All Episodes
Everything Hertz — 195 episodes
195: Living meta-analysis
194: Author verification
193: The pop-up journal
192: Outsourcing in academia
191: Cleaning up contaminated medical treatment guidelines
190: What happens when you pay reviewers?
189: Crit me baby, one more time
188: Double-blind peer review vs. scientific integrity
187: What started the replication crisis era?
186: Evaluating journal quality
185: The Retraction
184: A race to the bottom
183: Too beautiful to be true
182: What practices should the behavioural sciences borrow (and ignore) from other research fields?
181: Down the rabbit hole
180: Consortium peer reviews
179: Discovery vs. maintenance
178: Alerting researchers about retractions
177: Plagiarism
176: Tracking academic workloads
175: Defending against the scientific dark arts
174: Smug missionaries with test tubes
173: How do science journalists evaluate psychology papers?
172: In defence of the discussion section
171: The easiest person to fool is yourself (with Daniel Simons and Christopher Chabris)
170: Holy sheet
169: Using big data to understand behavior (Live episode with Sandra Matz)
168: Meta-meta-science
167: Diluted effect sizes
166: Is science becoming less disruptive over time?
165: Self-promotion
164: The great migration
163: eLife's new peer review model
162: Status bias in peer review
161: The memo (with Brian Nosek)
160: Whistleblowing
159: Peer review isn't working (with Saloni Dattani)
158: Word limits
157: Limitations
156: Looking for seeders
155: Don't you know who I am?
154: When the evidence is constructed around the narrative
153: Shame shame shame
152: Sorry Not Sorry
151: The dirty dozen
150: Why can't you do nothing?
149: Medical misinformation (with Rohin Francis)
148: Academic reference letters
147: The $7000 golden ticket
146: Skills pay bills
145: Our boat is sinking slightly slower
144: The role of luck in academia
143: A little less conversation, a little more action
142: Red flags in academia [Live episode]
141: Why we should diversify study samples (with Sakshi Ghai)
140: You can’t buy cat biscuits with ‘thank you’ emails
139: Open science from a funder's perspective (with Ashley Farley)
138: Preprints in the time of coronavirus (with Michele Avissar-Whiting)
137: Ten rules for improving academic work-life balance
136: Who peer-reviews the peer-reviewed journals?
135: A loss of confidence
134: Paywalled questionnaires
133: Manuscript submission fees
132: Post-pandemic academia
131: Long live the overhead projector!
130: Normalizing retractions (with Dorothy Bishop)
129: Transparency audits
128: How do you generate new research ideas?
127: Speak up or shut up?
126: The division of scientific labor (with Saloni Dattani)
125: Upon reasonable request
124: From Ptolemy to Takeshi's Castle
123: Authenticated anonymity (with Michael Eisen)
122: Reoptimizing scientific publishing for the internet age (with Michael Eisen)
121: Transparent peer review
120: How false beliefs spread in science (with Cailin O'Connor)
119: Rules of thumb
118: Evidence-free gatekeeping
117: How we peer-review papers
116: In my opinion
115: A modest proposal
114: Diversity in science (with Jess Wade)
113: Citation needed
112: Leaving academia
111: The cumulative advantage of academic capital (with Chris Jackson)
110: Red flags for errors in papers
109: Open scientific publishing [Live episode]
108: Requiem for a Screen
107: Memes, TikTok, and science communication (with Chelsea Parlett-Pelleriti)
106: Science on the run
105: Tell it like it is (with Marike Schiffer)
104: Now we'll discover which meetings could've been emails
103: Swiping right
102: Master of none
101: Punishing research misconduct
100: Hundredth episode live special (with Daniel Lakens, Amy Orben, and Chris Chambers)
99: Science advocacy
98: Episode titles are redundant, at best (with Sophia Crüwell)
97: Slow science
96: The chaotic state of doctoral research
95: All good presentations are alike; each bad presentation is bad in its own way
94: Predicting the replicability of research
93: Double-blind peer review vs. open science
92: Chaos in the brickyard
91: Shifting the goalposts in statistics (with Kristin Sainani)
90: Mo data mo problems
89: Conflicts of interest in psychology (with Tom Chivers)
88: The pomodoro episode
87: Improving the scientific poster (with Mike Morrison)
86: Should I stay or should I go?
85: GWAS big teeth you have, grandmother (with Kevin Mitchell)
84: A GPS in the Garden of Forking Paths (with Amy Orben)
83: Back to our dirty unwashed roots
82: More janitors and fewer architects
81: Too Young To Know, Too Old To Care
80: Cites are not endorsements (with Sean Rife)
79: Clinical trial reporting (with Henry Drysdale)
78: Large-scale collaborative science (with Lisa DeBruine)
77: Promiscuous expertise
76: Open peer review
75: Overlay journals (with Daniele Marinazzo)
74: Seeing double (with Elisabeth Bik)
73: Update your damn syllabus
72: Anonymity in scientific publishing
71: Moving for your job
70: Doubling-blinding dog balls
69: Open science tools (with Brian Nosek)
68: Friends don’t let friends believe in impact factors (with Nathan Hall)
67: Shit Academics Say (with Nathan Hall)
66: Ideal worlds vs grim truths
65: Blockchain and open science (with Jon Brock)
64: Salami slicing
63: Science journalism (with Brian Resnick)
62: Adopting open science practices (with Dorothy Bishop)
61: Performance enhancing thugs (with Greg Nuckols)
60: This is more of a comment than a question
59: Rethinking the scientific journal (with Rickard Carlsson)
58: Lessons from podcasting (with Simine Vazire)
57: Radical Transparency (with Rebecca Willén)
56: Registered reports (with Chris Chambers)
55: The proposal to redefine clinical trials
54: Cuckoo Science
53: Skin in the game
52: Give p's a chance (with Daniel Lakens)
51: Preprints (with Jessica Polka)
50: Special 50th episode (LIVE)
49: War and p's
48: Breaking up with the impact factor (with Jason Hoyt)
47: Truth bombs from a methodological freedom fighter (with Anne Scheel)
46: Statistical literacy (with Andy Field)
45: Conferences and conspiracy theories
44: Who’s afraid of the New Bad People? (with Nick Brown)
43: Death, taxes, and publication bias in meta-analysis (with Daniel Lakens)
42: Some of my best friends are Bayesians (with Daniel Lakens)
41: Objecting to published research (with William Gunn)
40: Meta-research (with Michèle Nuijten)
39: Academic hipsters
38: Work/life balance - Part 2
37: Work/life balance in academia
36: Statistical inconsistencies in published research
35: A manifesto for reproducible science
34: E-health (with Robin Kok)
33: Zombie theories
32: Can worrying about getting sick make you sicker?
31: Discover your psychiatric risk with this one weird trick
30: Authorship
29: Learning new skills
28: Positive developments in biomedical science
27: Complaints and grievances
26: Interpreting effect sizes
25: Misunderstanding p-values
24: Incentive structures in science
23: Serious academics
22: Pokemon and public health
21: This is your brain on steroids
20: Sample sizes in psychology studies
19: Let us spray: oxytocin and spirituality
18: Data sharing
17: Journals: Do we need them?
16: What makes a good psych study?
15: Software and coding
14: Science communication
13: Academic horror stories
12: Reporting heart rate variability studies
11: The placebo effect
10: Failure
9: What happens if your research is wrong?
8: The PhD to Postdoc transition
Episode 7: 7: The writing process
6: The research pipeline - getting from idea to publication
5: Do you even replicate?
4: Meta-analysis or mega-silliness?
3: Scientific publishing
2: Nutrition and Psychiatry
1: So you want to measure heart rate variability...