All Episodes

Case Explained: SINGH V. BLANCHE

Case Explained: Liberty Global v. United States

Case Explained: Miller v. Mitchell

Case Explained: KYICK HOLDINGS, LLC, Transferee v. COMMISSIONER OF INTERNAL REVENUE SERVICE

Case Explained: ANN JOHNSON as the representative of a class of similarly situated persons, and v. RUSSELL INVESTMENT MANAGEMENT, LLC RUSSELL INVESTMENTS TRUST COMPANY f.k.a. Russell Trust Company ROYAL CARIBBEAN CRUISES LTD ROYAL CARIBBEAN CRUISES LTD USCA11 Case: 25-10692 Document: 76-1 Date Filed: 08/17/2026 Page: 1 of 14 2

Case Explained: Non-Argument Calendar UNITED STATES OF AMERICA v. DUBER DARIO TORRES TAPIAS

Case Explained: JIANGMEN BENLIDA PRINTED CIRCUIT CO., LTD. Plaintiff-Counter Defendant ROK PRINTED CIRCUIT CO., LTD v. CIRCUITRONIX, LLC Defendant-Counter

Case Explained: United States v. Clements

Case Explained: ERNEST N. FINLEY, JR. JENNIFER M. REAVES v. STEVEN L. REED in both his official and individual capacities, et al THOMAS ALBRITTON CYNTHIA RAULSTON BYRON BUTLER

Case Explained: Non-Argument Calendar UNITED STATES OF AMERICA v. BARRETT PURVIS

Case Explained: GREENBRIER MINERALS, LLC, as insured through SummitPoint Insurance Company v. DIRECTOR, OFFICE OF WORKERS’ COMPENSATION PROGRAMS UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF LABOR; CARL E. LILLY

Case Explained: Non-Argument Calendar COMMODITY FUTURES TRADING COMMISSION v. EMPIRES CONSULTING CORP., et al JOSHUA DAVID NICHOLAS

Case Explained: UNITED STATES OF AMERICA v. JAMES AARON HABURN

Case Explained: UNITED STATES OF AMERICA v. JAMES EVANS HUGHES

Case Explained: DEREK FIELDS v. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA

Case Explained: Andrew v. Tinsley

Case Explained: UNITED STATES OF AMERICA and THE STATE OF ILLINOIS, EX REL. A. SAMUEL ENLOE v. HERITAGE OPERATIONS GROUP, LLC, and GREEN TREE PHARMACY, INC

Case Explained: TOMMY GIGUERE v. STACY TARDIF

Case Explained: Non-Argument Calendar UNITED STATES OF AMERICA v. WILLIAM CHARLES FRANKLIN

Case Explained: Raya Nsheiwat v. Walmart, Inc

Case Explained: United States of America v. Nicholas Joseph Peterson

Case Explained: UNITED STATES OF AMERICA v. JOSE TAVARES

Case Explained: Jessica Ann McKee v. Jessica J. Brady, in her individual as well as her official capacity as a nurse at the Steele County Detention Center Defendant – Appellant Steele County

Case Explained: United States of America v. Anfernee Rondeau

Case Explained: Nuria Maricela Argueta-Rodriguez; J.I.C.A.; Gilman Ernesto Cortez Cucufute; Josseline Gilmary Cortez-Argueta v. Todd Blanche, Attorney General of the United States1

Case Explained: RUSOFF, ET AL. V. THE HAPPY GROUP, INC.

Case Explained: USA V. CASTRO, JR.

Case Explained: GRACIANI V. PROVIDENCE HEALTH AND SERVICES – OREGON, ET AL.

Case Explained: BODDEN V. DREESEN, ET AL.

Case Explained: UNITED STATES OF AMERICA Plaintiff – v. DANNY T. RONEY

Case Explained: BLAKE WARNER v. HILLSBOROUGH COUNTY CLERK OF COURTS

Case Explained: CENTER FOR BIOLOGICAL DIVERSITY, ET AL. V. UNITED STATES BUREAU OF RECLAMATION, ET AL.

Case Explained: USA V. SMITH

Case Explained: Kenneth Hunt v. Dale Acosta, Marianna Police Officer, in his individual and official capacity Martin Wilson, Chief of Police, in his individual and official capacity; Jimmy Williams, Marianna Mayor, in his individual and official capacity; City of Marianna, Arkansas

Case Explained: USA V. JACKSON

Case Explained: USA V. ENRIQUEZ

Case Explained: USA V. SALAZAR DEL REAL

Case Explained: VINITHA R. ROBINSON v. HABERSHAM COUNTY BOARD OF COMMISSIONERS PHILLIP SUTTON Individual Capacity HABERSHAM COUNTY

Case Explained: USA V. HERNANDEZ-ZAMORA

Case Explained: USA V. ENRIQUEZ

Case Explained: USA V. SALAZAR DEL REAL

Case Explained: 26a0233p.06

Case Explained: 26-1590: BOYER v. MSPB [ORDER], Nonprecedential

Case Explained: JOSE ARCENIO ARISTY-ROSA v. ATTORNEY GENERAL OF THE UNITED STATES OF AMERICA

Case Explained: UNITED STATES OF AMERICA v. RICARDO VILLANUEVA-MARTINEZ

Case Explained: United States v. Garley

Case Explained: DORCAS INTERNATIONAL INSTITUTE OF RHODE ISLAND; REFUGEE DREAM CENTER; SERVICE EMPLOYEES INTERNATIONAL UNION; INTERNATIONAL UNION UNITED AUTOMOBILE, AEROSPACE AND AGRICULTURAL IMPLEMENT WORKERS OF AMERICA; AFRICAN COMMUNITIES TOGETHER; VENEZUELAN ASSOCIATION OF MASSACHUSETTS; PARTNERSHIP FOR THE ADVANCEMENT OF NEW AMERICANS; AMERICAN GATEWAYS v. UNITED STATED CITIZENSHIP AND IMMIGRATION SERVICES; JOSEPH EDLOW, in the official capacity as Director of the United States Citizenship and Immigration Services; DEPARTMENT OF HOMELAND SECURITY; MARKWAYNE MULLIN, in the official capacity as Secretary of the Department of Homeland Security Before Montecalvo, Aframe, and Dunlap Circuit Judges

Case Explained: AECOM Technical Services v. Flatiron | AECOM

Case Explained: Ntwari v. Bondi

Case Explained: Non-Argument Calendar SHAUNDA SANDERS MAURICE SANDERS v. ELMINGTON PROPERTY MANAGEMENT, LLC 101 DAVENPORT DRIVE HOLDINGS, LLC SOUTHEAST MULTI-FAMILY PARTNERS, LLC DAVID DESHONG SHIELD SECURITY SOLUTIONS, LLC, et al USCA11 Case: 25-12729 Document: 29-1 Date Filed: 08/14/2026 Page: 1 of 7 2

Case Explained: Non-Argument Calendar DWIGHT SMITH CATHERINE SMITH BRYANT SMITH v. CITY OF JOHNS CREEK, GA a Municipality in the State of Georgia ERIC EHRENREICH BRADLEYROSENQUIST MICHAEL BACON JAMES TAIT, et al USCA11 Case: 26-11526 Document: 13-1 Date Filed: 08/14/2026 Page: 1 of 3 2

Case Explained: UNITED STATES OF AMERICA v. EARL LEROY GRIFFIN, JR

Case Explained: DONALD HERRINGTON v. JOSEPH WALTERS

Case Explained: UNITED STATES OF AMERICA v. TERRANCE LAMONT MOORE

Case Explained: Medina v. Hansen, et al.

Case Explained: ALYSE SANCHEZ; ELMER ONAN SANCHEZ HERNANDEZ; AMIRA ABBAS ABDALLA; JEAN CLAUDE EYEGHE-NANA; THERESA RODRIGUEZ PENA; MISAEL RODRIGUEZ PENA; OLIVIA ALDANA MARTINEZ; JOSE CARLOS ALDANA MARTINEZ; TATYANA MURITHI; MWITI MURITHI; BIBIANA NDULA; ERIC NDULA Plaintiffs – v. MARKWAYNE MULLIN, Secretary, Department of Homeland Security; CALEB VITELLO, Acting Director, Immigration & Customs Enforcement; MATTHEW ELLISTON, Director, Maryland Field Office of ICE Enforcement & Removal Operations Defendants – Appellants —————————— IMMIGRATION REFORM LAW INSTITUTE Amicus Supporting

Case Explained: Non-Argument Calendar SCOTT WILLIAM CARTLIDGE v. ACTING COMMISSIONER OF THE SOCIAL SECURITY ADMINISTRATION

Case Explained: JOHNNIE L. SAVORY v. ALLEN ANDREWS, et al

Case Explained: UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE SIXTH CIRCUIT UNITED STATES OF AMERICA v. QUANTRESE BRAZZELL ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) )

Case Explained: SANDRA HUNTER and MARLA STRAPPE v. ELANCO ANIMAL HEALTH INCORPORATED, et al

Case Explained: UNITED STATES OF AMERICA v. ZERION MARCOS FRANKLIN

Case Explained: Astrid Lucero Matias-Pablo; E.J.E.V.M v. Todd Blanche, Attorney General of the United States

Case Explained: LYNNETTE J. KAISER v. ALCOA USA CORP., et al

Case Explained: IRMA HERRERA v. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA

Case Explained: 26a0231p.06

Case Explained: 26a0234p.06

Case Explained: JOSE BACA-HERNANDEZ V. TODD BLANCHE

Case Explained: ANDREW BROWN V. RON BROOMFIELD

Case Explained: MAHAMAT KHALID V. TODD BLANCHE

Case Explained: JOSE BACA-HERNANDEZ V. MERRICK GARLAND

Case Explained: CORDOVA VELASCO V. BLANCHE

Case Explained: USA V. TULALI

Case Explained: SFR INVESTMENTS POOL 1, LLC V. BANK OF AMERICA, N.A.

Case Explained: GOLDEN CREEK HOLDINGS, INC. V. MTC FINANCIAL, INC., ET AL.

Case Explained: VIJAYRAGHAVAN V. COHAN, ET AL.

Case Explained: HUGHES, ET AL. V. AMERICAN STRATEGIC INSURANCE CORP., ET AL.

Case Explained: DE LAS CASAS CHIRINOS V. BLANCHE

Case Explained: KLAWONN V. BOARD OF DIRECTORS FOR THE MOTION PICTURE INDUSTRY PENSION PLANS, ET AL.

Case Explained: DAWSON, ET AL. V. TARGET CORPORATION, ET AL.

Case Explained: ARMES V. BISIGNANO

Case Explained: DE LEON-DOMINGO, ET AL. V. BLANCHE

Case Explained: USA V. DELUMEAU

Case Explained: MATEO-MATEO, ET AL. V. BLANCHE

Case Explained: VEGA-OSUNA V. BLANCHE

Case Explained: ORELLANA BELTRAN V. BLANCHE

Case Explained: QUEERDOC, PLLC V. DOJ – UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE

Case Explained: RIVERA-LOPEZ V. BLANCHE

Case Explained: KAUR, ET AL. V. BLANCHE

Case Explained: BRIMER v. NAVY

Case Explained: SZ DJI TECHNOLOGY CO., LTD. AND SZ DJI BAIWANG TECHNOLOGY CO., LTD v. UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF DEFENSE

Case Explained: 25-1371: NIELSEN COMPANY (US), LLC v. TVISION INSIGHTS, INC. [OPINION], Precedential

Case Explained: JACKI EASLICK, LLC v. CJ EMERALD

Case Explained: 26-1907: TECHNATOMY CORP. v. US [ORDER], Nonprecedential

Case Explained: RAMONA MATOS RODRIGUEZ v. PAN AMERICAN HEALTH ORGANIZATION JOAQUIN MOLINA

Case Explained: 24-2166: CUMMINS v. US [OPINION], Nonprecedential

Case Explained: 26a0232p.06

Case Explained: KLAWONN V. BOARD OF DIRECTORS FOR THE MOTION PICTURE INDUSTRY PENSION PLANS, ET AL.

Case Explained: Charles L. Burgett v. Frank Bisignano, Commissioner of Social Security

Case Explained: Non-Argument Calendar UNITED STATES OF AMERICA v. HENRY ABDO

Case Explained: RALPH G. EVANS v. COMMISSIONER OF INTERNAL REVENUE Petitions for Review of a Decision of the U.S. Tax Court

Case Explained: IN RE: THE FINANCIAL OVERSIGHT AND MANAGEMENT BOARD FOR PUERTO RICO, as Representative for the Commonwealth of Puerto Rico; THE FINANCIAL OVERSIGHT AND MANAGEMENT BOARD FOR PUERTO RICO, as Representative for the Employees Retirement System of the Government of the Commonwealth of Puerto Rico; THE FINANCIAL OVERSIGHT AND MANAGEMENT BOARD FOR PUERTO RICO, as Representative for the Puerto Rico Highways and Transportation Authority; THE FINANCIAL OVERSIGHT AND MANAGEMENT BOARD FOR PUERTO RICO, as Representative for the Puerto Rico Electric Power Authority (PREPA); THE FINANCIAL OVERSIGHT AND MANAGEMENT BOARD FOR PUERTO RICO, as Representative of the Puerto Rico Public Buildings Authority Debtors LUMA ENERGY, LLC; LUMA ENERGY SERVCO, LLC v. PUERTO RICO DEPARTMENT OF CONSUMER AFFAIRS (DACO); INSTITUTO DE COMPETITIVIDAD Y SOSTENIBILIDAD ECONÓMICA (ICSE)

Case Explained: United States v. Gigena

Case Explained: UNITED STATES OF AMERICA v. THOMAS JAMES SHEELY, JR

Case Explained: Non-Argument Calendar UNITED STATES OF AMERICA v. TIMOTHY ALLEN ARTHUR

Case Explained: Non-Argument Calendar UNITED STATES OF AMERICA v. JELYSSA RENEA WASHINGTON

Case Explained: United States v. Moreno

Case Explained: Non-Argument Calendar ERVIN JOINER v. HOUSTON COUNTY SHERIFF DEPARTMENT

Case Explained: Non-Argument Calendar UNITED STATES OF AMERICA v. KYLE KERIAN MAHARAJ

Case Explained: Non-Argument Calendar UNITED STATES OF AMERICA v. EDUARDO PALOMEQUE

Case Explained: GERSEN GABRIEL v. DSM BIOMEDICAL, INC

Case Explained: (2:21-cv-00316) B.P.J., by her next friend and mother; HEATHER JACKSON Plaintiffs – v. WEST VIRGINIA STATE BOARD OF EDUCATION; HARRISON COUNTY BOARD OF EDUCATION; WEST VIRGINIA SECONDARY SCHOOL ACTIVITIES COMMISSION; W. CLAYTON BURCH

Case Explained: Non-Argument Calendar JOHN SHUNG v. SECRETARY OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES

Case Explained: ARTHUR JONES v. WARDEN BUCKINGHAM DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS COMMONWEALTH OF VIRGINIA

Case Explained: EDDIE STEWART Plaintiff – v. GES RECYCLING SOUTH CAROLINA LLC Defendant –

Case Explained: 26a0229p.06

Case Explained: (L), 25-4664 UNITED STATES OF AMERICA Plaintiff – v. CORTEZ DESEAN IRELAND Defendant – Appellant Appeals from the United States District Court for the Middle District of North Carolina, at Greensboro. Thomas D. Schroeder, District Judge. (1:20-cr-00217-TDS-1; 1:24-cr-00310- TDS-1)

Case Explained: UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE SIXTH CIRCUIT CORNELIUS PHELPS v. CITY OF SAGINAW, MICHIGAN, a municipal corporation; FRATERNAL ORDER OF POLICE ASSOCIATES, RAY JANNI LODGE, INC.; VINCENT JACKSON; DESIRAE KZINOWEK; OSCAR LOPEZ; FRATERNAL ORDER OF POLICE OF SAGINAW, INC TERRANCE MOORE, in his individual and official capacities ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ON APPEAL FROM THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF MICHIGAN

Case Explained: UNITED STATES OF AMERICA v. JOHN AUSTIN PERKINS, III

Case Explained: UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE SIXTH CIRCUIT ALA RAHIM YONAN v. TODD BLANCHE, Attorney General ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) )

Case Explained: UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE SIXTH CIRCUIT AARON DAVIS v. TYLER W.A. DUNCAN DALE R. OSBORN, et al ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) )

Case Explained: FinalOpinion in case# 24-2977

Case Explained: JEVARREO KELLEY-LOMAX v. CITY OF CHICAGO, et al

Case Explained: FinalOpinion in case# 24-3017

Case Explained: FinalOpinion in case# 25-1311

Case Explained: FinalOpinion in case# 25-1392

Case Explained: ROBERT D. FERGUSON v. AON RISK SERVICES COMPANIES, INC., et al

Case Explained: FinalOpinion in case# 24-3018

Case Explained: FinalOpinion in case# 25-1964

Case Explained: AISHA PUTNAM v. CARAMELCRISP, LLC d/b/a GARRETT POPCORN SHOPS

Case Explained: United States of America v. Carlos Danacio Traywick

Case Explained: UNITED STATES OF AMERICA v. JERID HINZ

Case Explained: OSCANOA ARELLANO, ET AL. V. BLANCHE

Case Explained: United States of America v. Timothy Paul Cota, Jr

Case Explained: NILSEN, ET AL. V. UNIVERSITY OF WASHINGTON, ET AL.

Case Explained: USA V. HUNTER

Case Explained: UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE SIXTH CIRCUIT ERIC LAMONT THOMAS v. KIM CARGOR, Warden ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) )

Case Explained: SOUTHCENTRAL FOUNDATION V. ALASKA NATIVE TRIBAL HEALTH CONSORTIUM

Case Explained: 26a0228p.06

Case Explained: BANDY, ET AL. V. MOVE, INC., ET AL.

Case Explained: WILLIAMS, ET AL. V. SHAC, LLC, ET AL.

Case Explained: RALPH G. EVANS v. COMMISSIONER OF INTERNAL REVENUE Petitions for Review of a Decision of the U.S. Tax Court

Case Explained: USA V. HUNTER

Case Explained: UNITED STATES OF AMERICA v. JACQUELINE BREWSTER

Case Explained: CENTER FOR BIOLOGICAL DIVERSITY v. U.S. ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY ADMINISTRATOR, U.S. ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY MOSAIC FERTILIZER, LLC

Case Explained: SALOME J. JOHNSON v. BROOKE ARMY MEDICAL CENTER

Case Explained: SINDI BEATRIZ PAZ PINEDA; Z.L.L.P v. TODD BLANCHE, Attorney General

Case Explained: UNITED STATES OF AMERICA v. DANIEL A. BETTY

Case Explained: Marquez-Cortez, et al. v. Bondi

Case Explained: DOE V. WEBGROUP CZECH REPUBLIC, AS, ET AL.

Case Explained: STEWART, ET AL. V. CITY OF TACOMA, ET AL.

Case Explained: TURREY, ET AL. V. VERVENT, INC., ET AL.

Case Explained: E.V., ET AL. V. CITY OF COVINA, ET AL.

Case Explained: EUFRACIO HERRERA, ET AL. V. BLANCHE

Case Explained: MERCER GLOBAL ADVISORS, INC. V. HEWITT, ET AL.

Case Explained: DUDEN V. STATE OF WASHINGTON, ET AL.

Case Explained: CLYBURN V. BISIGNANO

Case Explained: TURREY, ET AL. V. VERVENT, INC., ET AL.

Case Explained: United States v. Reed

Case Explained: KELLY ANN REYNERSON v. COMMISSIONER OF SOCIAL SECURITY

Case Explained: DEVAS MULTIMEDIA PRIVATE LTD. V. ANTRIX CORP. LTD.

Case Explained: UNITED STATES OF AMERICA Plaintiff – v. COLBY EDWARD JOYNER Defendant –

Case Explained: UNITED STATES OF AMERICA v. DEQUAN TYRIE PAYTON

Case Explained: FRANK WILLIAM BONAN, II v. FEDERAL DEPOSIT INSURANCE CORPORATION

Case Explained: United States of America v. Xavier Murry

Case Explained: UNITED STATES OF AMERICA v. CHRISTOPHER LLOYD

Case Explained: United States of America v. Amir Kalomo Mulamba

Case Explained: United States of America v. David Rafael Walker

Case Explained: Shamrock Hills, LLC, doing business as Shamrock Roofing and Construction v. State of Iowa; Iowa Insurance Division; Doug Ommen

Case Explained: United States of America v. Levi Farren Miller

Case Explained: CHUN YU V. TODD BLANCHE

Case Explained: United States of America v. Andre McCoy

Case Explained: 26a0227p.06

Case Explained: USA V. PIGIDA

Case Explained: TURREY, ET AL. V. VERVENT, INC., ET AL.

Case Explained: BRIAN PFALZGRAF v. RUSK COUNTY, WISCONSIN and BEN REISNER

Case Explained: AHMED AL-NOURI V. RUBIO, ET AL.

Case Explained: GRANADOS V. BREITENBACH

Case Explained: DEVAS MULTIMEDIA PRIVATE LTD., ET AL V. ANTRIX CORP. LTD.

Case Explained: MELENDEZ V. UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF HOMELAND SECURITY, ET AL.

Case Explained: DEVAS MULTIMEDIA PRIVATE LTD. V. ANTRIX CORP. LTD.

Case Explained: USA V. PIGIDA

Case Explained: TURREY, ET AL. V. VERVENT, INC., ET AL.

Case Explained: Watson v. DeQuardo, et al.

Case Explained: Mitchell-Pennington v. Installtec

Case Explained: In re ZACHARY RUSK Debtor. —————————— ZACHARY RUSK

Case Explained: ROBERT S. MARTIN as a Trustee of (i) the Martin 2008-A Investment Trust, (ii) as a Trustee of the Martin 2013-A Investment Trust, (iii) as a Trustee of the RPM 2005 Family Trust, and (iv) as a Trustee of the RSM 1988 Trust v. ERIC BISCHOFF Defendant-Third Party Plaintiff-Counter Claimant-Appellant USCA11 Case: 23-13851 Document: 64-1 Date Filed: 08/11/2026 Page: 1 of 19 2

Case Explained: Mighell v. HPG Pizza I, et al.

Case Explained: Homie Technology v. National Association of Realtors, et al.

Case Explained: MT. HAWLEY INSURANCE COMPANY v. H&M BUILDERS, LLC PERSONAL REP. GLORIA ESCALANTE

Case Explained: ISHMAEL KOIGOR BANGS v. TODD BLANCHE, Attorney General,*

Case Explained: FLORIDA EAST COAST RAILWAY LLC v. FEDERAL RAILROAD ADMINISTRATION ADMINISTRATOR, FEDERAL RAILROAD ADMINISTRATION UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION INTERNATIONAL ASSOCIATION OF SHEET METAL, AIR RAIL AND TRANSPORTATION WORKERS- TRANSPORTATION DIVISION USCA11 Case: 24-11076 Document: 97-1 Date Filed: 08/11/2026 Page: 1 of 93 2

Case Explained: MARTIN D. RENFROE v. USAA GENERAL INDEMNITY CO Appeals from the United States District Court for the Northern District of Alabama

Case Explained: Wildcat Coal v. Pacific Minerals, et al.

Case Explained: UNITED STATES OF AMERICA v. SCOTT ANDREW HOLLINGTON

Case Explained: Non-Argument Calendar UNITED STATES OF AMERICA v. ANTHONY KENNETH GRIFFIN

Case Explained: UNITED STATES OF AMERICA v. LASHAWN D. PULLIE

Case Explained: Non-Argument Calendar DONALD GOINS v. SECRETARY, DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS

Case Explained: JAIME DANIEL NAVARRO CERRITOS v. TODD BLANCHE, Attorney General ————————————— NATIONAL IMMIGRATION LITIGATION ALLIANCE Amicus Supporting

Case Explained: Ortiz y Pino v. Oliver

Case Explained: United States of America v. Malachi Patton Handley

Case Explained: Non-Argument Calendar UNITED STATES OF AMERICA v. KENNETH STEELE

Case Explained: United States of America v. Lloyd Emerson Elk

Case Explained: Nate Maniktala; Jaya Maniktala v. Commissioner of Internal Revenue —————————— Center for Taxpayer Rights Amicus

Case Explained: Berkley National Insurance Company, a/s/o Lakes Community Cooperative v. Broan-Nutone, LLC

Case Explained: UNITED STATES OF AMERICA v. MARVIN RASHAAD CUMMINGS

Case Explained: Anna Chernyy v. Monty Roesler

Case Explained: Ross Christensen v. Union Pacific Railroad Co

Case Explained: United States of America v. Marcus Lathez Nails

Case Explained: United States of America v. Chelsea Monique Taken Alive

Case Explained: United States of America v. Stephon Verges

Case Explained: Brittany Byrd v. William Tapley, Chief, in his Individual and Official Capacity Chris Harris, Assistant Chief, in his Individual and Official Capacity; Clayton Smith, Major, in his Individual and Official Capacity; Andrew Burningham, Lt., in his Individual and Official Capacity; City of Conway; Bart Castleberry, Mayor, in his individual and official capacity; Mike Welsh, Major; in his individual and official capacity

Case Explained: United States of America v. James Marcus Dyett

Case Explained: United States of America v. Colton Rickels

Case Explained: NATASHA URENA, Administrator of the Estate of Juliana Rodriguez Morel; DANIEL RODRIGUEZ, Administrator of the Estate of Juliana Rodriguez Morel v. TRAVELERS CASUALTY AND SURETY COMPANY OF AMERICA

Case Explained: Dakotans for Health; Rick Weiland v. Monae Johnson, Secretary of State

Case Explained: PAMELA MOROCHO-MOROCHO V. TODD BLANCHE

Case Explained: CARLOS FLORES-HERNANDEZ V. TODD BLANCHE

Case Explained: MATEO-JOAQUIN, ET AL. V. BLANCHE

Case Explained: KAITLYN TRIMBLE v. ENTRATA, INC

Case Explained: MARIA MERAZ ESPINDOLA, ET AL V. TODD BLANCHE

Case Explained: MOLLY COSEL v. GEOFFREY C. WENDT, as Trustee of the William G. Wendt 2022 Family Trust WILLIAM H. WENDT; DALIA K. WENDT

Case Explained: QIANWU LI V. TODD BLANCHE

Case Explained: ELLIS V. BISIGNANO

Case Explained: YANDRICH V. BISIGNANO

Case Explained: CERVANTES MONTOYA, ET AL. V. BLANCHE

Case Explained: HEALTHCARE ALLY MANAGEMENT OF CALIFORNIA, LLC V. WSP USA, INC., ET AL.

Case Explained: BLANCO CARDONA, ET AL. V. BLANCHE

Case Explained: USA V. SUTTON

Case Explained: FRIENDS OF ANIMALS v. MARTHA WILLIAMS

Case Explained: FLEURINORD V. BLANCHE

Case Explained: HOCH, ET AL. V. FIGS, INC., ET AL.

Case Explained: CALDERON V. BLANCHE

Case Explained: LOZA BOTELLO, ET AL. V. BLANCHE

Case Explained: JARED FISHMAN v. DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA

Case Explained: UNITED STATES OF AMERICA v. EDWARD L. WILLIAM

Case Explained: CITY UTILITIES OF SPRINGFIELD, MISSOURI v. FEDERAL ENERGY REGULATORY COMMISSION BASIN ELECTRIC POWER COOPERATIVE, ET AL Consolidated with 24-1282, 24-1283, 24-1285, 24-1372 25-1007, 25-1023

Case Explained: COALITION FOR HUMANE IMMIGRANT RIGHTS v. MARKWAYNE MULLIN

Case Explained: FLORIDA EAST COAST RAILWAY LLC v. FEDERAL RAILROAD ADMINISTRATION ADMINISTRATOR, FEDERAL RAILROAD ADMINISTRATION UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION INTERNATIONAL ASSOCIATION OF SHEET METAL, AIR RAIL AND TRANSPORTATION WORKERS- TRANSPORTATION DIVISION USCA11 Case: 24-11076 Document: 97-1 Date Filed: 08/11/2026 Page: 1 of 93 2

Case Explained: FLORIDA EAST COAST RAILWAY LLC v. FEDERAL RAILROAD ADMINISTRATION ADMINISTRATOR, FEDERAL RAILROAD ADMINISTRATION UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION INTERNATIONAL ASSOCIATION OF SHEET METAL, AIR RAIL AND TRANSPORTATION WORKERS- TRANSPORTATION DIVISION USCA11 Case: 24-11076 Document: 97-1 Date Filed: 08/11/2026 Page: 1 of 93 2

Case Explained: FLORIDA EAST COAST RAILWAY LLC v. FEDERAL RAILROAD ADMINISTRATION ADMINISTRATOR, FEDERAL RAILROAD ADMINISTRATION UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION INTERNATIONAL ASSOCIATION OF SHEET METAL, AIR RAIL AND TRANSPORTATION WORKERS- TRANSPORTATION DIVISION USCA11 Case: 24-11076 Document: 97-1 Date Filed: 08/11/2026 Page: 1 of 93 2

Case Explained: FLORIDA EAST COAST RAILWAY LLC v. FEDERAL RAILROAD ADMINISTRATION ADMINISTRATOR, FEDERAL RAILROAD ADMINISTRATION UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION INTERNATIONAL ASSOCIATION OF SHEET METAL, AIR RAIL AND TRANSPORTATION WORKERS- TRANSPORTATION DIVISION USCA11 Case: 24-11076 Document: 97-1 Date Filed: 08/11/2026 Page: 1 of 93 2

Case Explained: FLORIDA EAST COAST RAILWAY LLC v. FEDERAL RAILROAD ADMINISTRATION ADMINISTRATOR, FEDERAL RAILROAD ADMINISTRATION UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION INTERNATIONAL ASSOCIATION OF SHEET METAL, AIR RAIL AND TRANSPORTATION WORKERS- TRANSPORTATION DIVISION USCA11 Case: 24-11076 Document: 97-1 Date Filed: 08/11/2026 Page: 1 of 93 2

Case Explained: FLORIDA EAST COAST RAILWAY LLC v. FEDERAL RAILROAD ADMINISTRATION ADMINISTRATOR, FEDERAL RAILROAD ADMINISTRATION UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION INTERNATIONAL ASSOCIATION OF SHEET METAL, AIR RAIL AND TRANSPORTATION WORKERS- TRANSPORTATION DIVISION USCA11 Case: 24-11076 Document: 97-1 Date Filed: 08/11/2026 Page: 1 of 93 2

Case Explained: LEONARDO FRANQUI v. SECRETARY, FLORIDA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS

Case Explained: RONALD KING ANTHONY ROBINSON CHRIS SAMUEL NOLAN JONES, JR. BRIAN STRUGGS v. UA LOCAL 91 United Association of Plumbers, Steamfitters, Welders and HVAC Techni- cians, et al DAY & ZIMMERMANN NPS, INC USCA11 Case: 24-13659 Document: 54-1 Date Filed: 08/10/2026 Page: 1 of 14 2

Case Explained: RONALD KING ANTHONY ROBINSON CHRIS SAMUEL NOLAN JONES, JR. BRIAN STRUGGS v. UA LOCAL 91 United Association of Plumbers, Steamfitters, Welders and HVAC Techni- cians UNITED ASSOCIATION OF JOURNEYMEN AND APPRENTICES OF THE PLUMBING AND PIPEFITTING INDUSTRY OF THE UNITED STATES AND CANADA UNION OF PLUMBERS, FITTERS, WELDERS AND SERVICE TECHNICIANS USCA11 Case: 24-13658 Document: 70-1 Date Filed: 08/10/2026 Page: 1 of 19 2

Case Explained: Non-Argument Calendar DANIEL M. HABTEMARIAM v. U.S. ATTORNEY GENERAL

Case Explained: Non-Argument Calendar UNITED STATES OF AMERICA v. GILBERTO VAZQUEZ GOMEZ

Case Explained: JOANN WRIGHT HAYSBERT Plaintiff – v. OUTBACK STEAKHOUSE OF FLORIDA, LLC Defendant – Appellee and BLOOMIN’ BRANDS, INC

Case Explained: United States v. Trujillo

Case Explained: Non-Argument Calendar UNITED STATES OF AMERICA v. JORDAN FRANKLIN TREXLER

Case Explained: THE CINCINNATI INSURANCE COMPANY Plaintiff – v. LEVI OWENS, Personal Representative for the Estate of Christopher McLean Defendant – Appellant and WILMINGTON SHIPPING COMPANY; WAYNE HUNT

Case Explained: United States of America v. Michael Lee Brunson

Case Explained: United States of America v. Alexzandra Blanco

Case Explained: Justin Thomas Morales v. United States of America

Case Explained: The Hanover Insurance Company v. James Larson; Steven Bateski; Brian Aguiar

Case Explained: Boechler, P.C v. Commissioner of Internal Revenue United States Tax Court

Case Explained: Ezequiel Morales Escalante v. Todd Blanche, Attorney General of the United States

Case Explained: Deborah A. Tobacco v. Avera McKennan, doing business as Avera Research Institute

Case Explained: UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE SIXTH CIRCUIT DEYLIN ORTEGA VILLALBA v. TODD BLANCHE, Attorney General ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) )

Case Explained: In re: Kevin P. Dandurand Debtor —————————— Kanyon Holdings, LLC Creditor – v. Kevin P. Dandurand Debtor –

Case Explained: PERSONAL INJURY PLAINTIFFS, ET AL. V. META PLATFORMS, INC., ET AL.

Case Explained: DRIP MORE LLC V. FDA

Case Explained: Edwards Lifesciences, et al. v. Thompson, et al.

Case Explained: PERSONAL INJURY PLAINTIFFS, ET AL. V. TIKTOK, LLC, ET AL.

Case Explained: MULTISTATE ATTORNEY GENERAL PLAINTIFFS, ET AL. V. META PLATFORMS, INC., ET AL.

Case Explained: JESUS ADAME GARCIA V. TODD BLANCHE

Case Explained: USA V. GRAY

Case Explained: MENDOZA V. FIRST UNUM LIFE INSURANCE COMPANY, ET AL.

Case Explained: ARELLANO MARTINEZ V. BLANCHE

Case Explained: CITY OF TACOMA V. WESTERN METAL INDUSTRY PENSION FUND, ET AL.

Case Explained: PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA, ET AL. V. META PLATFORMS, INC., ET AL.

Case Explained: STATE OF COLORADO, ET AL. V. META PLATFORMS, INC., ET AL.

Case Explained: CLAUDIA LISSETH ORELLANA-RAMOS; N.A.R.O.; R.A.R.O v. TODD BLANCHE, Acting Attorney General

Case Explained: PERSONAL INJURY PLAINTIFFS, ET AL. V. META PLATFORMS, INC., ET AL.

Case Explained: Non-Argument Calendar JOHN H. OWOC v. THE LIQUIDATING TRUSTEE

Case Explained: Jane Doe v. Anoka County; James Stuart, the Anoka County Sheriff

Case Explained: WALTER EBBERT v. OCEAN CITY WRIGHT FIRE CONTROL DISTRICT

Case Explained: SHANNON WALLER, JR v. BOARD OF REGENTS OF THE UNIVERSITY SYSTEM OF GEORGIA TERRI MILLER JASMINE BROWN SHANOYA CORDEW MARINA SPEARS, et al

Case Explained: UNITED STATES OF AMERICA v. DERBY CLERFE

Case Explained: Elizabeth J. Martin v. Chief Disciplinary Counsel of Missouri; Chief Judge Mary R. Russell

Case Explained: Non-Argument Calendar GUERLANCIE FELIX v. U.S. ATTORNEY GENERAL

Case Explained: TAWOINE BANKS v. WARDEN M. L. KING

Case Explained: THOMPSON V. U.S. BANK NATIONAL ASSOCIATION, ET AL.

Case Explained: JAIMES SOLANO V. BLANCHE

Case Explained: ERNEST OWUSU v. TODD BLANCHE, Attorney General; MARKWAYNE MULLIN; BAEZ LUCY d/b/a Baez Lucy

Case Explained: DOAN V. BLANCHE

Case Explained: FRANCO-PRADA, ET AL. V. BLANCHE

Case Explained: RICHARD D. KELLY v. ALTRIA CLIENT SERVICES, LLC; DEFERRED PROFIT-SHARING PLAN FOR SALARIED EMPLOYEES; FIDELITY WORKPLACE SERVICES, LLC

Case Explained: JASON WOLFORD, ET AL V. ANNE LOPEZ

Case Explained: RLI INSURANCE COMPANY v. JOHN LEHMAN ALICIA LEHMAN

Case Explained: United States v. Hahn

Case Explained: UNITED STATES OF AMERICA v. CRISTIAN PONCE

Case Explained: SOUTHEAST DEVELOPMENT PARTNERS, LLC a Florida limited liability company SOUTHEAST LAND VENTURES, LLC a Florida limited liability company Plaintiffs-Counter v. ST. JOHNS COUNTY, FLORIDA a political subdivision of the State of Florida Defendant-Third Party Plaintiff-Counter Claimant-Appellee DAYLATE ENTERPRISES, INC a Florida for-profit corporation Third Party Defendant-Counter

Case Explained: Non-Argument Calendar UNITED STATES OF AMERICA v. ROY FRANCIS LABARE

Case Explained: Non-Argument Calendar UNITED STATES OF AMERICA v. JULIAN LOPEZ

Case Explained: UNITED STATES OF AMERICA v. ARNEL HATEGEKIMANA

Case Explained: United States v. Hernandez

Case Explained: LESVI LUCIA MONZON GUZMAN v. TODD BLANCHE,* Acting Attorney General

Case Explained: UNITED STATES OF AMERICA v. JERMAR HARDIN

Case Explained: UNITED STATES OF AMERICA v. MARSHALL ISIAH GRADY

Case Explained: S.A.S.B. CORP, a Florida corporation v. JOHNSON & JOHNSON HEALTH CARE SYSTEMS INC.; JANSSEN PHARMACEUTICALS INC

Case Explained: FinalOpinion in case# 23-3198

Case Explained: UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE SIXTH CIRCUIT UNITED STATES OF AMERICA v. EVAN A. GALASSO ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ON APPEAL FROM THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF OHIO O P I N I O N

Case Explained: MARIA DIFRANCO, as the Independent Administrator of the ESTATE OF MARCO DIFRANCO v. CITY OF CHICAGO, a municipal corporation

Case Explained: FinalOpinion in case# 25-1755

Case Explained: G.T., by and through next friend LILIANA T. HANLON v. SAMSUNG ELECTRONICS AMERICA, INCORPORATED and SAMSUNG ELECTRONICS COMPANY, LIMITED

Case Explained: CSX TRANSPORTATION, INC v. ZAYO GROUP, LLC

Case Explained: FinalOpinion in case# 25-1808

Case Explained: MOSenecaManufacturer, LLC, doing business as American Tripoli v. Federal Mine Safety and Health Review Commission; Secretary of Labor

Case Explained: United States of America v. Shaquan Willis

Case Explained: Ana Yessenia Ponce-Lopez; Mario Enriquez Paz-Guevara; M.J.P.P v. Todd Blanche, Acting Attorney General of the United States

Case Explained: United States of America v. Trevion Dickson

Case Explained: Non-Argument Calendar KANAYO DERHEM v. BAY HOUSE MIAMI CONDOMINIUM ASSOCIATION CHARLES BRUMSTED, JR SEAN ZAHNISER MIKE DESIMONE JAMES PINKERT, et al

Case Explained: PAUL JOHNSON v. RIDGE TOOL MANUFACTURING COMPANY, INC

Case Explained: LYNSEY ANN PORTER Plaintiff – v. BLUE RIDGE BANKSHARES, INC., d/b/a Blue Ridge Bank; G. WILLIAM BEALE

Case Explained: 26a0223p.06

Case Explained: FERNANDO DELGADO V. RAYMOND MADDEN

Case Explained: FinalOpinion in case# 25-2081

Case Explained: 26a0225p.06

Case Explained: PACIFICORP V. SIXKILLER

Case Explained: 26a0222p.06

Case Explained: 26a0224p.06

Case Explained: RUVIRA-RODRIGUEZ V. BLANCHE

Case Explained: N. M., ET AL. V. GUILLEMIN, ET AL.

Case Explained: NATIONAL TRUST FOR HISTORIC PRESERVATION IN THE UNITED STATES v. NATIONAL PARK SERVICE, ET AL Consolidated with 26-5134 Appeals from the United States District Court for the District of Columbia (No. 1:25-cv-04316) Yaakov M. Roth, Principal Deputy Assistant Attorney General, U.S. Department of Justice, argued the cause for appellants/cross-appellees. With him on the briefs were Brett A. Shumate, Assistant Attorney General, Brantley T. Mayers Attorney, and Adam R.F. Gustafson, Principal Deputy Assistant Attorney General, Environment and Natural 2 Resources Division. Steven A. Myers and Michael S. Raab Attorneys, entered appearances Richard Jaffe was on the brief for amicus curiae American Conservative Union in support of appellants/cross-appellees Thaddeus A. Heuer argued the cause for appellee/cross- appellant. With him on the brief were Matthew F. Casassa Kevin Y. Chen, Jack C. Smith, and Gregory B. Craig Philip Allen Lacovara, Andrea C. Ferster, and Paul W Edmondson were on the brief for amici curiae Various Organizations Advancing Protection of National Parks Historic Preservation, and National Capital Planning in support of appellee/cross-appellant Nikhel S. Sus, Christina Wentworth, and Daniel S. Lenz were on the brief for amici curiae Campaign Legal Center and Citizens for Responsibility and Ethics in Washington in support of appellee/cross-appellant Elizabeth Wydra and Brianne J. Gorod were on the brief for amici curiae Members of Congress in support of Aditi Shah and Scott Michelman were on the brief for amicus curiae American Civil Liberties Union of the District of Columbia in support of

Case Explained: USA V. DOYLE

Case Explained: MARINO V. AVEN FINANCIAL, INC.

Case Explained: ARIZONA ALLIANCE FOR RETIRED AMERICANS, ET AL V. KRISTIN K. MAYES, ET AL

Case Explained: GOCE GLIGOROV v. NATION OF BRUNEI

Case Explained: WOONASQUATUCKET RIVER WATERSHED COUNCIL; EASTERN RHODE ISLAND CONSERVATION DISTRICT; GREEN INFRASTRUCTURE CENTER; NATIONAL COUNCIL OF NONPROFITS; CHILDHOOD LEAD ACTION PROJECT; CODMAN SQUARE NEIGHBORHOOD DEVELOPMENT CORPORATION v. U.S. DEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTURE; BROOKE ROLLINS, in the official capacity as Secretary of Agriculture; U.S. DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY; CHRIS WRIGHT, in the official capacity as Secretary of Energy; U.S. DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR; DOUG BURGUM, in the official capacity as Secretary of the Interior; U.S. ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY; LEE ZELDIN, in the official capacity as Administrator of the Environmental Protection Agency; U.S OFFICE OF MANAGEMENT AND BUDGET; RUSSELL VOUGHT, in the official capacity as Director of the Office of Management and Budget; KEVIN HASSETT, in the official capacity as Director of the National Economic Council; U.S. DEPARTMENT OF HOUSING AND URBAN DEVELOPMENT; SCOTT TURNER, in the official capacity as Secretary of Housing and Urban Development

Case Explained: DISH NETWORK L.L.C. Plaintiff-Counter v. GABY FRAIFER TELE-CENTER, INC PLANET TELECOM, INC

Case Explained: SHARON A. MCTURK RUTHERFORD ENTERPRISES, LLC. SJB SOLUTIONS, LLC. ASTRA SUPPLY CHAIN, LLC v. LOTTERY.COM, INC MATTHEW MCGAHAN

Case Explained: Scannell Properties #516, et al. v. City of Edwardsville, Kansas, et al.

Case Explained: UNITED STATES OF AMERICA v. SHERRIFF COOPER

Case Explained: Non-Argument Calendar JULIA HAGANS Mother of Plaintiffs’ decedent, Rufus Lee as surviving parents and one of several next of kin; In a representative capacity for the now deceased father and next of kin; In a representative capacity as a putative personal representative of the estate of Rufus Lee SOLOMON LEE, SR. and his heirs and next of kin, the adult siblings of Rufus Lee namely Solomon Lee, Jr., Henry Lee Quaneisha Tribble and Janeisha Page v. TIMOTHY WARD Commissioner, Georgia Department of Corrections

Case Explained: Non-Argument Calendar UNITED STATES OF AMERICA v. DEVIN COVON RANDLE

Case Explained: Masek v. Peterson

Case Explained: Non-Argument Calendar LOURDES VERONICA VILLANUEVA-QUIROZ IRVIN DAVID MATUTE-MORADEL N. M. MATUTE-VILLANUEVA H. N. MATUTE-VILLANUEVA DAYANA CELESTINA LOPEZ-VILLANUEVA VERONICA DANIELA LOPEZ-VILLANUEVA JOB DANIEL LOPEZ-VILLANUEVA v. U.S. ATTORNEY GENERAL USCA11 Case: 25-13891 Document: 17-1 Date Filed: 08/06/2026 Page: 1 of 5 2

Case Explained: UNITED STATES OF AMERICA Plaintiff – v. TYREE LASHAWN MAY Defendant –

Case Explained: Non-Argument Calendar UNITED STATES OF AMERICA v. AUNYIS CHERRY

Case Explained: UNITED STATES OF AMERICA Plaintiff – v. ALEXANDER ALONSO GALINDO Defendant –

Case Explained: UNITED STATES OF AMERICA v. TEVON O’SHEA VANHORN

Case Explained: Scholl, et al. v. Walgreens Specialty Pharmacy, et al.

Case Explained: PSEG RENEWABLE TRANSMISSION LLC v. ARENTZ FAMILY, LP; BARNEY’S FARM, LLC; HZ PROPERTIES, LLC; M & R, LLC; THE DUG HILL ROD AND GUN CLUB, INC.; TROYER FARMS, LLC; TROYER REAL ESTATE, LLC; ALENE R. STICKLES; ROBERT H. STICKLES SR.; AMY GAYLE YOUNGBLOOD; ANDREW D. MCLEAN; REBECCA MCLEAN; BENJAMIN EUGENE NUSBAUM; KENNETH EUGENE NUSBAUM; BETTY LOU MILLER; CARL E. MILLER; BRYAN N. HENDRIX; CONSTANCE M. HENDRIX; CARMEN COCKEY; CHRISTOPHER D COCKEY; CATHERINE V. MILLER; WAYNE D. MILLER; CHARLES WILLIAM BOND; MORGAN DAVIS BOND; CHARLOTTE RUTH BIXLER; CHRIS N. RESH; DOROTHY I. DONMOYER; PETRICE MARIE DONMOYER- RESH; ROBERT L. DONMOYER; DEBORAH H. MAEDER; JOHN D MAEDER; DIANE M. COOK; JAMES R. COOK; ERICH CHARLES STEIGER; REBECCA IRENE SCOLLAN; ESTHER JOHANN LENTZ-BUENGER; FAY ANN MILLER; KENNETH E. MILLER; GARY J. BROCKMEYER; NANCY M BROCKMEYER; HELEN L. BULL; JOSEPH L. GLOVER; RAINA C. GLOVER; JULIA LU; ZHEJUN FAN; JUSTIN WRIGHT; KEITH EMERSON ENSOR; KEVIN LEE ENSOR; KIMBERLY A. JOHNSTON; LESLIE ALFRED WHITE; MATT UNKLE; TOMI UNKLE; MOHAMAD A. KOURANI; NADA E KOURANI; MORRIS L. BOHLAYER; SHARON L. BOHLAYER; NANCY P MACBRIDE; RICHARD M. DOSTER; THOMAS B. COLLINS; TRACY W COLLINS Defendants – Appellants and DELLS GENERATION FARMS, LLC; GROVES MILL, LLC; PANORA ACRES INC.; PETER AND JOHN RADIO FELLOWSHIP, INC.; RBC REAL ESTATE I 2 LLC; SCHOOL OF LIVING; ALLAN PATRICK SANDERS; ROY FRANCIS SANDERS; ANNE F. PRICE-DAVIS; MICHAEL A. DAVIS; AUSTIN L KALTRIDER; JOYCE E. KALTRIDER; MARLIN L. KALTRIDER; MARVIN L KALTRIDER; SHAWN L. KALTRIDER; BARCLAY G. CARAS; PAMELA J CARAS; BRANDON HILL; BRUCE E. DOAK; GAYLE M. DOAK; C. WILLIAM KNOBLOCH, JR. AND CAROL KNOBLOCH REVOCABLE LIVING TRUST AGREEMENT DATED JANUARY 30, 2019; CAROL J. FERTITTA; JOSEPH V FERTITTA, III; CATHERINE M. GESTIDO; EDUARDO E. GESTIDO; CHARLES GARY ATKINSON; INDRANEE KURUPPUNAYAKE; STEPHEN GORDON ATKINSON; CHARLES WILLIAM ATKINSON; CHERYL ANN GEARY; PAUL JOSEPH GEARY; CHRISTINE D. EYRING; JOHN M. EYRING JR.; DANIEL GEORGE SCHWARTZ; ERIK J. LENZ; FAITH J. WEEKS; MICHAEL D. HANDS, JR.; FRANCIS LEE DELL; MARIAN V. DELL; HENRY WHITAKER; KAREN A. SCHLEPER; HOECKEL FAMILY SELF SETTLED ASSET PROTECTION FAMILY IRREVOCABLE TRUST; JAMES A O’DONNELL; PATRICIA J. O’DONNELL; JUDITH A. FIEDLER; JULIUS J PITRONE; LINDA S. GRESOCK; THOMAS S. GRESOCK; LISA M. WARD; ZACHARY J. WARD; MABEL E. WILSON REVOCABLE DEED OF TRUST DATED 3/25/1998; MATTHEW LEE DELL; NANCY E. CRAMER; NANCY EILEEN PIERCE; PAMELA M. WILSON; ROBERT KEITH WILSON; PHYLLIS A. REHMEYER; TODD M. REHMEYER —————————— COUNTY COMMISSIONERS OF CARROLL COUNTY, MARYLAND Amicus Supporting

Case Explained: UNITED STATES OF AMERICA v. WILLIAM KEVIN GLOVER

Case Explained: MARIA SUSANA NAVARRETE-MELGAR v. TODD BLANCHE, Acting Attorney General

Case Explained: UNITED STATES OF AMERICA v. THOMAS E. DUNCAN

Case Explained: UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE SIXTH CIRCUIT JERREECE NOEL v. CHALLENGE MANUFACTURING HOLDINGS, INC ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) )

Case Explained: FinalOpinion in case# 24-2230

Case Explained: FinalOpinion in case# 24-2236

Case Explained: Non-Argument Calendar DALTON D. BANKS v. DONNA K. LAMONS, et al TAMMY BROWN Honorable, Judge SHERIFF’S DEPARTMENT OF CULLMAN COUNTY ALABAMA

Case Explained: UNITED STATES OF AMERICA v. DAMOND K. WILEY, JR

Case Explained: United States of America v. Tiarra Lenae Jones

Case Explained: UNITED STATES OF AMERICA v. ROBERT BOYD

Case Explained: Kristine Williams v. Missouri Department of Corrections Bill Stange Billy Loflin; Pierce Yount; Stephanie Noisworthy Christy Williams; William L. Johnson, MD, DO; Cynthia Reese, LPC; Centurion of Missouri, LLC

Case Explained: United States of America v. Turner Heinbaugh

Case Explained: Rustico Lacsina v. Todd Blanche,1 Acting Attorney General of the United States

Case Explained: In re JASON ROBERT WYLIE; LEAH S. WYLIE Debtors. KATHLEEN SULLIVAN

Case Explained: United States of America v. Sydney Morgan Mittan-Ybarra

Case Explained: United States of America v. Andrew Lee Hawkins

Case Explained: JOSE SANCHEZ OLIVARES V. TODD BLANCHE

Case Explained: 26a0219p.06

Case Explained: PETCONNECT RESCUE, INC., ET AL. V. SALINAS, ET AL.

Case Explained: In re TOWER PARK PROPERTIES LLC DEBTOR TOWER PARK PROPERTIES, LLC

Case Explained: BEYOND BLOND PRODUCTIONS, LLC V. HELDMAN, ET AL.

Case Explained: USA V. BENNETT

Case Explained: 26a0220p.06

Case Explained: UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE SIXTH CIRCUIT NEWTON SCOTT MULAMA v. TODD W. BLANCHE, Acting U.S. Attorney General ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ON PETITION FOR REVIEW FROM THE UNITED STATES BOARD OF IMMIGRATION APPEALS

Case Explained: RAVIN CROSSBOWS, LLC v. SQUIRES

Case Explained: IN RE: KOI DESIGN LLC, ET AL V. MARRON LAWYERS, APC, ET AL

Case Explained: JOSSUE HERNANDEZ-ALVARADO V. TODD BLANCHE

Case Explained: IN RE: KOI DESIGN LLC, ET AL V. A. MASTROIANNI, ET AL

Case Explained: 26a0218p.06

Case Explained: Non-Argument Calendar STONI MEDICAL STAFFING JAZZMA HALL v. ALLY FINANCIAL

Case Explained: UNITED STATES OF AMERICA v. MARCUS RYAN TELFAIR

Case Explained: Non-Argument Calendar MICHELLE MAUPIN v. SCHOOL BOARD OF MIAMI-DADE COUNTY MARIA ZABALA in her official and individual capacity CARMINE MOLINA BRENDA SWAIN in her official and individual capacity PIERRE EDOUARD in his official and individual capacity, et al RASHIMA BYNUM, et al USCA11 Case: 25-12982 Document: 40-1 Date Filed: 08/05/2026 Page: 1 of 10 2

Case Explained: UNITED STATES OF AMERICA v. AUGUSTUS C. ROMAIN, JR

Case Explained: Non-Argument Calendar UNITED STATES OF AMERICA v. MICHAEL WILLIAMS KERSEY

Case Explained: UNITED STATES OF AMERICA v. ALEXANDER ALLI

Case Explained: UMAR ADEYOLA v. DR. EDAVALLY REDDY; JENNIFER ADKINS; MS. BUNN; UNITED STATES OF AMERICA

Case Explained: In re: TOTAL AUTO FINANCING LLC Debtor. ————————————— ELSHAN BAYRAMOV; BABAK M. BAYRAMOV Plaintiffs – v. AMERICAN CREDIT ACCEPTANCE, LLC Defendant –

Case Explained: Non-Argument Calendar UNITED STATES OF AMERICA v. JEROME WALTER KIGGUNDU

Case Explained: CAMERON J. AIKENS v. HERBALIFE INTERNATIONAL OF AMERICA, INC

Case Explained: Non-Argument Calendar SVETLANA N. WRIGHTSON v. SECRETARY OF THE TREASURY

Case Explained: UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE SIXTH CIRCUIT TRAVIS KOTKE v. ANDREW AGER ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ON APPEAL FROM THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF MICHIGAN

Case Explained: UNITED STATES OF AMERICA v. DARYL SMITH

Case Explained: 26a0217p.06

Case Explained: UNITED STATES OF AMERICA v. CHRISTOPHER LOUIS PARK

Case Explained: UNITED STATES OF AMERICA v. RANDY PRICE

Case Explained: 251285.U Cameron Aikens v. Herbalife International of America, Inc.

Case Explained: UNITED STATES OF AMERICA v. MIGUEL A. MORALES-GARCIA

Case Explained: FinalOpinion in case# 25-1134

Case Explained: FinalOpinion in case# 25-1336

Case Explained: ELIZABETH SCHULTE v. KENNETH J. LENERS and TOWN OF CEDAR LAKE, WISCONSIN

Case Explained: Thomas Riles v. Carroll County, Arkansas, an Arkansas Municipality; Anthony Scotti, formerly known as Andrew Scotti Officer Laralyn Koster

Case Explained: DUPONT WATER COMPANY, INC v. CITY OF MADISON, INDIANA and JEFFERSON COUNTY, INDIANA

Case Explained: UNITED STATES OF AMERICA v. SHAWN PENA

Case Explained: United States of America v. Latroy L. Currie

Case Explained: United States of America v. Todd Aaron Howard Hamilton Sutton, Jr

Case Explained: CHEN V. BLANCHE

Case Explained: INLAND EMPIRE WATERKEEPER, ET AL. V. CORONA CLAY COMPANY

Case Explained: USA V. CHAPMAN

Case Explained: INLAND EMPIRE WATERKEEPER, ET AL. V. CORONA CLAY COMPANY

Case Explained: COMMITTEE FOR A BETTER ARVIN, ET AL. V. UNITED STATES ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY, ET AL.

Case Explained: ROHIT V. BLANCHE

Case Explained: QUICK DISPENSE, INC. V. VITALITY FOODSERVICE, INC.

Case Explained: BUSTOS-ALONSO V. BLANCHE

Case Explained: USA V. THOMAS

Case Explained: 26a0216p.06

Case Explained: USA V. DAVIDOVICS

Case Explained: USA V. LEBEAUX

Case Explained: YOUSSEF V. GREAT AMERICAN LIFE INSURANCE COMPANY, ET AL.

Case Explained: YOUSSEF V. GREAT AMERICAN LIFE INSURANCE COMPANY

Case Explained: HERRERA, ET AL. V. BLANCHE

Case Explained: TITLEMAX OF SOUTH CAROLINA, INC v. WENDY SPICHER

Case Explained: BRYAN WARDELL v. PITT COUNTY, NORTH CAROLINA; PITT COUNTY BOARD OF COMMISSIONERS; JANIS GALLAGHER

Case Explained: ALTIERO, ET AL. V. COUNTY OF SPOKANE, ET AL.

Case Explained: ZAJRADHARA V. OFFICE OF THE CHIEF ADMINISTRATIVE HEARING OFFICER, ET AL.

Case Explained: ELLAWENDY V. DRISCOLL

Case Explained: RICKES V. THERMO FISHER SCIENTIFIC, INC., ET AL.

Case Explained: IBRAHIMA DIENG v. ORKIN, LLC

Case Explained: BUSTOS-ALONSO V. BLANCHE

Case Explained: BUSTOS-ALONSO V. BLANCHE

Case Explained: HM FLORIDA-ORL, LLC v. GOVERNOR OF FLORIDA, et al SECRETARY OF THE FLORIDA DEPARTMENT OF BUSINESS AND PROFESSIONAL REGULATION

Case Explained: Donaldson v. Langford

Case Explained: JEREMIAS MEDRADO PASQUAL-ANDRES v. U.S. ATTORNEY GENERAL

Case Explained: Non-Argument Calendar UNITED STATES OF AMERICA v. ALEJANDRO ACEVEDO LUNA

Case Explained: In re Cline, 531 F.3d 1249, 1251 (10th Cir. 2008) (per curiam) (“A district court does not have jurisdiction to address the merits of a second or successive . . . § 2254 claim until this court has granted the required authorization.”). Daniels objected, but the district court found the objections unpersuasive. It concluded Daniels’s claims regarding the

Case Explained: SANDRA RODRÍGUEZ-COTTO; RAFELLI GONZÁLEZ-COTTO v. JENNIFFER A. GONZÁLEZ-COLÓN, Governor of Puerto Rico, in the official capacity and as representative of the Commonwealth of Puerto Rico; LOURDES L. GÓMEZ TORRES, Secretary of the Department of Justice, in the official capacity; ARTURO GARFFER Secretary of Puerto Rico Department of Public Safety, in the official capacity; JOSEPH GONZÁLEZ FALCÓN, Commissioner of the Puerto Rico Police Bureau,*

Case Explained: Non-Argument Calendar UNITED STATES OF AMERICA v. DEDRICK GERMOND SMITH

Case Explained: DELTONA TRANSFORMER CORPORATION v. THE NOCO COMPANY

Case Explained: Non-Argument Calendar JOSEPH AUGUSTUS ARTHUR COLEMAN v. U.S. ATTORNEY GENERAL

Case Explained: CA11 11th Circuit Court of Appeals Unpublished Opinions

Case Explained: Non-Argument Calendar FERNANDO JOSE OBANDO-BRIZUELA REBECCA HOMER BUCARDO-ESPINOSA LINDSEY FERNANDA OBANDO-BUCARDO FERNANDO YEMIL OBANDO-BURCADO v. U.S. ATTORNEY GENERAL

Case Explained: BLUFF SPUR COAL CORPORATION v. DIRECTOR, OFFICE OF WORKERS’ COMPENSATION PROGRAMS UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF LABOR; FREDERICK B. BATEMAN

Case Explained: UNITED STATES OF AMERICA v. JACK BENSON FLANDERS

Case Explained: UNITED STATES OF AMERICA v. DAVID LEE GRAHAM

Case Explained: JOSHUA PHILLIPS v. CITY OF HANCEVILLE ALABAMA KYLE DUNCAN JOSH HOWELL LOWELL ADAM HADDER

Case Explained: 24-3291, Filed 08/04/2026

Case Explained: AMER RIZVI v. LOUDOUN COUNTY SCHOOL BOARD

Case Explained: UNITED STATES OF AMERICA Plaintiff– v. DEVON SHERMAN MICKINS Defendant–

Case Explained: PAUL LISENBY v. OLYMPUS CORP. OF THE AMERICAS; OLYMPUS AMERICA INC.; GYRUS ACMI, INC

Case Explained: KADIATOU BABILA KEITA v. TODD BLANCHE, Acting Attorney General

Case Explained: BENJAMIN FORREST CARTER v. BETH CABELL, in her individual and official capacity; KEVIN MCCOY, in his individual and official capacity; JOSHUA BRANCH, in his individual and official capacity; JOHN DOES; COMMONWEALTH OF VIRGINIA and HAROLD W. CLARKE

Case Explained: MICHAEL DRIGGS; THOMAS MICHAEL LOGAN; DAVID LOGAN; MEGAN MARX; TERRI MUMLEY; JOHN ZIMMERLEE; CAROL HRDLICKA; GEORGE PATTERSON; POW INVESTIGATIVE PROJECT, INC. Plaintiffs – v. CENTRAL INTELLIGENCE AGENCY Defendant –

Case Explained: 26a0214p.06

Case Explained: FinalOpinion in case# 23-2434

Case Explained: FinalOpinion in case# 23-2479

Case Explained: UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE SIXTH CIRCUIT UNITED STATES OF AMERICA v. KENNETH J. JACKSON, JR ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ON APPEAL FROM THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF OHIO

Case Explained: FinalOpinion in case# 23-2450

Case Explained: UNITED STATES OF AMERICA v. AUSARIAN CARNEY

Case Explained: HALIL DEMIR v. MARKWAYNE MULLIN, et al

Case Explained: 26a0215p.06

Case Explained: SIDNEY UPCHURCH Applicant v. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA On Motion for Leave to File

Case Explained: FinalOpinion in case# 23-2652

Case Explained: Captain Rory M. Walsh v. Carlos Del Toro, Secretary of the Navy; Michael W. Hagee; Jerry D. Humble; Michael D. Nordwall, FBI; Alvin M. Winston, Sr., FBI SAIC; Alison J. Ramsdell U.S. Attorney; David J. Gamez, FBI Informant; United States of America; Department of the Navy

Case Explained: United States of America v. Eagle Wind Lajeunesse

Case Explained: SHANNON GOLAT v. HONORABLE AUDREY K. SKWIERAWSKI, et al

Case Explained: United States of America v. Darren D. Duncan

Case Explained: United States of America v. Tjuan Thompson

Case Explained: OSCAR HERNANDEZ-HERNANDEZ V. TODD BLANCHE

Case Explained: MITCHELL V. AIR INDIA, LTD., ET AL.

Case Explained: FEDERAL TRADE COMMISSION V. HOSKINS, ET AL.

Case Explained: RODRIGUEZ-GARCIA, ET AL. V. BLANCHE

Case Explained: GOSZTYLA V. GRUENWALD

Case Explained: UNITE HERE INTERNATIONAL UNION V. SKY CHEFS, INC.

Case Explained: UNITED STATES SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION V. EVERETT, ET AL.

Case Explained: MAYNE V. FRAZER RYAN GOLDBERG & ARNOLD, LLP, ET AL.

Case Explained: PRICE V. HUDSON

Case Explained: In re NATALIA ALEKSANDROVNA NEAL Debtor

Case Explained: USA V. GOMEZ

Case Explained: LATHUS V. ROUND VALLEY JUSTICE COURT, ET AL.

Case Explained: VIP PRODUCTS, LLC V. JACK DANIEL’S PROPERTIES, INC.

Case Explained: USA V. BRADFORD

Case Explained: USA V. GALLARDO

Case Explained: USA V. ROGERS

Case Explained: FIELDS V. AAA LIFE INSURANCE COMPANY, ET AL.

Case Explained: USA V. HERRIN

Case Explained: In re TRANSPACIFIC PASSENGER AIR TRANSPORTATION ANTITRUST LITIGATION

Case Explained: USA V. HOWARD

Case Explained: LIU V. MULLIN, ET AL.

Case Explained: 25-1017: JOHNSON v. US [OPINION], Precedential

Case Explained: ALSTON V. COUNTY OF SACRAMENTO, ET AL.

Case Explained: AMAZON.COM SERVICES, LLC V. PERPLEXITY AI, INC.

Case Explained: SOCKET SOLUTIONS, LLC v. IMPORT GLOBAL, LLC

Case Explained: DALAVAI V. REGENTS OF THE UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA, ET AL.

Case Explained: ESTELLA CURRY v. WARDEN

Case Explained: JOSEPH PAUL ENGLEHARDT AND YVONNE DORA WADE v. TODD BLANCHE

Case Explained: UNITED STATES OF AMERICA v. LATONA MAE LAMBERT

Case Explained: UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE SIXTH CIRCUIT UNITED STATES OF AMERICA v. JARED METZGER ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) )

Case Explained: UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE SIXTH CIRCUIT DANIEL TASCARELLA v. APTIV US GENERAL SERVICES PARTNERSHIP

Case Explained: DANIEL P. MOOK Plaintiff – v. G. ANDREW HALL Defendant – Appellant and CITY OF MARTINSVILLE, VIRGINIA

Case Explained: INSURANCE COMPANY OF THE WEST Plaintiff/Counter v. HIGH PERFORMANCE ALLOYS, INC Defendant/Counter

Case Explained: Equal Employment Opportunity Commission Bryan Banks v. Sun Chemical Corporation

Case Explained: United States of America v. Derek Underdahl

Case Explained: FIRSOV V. CITY AND COUNTY OF HONOLULU, ET AL.

Case Explained: FA ND Chev, LLC; FA ND Sub, LLC BAPTKO, Inc v. Robert Kupper Bismarck Motor Company; BMC Marine, LLC, doing business as Moritz Sport & Marine Foundation Automotive Corp., an Alberta Corporation

Case Explained: KRILEY V. BROWNE, ET AL.

Case Explained: VELESA DRAUGHN v. DEPARTMENT OF THE ARMY

Case Explained: RAMIREZ V. RIVERSIDE COUNTY SHERIFF’S DEPARTMENT, ET AL.

Case Explained: LEGACY SPENCER, as the Administrator for the Estate of Sylvester Demetrius Selby Plaintiff – v. EDWARD GLASER, III

Case Explained: United States of America v. Lance Brunsting

Case Explained: Non-Argument Calendar UNITED STATES OF AMERICA v. ANTWAN D. WILLIAMS

Case Explained: SCILEX PHARMACEUTICALS INC v. AVEVA DRUG DELIVERY SYSTEMS, INC

Case Explained: Gladstone v. Summit County, et al.

Case Explained: 254268.U US v. Kewuan Gregg

Case Explained: In re TRANSPACIFIC PASSENGER AIR TRANSPORTATION ANTITRUST LITIGATION

Case Explained: UNITED STATES v. REY DAVID FULCAR

Case Explained: 25-1544 Muchiri v. Blanche

Case Explained: 25-1340 Muchiri v. Blanche

Case Explained: LUIS ADRIÁN CORTÉS-RAMOS v. ENRIQUE MARTIN-MORALES

Case Explained: UNITED STATES v. ERIC ROBERT JOHNSON

Case Explained: AFRICAN COMMUNITIES TOGETHER v. MARKWAYNE MULLIN, in the official capacity as Secretary of the U.S. Department of Homeland Security; U.S. DEPARTMENT OF HOMELAND SECURITY; U.S. CITIZENSHIP AND IMMIGRATION SERVICES; UNITED STATES OF AMERICA Before Aframe, Lynch, and Dunlap Circuit Judges JUDGMENT Entered: August 3, 2026 The government has filed an appeal from the district court’s July 2, 2026, order in part continuing its administrative stay of the temporary protected status termination that is at issue in the underlying district court proceedings. On July 21, 2026, the government moved for summary reversal and in the alternative for mandamus relief, seeking an order from this court “summarily vacat[ing] the district court’s administrative stay and direct[ing] it to promptly adjudicate [p]laintiffs’ underlying [5 U.S.C.] § 705 motion.” Plaintiffs responded on July 24, 2026, and the government replied on July 27, 2026 Complicating matters, we note that on July 31, 2026, with this appeal pending, the district court issued an order in which it stated that, upon receipt of mandate from this court, (1) the challenged administrative stay would be dissolved, and (2) a new administrative stay would enter The district court thus appeared to assume that it did not have jurisdiction to enter an order that – 2 – would be effective immediately, likely because of the pendency of this appeal. We are therefore inclined to treat the July 31, 2026, order as an indicative ruling that the court would grant relief the government seeks here — dissolution of the existing administrative stay — if jurisdiction were returned to that court. See Fed. R. Civ. P. 62.1; see also United States v. Rodriguez-Milian, 820 F.3d 26 (1st Cir. 2016) (treating district court order granting compassionate release while sentencing appeal was pending as an indicative ruling). In light of the district court’s July 31 2026, order, we remand for further proceedings and decline to retain jurisdiction. See Fed. R App. P. 12.1(b). Furthermore, it is the view of this court that the district court must rule promptly on the motion before it and nothing in this judgment should be read to approve the briefing deadlines set by that court. The appeal is dismissed. Mandate shall enter forthwith DUNLAP, Circuit Judge, dissenting. This proceeding concerns the Secretary of Homeland Security’s revocation of Temporary Protected Status (“TPS”) for Somalia. On July 2 2026, the district court denied the government’s request to lift the administrative stay that had been in place while the Supreme Court considered a challenge to the revocation of TPS for Syria and Haiti in Mullin v. Doe, 146 S. Ct. 2121 (2026) — a case, decided by the Court on June 25, 2026 which bore directly on the claims asserted by the plaintiffs in this case. The administrative stay was temporally indefinite: According to the July 2 order, it was to “remain in place until further notice to permit the [c]ourt to resolve the issues” presented by the plaintiffs.1 The stay has been in place for longer than a temporary restraining order (“TRO”) may lawfully be in force. See Fed R. Civ. P. 65(b)(2). The government appealed the July 2 order. We have jurisdiction because, as explained below, the stay has the practical effect of granting an injunction. 28 U.S.C. § 1292(a)(1); see Abbott v. Perez, 585 U.S. 579, 594 (2018). The stay ought to be vacated I see no basis to issue an open-ended administrative stay here. An “administrative stay is supposed to be a short-lived prelude to the main event: a ruling on the motion” for preliminary relief. United States v. Texas, 144 S. Ct. 797, 799 (2024) (Barrett, J., concurring). There is no doubt that an administrative stay can be a valid tool when rightly employed; it may be used, for instance, to allow a court “time to deliberate.” Id. at 798. But administrative stays also create a risk of misuse by allowing a court to avoid the necessity of assessing whether a movant has carried its burden to obtain injunctive relief — including by demonstrating likelihood of success on the merits — even while effectively granting such relief. Id. at 799; see Nken v. Holder, 556 U.S. 418 425-26 (2009) (describing movant’s burden

Case Explained: United States v. Underwood

Case Explained: UNITED STATES OF AMERICA v. ALONSO PINEDA-TORRES

Case Explained: Non-Argument Calendar UNITED STATES OF AMERICA v. KIA HICKMAN

Case Explained: United States v. Doe

Case Explained: Non-Argument Calendar DWIGHT SMITH CATHERINE SMITH BRYANT SMITH v. CITY OF JOHNS CREEK a Municipality in the State of Georgia ERIC EHRENREICH BRADLEY ROSENQUIST MICHAEL BACON JAMES TAIT, et al USCA11 Case: 26-11386 Document: 13-1 Date Filed: 08/03/2026 Page: 1 of 3 2

Case Explained: Non-Argument Calendar UNITED STATES OF AMERICA v. FLOYD BOSTIC

Case Explained: Non-Argument Calendar JUSTIN MICHAEL ROSSI v. STATE OF FLORIDA DEPARTMENT OF CHILDREN AND FAMILIES FLORIDA STATE HOSPITAL

Case Explained: GreenLatinos, et al. v. Suncor Energy (U.S.A.)

Case Explained: United States v. Beard

Case Explained: BAILEY V. MEJIA, ET AL.

Case Explained: OROZCO AGUILAR, ET AL. V. BLANCHE

Case Explained: Non-Argument Calendar ROGER LEE MATTHIS v. JUBAL ROGERS ROGER FRAZIER QUOSHANNA WILLIAMS REGINALD MCCAIN SOUTH FULTON POLICE DEPARTMENT

Case Explained: SALAKO V. FRANKLIN, ET AL.

Case Explained: USA V. FLORES

Case Explained: Non-Argument Calendar HALEY COLE v. LAWRENCE CHRISTOPHER YOUNG ELLYN SHOOK RYAN OAKES in their individual and professional capacities ACCENTURE, LLP

Case Explained: USA V. RAMIREZ

Case Explained: UNITED STATES OF AMERICA v. JOSEPH R. BEILHARZ

Case Explained: MARCEAUX V. COUNTY OF MARICOPA, ET AL.

Case Explained: GRIEPSMA V. ANDERSEN, ET AL.

Case Explained: D’ARTISAN V. CONNOR, ET AL.

Case Explained: DUNLAP V. THOMAS, ET AL.

Case Explained: SHENZHEN ZEHUIJIN INVESTMENT CENTER V. YINGKUI, ET AL.

Case Explained: USA V. ESPINOZA-ROMERO

Case Explained: MONTOYA PARADA V. BLANCHE

Case Explained: NORTHAM V. BISIGNANO

Case Explained: ROBERTS V. STUDIO 15, ET AL.

Case Explained: JAMES V. STATE OF CALIFORNIA, ET AL.

Case Explained: USA V. RIDLEY-THOMAS

Case Explained: HALL V. CITY AND COUNTY OF HONOLULU, ET AL.

Case Explained: USA V. HULL

Case Explained: PRZYBOCKI, ET AL. V. UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTURE, ET AL.

Case Explained: HOPKINS V. CALLAHAN

Case Explained: USA V. REYES-HERNANDEZ

Case Explained: Northland Management & Construction, LLC v. City of Parkville

Case Explained: GRENIER, ET AL. V. USA

Case Explained: Non-Argument Calendar JOHNIE OLIVER, JR v. JUDGE RONNIE K. BATCHELOR GWINNETT JUDICIAL CIRCUIT WARDEN, AUGUSTA SMP UNIT MANAGER RASHEEDA THOMAS SEARGENT NORRINGTON, et al

Case Explained: SCHRADE JONES CARTER GILLIAM v. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA TENNESSEE VALLEY AUTHORITY

Case Explained: Wood v. D’Amico

Case Explained: UNITED STATES OF AMERICA v. BOBBY LEE FISH, JR

Case Explained: In re GREGORY K. CLINTON

Case Explained: VAPOR TECHNOLOGY ASSOCIATION; AMV HOLDINGS, LLC, d/b/a Kure CBD and Vape; WAGES AND WHITE LION INVESTMENTS, LLC, d/b/a Triton Distribution; BRIGHT LEAF VENDORS, INC.; REAGAN MURPHY v. MCKINLEY WOOTEN, JR

Case Explained: ROBERT PAUL SHARPE v. THE DAVINCI COMPANY, LLC; DAVINCI AEROSPACE, LLC; DANIEL M SHOAF ALGERNON LEE BUTLER, III Trustee –

Case Explained: HARRIS INVESTMENT HOLDINGS, LLC, a Georgia Limited Liability Company Plaintiff – v. BFJ OF USA, LLC; CHOUDRY BUTTAR, a North Carolina Resident; SHEHZAD QUAMAR, a North Carolina Resident; FAISAL M. YASIN, An Illinois Resident Defendants –

Case Explained: Summary Calendar United States of America Plaintiff— v. Heather Hoffman Defendant—

Case Explained: Summary Calendar United States of America Plaintiff— v. Travis Hunter Blank Defendant—

Case Explained: UNITED STATES OF AMERICA v. CELESTE ALLEN PARDUE

Case Explained: Afeez Abiola Alao Petitioner— v. Warden Federal Medical Center Fort Worth Respondent—

Case Explained: JACIEL CIRRUS ROJAS v. SAMUEL OLSON, Field Office Director, Chicago Field Office Immigration and Customs Enforcement, and SCOTT SMITH Jail Administrator, Dodge County Jail

Case Explained: Weems Industries, Inc., doing business as Legacy Manufacturing Company v. Teknor Apex Company

Case Explained: Fayetteville Public Library, a political subdivision in the City of Fayetteville, State of Arkansas; Eureka Springs Carnegie Public Library; Central Arkansas Library System; Nate Coulter; Olivia Farrell Hayden Kirby Leta Caplinger; Adam Webb; Arkansas Library Association; Advocates for All Arkansas Libraries; Pearl’s Books, LLC; Wordsworth Community Bookstore LLC, doing business as WordsWorth Books; American Booksellers Association; Association of American Publishers, Inc.; Authors Guild, Inc.; Comic Book Legal Defense Fund; Freedom to Read Foundation; Miel Partain, In her own capacity and as parent and next friend of M. Partain, by next friend M. Partain v. Crawford County, Arkansas; Chris Keith

Case Explained: CASSANDRA SYKES v. EXPERIAN INFORMATION SOLUTIONS, INC

Case Explained: UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE SIXTH CIRCUIT UNITED STATES OF AMERICA v. MICHAEL ALEXANDER DAVIS ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) )

Case Explained: United States of America v. Victor Dominquez

Case Explained: United States of America v. Richard Stone

Case Explained: United States of America v. Marain Larayondra Rankins

Case Explained: Danielle M. Rennenger v. Aquawood, LLC; Ming Yiu Chan

Case Explained: Santos Teresa Sanchez Henrriquez v. Todd Blanche, Acting Attorney General of the United States1

Case Explained: United States of America v. Donavan Jay White Owl

Case Explained: Iowans for Alternatives to Smoking & Tobacco, Inc.; Global Source Distribution LLC; Wages and White Lion Investments, LLC, doing business as Triton Distribution; Smokin Hot LLC; Central Iowa Vapors WDM, LLC; Taste the Vape LLC, doing business as Route 69 Vapor; Martina Pagano; James Cole v. Mary Mosiman

Case Explained: United States of America v. Jesus Salamo-Roche

Case Explained: David Rolfsrud, as Trustee of the other – David and Gena Rolfsrud Mineral Trust dated April 1, 2016; Gena Rolfsrud, as Trustee of the other – David and Gena Rolfsrud Mineral Trust dated April 1, 2016 Plaintiffs – Appellants Davis Exploration, LLC v. Continental Resources, Inc.; Petro-Hunt, LLC

Case Explained: United States of America v. Clayton Reynolds

Case Explained: United States of America v. L.C. Myrick

Case Explained: Brent King, Receiver v. Texas Insurance Company

Case Explained: WOLF V. VALLEY, ET AL.

Case Explained: POVER V. THE CAPITAL GROUP COMPANIES, INC., ET AL.

Case Explained: Rick Hibbert v. MC Realty Group, LLC UMB Financial Corporation, doing business as UMB Bank JanCo FS3, LLC, doing business as Velociti Services

Case Explained: HESS V. CENTURION HEALTH, ET AL.

Case Explained: KUO V. NGY GROUP, INC., ET AL.

Case Explained: Wells Fargo Bank N.A., as Securities Intermediary v. Ameritas Life Insurance Corp

Case Explained: NEWLIN V. LAKESIDE PEDIATRIC & ADOLESCENT MEDICINE, PLLC, ET AL.

Case Explained: ANDRICH V. BANNER HEALTH, ET AL.

Case Explained: KULIKOVA V. NEWREZ, LLC, ET AL.

Case Explained: SANDY V. PARAMOUNT PICTURES CORPORATION

Case Explained: NEWLIN V. NEWLIN, ET AL.

Case Explained: COLEN V. COUNTY OF RIVERSIDE, ET AL.

Case Explained: BARTHA V. STATE OF ARIZONA

Case Explained: HICKS V. STATE OF WASHINGTON, ET AL.

Case Explained: BLOUNT V. USA

Case Explained: TAYLOR V. SEATTLE AND KING COUNTY DEPARTMENT OF PUBLIC HEALTH, ET AL.

Case Explained: SINHA V. STATE OF CALIFORNIA, ET AL.

Case Explained: MARTINEZ V. CITY OF SANTA MARIA, ET AL.

Case Explained: MUNOZ, ET AL. V. ALORICA, INC., ET AL.

Case Explained: MULTIPLE ENERGY TECHNOLOGIES, LLC V. CASDEN

Case Explained: RODRIGUEZ VAZQUEZ V. BOSTOCK, ET AL.

Case Explained: FinalOpinion in case# 23-2309

Case Explained: ARKEYO LLC v. SAGGEZZA, INC

Case Explained: ELEZI V. BISIGNANO

Case Explained: Fusilier v. State of Kansas, et al.

Case Explained: FinalOpinion in case# 23-2467

Case Explained: CRUZ MATAS V. BLANCHE

Case Explained: DEMAN KIM v. TODD BLANCHE,* Acting Attorney General

Case Explained: SEEKAMP, ET AL. V. COMMISSIONER OF INTERNAL REVENUE

Case Explained: UNITED STATES v. NAPOLEON GONZALEZ

Case Explained: ROZALIYA MYGALYUK, ET AL V. TODD BLANCHE

Case Explained: MARIN V. CATANO, ET AL.

Case Explained: ANASH, INC. d/b/a Wyoming Valley Yeshiva; RABBI SHIMON HELLINGER v. BOROUGH OF KINGSTON

Case Explained: YOONESSI V. JAMES, ET AL.

Case Explained: SCOTT V. EDWARDS, ET AL.

Case Explained: ROGERS V. COOPER, ET AL.

Case Explained: Scott v. Ward, et al.

Case Explained: 25-1633: ON24, INC. v. WEBINAR.NET, INC. [RULE 36 JUDGMENT], Nonprecedential

Case Explained: 25-1337: ILDICO INC. v. US [OPINION], Precedential

Case Explained: 26-1827: YAHNE v. US [ORDER], Nonprecedential

Case Explained: JAMES v. COLLINS

Case Explained: 24-1690: QOYE v. US [OPINION], Precedential

Case Explained: TAYLOR v. PEOPLE OF THE VENUE OF THE FOREIGN UNITED

Case Explained: HOLLINS v. MSPB

Case Explained: 26-1924: WILLIAMS v. DVA [ORDER], Nonprecedential

Case Explained: 26-1994: WALKER v. DHS [ORDER], Nonprecedential

Case Explained: 26-2014: SANDERS v. US [ORDER], Nonprecedential

Case Explained: COMMUNICATIONS, LLC v. SAMSUNG ELECTRONICS CO., LTD

Case Explained: SCHMEISSER GMBH v. AC-UNITY D.O.O

Case Explained: AFRICAN COMMUNITIES TOGETHER; SAMUEL DOE v. MARKWAYNE MULLIN, in the official capacity as Secretary of the U.S. Department of Homeland Security; U.S. DEPARTMENT OF HOMELAND SECURITY; U.S. CITIZENSHIP AND IMMIGRATION SERVICES; UNITED STATES Before Rikelman, Aframe, and Dunlap Circuit Judges JUDGMENT Entered: July 29, 2026 Previously, upon the government’s “Motion to Lift Abeyance and for Stay Pending Appeal Immediate Administrative Stay, and Summary Reversal,” we lifted the abeyance of this appeal and denied an administrative stay of the district court’s order postponing the termination of Temporary Protected Status (“TPS”) for Ethiopia. Upon further briefing, we now reverse the postponement

Case Explained: Non-Argument Calendar PAMELA DENISE COLBERT v. CENTRAL GEORGIA TECHNICAL COLLEGE

Case Explained: KAREN CORNISH-ADEBIYI; LUIS SANTIAGO; MONICA BLAIR-SMITH v. CAESARS ENTERTAINMENT, INC.; BOARDWALK REGENCY LLC, d/b/a Caesars Atlantic City Hotel & Casino; HARRAHS ATLANTIC CITY OPERATING COMPANY, LLC, d/b/a Harrahs Resort Atlantic City Hotel & Casino; TROPICANA ATLANTIC CITY CORPORATION, d/b/a Tropicana Casino and Resort Atlantic City; MGM RESORTS INTERNATIONAL; MARINA DISTRICT DEVELOPMENT COMPANY, LLC d/b/a Borgata Hotel Casino & Spa; HARD ROCK INTERNATIONAL INC.; SEMINOLE HARD ROCK SUPPORT SERVICES, LLC; BOARDWALK 1000, LLC d/b/a Hard Rock Hotel & Casino Atlantic City; CENDYN GROUP, LLC 2

Case Explained: PARAMONT CONTURA, LLC v. DIRECTOR, OFFICE OF WORKERS’ COMPENSATION PROGRAMS UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF LABOR; JAMIE L. BILLITER

Case Explained: Summary Calendar United States of America Plaintiff— v. Darwin Ayala-Ochoa Defendant—

Case Explained: Non-Argument Calendar JOSIAH ANTHONY HADLEY v. SECRETARY, DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS

Case Explained: UNITED STATES OF AMERICA v. KRISTI HEATHER KING

Case Explained: Summary Calendar United States of America Plaintiff— v. Marcus Allen Harlston Defendant—

Case Explained: Non-Argument Calendar UNITED STATES OF AMERICA v. WASHINGTON FRANCISCO MERO-MERO JUAN CARLOS MARIN-MERO ANTHONY BRYAN MERO-MERO Appeals from the United States District Court for the Southern District of Florida

Case Explained: Thomas B. Bennett, Trustee for the MTE Litigation Trust Plaintiff— v. Mark Siffin Defendant—

Case Explained: Summary Calendar Gracie Faye Harris Finley Plaintiff— v. Americredit Financial Services, Incorporated, doing business as GM Financial; Gulfport Capital, L.L.C., doing business as Champion Chrysler Dodge Jeep Ram Defendants—

Case Explained: Summary Calendar John Hurt Plaintiff— v. Brandon Garcia; Scott Sorbet; Julie Mandrell; Connie Hambrick; Hilltop Holdings, Incorporated; Dudley Strawn Defendants—

Case Explained: In re Amet de La Caridad Aldama Aleman

Case Explained: Robinson v. Oglala Sioux Tribe, et al.

Case Explained: 26a0209p.06

Case Explained: UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE SIXTH CIRCUIT UNITED STATES OF AMERICA v. JARVIS CLAYBORN ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) )

Case Explained: UNITED STATES OF AMERICA v. MARK RANDLE

Case Explained: United States of America v. Lionel Cawthon

Case Explained: United States of America v. Isaiah Thomas

Case Explained: JEFFREY R. JONES v. BRIAN LAMMER

Case Explained: USA V. $204,700 IN US CURRENCY

Case Explained: USA V. YATES

Case Explained: JOHN KUTRUBIS and BETTY STOKES v. EUGENIA KAMBEROS

Case Explained: 26-1548: TROVE BRANDS, LLC v. CAMELBAK PRODUCTS, LLC [ORDER], Nonprecedential

Case Explained: 26-1700: GOLDSMITH v. MSPB [ORDER], Nonprecedential

Case Explained: 26-1852: YOUNG v. OPM [ORDER], Nonprecedential

Case Explained: 26-1964: DAVID v. ARMY [ORDER], Nonprecedential

Case Explained: 26-1939: BRADLEY v. MSPB [ORDER], Nonprecedential

Case Explained: DARDEN V. BISIGNANO

Case Explained: JOLIET AVIONICS, INC v. CITY OF AURORA, ILLINOIS

Case Explained: UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE SIXTH CIRCUIT TAMMY W. RUSSELL v. U.S. DEPARTMENT OF THE TREASURY ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ON APPEAL FROM THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF OHIO O P I N I O N

Case Explained: DOUMITT V. BISIGNANO

Case Explained: SERENITY INVESTMENTS, LLC, ET AL. V. SUN HUNG KAI STRATEGIC CAPITAL, LTD., ET AL.

Case Explained: ROBERT R. RICHARDSON v. NORTHWESTERN MEMORIAL HEALTHCARE and CENTRAL DUPAGE PHYSICIAN GROUP, d/b/a Northwestern Medicine Regional Medical Group

Case Explained: United States v. Ellett

Case Explained: Garrett v. Denver C.A.R.E.S., et al.

Case Explained: United States v. Meier

Case Explained: Non-Argument Calendar UNITED STATES OF AMERICA v. KENNETH H. BURKE, JR

Case Explained: UNITED STATES OF AMERICA Plaintiff – v. GARY ROCKY JONES Defendant –

Case Explained: Non-Argument Calendar UNITED STATES OF AMERICA v. HARLAN DECOSTE

Case Explained: UNITED STATES OF AMERICA v. GEORGE HAMER, II

Case Explained: In re MARK ANTHONY KEY

Case Explained: UNITED STATES OF AMERICA v. ROBERT PATRICK HOFFMAN, II

Case Explained: In re: ALECTO HEALTHCARE SERVICES LLC, A DELAWARE LIMITED LIABILITY COMPANY Debtor THE REED ACTION JUDGMENT CREDITORS v. ALECTO HEALTHCARE SERVICES, LLC

Case Explained: UNITED STATES OF AMERICA Plaintiff – v. DARRELL ALAN THOMPSON Defendant –

Case Explained: DR. RHONDA L. JACKSON v. EDGEFIELD COUNTY WATER AND SEWER AUTHORITY; HOPE CARROWAY

Case Explained: UNITED STATES OF AMERICA Plaintiff – v. ABDULLAH KHALIL MICHELLE Defendant –

Case Explained: UNITED STATES OF AMERICA Plaintiff – v. THOMAS EMMANUEL WILLIAMS Defendant –

Case Explained: SAIRA GHUMMAN v. BOEING INTELLIGENCE & ANALYTICS, INC Defendant – Appellee —————————— EQUAL EMPLOYMENT OPPORTUNITY COMMISSION Amicus Supporting

Case Explained: UNITED STATES OF AMERICA v. DONNELL EDWARD CALLAHAM

Case Explained: MICHAEL CHATMAN v. PETER B. HEGSETH, Secretary of Defense; CHRISTINE E. WORMUTH Secretary of the Army; LT. GEN DAVID G. BASSETT, Defense Contract Management Agency

Case Explained: In re WELDON EUGENE HOLTZCLAW, JR

Case Explained: DAVID KEITH WILLIS v. JUDGE TODD SPONSELLER

Case Explained: WESLEY LEON BETHEA v. T. BISSETTE; CITY OF WILSON; BENNY BOYKIN; CALVIN WOODARD

Case Explained: In re JIMMY LEE ALLRED

Case Explained: JORDAN OWENS v. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA

Case Explained: PRESIDENTIAL CANDIDATE NUMBER P60005535 v. CHIEF JUDGE DERRICK WATSON, of Honolulu, Hawaii, United States District Court of Hawaii; JUDGE MICHAEL SEABRIGHT; JUDGE LESLIE KOBAYASHIA; JUDGE JILL OTAKE; JUDGE HELEN GILLMOR; MAGISTRATE JUDGE ROM TRADER Defendants –

Case Explained: In re ROBERT CHRISTIANSEN

Case Explained: ROBERT MCKINLEY BLANKENSHIP v. JIM TERRY SHORTT, Attorney

Case Explained: In re EMORY CHILES

Case Explained: UNITED STATES OF AMERICA v. DAVID TURNER

Case Explained: UNITED STATES OF AMERICA v. ERICK RAHUMID HOBBS

Case Explained: CHARLES TERRY v. SUPERINTENDENT JONATHAN FRAME, Mount Olive Correctional Complex and Jail

Case Explained: DAVID GRAHAM GRICE v. LINDA B. FORD, Agent for Commonwealth of Virginia Department of Motor Vehicles; COMMONWEALTH OF VIRGINIA DEPARTMENT OF MOTOR VEHICLES; GERALD F. LACKEY, Agent for the Commonwealth of Virginia Department of Vehicles

Case Explained: UNITED STATES OF AMERICA v. MICHAEL SCOTT HOOVER

Case Explained: UNITED STATES OF AMERICA v. SERVANDO MENDOZA

Case Explained: UNITED STATES OF AMERICA v. SARAH LYNN BERRY

Case Explained: ROBERT ALLEN PAUL BROWN, JR v. WEST VIRGINIA STATE POLICE FORENSIC LABORATORY, in its official and individual capacity; REBECCA E. HARRIS, in her official and individual capacity

Case Explained: UNITED STATES OF AMERICA v. MILTON LEWIS LANE, JR

Case Explained: UNITED STATES OF AMERICA v. JOSE MIGUEL TAPIA

Case Explained: DARREL R. FISHER v. PETER A. MOORE, JR.; JAMES C. DEVER, III; LOUISE W. FLANAGAN; W EARL BRITT; TERRENCE W. BOYLE; RICHARD E. MYERS, II

Case Explained: UNITED STATES OF AMERICA v. MARCUS ISAIAH CURRY

Case Explained: TORIAN GAITHER v. CAPTAIN JEFFERSON, Sussex I State Prison; LIEUTENANT HOLLIS; OFFICER L. WEST, Sussex I State Prison

Case Explained: Summary Calendar United States of America Plaintiff— v. Derek Lyn Minger Defendant—

Case Explained: Summary Calendar Steven Lawrence Hopper Petitioner— v. Eric Guerrero, Executive Director, Texas Department of Criminal Justice Respondent—

Case Explained: UNITED STATES OF AMERICA v. ROBERTO ANTOINE DARDEN

Case Explained: Summary Calendar United States of America Plaintiff— v. Samuel David Sanford, III Defendant—

Case Explained: Summary Calendar Olamide Olatayo Bello Petitioner— v. Kristi Ciolli, Warden, Federal Correctional Institution Seagoville Respondent—

Case Explained: Summary Calendar United States of America Plaintiff— v. Vicente Javier Carrillo-Ojeda Defendant—

Case Explained: Summary Calendar Nafeesa H. Naylor Plaintiff— v. Town of Rayville; Timothy L. Colvin; Jeffery Fields; Neal Harwell; Randy Jack; Popeyes Louisiana Kitchen; XYZ Insurance Companies; Natasha Robinson Defendants—

Case Explained: IN RE: ABBOTT LABORATORIES, et al., PRETERM INFANT NUTRITION PRODUCTS LIABILITY LITIGATION TERRAINE ABDULLAH, on her own behalf and as Parent and Natural Guardian of H.S., a minor v. MEAD JOHNSON & COMPANY LLC, et al

Case Explained: 26a0208p.06

Case Explained: UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE SIXTH CIRCUIT UNITED STATES OF AMERICA v. CHRISTOPHER M. CLOUGH ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) )

Case Explained: Summary Calendar In the Matter of Lockwood Holdings, Incorporated Debtor Michael Lockwood v. B. Riley Financial, Incorporated; Mark Shapiro; GlassRatner Advisory & Capital Group, L.L.C

Case Explained: UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE SIXTH CIRCUIT MUELLER BRASS COMPANY Plaintiff – v. DAVID CROMPTON Defendant – Third Party Plaintiff – Appellant MUELLER INDUSTRIES, INC Third-Party Defendant – Appellee ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) )

Case Explained: United States of America v. Benjamin K. Striplin

Case Explained: United States of America v. Leonard J. Higgins

Case Explained: United States of America v. Lance Quintin Longie

Case Explained: SEIDL V. BISIGNANO

Case Explained: AMAYA, ET AL. V. MENZIES AVIATION USA, INC., ET AL.

Case Explained: United States of America v. Rasheem Damonte Bogan

Case Explained: Matthew Goforth, an individual; Malinda Goforth, an individual; MG Management Co., LLC, a Missouri Limited Liability Company; Malinda’s Sugar and Spice LLC, a Missouri Limited Liability Company v. Transform Holdco, LLC, a Delaware limited liability company; Hometown Midco LLC, a Delaware limited liability company; ESL Investments, Inc., a Delaware corporation; ESL Partners, L.P., a Delaware limited partnership

Case Explained: RAYA V. BARKA, ET AL.

Case Explained: JAMES v. COLLINS

Case Explained: V.O.S. SELECTIONS, INC v. TRUMP

Case Explained: USA V. LOPEZ

Case Explained: Anthony Knight v. Cambria Company, LLC

Case Explained: ENVIRONMENTAL DEFENSE FUND v. ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY AND LEE M. ZELDIN AIR PERMITTING FORUM, ET AL Consolidated with 21-1039, 21-1259, 25-1176

Case Explained: FRITZ v. COLLINS

Case Explained: IN RE: ABBOTT LABORATORIES, et al., PRETERM INFANT NUTRITION PRODUCTS LIABILITY LITIGATION TERRAINE ABDULLAH, on her own behalf and as Parent and Natural Guardian of H.S., a minor v. MEAD JOHNSON & COMPANY LLC, et al

Case Explained: AMAYA, ET AL. V. MENZIES AVIATION USA, INC., ET AL.

Case Explained: IN RE: ABBOTT LABORATORIES, et al., PRETERM INFANT NUTRITION PRODUCTS LIABILITY LITIGATION TERRAINE ABDULLAH, on her own behalf and as Parent and Natural Guardian of H.S., a minor v. MEAD JOHNSON & COMPANY LLC, et al

Case Explained: IN RE: ABBOTT LABORATORIES, et al., PRETERM INFANT NUTRITION PRODUCTS LIABILITY LITIGATION TERRAINE ABDULLAH, on her own behalf and as Parent and Natural Guardian of H.S., a minor v. MEAD JOHNSON & COMPANY LLC, et al

Case Explained: Steven D. Magee Plaintiff— v. Varsity Brands Holding Company, Incorporated; Adam Blumenfeld; Jerry Garcia Defendants—

Case Explained: JOSUE ARIEL FUENTES; CRISTIAN AYALA RIVAS v. UNITED STATES CITIZENSHIP AND IMMIGRATION SERVICES

Case Explained: JAY FOLSE v. JOHN MCCUSKEY, JR., in his individual and official capacities; G. RUSSELL ROLLYSON, JR., in his individual and official capacities; WALLACE LOONEY in his individual and official capacities; LISA HOPKINS, in her individual and official capacities; STEPHEN CONNOLLY, in his individual and official capacities; MICHAEL NUSBAUM, in his individual and official capacities; KEVIN FOREMAN, in his individual and official capacities

Case Explained: CRYSTAL CZERNO v. GENERAL ELECTRIC COMPANY MONSANTO COMPANY; SOLUTIA, INC.; PHARMACIA LLC; BAYER, AG; SABIC INNOVATIVE PLASTICS GLOBAL TECHNOLOGIES LP; SABIC INNOVATIVE PLASTICS TECHNOLOGIES, INC.; SABIC INNOVATIVE PLASTICS US LLC; SAUDI BASIC INDUSTRIES CORP., (SABIC); GE PLASTICS

Case Explained: Non-Argument Calendar UNITED STATES OF AMERICA v. JEFFREY RYAN CLARK RICHARD DEWISE OTIS SANDERS, JR

Case Explained: PRAKASH DHOJ RANA v. TODD BLANCHE, Acting Attorney General

Case Explained: Non-Argument Calendar UNITED STATES OF AMERICA v. ANGELA CHEW

Case Explained: Non-Argument Calendar DANNY LEO VALDIVIA-ALEMAN JENNIFER VALESKA REYES-JAENZ JAYDEN LEONARDO VALDIVIA-REYES JAYKOB OSDANNY VALDIVIA-REYES v. U.S. ATTORNEY GENERAL

Case Explained: Non-Argument Calendar RHONDA JACKSON v. SUMTER COUNTY GEORGIA

Case Explained: Lichfield v. Kubler, et al.

Case Explained: Non-Argument Calendar UNITED STATES OF AMERICA v. JEREMIAH TRAVIS, III

Case Explained: Non-Argument Calendar UNITED STATES OF AMERICA v. SHAKIRA JANAE ENGLISH

Case Explained: Non-Argument Calendar JONATHAN HARRINGTON v. VERITEXT, LLC FLORIDA BOARD OF BAR EXAMINERS

Case Explained: Non-Argument Calendar UNITED STATES OF AMERICA v. MARCO ORLANDO VADO

Case Explained: Ol Private Counsel v. Olson

Case Explained: Non-Argument Calendar ROSA PERALTA v. U.S. ATTORNEY GENERAL

Case Explained: Non-Argument Calendar WILLIAM MENDOZA BERG v. SOCORRO DEL CARMEN POLANCO SANDOVAL

Case Explained: UNITED STATES OF AMERICA Plaintiff – v. DONALD CRAIG MELVIN Defendant –

Case Explained: Non-Argument Calendar UNITED STATES OF AMERICA v. DOGA KUYON YUOH

Case Explained: MICHAEL SCOTT DAVIS; STETSON MANSFIELD WEBSTER v. BRIAN RATLEDGE, in his official and individual capacity; JENNIFER BEDFORD, in her official and individual capacity; JULIE BELL, in her official and individual capacity; DAMION MCCULLERS, in his official and individual capacity

Case Explained: KENT J. ASHTON v. FEDERAL AVIATION ADMINISTRATION, Administrator

Case Explained: DONALD H. KIMBALL v. DAVID N. KIMBALL

Case Explained: UNITED STATES OF AMERICA v. KENYADA JAQU

Case Explained: In re STEPHEN NIVENS

Case Explained: MARLON DWAYNE BOYKIN v. INTERNAL REVENUE SERVICE

Case Explained: G.S MICHAEL T. MOORE v. MAYOR BRANDON SCOTT; P.F. WILCOX; ROBERT LEONARD

Case Explained: FRANK VEGA v. AMURCON REALTY COMPANY

Case Explained: JEROME ANDREW BURNETT v. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA; DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE

Case Explained: UNITED STATES OF AMERICA v. CHADIEZ WHITE

Case Explained: OLIVIA JOHNSON v. GINA ABADI; HONG YI ZENG

Case Explained: 26-1774 State of California v. Trump

Case Explained: REYNALDO CRUZ v. UNIÓN INDEPENDIENTE AUTÉNTICA DE LOS EMPLEADOS DE LA AUTORIDAD DE ACUEDUCTOS Y ALCANTARILLADOS; PUERTO RICO AQUEDUCT AND SEWER AUTHORITY; JENNIFFER A. GONZÁLEZ-COLÓN

Case Explained: STATE OF CALIFORNIA; COMMONWEALTH OF MASSACHUSETTS; STATE OF ARIZONA; STATE OF COLORADO; STATE OF CONNECTICUT; STATE OF DELAWARE; STATE OF HAWAI’I; STATE OF ILLINOIS; STATE OF MARYLAND; STATE OF MICHIGAN; STATE OF MINNESOTA; STATE OF NEVADA; STATE OF NEW JERSEY; STATE OF NEW YORK; STATE OF NORTH CAROLINA; STATE OF OREGON; STATE OF RHODE ISLAND; STATE OF VERMONT; STATE OF WASHINGTON; STATE OF WISCONSIN v. MARKWAYNE MULLIN, in the official capacity as Secretary of Homeland Security; UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF HOMELAND SECURITY; MARCO RUBIO, in the official capacity as Secretary of State; UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF STATE; KEITH E SONDERLING, in the official capacity as Acting Secretary of Labor; UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF LABOR; TODD BLANCHE, in the official capacity as Acting Attorney General of the United States; UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE; UNITED STATES Before Barron, Chief Judge Gelpí and Rikelman, Circuit Judges

Case Explained: Cooperstein v. Salt Lake City Corporation, et al.

Case Explained: Non-Argument Calendar GEORGIA SECOND AMENDMENT, INC. THOMAS STEPHENS v. GOVERNOR OF GEORGIA MICHAEL CHASTAIN

Case Explained: Drexler v. Weiser, et al.

Case Explained: Non-Argument Calendar UNITED STATES OF AMERICA v. MIGUEL ANGEL AGUASVIVAS LIZARDO

Case Explained: In Re: AEGIS ASSET MANAGEMENT, LLC Debtor. BAY UNITED HOLDINGS, LLC v. INXS 7, LLC

Case Explained: Non-Argument Calendar UNITED STATES OF AMERICA v. TRAVIS MONTRICE SIMS

Case Explained: United States v. Lin

Case Explained: Non-Argument Calendar PRAXEDIS RODRIGUEZ BARNACHE v. U.S. ATTORNEY GENERAL

Case Explained: Non-Argument Calendar UNITED STATES OF AMERICA v. JOSE MIGUEL DE PAZ TOVILLA

Case Explained: Summary Calendar United States of America Plaintiff— v. Rahool Amin Makani Defendant—

Case Explained: Summary Calendar United States of America Plaintiff— v. David Bailey Defendant—

Case Explained: UNITED STATES v. ARNALDO J. IRIZARRY-IRIZARRY

Case Explained: Summary Calendar United States of America Plaintiff— v. Eric Braziel Defendant—

Case Explained: Computer & Communications Industry Association; NetChoice, L.L.C. Plaintiffs— v. Ken Paxton, Attorney General, State of Texas Defendant—Appellant consolidated with

Case Explained: Summary Calendar United States of America Plaintiff— v. Victoriano Salmeron Defendant—

Case Explained: Computer & Communications Industry Association; NetChoice, L.L.C. Plaintiffs— v. Ken Paxton, Attorney General, State of Texas Defendant—Appellant consolidated with

Case Explained: Summary Calendar United States of America Plaintiff— v. Luis Joel Gonzalez-Pena Defendant—

Case Explained: Summary Calendar Carolina Velasco Plaintiff— v. Killeen Independent School District Defendant—

Case Explained: Jennifer Audette; Robert Audette v. Lake of the Woods County; Lake of the Woods Board of Commissioners; James Nordlof

Case Explained: IN RE: ABBOTT LABORATORIES, et al., PRETERM INFANT NUTRITION PRODUCTS LIABILITY LITIGATION ERICKA MAR, as administratrix of the ESTATE OF RAILEE MAR v. ABBOTT LABORATORIES

Case Explained: Becky Joseph v. Thomas-Grace Construction Inc

Case Explained: WEISS V. PERMANENTE MEDICAL GROUP, INC.

Case Explained: Rosalind A. Clayton v. United States Postal Service; American Postal Workers Union; David Steiner Postmaster General

Case Explained: BRISTOL SPRINGS CUSTOM HOMES, LLC v. ARGO GROUP US, INC.; COLONY INSURANCE CO

Case Explained: PATTERSON V. SIX FLAGS THEME PARKS, INC., ET AL.

Case Explained: CAO V. BLANCHE

Case Explained: MENDEZ-LEMUS V. BLANCHE

Case Explained: AMERICAN WHITEWATER v. FEDERAL ENERGY REGULATORY COMMISSION

Case Explained: 25-1148 | Adsync Technologies, Inc. v. FAA

Case Explained: STEAMFITTERS LOCAL 449 PENSION & RETIREMENT SECURITY FUNDS V. SUNPOWER CORPORATION, ET AL.

Case Explained: FAIRHOLME FUNDS, INC v. FEDERAL HOUSING FINANCE AGENCY, IN ITS CAPACITY AS CONSERVATOR OF THE FEDERAL NATIONAL MORTGAGE ASSOCIATION AND THE FEDERAL HOME LOAN MORTGAGE CORPORATION, ET AL Consolidated with 25-5121, 25-5154, 25-5155 Appeals from the United States District Court for the District of Columbia (No. 1:13-cv-01053) (No. 1:13-mc-01288) John P. Elwood argued the cause for appellants/cross- appellees. With him on the briefs were R. Stanton Jones Anthony Franze, Orion de Nevers, Meaghan M. VerGow, and 2 Michael J. Ciatti. David B. Bergman and Taylor T. Lankford entered appearances Hamish Hume argued the cause for Class appellees. With him on the brief were Adam H. Wierzbowski, Robert Kravetz Michael J. Barry, David H. Thompson, Brian W. Barnes, and John Ramer. Craig L. Briskin and Jonathan M. Shaw entered appearances Brian W. Barnes argued the cause for Berkley appellees/cross-appellants. With him on the briefs were David H. Thompson and John Ramer. Charles J. Cooper and Peter A Patterson entered appearances

Case Explained: JANNEASE JOHNSON v. DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA

Case Explained: JACKSON, ET AL. V. SUZUKI MOTOR OF AMERICA, INC., ET AL.

Case Explained: PHANTOMALERT INC v. APPLE INC

Case Explained: BRAMBLETT, ET AL. V. ALLIED WORLD SPECIALTY INSURANCE COMPANY

Case Explained: KNAACK, ET AL. V. ALLIED WORLD SPECIALTY INSURANCE COMPANY

Case Explained: In re PARKS DIVERSIFIED, L.P. DEBTOR TALON DIVERSIFIED HOLDINGS INC.; NORTH VALLEY MALL II

Case Explained: ANTONIA ELIZABETH CARRIN as the personal representative of the estate of Raymond Marshall Carrin v. ERICA STRONG Warden

Case Explained: Non-Argument Calendar UNITED STATES OF AMERICA v. JAMARUS DEONTAE HOSKINS

Case Explained: LUIS MANUEL RODRIGUEZ MARIA RODRIGUEZ v. IMPERIAL BRANDS, PLC CORPORACION HABANOS, S.A WPP, PLC YOUNG & RUBICAM, LLC BCW, LLC

Case Explained: Dressen v. AstraZeneca AB, et al.

Case Explained: Non-Argument Calendar UNITED STATES OF AMERICA v. JERELLE JONES

Case Explained: BADAR KHAN SURI v. DONALD TRUMP

Case Explained: United States of America Plaintiff— v. Trayvon Murphy Defendant—

Case Explained: CONSOL MINING COMPANY, LLC v. DIRECTOR, OFFICE OF WORKERS’ COMPENSATION PROGRAMS UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF LABOR; LUKE MAIDEN, JR

Case Explained: In the Matter of Scott Vincent Van Dyke Debtor Scott Vincent Van Dyke v. Mary Katherine Alonso; Rudolph Culp; Sarah Patel Pacheco

Case Explained: Summary Calendar United States of America Plaintiff— v. Paul Michael Oliver Defendant—

Case Explained: UNITED STATES OF AMERICA v. DONALD MCDUFFIN WILLIAMS

Case Explained: Summary Calendar United States of America Plaintiff— v. Gustavo Armando Amaya Defendant—

Case Explained: United States of America Plaintiff— v. Talanzo Debrow Defendant—

Case Explained: Summary Calendar Brandon Earl Crocker Petitioner— v. Eric Guerrero, Director, Texas Department of Criminal Justice Correctional Institutions Division Respondent—

Case Explained: Summary Calendar United States of America Plaintiff— v. Jesus Rodriguez De La Cruz Defendant—

Case Explained: Summary Calendar Katie Young Plaintiff— v. Parchment, L.L.C Defendant—

Case Explained: Summary Calendar United States of America Plaintiff— v. T.J. Aguilar Defendant—

Case Explained: UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE SIXTH CIRCUIT DARIN NEWSON v. NYX, LLC ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) )

Case Explained: UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE SIXTH CIRCUIT UNITED STATES OF AMERICA v. DAVID S. TROUTMAN ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) )

Case Explained: DEBRA PRATT v. WISCONSIN ALUMINUM FOUNDRY

Case Explained: United States v. Ford

Case Explained: Gelson Yanez Orellana v. Todd Blanche,1 Acting Attorney General of the United States

Case Explained: UNITED STATES OF AMERICA v. LARRY DARNELL DOSS

Case Explained: BRAD PASSWATER v. TRICIA PRETORIUS, et al

Case Explained: United States of America v. Christopher Martez Hoover

Case Explained: United States of America v. Steven Wayne Whitesell

Case Explained: La Belle Dairy, LLC v. Sharpe Holdings, Inc.; Charles N. Sharpe, Jr. Foundation

Case Explained: United States of America v. Ladonna Henderson

Case Explained: United States of America v. Gregory Shawn Berry

Case Explained: Revenue Management Solutions, LLC v. Commerce Bank Amy Rinard Third Party

Case Explained: HECTOR FUENTES-RAMOS V. TODD BLANCHE

Case Explained: In re PARKS DIVERSIFIED, L.P. DEBTOR TALON DIVERSIFIED HOLDINGS INC.; NORTH VALLEY MALL II

Case Explained: JHONY CABALLERO-CHAVEZ, ET AL V. TODD BLANCHE

Case Explained: ROBERTO DIAZ-BOYZO V. TODD BLANCHE

Case Explained: MCCOLLOUGH V. PORTLAND STATE UNIVERSITY, ET AL.

Case Explained: USA V. PEREDA

Case Explained: KANE V. HAYNES, ET AL.

Case Explained: KANE V. WALDO, ET AL.

Case Explained: 26-1332: YONGQIANG v. FOX FACTORY, INC. [ORDER], Nonprecedential

Case Explained: 26-1570: SABLES v. COLLINS [ORDER], Nonprecedential

Case Explained: FRENCHPORTE IP LLC v. C.H.I. OVERHEAD DOORS, INC

Case Explained: WINE V. MERIT SYSTEMS PROTECTION BOARD, ET AL.

Case Explained: GREEN v. MSPB

Case Explained: 26-1871: ZIMBECK v. COLLINS [ORDER], Nonprecedential

Case Explained: 26-1678: DEBUSK v. COLLINS [ORDER], Nonprecedential

Case Explained: 26-1743: HOLLIE v. US [ORDER], Nonprecedential

Case Explained: 26-1272: MUTAVA v. US [ORDER], Nonprecedential

Case Explained: CEIVA OPCO, LLC v. AMAZON.COM, INC

Case Explained: CARACCIOLO v. FDIC

Case Explained: 26-1582: CARTESSA AESTHETICS, LLC v. ITC [ORDER], Nonprecedential

Case Explained: Non-Argument Calendar TYLER LEE CANARIS v. MICHAEL MCMASTER

Case Explained: Candel & Partners SAS Movant— v. ExxonMobil Corporation Defendant—

Case Explained: Hughes v. Stancil, et al.

Case Explained: HECTOR FUENTES-RAMOS V. TODD BLANCHE

Case Explained: In re PARKS DIVERSIFIED, L.P. DEBTOR TALON DIVERSIFIED HOLDINGS INC.; NORTH VALLEY MALL II

Case Explained: In re PARKS DIVERSIFIED, L.P. DEBTOR TALON DIVERSIFIED HOLDINGS INC.; NORTH VALLEY MALL II

Case Explained: In re PARKS DIVERSIFIED, L.P. DEBTOR TALON DIVERSIFIED HOLDINGS INC.; NORTH VALLEY MALL II

Case Explained: In re PARKS DIVERSIFIED, L.P. DEBTOR TALON DIVERSIFIED HOLDINGS INC.; NORTH VALLEY MALL II

Case Explained: Hoid v. KNOP-2 News, et al.

Case Explained: Charley v. United States, et al.

Case Explained: Savelkoul v. Driscoll

Case Explained: Colorado Montana Wyoming State, et al. v. Smith, et al.

Case Explained: United States v. Pantoja-Hernandez

Case Explained: United States v. Smith

Case Explained: In re WINTER STORM URI NATURAL GAS LITIGATION —————————— RUSS MEHL; EDMUND GROSS

Case Explained: Estate of Kevin Dizmang v. Reed, et al.

Case Explained: United States v. Wallace

Case Explained: LINFO IP, LLC v. TRUSTPILOT, INC

Case Explained: UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE SIXTH CIRCUIT ANDREW J. DESORMEAUX v. KALITTA AIR, LLC ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ON APPEAL FROM THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF MICHIGAN

Case Explained: United States v. Nelson

Case Explained: AbbVie, Incorporated; Allergan, Incorporated; Durata Therapeutics, Incorporated; AbbVie Products, L.L.C.; Aptalis Pharma US, Incorporated; Allergan Sales L.L.C.; Pharmacyclics, L.L.C. Plaintiffs— v. Liz Murrill

Case Explained: Summary Calendar United States of America Plaintiff— v. Juan David Padilla-Perez Defendant—

Case Explained: Non-Argument Calendar UNITED STATES OF AMERICA v. RODZEBIES JERMINE SMITH

Case Explained: UNITED STATES v. JOAN ROSADO MALDONADO

Case Explained: RC Smithfield v. United States

Case Explained: Non-Argument Calendar UNITED STATES OF AMERICA v. LOUIS CHARLES YOUNGLOVE

Case Explained: ROBERT LYNN v. THE BANK OF NEW YORK MELLON; THE BANK OF NEW YORK MELLON CORP

Case Explained: Summary Calendar Brian A. Veals Plaintiff— v. Johnny Hedgemon, in his official and individual capacity; Bobby J Guidroz, in his official and individual capacity; Shaunn Callier Harden, in her official and individual capacity; Derek Metoeyer, in his official and individual capacity; Jessie Bellard, In His Individual & Official Capacity; James Doucet, In His Individual & Official Capacity; Glen Mayer; Wydette Williams; Carla Costello; William M. Gaar; Gregory J. Doucet; Nurse Frost; Nurse D; Kendall Thompson Defendants—

Case Explained: Summary Calendar 20100 Eastex, L.L.C. Plaintiff— v. Saltgrass, Incorporated Defendant—

Case Explained: AbbVie, Incorporated; Allergan, Incorporated; Durata Therapeutics, Incorporated; AbbVie Products, L.L.C.; Aptalis Pharma US, Incorporated; Allergan Sales L.L.C.; Pharmacyclics, L.L.C. Plaintiffs— v. Liz Murrill

Case Explained: Non-Argument Calendar MAURICE D. CUNNINGHAM v. CARNIVAL CRUISE LINE

Case Explained: Howard Lawrence Ellsworth, III; Theresa Lynn Ellsworth Plaintiffs— v. Allan Marx, VA Police Officer; Michael E. Dvorak, VA Police Officer; Gregory Wilson, VA Police Officer; Darrin W. Tanner VA Police Officer; Maurine Henry, Executive Assistant at the VA; Jason Cave, J.D., Executive Director of the VA; Wendell Jones Network Director for VISN 17; Kendrick Brown, was Acting Executive Medical Director in 2022; United States of America Defendants—

Case Explained: Carlos Manuel Ayestas v. Harris County District Attorney’s Office Defendant—

Case Explained: DIMITRIOS GEORGE LIAPIS v. FRANK BISIGNANO Commissioner of Social Security

Case Explained: UNITED STATES OF AMERICA v. DANIEL SAMUEL ETA

Case Explained: Summary Calendar Javier Antonio Amador-Ardon v. Todd Wallace Blanche, Acting U.S. Attorney General

Case Explained: Compeer Financial, ACA; Compeer Financial, PCA; Compeer Financial, FLCA v. Corporate America Lending, Inc

Case Explained: Navashia Akins v. Checkr, Inc

Case Explained: Opinion in case# 25-2268

Case Explained: United States of America v. Dymond Rene Hayden

Case Explained: MERLI VALDEZ-MERIDA V. TODD BLANCHE

Case Explained: WOLFE v. MSPB

Case Explained: JOHNSON v. MSPB

Case Explained: AbbVie, Incorporated; Allergan, Incorporated; Durata Therapeutics, Incorporated; AbbVie Products, L.L.C.; Aptalis Pharma US, Incorporated; Allergan Sales L.L.C.; Pharmacyclics, L.L.C. Plaintiffs— v. Liz Murrill

Case Explained: Opinion in case# 25-2256

Case Explained: NATIONAL PARKS CONSERVATION ASSOCIATION; AMERICAN ASSOCIATION FOR STATE AND LOCAL HISTORY; ASSOCIATION OF NATIONAL PARK RANGERS; COALITION TO PROTECT AMERICA’S NATIONAL PARKS; SOCIETY FOR EXPERIENTIAL GRAPHIC DESIGN; UNION OF CONCERNED SCIENTISTS v. U.S. DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR; DOUG BURGUM, in the official capacity as Secretary of the Interior; NATIONAL PARK SERVICE; JESSICA BOWRON, in the official capacity as the Official Exercising the Delegated Authority of the Director Before Barron, Chief Judge Gelpí and Rikelman, Circuit Judges

Case Explained: ST. DOMINIC ACADEMY, d/b/a Roman Catholic Bishop of Portland, a corporation sole; ROMAN CATHOLIC BISHOP OF PORTLAND, a corporation sole; KEITH RADONIS, on their own behalf and as next friend of children K.Q.R., L.R.R., and L.T.R.; VALORI RADONIS on their own behalf and as next friend of children K.Q.R. L.R.R., and L.T.R v. A. PENDER MAKIN, in the personal capacity and official capacity as Commissioner of the Maine Department of Education; JEFFERSON ASHBY, in the personal capacity; MEGAN SANDERS,* in the official capacity as Commissioner of the Maine Human Rights Commission; EDWARD DAVID, in the personal capacity and official capacity as Commissioner of the Maine Human Rights Commission; JULIE ANN O’BRIEN, in the personal capacity and official capacity as Commissioner of the Maine Human Rights Commission; MARK WALKER in the personal capacity and official capacity as Commissioner of the Maine Human Rights Commission; THOMAS L. DOUGLAS, in the personal capacity and official capacity as Commissioner of the Maine Human Rights Commission * Plaintiffs originally named Jefferson Ashby as a defendant in both his personal capacity and his official capacity as a Commissioner of the Maine Human Rights Commission. Sometime around February 2024, Megan Sanders replaced Jefferson Ashby on the Maine Human Rights Commission. Commissioners, Me. Hum. Rts. Comm’n https://www.maine.gov/mhrc/about/commissioners [https://perma.cc/AQ4H-47JF] (last visited Apr. 28, 2026). As to the claims against Ashby

Case Explained: Non-Argument Calendar RAMON GONZALEZ FIGUEROA v. JETBLUE AIRWAYS CORPORATION

Case Explained: Diamond G Rodeos, et al. v. Gifford

Case Explained: Rothschild v. Sarah Rockefeller Corporation, et al.

Case Explained: Non-Argument Calendar UNITED STATES OF AMERICA v. NICHOLAS P. SMITH

Case Explained: Non-Argument Calendar JAMAL ALLEN v. THE STATE OF ALABAMA BALDWIN COUNTY DISTRICT ATTORNEY SHERIFF, BALDWIN COUNTY CIRCUIT COURT CLERK FOR BALDWIN COUNTY

Case Explained: Non-Argument Calendar WANDA JEAN-BAPTISTE v. CITY OF MIAMI

Case Explained: Non-Argument Calendar UNITED STATES OF AMERICA v. DION DE CESARE

Case Explained: Non-Argument Calendar UNITED STATES OF AMERICA v. TEOPILO BARRIES MUNOZ

Case Explained: Non-Argument Calendar TENNILLE DECOSTE v. THE CITY OF BOYNTON BEACH a Florida Municipal corporation

Case Explained: Non-Argument Calendar UNITED STATES OF AMERICA v. DARWIN JOSE MARTINEZ ANCHUNDIA

Case Explained: Non-Argument Calendar UNITED STATES OF AMERICA v. RICHARD ISRAEL LAZARO

Case Explained: UNITED STATES OF AMERICA v. JASON DIX

Case Explained: Non-Argument Calendar UNITED STATES OF AMERICA v. ALEJANDRA FLOREZ-MEZA

Case Explained: UNITED STATES OF AMERICA v. BOOKER TYRELL HENLEY

Case Explained: Non-Argument Calendar IVETTE T. ECHENIQUE v. HAMILTON HOSPITAL HR, N.P., Testins, Records, Adm RIVERWOODS BEHAVIORAL HOSPITAL All employees, H.R. insurances, physicians, testins therapists, drivers, nurses, screening records adm P.A., N.P HIGHLAND RIVERS BEHAVIORAL HOSPITAL AARP INSURANCE HAMILTON HOSPITAL – AMBULANCE N.P., et al USCA11 Case: 25-14222 Document: 17-1 Date Filed: 07/02/2026 Page: 1 of 8 2

Case Explained: UNITED STATES OF AMERICA v. CHARAY LAMONT TRENT

Case Explained: K.C. LANGFORD Petitioner – v. WARDEN DONNIE STONEBREAKER, Warden, Evans Correctional Institution Respondent –

Case Explained: TIFFANY ADELE KING, as Administratrix of the Estate of Maurice Antoine King Plaintiff – v. CHARLES S. BLACKWOOD

Case Explained: JOHN DOE 1; JOHN DOE 2; JOHN DOE 3; JOHN DOE 4; JOHN DOE 5; JOHN DOE 6; JANE DOE 1; JANE DOE 2; JANE DOE 3; JANE DOE 4; JANE DOE 5 v. OFFICE OF THE DIRECTOR OF NATIONAL INTELLIGENCE; CENTRAL INTELLIGENCE AGENCY; JOHN RATCLIFFE

Case Explained: UNITED STATES OF AMERICA Plaintiff – v. SHRONDA COVINGTON Defendant –

Case Explained: CASSIOPIA RHOADS v. ERIK RIDDELL; JESSICA WHITAKER and SOUTHERN HEALTH PARTNERS, INC.; ROBERT J. WILLIAMS, M.D.; BRANDI GALLOWAY; DONNA WRIGHT; CHANATE BUCHANAN; TONETTA BUGGS; TAMARA ERIKSON

Case Explained: Summary Calendar United States of America Plaintiff— v. Carlos Uriel Pena Penaloza Defendant—

Case Explained: ANDREW JOSEPH DICKS v. RONALD S. WEBER, Warden

Case Explained: Summary Calendar United States of America Plaintiff— v. Montique Oshay Hall Defendant—

Case Explained: In re Google, L.L.C

Case Explained: Progressive Laboratories, Incorporated Plaintiff— v. Living Fuel, Incorporated Defendant—

Case Explained: Summary Calendar Daler Nazarkhudoev v. Todd Wallace Blanche, Acting U.S. Attorney General

Case Explained: Ignacio Sosnava Rodriguez Petitioner— v. Sylvester M. Ortega

Case Explained: Ignacio Sosnava Rodriguez Petitioner— v. Sylvester M. Ortega

Case Explained: Summary Calendar Adolfo Sandor Montero Petitioner— v. Commissioner of Internal Revenue Respondent—

Case Explained: Summary Calendar United States of America Plaintiff— v. Jason Lee Pride Defendant—

Case Explained: UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE SIXTH CIRCUIT MARCUS PIERCE v. SCHWEBEL BAKING COMPANY; LOCAL 377 CHAUFFEURS TEAMSTERS WAREHOUSEMEN & HELPERS UNION ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ON APPEAL FROM THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF OHIO

Case Explained: Wyatt Bury, LLC; Ballpark Investments, LLC, doing business as Hope & Healing Counseling; Wyatt Bury; Pamela Eisenreich State of Missouri ex rel. MO Attorney General Catherine L. Hanaway v. City of Kansas City, Missouri; Jackson County, Missouri —————————— The Alliance for Therapeutic Choice and Scientific Integrity; International Foundation for Therapeutic and Counselling Choice; Laura Haynes, Dr.; The Becket Fund for Religious Liberty; State of Missouri; State of Alabama; State of Alaska; State of Arkansas; State of Florida; State of Georgia; State of Idaho; State of Iowa; State of Kansas; State of Louisiana; State of Montana; State of Nebraska; State of North Dakota; State of Ohio; State of Oklahoma; State of South Carolina; State of South Dakota; State of Texas; State of West Virginia Amici

Case Explained: Joseph Anthony Reyna Plaintiff— v. Spotify Technology, S.A.; Spotify USA, Incorporated; DistroKid, Incorporated; Does 1–10 Defendants—

Case Explained: Jquan Leearthur McInnis v. William Bolin, Warden

Case Explained: USA V. SHI v. BOWEN HU

Case Explained: JOSHUA LAMBERT V. ROBERT MCKAY, ET AL

Case Explained: UNITED STATES OF AMERICA v. JONATHAN S. ROSE

Case Explained: CITY OF HAMMOND, INDIANA v. LAKE COUNTY BOARD OF ELECTIONS, et al

Case Explained: RINNAI AMERICA CORPORATION, ET AL. V. SOUTH COAST AIR QUALITY MANAGEMENT DISTRICT, ET AL.

Case Explained: JOHNSON V. AMAZON.COM, INC., ET AL.

Case Explained: TRACKTIME, LLC v. AMAZON.COM SERVICES LLC

Case Explained: HULL-JUSAINO V. BLANCHE

Case Explained: UNITED STATES OF AMERICA v. BABAJIDE G. ADEFUSI

Case Explained: 24-2327: PERNIX FEDERAL, LLC v. US [OPINION], Nonprecedential

Case Explained: 26a0190p.06

Case Explained: ETISON LLC v. HIGHLEVEL, INC

Case Explained: BERALL v. TELEFLEX MEDICAL INC

Case Explained: Ignacio Sosnava Rodriguez Petitioner— v. Sylvester M. Ortega

Case Explained: USA V. SHI v. BOWEN HU

Case Explained: USA V. SHI v. BOWEN HU

Case Explained: CROSSPOINT CHURCH v. A. PENDER MAKIN

Case Explained: 26-1727: PERDUE v. DVA [ORDER], Nonprecedential

Case Explained: United States of America Plaintiff— v. William Scott Kendall Defendant—

Case Explained: CRUZ RODRIGUEZ V. BLANCHE

Case Explained: Non-Argument Calendar AKEEM MUHAMMAD v. SECRETARY, FLORIDA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS BOYCE TURNER Correctional Officer

Case Explained: JOSÉ ERNESTO HERNÁNDEZ-CASTRODAD; IRIS MARTA MARCANO; CONJUGAL PARTNERSHIP HERNÁNDEZ-MARCANO v. HON. SIGFRIDO STEIDEL-FIGUEROA

Case Explained: United States v. Lacona

Case Explained: Bolongia v. Target Corporation, et al.

Case Explained: United States v. Reid

Case Explained: Moyer v. Murray, et al.

Case Explained: DEBORAH LAUBSCHER ROBERT LAUBSCHER as surviving parents of Dani Laubscher v. GWINNETT COUNTY

Case Explained: Non-Argument Calendar WILL TWIGG v. PALM BEACH COUNTY SHERIFF’S OFFICE

Case Explained: Non-Argument Calendar In re: BARBARA JOYCE REAVES SMITH Debtor. VINCE FARIDANI v. BARBARA JOYCE REAVES SMITH

Case Explained: Non-Argument Calendar JOSEPH DEAN a Tampa resident v. ROKU INC a Delaware corporation headquartered in San Jose, California

Case Explained: Non-Argument Calendar UNITED STATES OF AMERICA v. KANETHIA TREMEKA STEELE

Case Explained: Non-Argument Calendar ADRIAN CLARK v. PUBLIX SUPER MARKETS, INC

Case Explained: Non-Argument Calendar UNITED STATES OF AMERICA v. ALBERT COLE

Case Explained: Non-Argument Calendar UNITED STATES OF AMERICA v. MICHAEL CHRISTOPHER ROWSER

Case Explained: Non-Argument Calendar UNITED STATES OF AMERICA v. DANIEL OCHOA

Case Explained: UNITED STATES OF AMERICA v. BRANDON L. AUMILLER

Case Explained: Non-Argument Calendar SHANNON BAZEMORE v. INTERNATIONAL LONGSHOREMEN’S ASSOCIATION ILA LOCAL 1475

Case Explained: UNITED STATES OF AMERICA v. IVAN ERNESTO ARROYO PARRA

Case Explained: UNITED STATES OF AMERICA v. NOAH LEE CRADDOCK

Case Explained: Alta Power, L.L.C. Plaintiff— v. General Electric International, Incorporated Defendant—

Case Explained: Summary Calendar United States of America Plaintiff— v. Orvis Wayne Porter Defendant—

Case Explained: Non-Argument Calendar ZANE BYRD v. AUSTAL USA, LLC

Case Explained: Summary Calendar United States of America Plaintiff— v. Charles Roy Defendant—

Case Explained: Summary Calendar Norman Tarver Plaintiff— v. First Student, Incorporated Defendant—

Case Explained: Summary Calendar United States of America Plaintiff— v. Walter J. Massey, Jr Defendant—

Case Explained: Summary Calendar Joseph Anthony Reyna Plaintiff— v. Jane Nelson

Case Explained: Christopher Dilworth Plaintiff— v. Landon Tucker Defendant—

Case Explained: Summary Calendar Deana Ayres Plaintiff— v. ChemJet International, Incorporated, doing business as ChemJet, Incorporated Defendant—

Case Explained: 26a0189p.06

Case Explained: United States of America v. Jamie Shoulders

Case Explained: UNITED STATES OF AMERICA Plaintiff – v. BRAD ACY HOLLEY Defendant –

Case Explained: Eric Lamar Ellis Plaintiff— v. Rubi Garza-Lopez; Brian Marshall Barrier Defendants—

Case Explained: UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE SIXTH CIRCUIT GARRY RICHARDSON v. CITY OF DETROIT, MICHIGAN SERGEANT MIKE JACKSON ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) )

Case Explained: UNITED STATES OF AMERICA v. LUISITO ESPANOLA

Case Explained: United States of America v. I-44 Truck Center and Wrecker Service, LLC

Case Explained: United States of America v. Federico Luna

Case Explained: UNITED STATES OF AMERICA v. MIGUEL EDUARDO ROSARIO

Case Explained: GRACIANO GARCIA BECERRIL V. TODD BLANCHE

Case Explained: Brian Markins v. Syngenta Seeds

Case Explained: ABRAHAMIAN ASFORA V. BLANCHE

Case Explained: BOJAN ANDRIC v. TODD W. BLANCHE, Acting Attorney General of the United States

Case Explained: BOHANNON, ET AL. V. MARTIN MCDONALD DEVELOPMENT, INC., ET AL.

Case Explained: 26a0188p.06

Case Explained: In re MARINI Y COMPANIA, S.A

Case Explained: 26a0189p.06

Case Explained: ODETTE LÓPEZ COLLAZO MARITZA FONT ORTIZ; VERANIA CRESPO CRUZ v. WILFREDO RUIZ-FELICIANO; LUIS A. VÉLEZ; NANCY LABOY; MUNICIPALITY OF MARICAO