercise10:01 Strength Training and Its Importance16:35 Challenges and Practical Solutions for Exercise22:12 Conclusion and Final ThoughtsReferences:Dose-response associations between accelerometry measured physical activity and sedentary time and all cause mortality: systematic review and harmonised meta-analysisPhysical Activity, All-Cause and Cardiovascular Mortality, and Cardiovascular DiseaseAssociation of wearable device-measured vigorous intermittent lifestyle physical activity with mortalityResistance Training and Mortality Risk: A Systematic Review and Meta-AnalysisEffects of Resistance Training Frequency on Measures of Muscle Hypertrophy: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

In this 'Inbetweenie' episode of the Movement Logic podcast, Sarah delves into the widespread misinterpretation of a 2014 research study titled 'Ability to Sit and Rise from the Floor as a Predictor of All-Cause Mortality.' Popularly known as the Sitting Rising Test (SRT), the study has been sensationalized in the media and on social platforms, claiming that the ability (or inability) to get up from the floor without assistance can predict mortality. Sarah critiques the study's methodology, the pitfalls of its media representation, and the critical difference between correlation and causation. She also emphasizes the importance of proper interpretation to avoid fear-mongering and encourages training in strength and balance for overall health benefits.Get on our Wait List for the Bone Density Course!Follow us on Instagram @movementlogictutorials01:08 Overview of the Misinterpreted Study03:35 Details of the Sitting Rising Test (SRT)04:21 Methodology and Findings of the Study14:33 Critique of the Study's Methodology23:43 Misinterpretations and Media Hype29:17 Conclusion and Final ThoughtsReferences: Episode 15: 3! Easy! Rules! About! Research!Ability to sit and rise from the floor as a predictor of all-cause mortality(abstract)Conor O’Shea podcast: Taking Control of Your Pain Through MovementSRT Test on YouTubeDiscover Magazine: Simple Sitting Test Predicts How Long You'll Live

In this episode of the Movement Logic Podcast, we dive into cardiovascular health and the role of cardiorespiratory fitness in supporting longevity—especially for women as they age. We break down the science behind moderate and vigorous aerobic exercise, explain how it differs from strength training, and explore why both are essential for long-term health.We also tackle some of the most persistent cardio misconceptions, unpack the physiological differences between strength and aerobic training, and share evidence-based strategies for integrating both into your routine.Along the way, we offer personal insights and practical tips for building aerobic capacity—with a special focus on finding and sustaining moderate intensity. You'll learn how to gauge it using tools like RPE, the talk test, and heart rate zones.Sign up for Bone Density Course: Lift for Longevity. THE CART CLOSES THIS SATURDAY, MAY 10th, 2025!Follow us on Instagram @movementlogictutorials00:00 Podcast Introduction and Vocal Warmups07:32 The Importance of Cardio Respiratory Fitness11:01 Understanding VO2 Max and Its Benefits13:45 Physical Activity vs. Exercise23:36 The Role of Cardio Respiratory Fitness in Longevity30:30 Aerobic vs. Anaerobic Exercise34:35 Recovery and Adaptation53:30 Biology of Cardio Respiratory Fitness53:46 Aerobic vs. Resistance Training59:43 Understanding Lactate, Lactate Thresholds, and Exercise Intensity01:02:31 Training Zones01:22:07 Moderate vs. Vigorous Intensity Exercise01:44:13 Best Exercises for Aerobic Endurance01:49:58 Combining Strength and Cardio Training01:53:56 Cardiovascular Health in Women02:07:42 Why People Hate Cardio and How to Overcome It02:21:44 Conclusion and Final ThoughtsRESOURCESRead JAMA Network Open about cardio and mortality riskListen to Long & Lean pt. 2Read VO₂ max associated with reduction in all-cause mortalityListen about exercise recoveryRead Burn about human metabolism by Herman PonzerRead Eve about evolution and the female body by Cat BohannonRead about cardiovascular disease and risk factors for women

Welcome to Episode 97 of the Movement Logic Podcast! In this special episode, Laurel and Sarah talk to four women who recently completed the Bone Density Course: Lift for Longevity about their experiences. Whether it’s building strength and stability for hiking and biking, reclaiming confidence in their bodies, or surprising themselves with what they can lift, each woman brings a unique and inspiring story. In this episode, you’ll hear from: Leslie Nelson, a former professional dancer and movement educator from the Berkshires of Massachusetts, who rediscovered strength, resilience, and even more mobility through lifting. Julie Wright, a lifelong ballet dancer and psychotherapist based in New York City, who realized that ballet and walking weren’t enough to maintain her bone health — and found empowerment through barbell training. Barb Elias, a retired public servant and yoga teacher from Winnipeg, Manitoba, Canada, who worked with her natural hypermobility to build real-world strength that supports her hiking, biking, and day-to-day confidence. Susan Saylor, a former civil rights attorney turned yoga teacher in San Francisco, who overcame her hesitations about lifting and built a new relationship with strength training that shows up both on and off the mat.If you’ve ever wondered if you’re too old, too inexperienced, or too "not a gym person" to lift heavy and get stronger, these conversations will change your mind.Important: The cart for Bone Density Course: Lift for Longevity closes Saturday, May 10th — so don’t wait!  SIGN UP HERE! We won't run this course for another 6 months!

In this episode of the Movement Logic podcast, Sarah and Laurel dig into the grift surrounding popular bone health programs, critically analyzing Bones for Life, Bone Coach, and Buff Bones. They introduce the Grift-O-Meter™ scale to rate each program on their misleading tactics and claims about osteoporosis treatment. They conclude by decrying the patronizing nature of some fitness regimes, urging a more empowered and scientifically sound approach.Sign up for our FREE LIVE online Strength class on 4/26 at 11am ET / 8am PT00:00 Introduction11:40 Critique of Bone Density Programs43:30 Debunking Pseudoscience in Marketing45:49 Feldenkrais Movements and Bone Health01:23:43 Understanding Naturopathic Education01:29:49 Exploring Kevin Ellis' Supplement Company01:31:22 Osteo IQ: DNA Testing and Bone Health01:41:20 Buff Bones: A Deep Dive02:05:36 Outdated Research and Spinal Flexion02:16:28 Instagram Messaging and Audience Engagement02:20:52 Strength Training for Bone Density02:39:49 Lifting Weights in a PatriarchyDownload Your Grift-O-Meter here!Episode 56 Does Hypermobility Cause Osteoporosis?Episode 82 Weird Science: When It Doesn’t All Add UpEpisode 90 Capacities for Longevity Part 1: StrengthEpisode 91 LIFTMOR, Not Less: An Interview with Belinda BeckEpisode 93 Should You Avoid Spinal Flexion With OsteoporosisEpisode 94 Capacities for Longevity Part 2: PowerResults not Typical PodcastDecoding the GurusBones For Lifehttps://bonecoach.com/https://healthybonesco.com/https://osteoiq.com/https://www.integrativenutrition.com/Bone Turnover Markers in the Diagnosis and Monitoring of Metabolic Bone DiseaseSleep Duration and Bone DensityBuff BonesMEDEX-OPStop Worrying About Lifting Weights for Bone DensityLaurel’s ResponseOsteoporosis ConfusionSquat Alignment

In this insightful episode, Dr. Sarah Court sits down with Dr. Caitlin Casella, PT, DPT, to discuss the evolution and current state of physical therapy. Dr. Casella shares her journey from being a full-time yoga instructor to becoming a PT, the transition from yoga to developing her own physical therapy practice, and her thoughts on the business models in PT clinics today. They delve into the challenges of the current healthcare system, share personal experiences and lessons learned from clinical rotations, and discuss the importance of sustainable career practices to avoid burnout in the industry. This conversation is an invaluable resource for current and prospective PTs, and movement professionals considering a transition into physical therapy.00:41 Journey to Becoming a Physical Therapist00:56 Transition from Yoga to Physical Therapy02:59 Starting a PT Clinic04:15 Clinic Operations and Burnout05:55 Specialized Services and Classes07:16 Menopause and Women's Health09:47 First Experiences with Physical Therapy13:29 Clinical Rotations and Pandemic Challenges19:07 Inpatient vs. Outpatient PT22:43 Cash-Based vs. Insurance-Based Clinics30:04 Balancing Medicare and Cash Patients34:21 Private Practice Setup34:41 Balancing Rates and Burnout35:09 Recognizing Burnout Signs38:25 Transitioning to Private Practice39:51 Challenges in PT Profession43:47 Advice for Aspiring PTs48:54 PT School Experience57:52 Practical Application of PT EducationSign up for our FREE Bone Density Course Strength Class here!Resources:Practice Human websiteDr. Caitlin Casella on IG

In this episode of the Movement Logic Podcast, Laurel and Sarah explore why power training deserves a spot in your movement routine—especially as you age. They kick things off by reviewing the different types of strength before introducing the concept of power, breaking down the fact that, yes, there are different types of power too.You’ll hear why power is critical for balance, fall prevention, and quick, reactive movements that keep you moving safely and independently in daily life. Laurel and Sarah explain how power tends to decline faster than strength as we get older—and why that matters—along with how the right kind of training can help you maintain and even improve it.They share real-world examples of power in action, clear up common misconceptions, and highlight the key principles that make power training both safe and effective. Plus, they give a sneak peek into their upcoming course designed to make power training approachable, progressive, and even—dare we say—fun.SIGN UP HERE to take a free Bone Density Course class with us LIVE April 26th 8am PT / 11am ETFollow @MovementLogicTutorials on Instagram00:00 Introduction and Banter00:15 Discussion on PTs Calling Themselves Doctors01:17 Observations about the Bench Press from Recent Classes05:05 Upcoming Free Bone Density Class07:08 Series on Physical Capacities for Longevity10:11 Strength vs. Power11:54 Importance of Power Training for Older Adults38:43 Force-Velocity Curve Explained44:58 Types of Power49:08 Applying Strength and Power in Sports and Daily Life57:19 Neuromuscular Adaptations in Strength and Power Training01:02:35 The Stretch Shortening Cycle and Power Training01:08:07 The Importance of Power Training for Longevity01:21:08 Cultural Misconceptions About Power Training01:24:53 Teaser for Our New Course on Power01:27:48 Conclusion: The Importance of Power TrainingRESOURCESEpisode 60: Dismantling Long & Lean Pt. 1Episode 90: Capacities for Longevity Pt. 1: StrengthSys review and MA: Power v Strength for Older AdultsSys Review and MA: Power to Reduce Falls RiskForce Velocity Curve (the banana!)Episode 37: Plyometrics - More Bang for Your BonesLachlan James paper - Not All Strength is Created Equal + Table from NSCA with Each Classification

In this episode of the Movement Logic Podcast, hosts Laurel Beversdorf and Dr. Sarah Court critically examine common beliefs surrounding spinal flexion exercises and osteoporosis, particularly from a yoga and Pilates perspective. They delve into two pivotal studies on exercise and fracture risk, both led by Dr. Mehrsheed Sinaki, a renowned specialist in physical medicine and rehabilitation at the Mayo Clinic in Rochester, Minnesota.The first study, Postmenopausal Spinal Osteoporosis: Flexion versus Extension Exercises, is frequently cited on Pilates websites and in yoga and Pilates teacher trainings as evidence that spinal flexion is risky for individuals with osteoporosis—even during bodyweight exercises. However, despite its widespread use to justify movement restrictions, the study has notable methodological flaws. The second study, Stronger Back Muscles Reduce the Incidence of Vertebral Fractures: A Prospective 10-Year Follow-up of Postmenopausal Women, suggests that progressively overloaded back strengthening exercises can reduce fracture risk—even if the strengthening occurred only for a few years in the distant past. Yet, this study also has its own limitations.When viewed together, these studies present an intriguing contrast: one warns of the potential dangers of spinal flexion (even under low loads) based on weak evidence, while the other highlights the lasting protective benefits of strength training. Laurel and Sarah explore why bodyweight spinal flexion is often singled out as risky and question whether this caution is always justified.They also discuss the ethical implications and the boundaries of a movement teacher's scope of practice—particularly when making broad recommendations to avoid certain movements based on limited or flawed research. The hosts emphasize the importance of individualized context in exercise prescriptions, the need to follow medical guidance from a student’s doctor, the evidence-backed benefits of strength training, and the necessity of empowering students with the autonomy to make informed movement choices.Get on the wait list for our Bone Density Course: Lift for LongevityFollow Movement Logic on Instagram00:56 Podcast Production & Content Creation01:33 Bone Density & Squat Depth02:20 Benefits of Full ROM Strength Training08:24 Is Spinal Flexion Dangerous for OP?10:00 Issues with Yoga/Pilates for OP Classes18:43 1984 Paper: Flexion vs. Extension for OP40:22 Flaws in the 1984 Study41:57 2002 Study: Stronger Back Muscles & Fractures43:03 2002 Study Design & Methods46:35 2002 Study Key Findings52:09 2002 Study Limitations56:30 Practical Takeaways01:06:15 Ethics for Movement Teachers01:17:43 ConclusionReferences:Episode 77: Make Dr. Loren Fishman Make SenseEpisode 92: Are You Getting Dexa Scammed? 1984 Sinaki paper  2002 Sinaki paper 

In this episode of the Movement Logic podcast, Laurel and Sarah dissect a recent email they received from Dr. Loren Fishman, in which he expressed frustration over their critique of his study on yoga and bone density.  In this episode, they address Fishman's email and take another look at his study, Twelve-Minute Daily Yoga Regimen Reverses Osteoporotic Bone Loss.  Laurel and Sarah's conversation explores claims made in the email, as well as Fishman's study’s methodology and findings. They compare his claims against established evidence on bone adaptation and emphasize the importance of high-load and high-impact exercise for building bone. They also highlight the need for exercise recommendations to be grounded in solid, evidence-based research—especially for women looking to prevent or reverse osteoporosis and osteopenia.Get on the wait list for our Bone Density Course: Lift for LongevityFollow Movement Logic on Instagram00:00 Introduction00:47 Personal Updates & Course Insights14:25 Critique of Dr. Fishman's Yoga Study52:45 Critique of Yoga's Efficacy in Bone Building53:03 Mechanostat Theory and Bone Adaptation55:18 Challenges in Measuring Yoga's Impact on Bones01:06:17 Dynamic vs. Isometric Contractions in Exercise01:10:20 Unfalsifiable Claims and Scientific Inquiry01:15:16 Turkey Studies and Sustained vs. Intermittent Loading01:18:14 Dynamic Strength Training vs. Impact Training01:18:28 Cellular Accommodation and Running01:19:00 The Importance of Rate of Loading01:21:21 Critique of Yoga for Osteoporosis Claims01:26:24 Red Herrings and False Comparisons01:51:41 Concluding ThoughtsREFERENCESFishman’s StudyThe poses in Fishman’s studyTables of P values and more P values from Fishman’s studyEpisode 79: Make Yoga U Make SenseEpisodes on the Movement Logic podcast 5, 38, 51, 53, 84, and 88 that referenced Fishman’s paper.Episode 56 of the Yoga Research & Beyond podcast that looks at Fishman's paper.LIFTMOR trialLIFTMOR-M trialMedex OP Randomized Controlled TrialMeta-analysis on High-Load Resistance Training (HLRT)Systematic Review on Pilates and YogaBone "mass" and the "mechanostat": a proposal (Frost, 1987)Molecular pathways mediating mechanical signaling in boneEpisode 82: Weird Science1984 and 1985 Turkey Study

In this episode of the Movement Logic Podcast, Sarah and Laurel are thrilled to interview esteemed exercise scientist Professor Belinda Beck, investigator in the groundbreaking LIFTMOR trial. They discuss the necessity of high-intensity resistance and impact training for improving bone density, comparing it to less effective exercises like Pilates, yoga, and walking. Professor Beck shares insights on her LIFTMOR, LIFTMOR-M, and MEDEX-OP studies, underlining the importance of mechanical loading for bone health. They explore the misleading promotion of devices like OsteoStrong or courses like Buff Bones that do not provide the necessary rate of loading or magnitude of load to impact bone density. The conversation elucidates the mechanisms of bone adaptation and defends high-intensity training as essential for combating osteoporosis.00:20 Bone Density Course Progress06:28 Guest Introduction08:25 Interview with Professor Belinda Beck16:59 Understanding Bone Health and Research23:46 Bone Adaptation and Remodeling36:15 Bone Remodeling and Exercise Breaks37:52 Exercise Types and Bone Response39:35 Strength Training and Client Engagement42:37 Effective Exercise for Osteoporosis44:00 Impact of Weight-Bearing Activities48:47 High-Intensity Training for Older Adults53:14 Impact Training and Bone Health01:02:12 Marketing vs. Science in Osteoporosis Treatment01:04:09 Comparing Exercise Programs for Bone HealthReferences:Get on the wait list for our Bone Density CourseOnero at the Bone ClinicBecome an Onero ProviderHigh-Intensity Resistance and Impact Training Improves Bone Mineral Density and Physical Function in Postmenopausal Women With Osteopenia and Osteoporosis: The LIFTMOR Randomized Controlled TrialA Comparison of Bone-Targeted Exercise Strategies to Reduce Fracture Risk in Middle-Aged and Older Men with Osteopenia and Osteoporosis: LIFTMOR-M Semi-Randomized Controlled TrialA Comparison of Bone-Targeted Exercise With and Without Antiresorptive Bone Medication to Reduce Indices of Fracture Risk in Postmenopausal Women With Low Bone Mass: The MEDEX-OP Randomized Controlled TrialREMS Echolight Bone ScanPaul Grilley Bone PhotographsMechanosensitivity of the rat skeleton decreases after a long period of loading, but is improved with time offEpisode 53: Your Bones Are BoredExercise to prevent falls in older adults: an updated systematic review and meta-analysisOptimum frequency of exercise for bone health: randomised controlled trial of a high-impact unilateral interventionOsteostrong: 3 Things You Should KnowTwelve-Minute Daily Yoga Regimen Reverses Osteoporotic Bone LossBuff Bones

We start off Season 6 with Part 1 of our 3 Part series on Longevity. What are the capacities we need to retain or develop in order to continue to live the lives we want to at the end of our lives? In Part 1, hosts Sarah Court and Laurel Beversdorf dive deep into the capacity of strength. We discuss the difference between strength endurance and maximal strength, and the myriad benefits of heavy strength training at any age. The episode includes discussions on common functional mobility tests for seniors, the neural adaptations resulting from heavy lifting, and practical guidelines for transitioning from endurance strength to heavy weights. Sarah and Laurel emphasize the long-term advantages of incorporating heavy lifting into regular exercise routines.00:00 Welcome to Season Six00:19 Couch Recording Fun01:14 Notes from the Bone Density Course04:59 Three-Part Series Introduction06:09 Strength and Longevity21:52 Strength Endurance Explained35:03 Maximal Dynamic Strength vs Isometric Strength42:44 Functional Tests for Seniors51:04  The Timed Up and Go Test54:29 Understanding Grip Strength and Its Importance01:11:42 The Five Times Sit to Stand Test01:13:38 Building Strength Endurance01:18:16 The Benefits of Heavy Strength Training01:33:53 Improving Bone Density Through Strength Training01:39:28 Enhancing Metabolic Function with Strength Training01:42:26 The Value of Strength for Longevity01:45:27 Conclusion and Final ThoughtsLinks:Timed Up and Go Test5x Sit to Stand TestSign up here to get on the Bone Density Course wait list and receive free content and the only available discount!

In this episode of the Movement Logic Podcast, host Laurel Beversdorf explores the concept of 'dead butt syndrome' or 'gluteal amnesia', debunking both as a non-evidence-based myths perpetuated in fitness and health discussions. Laurel discusses the misleading information in a recent New York Times article titled Sitting All Day Can Cause Dead Butt Syndrome, and emphasizes the importance of evidence-based terms and ideas in understanding pain and body function. She outlines the dangers of accepting unsupported medical terms, advises on better exercise practices, and stresses the significance of regular, whole-body strength training for overall health. Listener feedback is also addressed, touching on the podcast's approach to myth-busting and health education.00:00 Introduction and Personal Check-In01:17 Understanding Dead Butt Syndrome03:03 Debunking the Myth: Evidence and Expert Opinions06:10 Critique of the New York Times Article09:12 Addressing Listener Feedback12:51 The Problem with Sensationalism in Media16:45 The Complexity of Pain and Misleading Diagnoses32:28 Exploring Gluteus Maximus Firing Patterns33:11 Factors Predicting Athletic Injuries33:48 Critiquing the New York Times Article34:18 Debunking Gluteal Amnesia Myths36:02 The Problem with Pathologizing Normal44:23 Understanding Muscle Cramping56:45 Effective Movement and Pain Prevention58:23 Upcoming Classes and CoursesFree offerings mentioned in this podcast:Take a free class with Laurel and get the replay - Escape the Gride: A Multi-Planar Banded FlowGet on the Waitlist for Bone Density Course and get the only discount for Spring 2025 cohortGet the free Bone Density Mini-Course: Barbell 101Resources mentioned in this podcast:Greg Lehman on "Trojan horsing" Conspirituality Podcast on Post-Truth AmericaSitting All Day Can Cause Dead Butt SyndromeHave the Butt Muscles of the World Gone Silent?Muscle Recruitment Patterns During the Prone Leg ExtensionTest showing more gm activity in presence of painPeople with low back pain do not have a delayed firing of GM

In this very special Inbetweenie, we're interviewed by Dr. Adam McAtee, PT, on his Evidence-Based Pilates podcast to talk all things bone density.You will learn:· The 3 aspects that make up bone strength: BMD, bone size, and bone architecture· Catabolism and anabolism across your lifespan· Why Pilates and yoga aren’t going to cut it long term for bone building· How weight bearing and weight lifting are not the same thing· What types of exercise will impact bone density· How and why intensity is relative· Why a jumpboard on a reformer does not count as impact trainingAnd more!Links:Get our free Bone Density Mini Course by signing up for our mailing list2-Week Free Trial of the Anatomy & Biomechanics Club: https://www.evidence-basedpilates.com/anatomy-and-biomechanics-club-2-week-free-trialAdam's Instagram handle: https://www.instagram.com/adammcateepilates/

In this in-between episode of the Movement Logic Podcast, Laurel discusses two major myths: the longevity significance of grip strength and the role of single leg exercises in improving balance. The discussion touches on the misinterpretations of grip strength's correlation with health and longevity, different types of grip and their training, and the genetic factors influencing grip strength. It also covers the efficacy of using gloves and straps. Additionally, the episode explores how single leg exercises contribute to overall strength and balance, challenging the notion that these exercises are essential for improving balance and athletic performance. 00:00 Introduction to Mythmas Season00:47 Debunking the Grip Strength Myth04:49 Understanding Different Types of Grip08:54 The Role of Genetics in Grip Strength17:25 Exploring Single Leg Exercises22:50 Benefits and Misconceptions of Unilateral Exercises31:09 Conclusion and Free Mini Course OfferGrab our Free Mini Course: Barbell 101Barbell GuideStronger By Science: The Evidence-Based Guide to Grip Strength Training & Forearm Muscle Development

In this in-between episode of the Movement Logic Podcast, Sarah discusses a new product for osteopenia called Osteoboost, a wearable medical device that uses gentle vibrations to improve bone density and strength, offering a non-invasive alternative to traditional treatments. Sarah delves into the research behind the device, its FDA clearance, and its effectiveness compared to medication and exercise. She emphasizes the importance of heavy lifting for bone health, and expresses concerns about people relying solely on passive treatments like Osteoboost instead of engaging in comprehensive exercise routines.00:00 Introduction and Episode Overview02:20 Introduction to Osteoboost03:00 How Osteoboost Works04:30 Research and Development Behind Osteoboost09:30 Clinical Trials and Results13:37 Comparing Osteoboost to Traditional Treatments17:21 Final Thoughts and RecommendationsOsteoboost websiteWellen websiteClick here to get on our mailing list for a FREE barbell mini course, access to discounts on our full Bone Density Program, and more!

In this solo episode of the Movement Logic Podcast, Laurel Beversdorf dives into the topic of exercise recovery. She differentiates between the physiological 'Big R' recovery and the 'little r' recovery, or aggressively marketed “recovery optimization” practices that the wellness industry loves to sell. Laurel discusses how sleep, nutrition, and strategic exercise stress management are critical to effective “big R’ recovery and clarifies why many marketed recovery methods may not be as effective as claimed. She emphasizes the importance of balancing exercise with adequate recovery to prevent injuries and achieve the positive adaptations and health outcomes we’re looking for when we exercise.Sign up for our free Bone Density Mini Course here!00:00 Introduction to exercise recovery01:23 Understanding recovery: the basics02:37 The rise of commercialized recovery “optimization practices” and why these are different from the recovery your body will do on its own if you let it.03:56 The essentials of recovery - time, resources, and strategy07:55 Misconceptions surrounding “recovery optimization” practices09:55 The importance of exercise12:27 Balancing exercise and recovery18:54 Practical tips for effective recovery28:26 Final thoughts and encouragementLinks:Good to Go: What the Athlete in All of Us Can Learn from the Strange Science of Recovery by Christie AschwandenDr Steph Mundt - managing bone stress injuries and relative energy deficiency in our athletes on the Movement Optimism podcastPost-exercise cold water immersion attenuates acute anabolic signalling and long-term adaptations in muscle to strength trainingResearch on cool downs:Pernigoni et al (2023) PMID: 37039750Afonso et al (2021) PMID: 34025459Mechelen et al (1993) PMID: 8238713CDC -  General Physical Activity GuidelinesLaurel's Instagram post about recovery

Welcome to Episode 84 of the Movement Logic podcast! In this Inbetweenie, Laurel and Sarah Court discuss health misinformation and practical tips for spotting misinformation around exercise for osteoporosis, “in the wild”.00:00 Introduction 01:07 Bone Density Course update02:22 Continuing the discussion on science and pseudoscience04:56 Yoga U email and legal considerations08:14 Six tricks of non-evidence based advice20:45 Spotting pseudoscience and critical thinking33:45 Becoming more science literate35:45 Conclusion SIGN UP FOR OUR FREE BONE DENSITY MINI COURSE: BARBELL 101Links:Episode 79: Make Yoga U Make SenseAlignment Dogma series parts 1, 2, and 3The Skeptic's Guide to the UniverseYoga Research & Beyond podcast with Jules Mitchell & Ariana RavenAdam Meakins on IGGreg Lehman's Blog

Welcome to Episode 83 of the Movement Logic podcast! In this Inbetweenie episode, Sarah discusses the importance of ‘banking’ capacities like strength, balance, and endurance, in order to have the best possible last 10 years of your life. Drawing from some real-life encounters, she compares how two very different lifestyle choices have led to two very different final decades for two women.Sign up for our free Bone Density Mini Course here!Links:Outlive: The Science and Art of Longevity

Welcome to Season 5, Episode 82 of the Movement Logic podcast! In this episode, Laurel and Sarah navigate the worlds of science, pseudoscience, and outdated science.We’ll be looking at claims from a range of topics, including crystals, Reiki, and Ayurveda, to personality tests, fad diets, yoga, Pilates, physical therapy and CAM treatments.Our discussion is organized around the "non-negotiable ingredients" of a science-based claim to separate pseudoscience from outdated ideas and solidly science-based claims.REFERENCES: Posture Panic: Pt. 1, 2, and 3,Dexa Scammed?, Walk Your Bones Stronger?, Knee Myths, McGill - 62 and 74, Meakins, Long & Lean: Pt. 1, 2, and 3, Make Yoga U Make Sense, Alignment Dogma: Shoulders, Spine, and Pelvis, Nutrition, Yoga w Jake, Conspirituality on Terrence Howard, Unbiased Science: Acupuncture, Cupping, Decoding the Gurus, Maintenance Phase Myers-Briggs, Beall's List, Onero

Welcome to Episode 81 of the Movement Logic podcast! In this episode, Laurel and Sarah talk to four women who took the Bone Density Course: Lift for Longevity last year about their experiences. Whether it’s reversing an osteoporosis diagnosis, to feeling more capable in all aspects of their lives, each woman has a unique perspective on their experience to share. In this episode you will hear from: Bea, who first discovered yoga from a book back in the 80s, and became a long-time yoga teacher, but who realized over time that was missing the strength part. Kathy, a private yoga teacher from Washington, D.C. She came across Movement Logic on social media and after receiving a diagnosis of osteoporosis, decided she wanted to try and overcome it using heavy lifting. Bridgette, a 48-year-old yoga teacher from Canada, who is currently in perimenopause, and wanted to address the symptoms that she was experiencing as well as shore up some solid bones. Samm, a Pilates instructor and sports massage therapist from England, who got into Pilates to try and help her bad back. She found us through our podcast, and had no hesitation in signing up to get stronger.Only a few days left to sign up for this year’s Bone Density Course: Lift for Longevity - so don’t delay!

Welcome to Episode 80 of the Movement Logic podcast! In this episode, Laurel and Sarah are joined by Dr. Beth Linker, PhD. Beth Linker, a former physical therapist, is an author and professor of the history of science, disability, and medicine at the University of Pennsylvania. Her most recent book, Slouch: Posture Panic in Modern America, reveals the little-known and surprising origins of our fears and ideas about poor posture. In this episode you will learn: How Dr. Linker transitioned from physical therapist to professor and author, and (then also) yoga teacher Where her interest in posture first began The most surprising discovery she made while writing her book on the history of posture The origin of physical therapy That the modern postural yoga practice is not a centuries old practice How opinions about good and bad posture influence the judgment calls made on people’s competence and character The relationship between posture-shaming and disability discrimination. The difference between posture correction and posture modification The value of posture modification for different individuals What a positive shift might look like with regards to changing society’s attitudes toward posture inactivity.Sign up here for our FREE Live Strength Class (and sample our Bone Density Course) on September 19th at 8:30am PT/11:30am ET with free replay!Reference links:Slouch: Posture Panic in Modern America, by Beth LinkerYoga Body: The Origins of Modern Posture Practice Episode 73: Posture Panic Pt. 1Episode 76: Posture Panic Pt. 2